Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 2/2019

22.02.2019 | Commentary

Viewpoint: Cardiac implantable electronic devices and magnetic resonance compatibility: was it really necessary?

verfasst von: Richard Sutton, David G. Benditt

Erschienen in: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology | Ausgabe 2/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

In 2005, Irnich et al. reported in Europace [1] the occurrence of six pacemaker patient deaths during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). These deaths were identified from files in German institutional medicolegal offices in various cities; it was believed that the deaths were not previously published, and thereby should be considered additional to deaths already known to the medical community at that time [1]. Specifically, the authors found that the deaths had occurred under a variety of MRI circumstances, i.e., four different MRI manufacturers, 0.5–1.5 Tesla (T) with half the deaths occurring in low induction (0.5 T) machines. It was notable that all had sinus node dysfunction as an indication for pacing (pacemakers from four different manufacturers), but none was pacemaker-dependent [1]. ECG monitoring was not performed in any patient but ventricular fibrillation was given as the cause of death in three and suspected in two others. The remaining cause of death was not assigned. The authors provided little background information in the way of clinical data regarding the patients or their care. …
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Irnich W, Irnich B, Bartsch C, Stertmann WA, Gufler H, Weiler G. Do we need pacemakers resistant to magnetic resonance imaging? Europace. 2005;7:353–65.CrossRefPubMed Irnich W, Irnich B, Bartsch C, Stertmann WA, Gufler H, Weiler G. Do we need pacemakers resistant to magnetic resonance imaging? Europace. 2005;7:353–65.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Fetter J, Aram G, Holmes DR, Gray JE, Hayes DL. The effects of nuclear magnetic resonance imagers on external and implantable pulse generators. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1984;7:720–7.CrossRefPubMed Fetter J, Aram G, Holmes DR, Gray JE, Hayes DL. The effects of nuclear magnetic resonance imagers on external and implantable pulse generators. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1984;7:720–7.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Duru F, Luechinger R, Scheidegger MB, Luscher TF, Boesiger P, Candinas R. Pacing in magnetic resonance imaging environment: clinical and technical considerations on compatibility. Eur Heart J. 2001;22:113–24.CrossRefPubMed Duru F, Luechinger R, Scheidegger MB, Luscher TF, Boesiger P, Candinas R. Pacing in magnetic resonance imaging environment: clinical and technical considerations on compatibility. Eur Heart J. 2001;22:113–24.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Vahlhaus C, Sommer T, Lewalter T, et al. Interference with cardiac pacemakers by magnetic resonance imaging: are there irreversible changes at 0.5T? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2001;24:489–95.CrossRefPubMed Vahlhaus C, Sommer T, Lewalter T, et al. Interference with cardiac pacemakers by magnetic resonance imaging: are there irreversible changes at 0.5T? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2001;24:489–95.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilkoff BL, Bello D, Taborsky M, Vymazal J, Kanal E, Heuer H, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with a pacemaker system designed for the magnetic resonance environment. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8:65–73.CrossRefPubMed Wilkoff BL, Bello D, Taborsky M, Vymazal J, Kanal E, Heuer H, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with a pacemaker system designed for the magnetic resonance environment. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8:65–73.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Elmouchi DA, Rosema S, Vanoosterhout SM, Khan M, Davis AT, Gauri AJ, et al. Cardiac perforation and lead dislodgement after implantation of a MR-conditional pacing lead: a single center experience. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014;37:4–10.CrossRefPubMed Elmouchi DA, Rosema S, Vanoosterhout SM, Khan M, Davis AT, Gauri AJ, et al. Cardiac perforation and lead dislodgement after implantation of a MR-conditional pacing lead: a single center experience. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014;37:4–10.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Higgins JV, Gard JJ, Sheldon SH, Espinosa RE, Wood CP, Felmlee JP, et al. Safety and outcomes of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with abandoned pacemaker and defibrillator leads. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014;37:1284–90.CrossRefPubMed Higgins JV, Gard JJ, Sheldon SH, Espinosa RE, Wood CP, Felmlee JP, et al. Safety and outcomes of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with abandoned pacemaker and defibrillator leads. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014;37:1284–90.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferreira AM, Costa F, Tralhão A, Marques H, Cardim N, Adragão P. MRI-conditional pacemakers: current perspectives. Medical Devices: Evidence and Research. 2014;7:115–24.CrossRef Ferreira AM, Costa F, Tralhão A, Marques H, Cardim N, Adragão P. MRI-conditional pacemakers: current perspectives. Medical Devices: Evidence and Research. 2014;7:115–24.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller JD, Nazarian S, Halperin HR. Implantable electronic cardiac devices and compatibility with magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:1590–8.CrossRefPubMed Miller JD, Nazarian S, Halperin HR. Implantable electronic cardiac devices and compatibility with magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:1590–8.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Indik JH, Gimbel JR, Abe H, Alkmim-Teixeira R, Birgersdotter-Green U, Clarke GD, et al. HRS expert consensus statement on magnetic resonance imaging and radiation exposure in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14:e97–e153 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.04.025. Indik JH, Gimbel JR, Abe H, Alkmim-Teixeira R, Birgersdotter-Green U, Clarke GD, et al. HRS expert consensus statement on magnetic resonance imaging and radiation exposure in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14:e97–e153 https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​hrthm.​2017.​04.​025.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Brignole M, Auricchio A, Baron-Esquivias G, Bordachar P, Boriani G, Breithardt OA, et al. 2013 ESC guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: the task force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Europace. 2013;15:1070–118.CrossRefPubMed Brignole M, Auricchio A, Baron-Esquivias G, Bordachar P, Boriani G, Breithardt OA, et al. 2013 ESC guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: the task force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Europace. 2013;15:1070–118.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Russo RJ, Costa HS, Silva PD, Anderson JL, Arshad A, Biederman RWW, et al. Assessing the risks associated with MRI in patients with a pacemaker or defibrillator. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:755–64.CrossRefPubMed Russo RJ, Costa HS, Silva PD, Anderson JL, Arshad A, Biederman RWW, et al. Assessing the risks associated with MRI in patients with a pacemaker or defibrillator. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:755–64.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Do DH, Eyvazian V, Bayoneta AJ, Hu P, Finn JP, Bradfield JS, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging using wideband sequences in patients with nonconditional cardiac implanted electronic devices. Heart Rhythm. 2018;15:218–25.CrossRefPubMed Do DH, Eyvazian V, Bayoneta AJ, Hu P, Finn JP, Bradfield JS, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging using wideband sequences in patients with nonconditional cardiac implanted electronic devices. Heart Rhythm. 2018;15:218–25.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Padmanabhan D, Kella DK, Mehta R, Kapa S, Deshmukh A, Mulpuru S, et al. Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with legacy pacemakers and defibrillators and abandoned leads. Heart Rhythm. 2018;15:228–33.CrossRefPubMed Padmanabhan D, Kella DK, Mehta R, Kapa S, Deshmukh A, Mulpuru S, et al. Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with legacy pacemakers and defibrillators and abandoned leads. Heart Rhythm. 2018;15:228–33.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Nazarian SM, Hansford R, Rahsepar AA, Weltin V, McVeigh D, Ipek EG, et al. Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac devices. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:2555–64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nazarian SM, Hansford R, Rahsepar AA, Weltin V, McVeigh D, Ipek EG, et al. Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac devices. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:2555–64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Shah AD, Morris MA, Hirsh DS, Warnock M, Huang Y, Mollerus M, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging safety in nonconditional pacemaker and defibrillator recipients: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Heart Rhythm. 2018;15:1001–8.CrossRefPubMed Shah AD, Morris MA, Hirsh DS, Warnock M, Huang Y, Mollerus M, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging safety in nonconditional pacemaker and defibrillator recipients: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Heart Rhythm. 2018;15:1001–8.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat British Cardiovascular Society and Royal College of Radiologists joint statement on MRI for patients with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators MRI conditional and legacy devices. 2018 August 10. www.bcs.com British Cardiovascular Society and Royal College of Radiologists joint statement on MRI for patients with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators MRI conditional and legacy devices. 2018 August 10. www.​bcs.​com
Metadaten
Titel
Viewpoint: Cardiac implantable electronic devices and magnetic resonance compatibility: was it really necessary?
verfasst von
Richard Sutton
David G. Benditt
Publikationsdatum
22.02.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology / Ausgabe 2/2019
Print ISSN: 1383-875X
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-8595
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-019-00526-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2019

Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 2/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.