Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 6/2016

05.09.2016 | Original Article

Virtual setup: application in orthodontic practice

verfasst von: Leonardo T. Camardella, Eduardo Kant C. Rothier, Oswaldo V. Vilella, Edwin M. Ongkosuwito, Karel Hero Breuning

Erschienen in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie | Ausgabe 6/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

A plaster dental model is a patient’s traditional three-dimensional (3D) record. If the dental crowns from a plaster model are separated and positioned in wax, this setup of the crowns can be used to simulate orthodontic treatment. The traditional way to make this dental setup requires significant time by the orthodontist and in the orthodontic lab. New developments in dentistry and orthodontics include the possibility of virtual setups.

Aim

In this article, the differences between conventional setups with plaster models and virtual setups are discussed.

Methods

A clinical patient is described for whom two different setups were made and compared by model superimposition with Geomagic Qualify software.

Results

According to the literature and the results from this study, virtual setups and conventional setups with plaster models are equally accurate.

Conclusion

Virtual setups present several advantages, e.g., digital storage, digital models cannot be damaged, the same model can undergo several treatment simulations, and communication between dental and surgical professionals and between dental professionals and patients is facilitated. Despite these advantages, considerable time and training are needed for dental professionals to master and adopt the general use of digital models and virtual setups in dentistry.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Alford TJ, Roberts WE, Hartsfield JK et al (2011) Clinical outcomes for patients finished with the SureSmile method compared with conventional fixed orthodontic therapy. Angle Orthod 81:383–388CrossRefPubMed Alford TJ, Roberts WE, Hartsfield JK et al (2011) Clinical outcomes for patients finished with the SureSmile method compared with conventional fixed orthodontic therapy. Angle Orthod 81:383–388CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Araujo TM, Fonseca LM, Caldus LD et al (2012) Preparation and evaluation of orthodontic setup. Dental Press J Orthod 17:146–165CrossRef Araujo TM, Fonseca LM, Caldus LD et al (2012) Preparation and evaluation of orthodontic setup. Dental Press J Orthod 17:146–165CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Barreto MS, Faber J, Vogel CJ et al (2016) Reliability of digital orthodontic setups. Angle Orthod 86:255–259CrossRefPubMed Barreto MS, Faber J, Vogel CJ et al (2016) Reliability of digital orthodontic setups. Angle Orthod  86:255–259CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Breuning KH (2011) Efficient tooth movement with new technologies for customized treatment. J Clin Orthod 45:257–262 (quiz 87) PubMed Breuning KH (2011) Efficient tooth movement with new technologies for customized treatment. J Clin Orthod 45:257–262 (quiz 87) PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen S, Xu TM (2013) Treatment of a severe transverse dental arch discrepancy assisted by 3-dimensional planning. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 143:105–115CrossRef Chen S, Xu TM (2013) Treatment of a severe transverse dental arch discrepancy assisted by 3-dimensional planning. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 143:105–115CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi DS, Jeong YM, Jang I et al (2010) Accuracy and reliability of palatal superimposition of three-dimensional digital models. Angle Orthod 80:497–503PubMed Choi DS, Jeong YM, Jang I et al (2010) Accuracy and reliability of palatal superimposition of three-dimensional digital models. Angle Orthod 80:497–503PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Fabels LN, Nijkamp PG (2014) Interexaminer and intraexaminer reliabilities of 3-dimensional orthodontic virtual setups. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 146:806–811CrossRef Fabels LN, Nijkamp PG (2014) Interexaminer and intraexaminer reliabilities of 3-dimensional orthodontic virtual setups. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 146:806–811CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Flugge TV, Schlager S, Nelson K et al (2013) Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 144:471–478CrossRef Flugge TV, Schlager S, Nelson K et al (2013) Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 144:471–478CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Goonewardene RW, Goonewardene MS, Razza JM et al (2008) Accuracy and validity of space analysis and irregularity index measurements using digital models. Aust Orthod J 24:83–90PubMed Goonewardene RW, Goonewardene MS, Razza JM et al (2008) Accuracy and validity of space analysis and irregularity index measurements using digital models. Aust Orthod J 24:83–90PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Gracco A, Buranello M, Cozzani M et al (2007) Digital and plaster models: a comparison of measurements and times. Prog Orthod 8:252–259PubMed Gracco A, Buranello M, Cozzani M et al (2007) Digital and plaster models: a comparison of measurements and times. Prog Orthod 8:252–259PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Grauer D, Proffit WR (2011) Accuracy in tooth positioning with a fully customized lingual orthodontic appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 140:433–443CrossRef Grauer D, Proffit WR (2011) Accuracy in tooth positioning with a fully customized lingual orthodontic appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 140:433–443CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Horton HM, Miller JR, Gaillard PR et al (2010) Technique comparison for efficient orthodontic tooth measurements using digital models. Angle Orthod 80:254–261CrossRefPubMed Horton HM, Miller JR, Gaillard PR et al (2010) Technique comparison for efficient orthodontic tooth measurements using digital models. Angle Orthod 80:254–261CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Im J, Cha JY, Lee KJ et al (2014) Comparison of virtual and manual tooth setups with digital and plaster models in extraction cases. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 145:434–442CrossRef Im J, Cha JY, Lee KJ et al (2014) Comparison of virtual and manual tooth setups with digital and plaster models in extraction cases. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 145:434–442CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kesling H (1956) The diagnostic setup with consideration of the third dimension. Am J Orthod 42:740–748CrossRef Kesling H (1956) The diagnostic setup with consideration of the third dimension. Am J Orthod 42:740–748CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kihara T, Tanimoto K, Michida M et al (2012) Construction of orthodontic setup models on a computer. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 141:806–813CrossRef Kihara T, Tanimoto K, Michida M et al (2012) Construction of orthodontic setup models on a computer. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 141:806–813CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Larson BE, Vaubel CJ, Grunheid T (2013) Effectiveness of computer-assisted orthodontic treatment technology to achieve predicted outcomes. Angle Orthod 83:557–562CrossRefPubMed Larson BE, Vaubel CJ, Grunheid T (2013) Effectiveness of computer-assisted orthodontic treatment technology to achieve predicted outcomes. Angle Orthod 83:557–562CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Leifert MF, Leifert MM, Efstratiadis SS et al (2009) Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 136:16e1–16e4 (discussion) Leifert MF, Leifert MM, Efstratiadis SS et al (2009) Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 136:16e1–16e4 (discussion)
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Macchi A, Carrafiello G, Cacciafesta V et al (2006) Three-dimensional digital modeling and setup. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 129:605–610CrossRef Macchi A, Carrafiello G, Cacciafesta V et al (2006) Three-dimensional digital modeling and setup. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 129:605–610CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller RJ, Derakhshan M (2004) Three-dimensional technology improves the range of orthodontic treatment with esthetic and removable aligners. World J Orthod 5:242–249PubMed Miller RJ, Derakhshan M (2004) Three-dimensional technology improves the range of orthodontic treatment with esthetic and removable aligners. World J Orthod 5:242–249PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Mujagic M, Fauquet C, Galletti C et al (2005) Digital design and manufacturing of the Lingualcare bracket system. J Clin Orthod 39:375–382 (quiz 0) PubMed Mujagic M, Fauquet C, Galletti C et al (2005) Digital design and manufacturing of the Lingualcare bracket system. J Clin Orthod 39:375–382 (quiz 0) PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Mullen SR, Martin CA, Ngan P et al (2007) Accuracy of space analysis with emodels and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 132:346–352CrossRef Mullen SR, Martin CA, Ngan P et al (2007) Accuracy of space analysis with emodels and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 132:346–352CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Park TJ, Lee SH, Lee KS (2012) A method for mandibular dental arch superimposition using 3D cone beam CT and orthodontic 3D digital model. Korean J Orthod 42:169–181CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Park TJ, Lee SH, Lee KS (2012) A method for mandibular dental arch superimposition using 3D cone beam CT and orthodontic 3D digital model. Korean J Orthod 42:169–181CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Quimby ML, Vig KW, Rashid RG et al (2004) The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models. Angle Orthod 74:298–303PubMed Quimby ML, Vig KW, Rashid RG et al (2004) The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models. Angle Orthod 74:298–303PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Rangel FA, Maal TJ, Bronkhorst EM et al (2013) Accuracy and reliability of a novel method for fusion of digital dental casts and Cone Beam Computed Tomography scans. PLoS ONE 8:e59130CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rangel FA, Maal TJ, Bronkhorst EM et al (2013) Accuracy and reliability of a novel method for fusion of digital dental casts and Cone Beam Computed Tomography scans. PLoS ONE 8:e59130CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Rheude B, Sadowsky PL, Ferriera A et al (2005) An evaluation of the use of digital study models in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Angle Orthod 75:300–304PubMed Rheude B, Sadowsky PL, Ferriera A et al (2005) An evaluation of the use of digital study models in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Angle Orthod 75:300–304PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Sachdeva RC (2001) SureSmile technology in a patient–centered orthodontic practice. J Clin Orthod 35:245–253PubMed Sachdeva RC (2001) SureSmile technology in a patient–centered orthodontic practice. J Clin Orthod 35:245–253PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Sousa MV, Vasconcelos EC, Janson G et al (2012) Accuracy and reproducibility of 3-dimensional digital model measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 142:269–273CrossRef Sousa MV, Vasconcelos EC, Janson G et al (2012) Accuracy and reproducibility of 3-dimensional digital model measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 142:269–273CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Stevens DR, Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B et al (2006) Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 129:794–803CrossRef Stevens DR, Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B et al (2006) Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 129:794–803CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Tomassetti JJ, Taloumis LJ, Denny JM et al (2001) A comparison of 3 computerized Bolton tooth-size analyses with a commonly used method. Angle Orthod 71:351–357PubMed Tomassetti JJ, Taloumis LJ, Denny JM et al (2001) A comparison of 3 computerized Bolton tooth-size analyses with a commonly used method. Angle Orthod 71:351–357PubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Torassian G, Kau CH, English JD et al (2010) Digital models vs plaster models using alginate and alginate substitute materials. Angle Orthod 80:474–481CrossRefPubMed Torassian G, Kau CH, English JD et al (2010) Digital models vs plaster models using alginate and alginate substitute materials. Angle Orthod 80:474–481CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Linden FP (1978) Changes in the position of posterior teeth in relation to ruga points. Am J Orthod 74:142–161CrossRefPubMed van der Linden FP (1978) Changes in the position of posterior teeth in relation to ruga points. Am J Orthod 74:142–161CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Wiranto MG, Engelbrecht WP, Nolthenius HET et al (2013) Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 143:140–147CrossRef Wiranto MG, Engelbrecht WP, Nolthenius HET et al (2013) Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 143:140–147CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Virtual setup: application in orthodontic practice
verfasst von
Leonardo T. Camardella
Eduardo Kant C. Rothier
Oswaldo V. Vilella
Edwin M. Ongkosuwito
Karel Hero Breuning
Publikationsdatum
05.09.2016
Verlag
Springer Medizin
Erschienen in
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie / Ausgabe 6/2016
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Elektronische ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-016-0048-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2016

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 6/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.