Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Obesity Surgery
Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery 3/2021

04.11.2020 | Original Contributions

Weight Loss After Sleeve Gastrectomy: Does Type 2 Diabetes Status Impact Weight and Body Composition Trajectories?

Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery | Ausgabe 3/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction/ purpose:

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG), the most frequently performed bariatric procedure, induces marked weight-loss, but with high inter-individual variability. Since type 2 diabetes (T2D) negatively impacts weight-loss outcomes after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), we herein aimed to evaluate whether and how T2D status may influence weight-loss and body composition changes in individuals with or without T2D after SG.

Material and Methods:

We retrospectively included individuals with obesity operated from SG and prospectively followed at our center: 373 patients including 152 with T2D (40%). All subjects’ clinical characteristics were collected before and during 4 years of follow-up post-SG. Linear mixed models were applied to analyze weight-loss trajectories post-surgery.

Results:

Compared to individuals with obesity but no T2D, those with T2D before SG displayed lower weight-loss at 1 year (21 vs. 27% from baseline, p < 10−3). This difference was accentuated in patients with poorer glucose control (HbA1c > 7%) at baseline. Furthermore, patients with T2D underwent less favorable body composition changes at 1-year post-SG compared to individuals without T2D (% fat mass reduction: 28 vs. 37%, p < 10−3 respectively).

Conclusion:

When undergoing SG, subjects with obesity and T2D who have poor pre-operative glycemic control display reduced weight-loss and less improvement in body composition compared to patients with obesity but without T2D. This result suggests that glycemic control prior to surgery is important to take into account for the outcome of bariatric surgery.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Sjöström L. Review of the key results from the Swedish Obese Subjects (SOS) trial - a prospective controlled intervention study of bariatric surgery. J Intern Med. 2013 Mar;273(3):219–34.PubMed
2.
Courcoulas AP, King WC, Belle SH, Berk P, Flum DR, Garcia L, et al. Seven-year weight trajectories and health outcomes in the longitudinal assessment of bariatric surgery (LABS) study. JAMA Surg 2017 6
3.
Peterli R, Wölnerhanssen BK, Peters T, et al. Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss in patients with morbid obesity: the SM-BOSS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319(3):255–65.PubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Courcoulas AP, Christian NJ, O’Rourke RW, et al. Preoperative factors and 3-year weight change in the longitudinal assessment of bariatric surgery (LABS) consortium. Surg Obes Relat Dis Off J Am Soc Bariatr Surg. 2015;11(5):1109–18.
5.
Courcoulas AP, Christian NJ, Belle SH, et al. Weight change and health outcomes at 3 years after bariatric surgery among individuals with severe obesity. JAMA. 2013;310(22):2416–25.PubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Abdennour M, Reggio S, Le Naour G, et al. Association of adipose tissue and liver fibrosis with tissue stiffness in morbid obesity: links with diabetes and BMI loss after gastric bypass. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014 Mar;99(3):898–907.PubMed
7.
Bel Lassen P, Charlotte F, Liu Y, Bedossa P, le Naour G, Tordjman J, et al. The FAT score, a fibrosis score of adipose tissue: predicting weight loss outcome after gastric bypass. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2017 17
8.
Schauer PR, Mingrone G, Ikramuddin S, et al. Clinical outcomes of metabolic surgery: efficacy of glycemic control, weight loss, and remission of diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(6):902–11.PubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. Bariatric surgery and endoluminal procedures: IFSO worldwide survey 2014. Obes Surg. 2017;27(9):2279–89.PubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Osland E, Yunus RM, Khan S, et al. Weight loss outcomes in laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy (LVSG) versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) procedures: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017;27(1):8–18.PubMed
11.
Salminen P, Helmiö M, Ovaska J, et al. Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss at 5 years among patients with morbid obesity: the SLEEVEPASS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319(3):241–54.PubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Aminian A, Zajichek A, Arterburn DE, Wolski KE, Brethauer SA, Schauer PR, et al. Association of metabolic surgery with major adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity. JAMA. 2019 2
13.
Gepner Y, Shelef I, Schwarzfuchs D, et al. Effect of distinct lifestyle interventions on mobilization of fat storage pools: CENTRAL magnetic resonance imaging randomized controlled trial. Circulation. 2018;137(11):1143–57.PubMed
14.
Verger EO, Aron-Wisnewsky J, Dao MC, Kayser BD, Oppert J-M, Bouillot J-L, et al. Micronutrient and protein deficiencies after gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a 1-year Follow-up. Obes Surg. 2016;26(4):785–96.
15.
Liu Y, Aron-Wisnewsky J, Marcelin G, et al. Accumulation and changes in composition of collagens in subcutaneous adipose tissue after bariatric surgery. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016;101(1):293–304.PubMed
16.
Thereaux J, Corigliano N, Poitou C, et al. Five-year weight loss in primary gastric bypass and revisional gastric bypass for failed adjustable gastric banding: results of a case-matched study. Surg Obes Relat Dis Off J Am Soc Bariatr Surg. 2015;11(1):19–25.
17.
Wijngaarden LH, Jonker FHW, van den Berg JW, et al. Impact of initial response of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding on outcomes of revisional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Surg Obes Relat Dis Off J Am Soc Bariatr Surg. 2017;13(4):594–9.
18.
Dardamanis D, Navez J, Coubeau L, et al. A retrospective comparative study of primary versus revisional Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: long-term results. Obes Surg. 2018;28(8):2457–64.PubMed
19.
Mechanick JI, Apovian C, Brethauer S, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutrition, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of patients undergoing bariatric procedures - 2019 update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology, the Obesity Society, American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, Obesity Medicine Association, and American Society of Anesthesiologists. Obes Silver Spring Md. 2020;28(4):O1–58.
20.
Vignot M, Bernat M, Oppert J-M, et al. The care pathway in weight loss surgery. Soins Rev Ref Infirm. 2016;61(811):37–8.
21.
Thereaux J, Corigliano N, Poitou C, et al. Comparison of results after one year between sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass in patients with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2. Surg Obes Relat Dis Off J Am Soc Bariatr Surg. 2015;11(4):785–90.
22.
Oppert J-M, Bellicha A, Roda C, et al. Resistance training and protein supplementation increase strength after bariatric surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Obes Silver Spring Md. 2018;26(11):1709–20.
23.
JONES BL, NAGIN DS, ROEDER K. A SAS procedure based on mixture models for estimating developmental trajectories. Sociol Methods Res. 2001;29(3):374–93.
24.
Rometo D, Korytkowski M. Perioperative glycemic management of patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Curr Diab Rep. 2016;16(4):23.PubMed
25.
Batterham M, Tapsell LC, Charlton KE. Baseline characteristics associated with different BMI trajectories in weight loss trials: a case for better targeting of interventions. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2016;70(2):207–11.PubMed
26.
Sjöström L, Peltonen M, Jacobson P, et al. Bariatric surgery and long-term cardiovascular events. JAMA. 2012;307(1):56–65.PubMed
27.
Dicker D, Yahalom R, Comaneshter DS, et al. Long-term outcomes of three types of bariatric surgery on obesity and type 2 diabetes control and remission. Obes Surg. 2016;26(8):1814–20.PubMed
28.
Pories WJ, Swanson MS, MacDonald KG, et al. Who would have thought it? An operation proves to be the most effective therapy for adult-onset diabetes mellitus. Ann Surg. 1995;222(3):339–50. discussion 350-352PubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Mäkimattila S, Nikkilä K, Yki-Järvinen H. Causes of weight gain during insulin therapy with and without metformin in patients with type II diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia. 1999;42(4):406–12.PubMed
30.
Van Gaal L, Scheen A. Weight management in type 2 diabetes: current and emerging approaches to treatment. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(6):1161–72.PubMed
31.
Schauer PR, Bhatt DL, Kirwan JP, et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes--3-year outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(21):2002–13.PubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Schauer PR, Bhatt DL, Kirwan JP, et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes - 5-year outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(7):641–51.PubMedPubMedCentral
33.
Mingrone G, Panunzi S, De Gaetano A, et al. Bariatric surgery versus conventional medical therapy for type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(17):1577–85.PubMed
34.
Mingrone G, Panunzi S, De Gaetano A, et al. Bariatric-metabolic surgery versus conventional medical treatment in obese patients with type 2 diabetes: 5 year follow-up of an open-label, single-centre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Lond Engl. 2015;386(9997):964–73.
35.
Gils Contreras A, Bonada Sanjaume A, Becerra-Tomás N, et al. Adherence to Mediterranean diet or physical activity after bariatric surgery and its effects on weight loss, quality of life, and food tolerance. Obes Surg. 2020 Feb;30(2):687–96.PubMed
36.
Bellicha A, Ciangura C, Poitou C, et al. Effectiveness of exercise training after bariatric surgery-a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev Off J Int Assoc Study Obes. 2018;19(11):1544–56.
37.
Fontana AD, Lopes AD, Lunardi AC. Bariatric surgery associated with practice of moderate to intense physical activity related to weight loss, activity level in daily life, dyspnea, and quality of life of sedentary individuals with morbid obesity: a prospective longitudinal study. Obes Surg. 2019;29(8):2442–8.PubMed
38.
Marc-Hernández A, Ruiz-Tovar J, Aracil A, et al. Effects of a high-intensity exercise program on weight regain and cardio-metabolic profile after 3 years of bariatric surgery: a randomized trial. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):3123.PubMedPubMedCentral
39.
Miras AD, Pérez-Pevida B, Aldhwayan M, et al. Adjunctive liraglutide treatment in patients with persistent or recurrent type 2 diabetes after metabolic surgery (GRAVITAS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;7(7):549–59.PubMed
40.
Keidar A, Hershkop KJ, Marko L, et al. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass vs sleeve gastrectomy for obese patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomised trial. Diabetologia. 2013;56(9):1914–8.PubMed
41.
Thibault R, Pichard C. The evaluation of body composition: a useful tool for clinical practice. Ann Nutr Metab. 2012;60(1):6–16.PubMed
42.
Heitmann BL, Erikson H, Ellsinger BM, et al. Mortality associated with body fat, fat-free mass and body mass index among 60-year-old Swedish men-a 22-year follow-up. The study of men born in 1913. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord J Int Assoc Study Obes. 2000;24(1):33–7.
43.
Sjöström CD, Lissner L, Sjöström L. Relationships between changes in body composition and changes in cardiovascular risk factors: the SOS intervention study. Swedish Obese Subjects Obes Res. 1997;5(6):519–30.PubMed
44.
Aminian A, Brethauer SA, Andalib A, et al. Individualized metabolic surgery score: procedure selection based on diabetes severity. Ann Surg. 2017;266(4):650–7.PubMed
45.
Romeo S, Maglio C, Burza MA, et al. Cardiovascular events after bariatric surgery in obese subjects with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(12):2613–7.PubMedPubMedCentral
46.
Fisher DP, Johnson E, Haneuse S, et al. Association between bariatric surgery and macrovascular disease outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and severe obesity. JAMA. 2018;320(15):1570–82.PubMedPubMedCentral
47.
Gesquiere I, Aron-Wisnewsky J, Foulon V, Haggege S, Van der Schueren B, Augustijns P, et al. Medication cost is significantly reduced after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in obese patients. Obes Surg. 2014
48.
Neovius M, Narbro K, Keating C, et al. Health care use during 20 years following bariatric surgery. JAMA. 2012;308(11):1132–41.PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Weight Loss After Sleeve Gastrectomy: Does Type 2 Diabetes Status Impact Weight and Body Composition Trajectories?
Publikationsdatum
04.11.2020
Erschienen in
Obesity Surgery / Ausgabe 3/2021
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Elektronische ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-05075-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2021

Obesity Surgery 3/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Multimedia Article

The Hardship of Recovering a Patient from Liver Failure after One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass

Original Contributions

Efficacy of Fibrin Sealant in Reducing Complication Risk After Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Original Contributions

Are We Ready for Bariatric Surgery in a Liver Transplant Program? A Meta-Analysis

Original Contributions

Gastric Fistula After Sleeve Gastrectomy: Clinical Features and Treatment Options

Original Contributions

Role of DiaRem Score in Preoperative Prediction of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Remission After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Indian Perspective

Original Contributions

Development and Validation of a Predictive Model of Success in Bariatric Surgery

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

23.04.2024 | Ablationstherapie | Nachrichten

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 | Appendizitis | Nachrichten

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 | Operationsvorbereitung | Nachrichten

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

19.04.2024 | EAU 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich
weitere anzeigen

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.