Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 8/2017

07.12.2016

Volume of hospital is important for the prognosis of high-risk patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB)

verfasst von: Jin Woo Choi, Seong Woo Jeon, Jung Gu Kwon, Dong Wook Lee, Chang Yoon Ha, Kwang Bum Cho, Byung Ik Jang, Jung Bae Park, Youn Sun Park

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 8/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background and aim

Nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) is a potentially life-threatening hospital emergency requiring hemodynamic stabilization and resuscitation. This study is carried out to determine whether hospital volume can influence outcome in patients with NVUGIB.

Method

This is a retrospective study with a prospective cohort database (KCT 0000514. cris.nih.go.kr). Eight teaching hospitals were divided into two different groups: high-volume centers (HVC, ≥60 NVUGIB patients/year, four clinics) and low-volume centers (LVC, <60 NVUGIB patients/year, four clinics). Baseline characteristics of patients, risk stratification, and outcomes between hospitals of different volumes were compared. From February 2011 to December 2013, a total of 1584 NVUGIB patients enrolled in eight clinics were retrospectively reviewed. The main outcome measurements consisted of continuous bleeding after treatment, re-bleeding, necessity for surgical/other retreatments, and death within 30 days.

Results

Similar baseline characters for patients were observed in both groups. There was a significant difference in the incidence of poor outcome between the HVC and LVC groups (9.06 vs. 13.69%, P = 0.014). The incidence rate of poor outcome in high-risk patients (Rockall score ≥8) in HVC was lower than that in high-risk patients in LVC (16.07 vs. 26.92%, P = 0.048); however, there was no significant difference in poor outcome in the lower-risk patients in either group (8.72 vs. 10.42%, P = 0.370).

Conclusions

Significant correlation between hospital volume and outcome in NVUGIB patients was observed. Referral to HVC for the management of high-risk NVUGIB patients should be considered in clinical practice.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Ananthakrishnan AN, McGinley EL, Saeian K (2009) Higher hospital volume is associated with lower mortality in acute nonvariceal upper-gi hemorrhage. Gastrointest Endosc 70:422–432CrossRefPubMed Ananthakrishnan AN, McGinley EL, Saeian K (2009) Higher hospital volume is associated with lower mortality in acute nonvariceal upper-gi hemorrhage. Gastrointest Endosc 70:422–432CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bach PB, Cramer LD, Schrag D, Downey RJ, Gelfand SE, Begg CB (2001) The influence of hospital volume on survival after resection for lung cancer. N Engl J Med 345:181–188CrossRefPubMed Bach PB, Cramer LD, Schrag D, Downey RJ, Gelfand SE, Begg CB (2001) The influence of hospital volume on survival after resection for lung cancer. N Engl J Med 345:181–188CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Barkun AN, Bardou M, Kuipers EJ, Sung J, Hunt RH, Martel M, Sinclair P (2010) International consensus recommendations on the management of patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Ann Intern Med 152:101–113CrossRefPubMed Barkun AN, Bardou M, Kuipers EJ, Sung J, Hunt RH, Martel M, Sinclair P (2010) International consensus recommendations on the management of patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Ann Intern Med 152:101–113CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, Stukel TA, Lucas FL, Batista I, Welch HG, Wennberg DE (2002) Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 346:1128–1137CrossRefPubMed Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, Stukel TA, Lucas FL, Batista I, Welch HG, Wennberg DE (2002) Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 346:1128–1137CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Chowdhury MM, Dagash H, Pierro A (2007) A systematic review of the impact of volume of surgery and specialization on patient outcome. Br J Surg 94:145–161CrossRefPubMed Chowdhury MM, Dagash H, Pierro A (2007) A systematic review of the impact of volume of surgery and specialization on patient outcome. Br J Surg 94:145–161CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Cowan JA Jr, Dimick JB, Henke PK, Huber TS, Stanley JC, Upchurch GR Jr (2003) Surgical treatment of intact thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms in the united states: hospital and surgeon volume-related outcomes. J Vasc Surg 37:1169–1174CrossRefPubMed Cowan JA Jr, Dimick JB, Henke PK, Huber TS, Stanley JC, Upchurch GR Jr (2003) Surgical treatment of intact thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms in the united states: hospital and surgeon volume-related outcomes. J Vasc Surg 37:1169–1174CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat David MC, Sydney MD, Paul JT, Eric BB (2003) Hospital experience and outcomes for esophageal variceal bleeding. Int J Qual Health Care 15:139–146CrossRef David MC, Sydney MD, Paul JT, Eric BB (2003) Hospital experience and outcomes for esophageal variceal bleeding. Int J Qual Health Care 15:139–146CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Dimick JB, Cowan JA Jr, Henke PK, Wainess RM, Posner S, Stanley JC, Upchurch GR Jr (2003) Hospital volume-related differences in aorto-bifemoral bypass operative mortality in the United States. J Vasc Surg 37:970–975CrossRefPubMed Dimick JB, Cowan JA Jr, Henke PK, Wainess RM, Posner S, Stanley JC, Upchurch GR Jr (2003) Hospital volume-related differences in aorto-bifemoral bypass operative mortality in the United States. J Vasc Surg 37:970–975CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Dulai GS (2006) Process of care in acute nonvariceal upper-gi hemorrhage. Gastrointest Endosc 64:310–312CrossRefPubMed Dulai GS (2006) Process of care in acute nonvariceal upper-gi hemorrhage. Gastrointest Endosc 64:310–312CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Enestvedt BK, Gralnek IM, Mattek N, Lieberman DA, Eisen G (2008) An evaluation of endoscopic indications and findings related to nonvariceal upper-gi hemorrhage in a large multicenter consortium. Gastrointest Endosc 67:422–429CrossRefPubMed Enestvedt BK, Gralnek IM, Mattek N, Lieberman DA, Eisen G (2008) An evaluation of endoscopic indications and findings related to nonvariceal upper-gi hemorrhage in a large multicenter consortium. Gastrointest Endosc 67:422–429CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Epstein AM (2002) Volume and outcome–it is time to move ahead. N Engl J Med 346:1161–1164CrossRefPubMed Epstein AM (2002) Volume and outcome–it is time to move ahead. N Engl J Med 346:1161–1164CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Esrailian E, Gralnek IM (2005) Nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: epidemiology and diagnosis. Gastroenterol Clin N Am 34:589–605CrossRef Esrailian E, Gralnek IM (2005) Nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: epidemiology and diagnosis. Gastroenterol Clin N Am 34:589–605CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferguson CB, Mitchell RM (2005) Nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: standard and new treatment. Gastroenterol Clin N Am 34:607–621CrossRef Ferguson CB, Mitchell RM (2005) Nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: standard and new treatment. Gastroenterol Clin N Am 34:607–621CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Halm EA, Lee C, Chassin MR (2002) Is volume related to outcome in health care? A systematic review and methodologic critique of the literature. Ann Intern Med 137:511–520CrossRefPubMed Halm EA, Lee C, Chassin MR (2002) Is volume related to outcome in health care? A systematic review and methodologic critique of the literature. Ann Intern Med 137:511–520CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Jollis JG, Peterson ED, DeLong ER, Mark DB, Collins SR, Muhlbaier LH, Pryor DB (1994) The relation between the volume of coronary angioplasty procedures at hospitals treating medicare beneficiaries and short-term mortality. N Engl J Med 331:1625–1629CrossRefPubMed Jollis JG, Peterson ED, DeLong ER, Mark DB, Collins SR, Muhlbaier LH, Pryor DB (1994) The relation between the volume of coronary angioplasty procedures at hospitals treating medicare beneficiaries and short-term mortality. N Engl J Med 331:1625–1629CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Lanas A, Aabakken L, Fonseca J, Mungan ZA, Papatheodoridis GV, Piessevaux H, Cipolletta L, Nuevo J, Tafalla M (2011) Clinical predictors of poor outcomes among patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in Europe. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 33:1225–1233CrossRefPubMed Lanas A, Aabakken L, Fonseca J, Mungan ZA, Papatheodoridis GV, Piessevaux H, Cipolletta L, Nuevo J, Tafalla M (2011) Clinical predictors of poor outcomes among patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in Europe. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 33:1225–1233CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Meltzer AC, Klein JC (2014) Upper gastrointestinal bleeding: patient presentation, risk stratification, and early management. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 43:665–675CrossRefPubMed Meltzer AC, Klein JC (2014) Upper gastrointestinal bleeding: patient presentation, risk stratification, and early management. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 43:665–675CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Murata A, Matsuda S, Mayumi T, Yokoe M, Kuwabara K, Ichimiya Y, Fujino Y, Kubo T, Fujimori K, Horiguchi H (2011) Effect of hospital volume on clinical outcome in patients with acute pancreatitis, based on a national administrative database. Pancreas 40:1018–1023CrossRefPubMed Murata A, Matsuda S, Mayumi T, Yokoe M, Kuwabara K, Ichimiya Y, Fujino Y, Kubo T, Fujimori K, Horiguchi H (2011) Effect of hospital volume on clinical outcome in patients with acute pancreatitis, based on a national administrative database. Pancreas 40:1018–1023CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Parente F, Anderloni A, Bargiggia S, Imbesi V, Trabucchi E, Baratti C, Gallus S, Bianchi Porro G (2005) Outcome of non-variceal acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in relation to the time of endoscopy and the experience of the endoscopist: a two-year survey. World J Gastroenterol 11:7122–7130CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Parente F, Anderloni A, Bargiggia S, Imbesi V, Trabucchi E, Baratti C, Gallus S, Bianchi Porro G (2005) Outcome of non-variceal acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in relation to the time of endoscopy and the experience of the endoscopist: a two-year survey. World J Gastroenterol 11:7122–7130CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Patti MG, Corvera CU, Glasgow RE, Way LW (1998) A hospital’s annual rate of esophagectomy influences the operative mortality rate. J Gastrointest Surg 2:186–192CrossRefPubMed Patti MG, Corvera CU, Glasgow RE, Way LW (1998) A hospital’s annual rate of esophagectomy influences the operative mortality rate. J Gastrointest Surg 2:186–192CrossRefPubMed
22.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Singla A, Simons J, Li Y, Csikesz NG, Ng SC, Tseng JF, Shah SA (2009) Admission volume determines outcome for patients with acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 137:1995–2001CrossRefPubMed Singla A, Simons J, Li Y, Csikesz NG, Ng SC, Tseng JF, Shah SA (2009) Admission volume determines outcome for patients with acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 137:1995–2001CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Suk KT, Kim HS, Kim HJ, Won CS, Byun JW, Choi H, Yea CJ, Kim MY, Kim JW, Baik SK, Kwon SO (2009) Risk factors of rebleeding following endoscopic therapy for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Gastrointest Endosc 69:AB214CrossRef Suk KT, Kim HS, Kim HJ, Won CS, Byun JW, Choi H, Yea CJ, Kim MY, Kim JW, Baik SK, Kwon SO (2009) Risk factors of rebleeding following endoscopic therapy for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Gastrointest Endosc 69:AB214CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Targownik LE, Nabalamba A (2006) Trends in management and outcomes of acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: 1993–2003. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 4:1459–1466CrossRefPubMed Targownik LE, Nabalamba A (2006) Trends in management and outcomes of acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: 1993–2003. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 4:1459–1466CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Volume of hospital is important for the prognosis of high-risk patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB)
verfasst von
Jin Woo Choi
Seong Woo Jeon
Jung Gu Kwon
Dong Wook Lee
Chang Yoon Ha
Kwang Bum Cho
Byung Ik Jang
Jung Bae Park
Youn Sun Park
Publikationsdatum
07.12.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 8/2017
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5369-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2017

Surgical Endoscopy 8/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.