nach oben

Osteoporosis International

Erschienen in:

01.08.2006 | Original Article

Vitamin D receptor genotype and risk of osteoporotic hip fracture in elderly women of Utah: an effect modified by parity

verfasst von: H. Wengreen, D. R. Cutler, R. Munger, M. Willing

Erschienen in: Osteoporosis International | Ausgabe 8/2006

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

The associations between vitamin D receptor (VDR) Bsm I and Fok I genotypes, parity, and risk of osteoporotic hip fracture were evaluated in a statewide population-based case-control study in Utah.

Methods

Women age 50–89 years with hip fracture (n=882) were ascertained via surveillance of 18 Utah hospitals from 1997 to 2001. Age-matched controls were randomly selected (n=897). Participants were interviewed in their homes, and blood samples were collected for genotyping.

Results

In logistic regression analyses that controlled for multiple confounders, Bsm I VDR genotype but not Fok I genotype was associated with risk of osteoporotic hip fracture (OR bb vs. BB genotype: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.50, 0.95). In similar analyses, no overall association was observed between parity status and risk of osteoporotic hip fracture. However, the effect of VDR genotype was modified by parity status. Among nulliparous women (n=140), Bsm I genotype was not associated with risk of hip fracture (OR bb vs. BB: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.28, 2.4); among primiparous women (n=133), bb genotype was associated with increased risk of hip fracture (OR bb vs. BB: 3.30; 95% CI: 0.96, 11.29); among multiparous women (n=1,400), bb genotype was associated with decreased risk of hip fracture (OR bb vs. BB: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.42, 0.84).

Conclusion

VDR Bsm I genotype was associated with risk of hip fracture in Utah women, and this effect was modified by parity status. Hormonal or lifestyle factors related to parity may underlie this interaction.

Prentice A (2000) Calcium in pregnancy and lactation. Annu Rev Nutr 20:249–272PubMedCrossRef

Kalkwarf HJ, Specker BL (2002) Bone mineral changes during pregnancy and lactation. Endocrine 17(1):49–53PubMedCrossRef

Kovacs CS (2001) Calcium and bone metabolism in pregnancy and lactation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86(6):2344–2348PubMedCrossRef

Pearson D et al (2004) Recovery of pregnancy mediated bone loss during lactation. Bone 34(3):570–578PubMedCrossRef

Sowers M et al (1993) Changes in bone density with lactation. JAMA 269(24):3130–3135PubMedCrossRef

More C et al (2001) The effects of pregnancy and lactation on bone mineral density. Osteoporos Int 12(9):732–737PubMedCrossRef

Karlsson C, Obrant KJ, Karlsson M (2001) Pregnancy and lactation confer reversible bone loss in humans. Osteoporos Int 12(10):828–834PubMedCrossRef

Hoffman S et al (1993) Parity, lactation and hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 3(4):171–176PubMedCrossRef

Cure-Cure C et al (2002) Bone-mass peak in multiparity and reduced risk of bone-fractures in menopause. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 76(3):285–291PubMedCrossRef

10.

Nguyen TV et al (1995) Effects of estrogen exposure and reproductive factors on bone mineral density and osteoporotic fractures. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80(9):2709–2714PubMedCrossRef

11.

Hillier TA et al (2003) Nulliparity and fracture risk in older women: the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Res 18(5):893–899PubMedCrossRef

12.

Michaelsson K et al (2001) Influence of parity and lactation on hip fracture risk. Am J Epidemiol 153(12):1166–1172PubMedCrossRef

13.

Petersen HC et al (2002) Reproduction life history and hip fractures. Ann Epidemiol 12(4):257–263PubMedCrossRef

14.

Parazzini F et al (1996) Menstrual and reproductive factors and hip fractures in post menopausal women. Maturitas 24(3):191–196PubMedCrossRef

15.

Alderman BW et al (1986) Reproductive history and postmenopausal risk of hip and forearm fracture. Am J Epidemiol 124(2):262–267PubMed

16.

Huo D, Lauderdale DS, Li L (2003) Influence of reproductive factors on hip fracture risk in Chinese women. Osteoporos Int 14(8):694–700PubMedCrossRef

17.

Cumming RG, Klineberg RJ (1993) Breastfeeding and other reproductive factors and the risk of hip fractures in elderly women. Int J Epidemiol 22(4):684–691PubMedCrossRef

18.

Haussler MR et al (1998) The nuclear vitamin D receptor: biological and molecular regulatory properties revealed. J Bone Miner Res 13(3):325–349PubMedCrossRef

19.

Morrison NA et al (1994) Prediction of bone density from vitamin D receptor alleles. Nature 367(6460):284–287PubMedCrossRef

20.

Thakkinstian A et al (2004) Meta-analysis of molecular association studies: vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and BMD as a case study. J Bone Miner Res 19(3):419–428PubMedCrossRef

21.

Gennari L et al (2002) Genetics of osteoporosis: role of steroid hormone receptor gene polymorphisms. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 81(1):1–24PubMedCrossRef

22.

Looney JE et al (1995) Lack of a high prevalence of the BB vitamin D receptor genotype in severely osteoporotic women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80(7):2158–2162PubMedCrossRef

23.

Houston LA et al (1996) Vitamin D receptor polymorphism, bone mineral density, and osteoporotic vertebral fracture: studies in a UK population. Bone 18(3):249–252PubMedCrossRef

24.

Aerssens J et al (2000) Polymorphisms of the VDR, ER and COLIA1 genes and osteoporotic hip fracture in elderly postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 11(7):583–591PubMedCrossRef

25.

Langdahl BL et al (2000) Polymorphisms in the vitamin D receptor gene and bone mass, bone turnover and osteoporotic fractures. Eur J Clin Invest 30(7):608–617PubMedCrossRef

26.

Feskanich D et al (1998) Vitamin D receptor genotype and the risk of bone fractures in women. Epidemiology 9(5):535–539PubMedCrossRef

27.

Ensrud KE et al (1999) Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and the risk of fractures in older women. For the study of osteoporotic fractures research group. J Bone Miner Res 14(10):1637–1645PubMedCrossRef

28.

Uitterlinden AG et al (1997) Vitamin D receptor genotype is associated with radiographic osteoarthritis at the knee. J Clin Invest 100(2):259–263PubMedCrossRef

29.

Crum RM et al (1993) Population-based norms for the Mini-Mental State Examination by age and educational level. JAMA 269(18):2386–2391PubMedCrossRef

30.

Breitner JC et al (1999) APOE-epsilon4 count predicts age when prevalence of AD increases, then declines: the Cache County Study. Neurology 53(2):321–331PubMed

31.

Cooper GS, Umbach DM (1996) Are vitamin D receptor polymorphisms associated with bone mineral density? A meta-analysis. J Bone Miner Res 11(12):1841–1849PubMedCrossRef

32.

Hobson EE, Ralston SH (2001) Role of genetic factors in the pathophysiology and management of osteoporosis. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 54(1):1–9CrossRef

33.

Garnero P et al (2005) Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms are associated with the risk of fractures in postmenopausal women, independently of bone mineral density. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90(8):4829–4835PubMedCrossRef

34.

Eisman JA (1999) Genetics of osteoporosis. Endocr Rev 20(6):788–804PubMedCrossRef

35.

Gennari L et al (1997) Vitamin D receptor genotypes and intestinal calcium absorption in postmenopausal women. Calcif Tissue Int 61(6):460–463PubMedCrossRef

36.

Holmberg-Marttila D et al (2000) Vitamin D and estrogen receptor polymorphisms and bone mineral changes in postpartum women. Calcif Tissue Int 66(3):184–189PubMedCrossRef

37.

Kaplan JR, Manuck SB (2004) Ovarian dysfunction, stress, and disease: a primate continuum. Ilar J 45(2):89–115PubMed

38.

Liel Y et al (1992) Evidence that estrogens modulate activity and increase the number of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D receptors in osteoblast-like cells (ROS 17/2.8). Endocrinology 130(5):2597–2601PubMedCrossRef

39.

Liel Y et al (1999) Estrogen increases 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D receptors expression and bioresponse in the rat duodenal mucosa. Endocrinology 140(1):280–285PubMedCrossRef

40.

Liel Y, Shany S, Schwartz B (1998) Interaction between estrogen and vitamin D-endocrine system: a potential addition to the unitary model of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 13(12):1954–1955PubMedCrossRef

41.

National Center for Health Statistics (2001) Percent distribution of women by parity, by exact age of woman, and race of child for women in cohort from 1949 to 1983. National Center for Health Statistics, Washington, DC

42.

Payette H et al (2000) Validity of self-reported height and weight estimates in cognitively-intact and impaired elderly individuals. J Nutr Health Aging 4(4):223–228PubMed

43.

Gunnell D et al (2000) How accurately are height, weight and leg length reported by the elderly, and how closely are they related to measurements recorded in childhood? Int J Epidemiol 29(3):456–464PubMedCrossRef

44.

Kuczmarski MF, Kuczmarski RJ, Najjar M (2001) Effects of age on validity of self-reported height, weight, and body mass index: findings from the third national health and nutrition examination survey, 1988–1994. J Am Diet Assoc 101(1):28–34; quiz 35–36PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Vitamin D receptor genotype and risk of osteoporotic hip fracture in elderly women of Utah: an effect modified by parity
verfasst von: H. Wengreen
D. R. Cutler
R. Munger
M. Willing
Publikationsdatum: 01.08.2006
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: Osteoporosis International / Ausgabe 8/2006
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-006-0100-7

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

18.04.2024 | Wirbelsäulenmetastase | Nachrichten

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Vitamin D receptor genotype and risk of osteoporotic hip fracture in elderly women of Utah: an effect modified by parity

Abstract

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Brustkrebs in der Vorgeschichte macht Gelenkersatz komplikationsträchtiger

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2006

Accuracy of pQCT for evaluating the aged human radius: an ashing, histomorphometry and failure load investigation

Validation of various osteoporosis risk indices in elderly Chinese females in Singapore

Calcium supplementation does not affect CRP levels in postmenopausal women – a randomized controlled trial

Correlations between bone mineral density and demographic, lifestyle, and biochemical variables in community-dwelling Japanese women 69 years of age and over

Osteoporosis after spinal cord injury

Olof Johnell

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Brustkrebs in der Vorgeschichte macht Gelenkersatz komplikationsträchtiger

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie