Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 2/2017

06.09.2016

Voxel-based whole-lesion enhancement parameters: a study of its clinical value in differentiating clear cell renal cell carcinoma from renal oncocytoma

verfasst von: Frank Chen, Mittul Gulati, Darryl Hwang, Steven Cen, Felix Yap, Chidubem Ugwueze, Bino Varghese, Mihir Desai, Manju Aron, Inderbir Gill, Vinay Duddalwar

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 2/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare whole-lesion (WL) enhancement parameters to single region of interest (ROI)-based enhancement in discriminating clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) from renal oncocytoma.

Materials and Methods

In this IRB-approved retrospective study, the surgical database was queried to derive a cohort of 94 postnephrectomy patients with ccRCC or oncocytoma (68 ccRCC, 26 oncocytoma), who underwent preoperative multiphase contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) between June 2009 and August 2013. CT acquisitions were transferred to a three-dimensional workstation, and WL ROIs were manually segmented. WL enhancement and histogram distribution parameters skewness, kurtosis, standard deviation (SD), and interquartile range (IQR) were calculated. WL enhancement parameters were compared to single ROI-based enhancement using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

Results

Oncocytoma had significantly higher WL enhancement than ccRCC in nephrographic (mean, p = 0.02; median, p = 0.03) and excretory phases (mean, p = 0.03; median p < 0.01). ccRCC had significantly higher kurtosis than oncocytoma in corticomedullary (p = 0.03) and excretory phases (p < 0.01), and significantly higher SD and IQR than oncocytoma in all postcontrast phases: corticomedullary (SD, p = 0.02; IQR, p < 0.01), nephrographic (SD, p = 0.01; IQR, p = 0.03), and excretory (SD, p < 0.01; IQR, p < 0.01). When compared to single ROI-based enhancement, WL enhancement alone did not demonstrate a statistical advantage in discriminating between ccRCC and oncocytoma (area under ROC curve of 0.78 and 0.72 respectively), but when combined with histogram distribution parameters (area under ROC curve of 0.86), it did demonstrate a slight improvement.

Conclusion

Our study suggests that voxel-based WL enhancement parameters provide only a slight improvement over single ROI-based enhancement techniques in differentiating between ccRCC and renal oncocytoma.
Literatur
1.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Mai KT, Landry DC, Robertson SJ, et al. (2001) A comparative study of metastatic renal cell carcinoma with correlation to subtype and primary tumor. Pathol Res Pract 197(10):671–675CrossRefPubMed Mai KT, Landry DC, Robertson SJ, et al. (2001) A comparative study of metastatic renal cell carcinoma with correlation to subtype and primary tumor. Pathol Res Pract 197(10):671–675CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Trpkov K, Yilmaz A, Uzer D, et al. (2010) Renal oncocytoma revisited: a clinicopathological study of 109 cases with emphasis on problematic diagnostic features. Histopathology 57(6):893–906CrossRefPubMed Trpkov K, Yilmaz A, Uzer D, et al. (2010) Renal oncocytoma revisited: a clinicopathological study of 109 cases with emphasis on problematic diagnostic features. Histopathology 57(6):893–906CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Jasinski RW, Amendola MA, Glazer GM, Bree RL, Gikas PW (1985) Computed tomography of renal oncocytomas. Comput Radiol 9:307–314CrossRefPubMed Jasinski RW, Amendola MA, Glazer GM, Bree RL, Gikas PW (1985) Computed tomography of renal oncocytomas. Comput Radiol 9:307–314CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Tikkakoski T, Paivansalo M, Alanen A, et al. (1991) Radiologic findings in renal oncocytoma. Acta Radiol 32:363–367CrossRefPubMed Tikkakoski T, Paivansalo M, Alanen A, et al. (1991) Radiologic findings in renal oncocytoma. Acta Radiol 32:363–367CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Quinn MJ, Hartman DS, Friedman AC, et al. (1994) Renal oncocytoma: new observations. Radiology 153:49–53CrossRef Quinn MJ, Hartman DS, Friedman AC, et al. (1994) Renal oncocytoma: new observations. Radiology 153:49–53CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Levine E, Huntrakoon M (1983) Computed tomography of renal oncocytoma. Am J Roentgenol 141(4):741–746CrossRef Levine E, Huntrakoon M (1983) Computed tomography of renal oncocytoma. Am J Roentgenol 141(4):741–746CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Prasad SR, Surabhi VR, Menias CO, Raut AA, Chintapalli KN (2008) Benign renal neoplasms in adults: cross-sectional imaging findings. Am J Roentgenol 190(1):158–164CrossRef Prasad SR, Surabhi VR, Menias CO, Raut AA, Chintapalli KN (2008) Benign renal neoplasms in adults: cross-sectional imaging findings. Am J Roentgenol 190(1):158–164CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim JI, Cho JY, Moon KC, Lee HJ, Kim SH (2009) Segmental enhancement inversion at biphasic multidetector CT: characteristic finding of small renal oncocytoma. Radiology 252(2):441–448CrossRefPubMed Kim JI, Cho JY, Moon KC, Lee HJ, Kim SH (2009) Segmental enhancement inversion at biphasic multidetector CT: characteristic finding of small renal oncocytoma. Radiology 252(2):441–448CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Schieda N, McInnes MD, Cao L (2014) Diagnostic accuracy of segmental enhancement inversion for diagnosis of renal oncocytoma at biphasic contrast enhanced CT: systematic review. Eur Radiol 24(6):1421–1429CrossRefPubMed Schieda N, McInnes MD, Cao L (2014) Diagnostic accuracy of segmental enhancement inversion for diagnosis of renal oncocytoma at biphasic contrast enhanced CT: systematic review. Eur Radiol 24(6):1421–1429CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Malley ME, Tran P, Hanbidge A, Rogalla P (2012) Small renal oncocytomas: is segmental enhancement inversion a characteristic finding at biphasic MDCT? Am J Roentgenol 199(6):1312–1315CrossRef O’Malley ME, Tran P, Hanbidge A, Rogalla P (2012) Small renal oncocytomas: is segmental enhancement inversion a characteristic finding at biphasic MDCT? Am J Roentgenol 199(6):1312–1315CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat McGahan JP, Lamba R, Fisher J, et al. (2011) Is segmental enhancement inversion on enhanced biphasic MDCT a reliable sign for the noninvasive diagnosis of renal oncocytomas? Am J Roentgenol 197(4):W674–W679CrossRef McGahan JP, Lamba R, Fisher J, et al. (2011) Is segmental enhancement inversion on enhanced biphasic MDCT a reliable sign for the noninvasive diagnosis of renal oncocytomas? Am J Roentgenol 197(4):W674–W679CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ishigami K, Jones AR, Dahmoush L, et al. (2015) Imaging spectrum of renal oncocytomas: a pictorial review with pathologic correlation. Insights Imaging 6(1):53–64CrossRefPubMed Ishigami K, Jones AR, Dahmoush L, et al. (2015) Imaging spectrum of renal oncocytomas: a pictorial review with pathologic correlation. Insights Imaging 6(1):53–64CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Choudhary S, Rajesh A, Mayer NJ, Mulcahy KA, Haroon A (2009) Renal oncocytoma: CT features cannot reliably distinguish oncocytoma from other renal neoplasms. Clin Radiol 64(5):517–522CrossRefPubMed Choudhary S, Rajesh A, Mayer NJ, Mulcahy KA, Haroon A (2009) Renal oncocytoma: CT features cannot reliably distinguish oncocytoma from other renal neoplasms. Clin Radiol 64(5):517–522CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Bird VG, Kanagarajah P, Morillo G, et al. (2011) Differentiation of oncocytoma and renal cell carcinoma in small renal masses (<4 cm): the role of 4-phase computerized tomography. World J Urol 29(6):787–792CrossRefPubMed Bird VG, Kanagarajah P, Morillo G, et al. (2011) Differentiation of oncocytoma and renal cell carcinoma in small renal masses (<4 cm): the role of 4-phase computerized tomography. World J Urol 29(6):787–792CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Pierorazio PM, Hyams ES, Tsai S, et al. (2013) Multiphasic enhancement patterns of small renal masses (≤4 cm) on preoperative computed tomography: utility for distinguishing subtypes of renal cell carcinoma, angiomyolipoma, and oncocytoma. Urology 81(6):1265–1271CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pierorazio PM, Hyams ES, Tsai S, et al. (2013) Multiphasic enhancement patterns of small renal masses (≤4 cm) on preoperative computed tomography: utility for distinguishing subtypes of renal cell carcinoma, angiomyolipoma, and oncocytoma. Urology 81(6):1265–1271CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Millet I, Doyon FC, Hoa D, et al. (2011) Characterization of small solid renal lesions: can benign and malignant tumors be differentiated with CT? Am J Roentgenol 197(4):887–896CrossRef Millet I, Doyon FC, Hoa D, et al. (2011) Characterization of small solid renal lesions: can benign and malignant tumors be differentiated with CT? Am J Roentgenol 197(4):887–896CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang J, Lefkowitz RA, Ishill NM, et al. (2007) Solid renal cortical tumors: differentiation with CT. Radiology 244(2):494–504CrossRefPubMed Zhang J, Lefkowitz RA, Ishill NM, et al. (2007) Solid renal cortical tumors: differentiation with CT. Radiology 244(2):494–504CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Gakis G, Kramer U, Schilling D, et al. (2011) Small renal oncocytomas: differentiation with multiphase CT. Eur J Radiol 80(2):274–278CrossRefPubMed Gakis G, Kramer U, Schilling D, et al. (2011) Small renal oncocytomas: differentiation with multiphase CT. Eur J Radiol 80(2):274–278CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Young JR, Margolis D, Sauk S, et al. (2013) Clear cell renal cell carcinoma: discrimination from other renal cell carcinoma subtypes and oncocytoma at multiphasic multidetector CT. Radiology 267(2):444–453CrossRefPubMed Young JR, Margolis D, Sauk S, et al. (2013) Clear cell renal cell carcinoma: discrimination from other renal cell carcinoma subtypes and oncocytoma at multiphasic multidetector CT. Radiology 267(2):444–453CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee-Felker SA, Felker ER, Tan N, et al. (2014) Qualitative and quantitative MDCT features for differentiating clear cell renal cell carcinoma from other solid renal cortical masses. Am J Roentgenol 203:W516–W524CrossRef Lee-Felker SA, Felker ER, Tan N, et al. (2014) Qualitative and quantitative MDCT features for differentiating clear cell renal cell carcinoma from other solid renal cortical masses. Am J Roentgenol 203:W516–W524CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Eble J, Sauter G, Epstein J (2004) World Health Organization classification of tumours: pathology and genetics of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs. Lyon: IARC Press Eble J, Sauter G, Epstein J (2004) World Health Organization classification of tumours: pathology and genetics of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs. Lyon: IARC Press
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Kunkle DA, Egleston BL, Uzzo RG (2008) Excise, ablate or observe: the small renal mass dilemma-a meta-analysis and review. J Urol 179:1227–1233CrossRefPubMed Kunkle DA, Egleston BL, Uzzo RG (2008) Excise, ablate or observe: the small renal mass dilemma-a meta-analysis and review. J Urol 179:1227–1233CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Chawla SN, Crispen PL, Hanlon AL, et al. (2006) The natural history of observed enhancing renal masses: meta-analysis and review of the world literature. J Urol 175:425–431CrossRefPubMed Chawla SN, Crispen PL, Hanlon AL, et al. (2006) The natural history of observed enhancing renal masses: meta-analysis and review of the world literature. J Urol 175:425–431CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Smaldone MC, Kutikov A, Egleston BL, et al. (2012) Small renal masses progressing to metastases under active surveillance: a systematic review and pooled analysis. Cancer 118:997–1006CrossRefPubMed Smaldone MC, Kutikov A, Egleston BL, et al. (2012) Small renal masses progressing to metastases under active surveillance: a systematic review and pooled analysis. Cancer 118:997–1006CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Mason RJ, Abdolell M, Trottier G, et al. (2011) Growth kinetics of renal masses: analysis of a prospective cohort of patients undergoing active surveillance. Eur Urol 59:863–867CrossRefPubMed Mason RJ, Abdolell M, Trottier G, et al. (2011) Growth kinetics of renal masses: analysis of a prospective cohort of patients undergoing active surveillance. Eur Urol 59:863–867CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Kouba E, Smith A, McRackan D, et al. (2007) Watchful waiting for solid renal masses: insight into the natural history and results of delayed intervention. J Urol 177:466–470CrossRefPubMed Kouba E, Smith A, McRackan D, et al. (2007) Watchful waiting for solid renal masses: insight into the natural history and results of delayed intervention. J Urol 177:466–470CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Pierorazio PM, Hyams ES, Mullins JK, Allaf ME (2012) Active surveillance for small renal masses. Nat Rev Urol 14(1–2):13–19 Pierorazio PM, Hyams ES, Mullins JK, Allaf ME (2012) Active surveillance for small renal masses. Nat Rev Urol 14(1–2):13–19
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Volpe A, Kachura JR, Geddie WR, et al. (2007) Techniques, safety and accuracy of sampling of renal tumors by fine needle aspiration and core biopsy. J Urol 178:379CrossRefPubMed Volpe A, Kachura JR, Geddie WR, et al. (2007) Techniques, safety and accuracy of sampling of renal tumors by fine needle aspiration and core biopsy. J Urol 178:379CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Kümmerlin I, ten Kate F, Smedts F, et al. (2008) Core biopsies of renal tumors: a study on diagnostic accuracy, interobserver, and intraobserver variability. Eur Urol 53:1219CrossRefPubMed Kümmerlin I, ten Kate F, Smedts F, et al. (2008) Core biopsies of renal tumors: a study on diagnostic accuracy, interobserver, and intraobserver variability. Eur Urol 53:1219CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Lebret T, Poulain JE, Molinie V, et al. (2007) Percutaneous core biopsy for renal masses: indications, accuracy and results. J Urol 178(4 Pt 1):1184CrossRefPubMed Lebret T, Poulain JE, Molinie V, et al. (2007) Percutaneous core biopsy for renal masses: indications, accuracy and results. J Urol 178(4 Pt 1):1184CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmidbauer J, Remzi M, Memarsadeghi M, et al. (2008) Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography-guided percutaneous biopsy of renal masses. Eur Urol 53:1003CrossRefPubMed Schmidbauer J, Remzi M, Memarsadeghi M, et al. (2008) Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography-guided percutaneous biopsy of renal masses. Eur Urol 53:1003CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Jeon HG, Seo SI, Jeong BC, et al. (2015) Percutaneous kidney biopsy for a small renal mass: a critical appraisal of results. J Urol S0022–5347(15):4881–4888 Jeon HG, Seo SI, Jeong BC, et al. (2015) Percutaneous kidney biopsy for a small renal mass: a critical appraisal of results. J Urol S0022–5347(15):4881–4888
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Chandarana H, Rosenkrantz AB, Mussi TC, et al. (2012) Histogram analysis of whole-lesion enhancement in differentiating clear cell from papillary subtype of renal cell cancer. Radiology 265:790–798CrossRefPubMed Chandarana H, Rosenkrantz AB, Mussi TC, et al. (2012) Histogram analysis of whole-lesion enhancement in differentiating clear cell from papillary subtype of renal cell cancer. Radiology 265:790–798CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen F, Huhdanpaa H, Desai B, et al. (2015) Whole lesion quantitative CT evaluation of renal cell carcinoma: differentiation of clear cell from papillary renal cell carcinoma. Springerplus 4:66CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chen F, Huhdanpaa H, Desai B, et al. (2015) Whole lesion quantitative CT evaluation of renal cell carcinoma: differentiation of clear cell from papillary renal cell carcinoma. Springerplus 4:66CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim JY, Kim JK, Kim N, Cho KS (2008) CT histogram analysis: differentiation of angiomyolipoma without visible fat from renal cell carcinoma at CT imaging. Radiology 246(2):472–479CrossRefPubMed Kim JY, Kim JK, Kim N, Cho KS (2008) CT histogram analysis: differentiation of angiomyolipoma without visible fat from renal cell carcinoma at CT imaging. Radiology 246(2):472–479CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Voxel-based whole-lesion enhancement parameters: a study of its clinical value in differentiating clear cell renal cell carcinoma from renal oncocytoma
verfasst von
Frank Chen
Mittul Gulati
Darryl Hwang
Steven Cen
Felix Yap
Chidubem Ugwueze
Bino Varghese
Mihir Desai
Manju Aron
Inderbir Gill
Vinay Duddalwar
Publikationsdatum
06.09.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 2/2017
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0891-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2017

Abdominal Radiology 2/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Classics in Abdominal Imaging

The leaping dolphin sign

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.