Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 1/2018

10.07.2017 | Musculoskeletal

What are the differentiating clinical and MRI-features of enchondromas from low-grade chondrosarcomas?

verfasst von: Hassan Douis, M. Parry, S. Vaiyapuri, A. M. Davies

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the role of clinical assessment, conventional and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in differentiating enchondromas from chondrosarcomas of long bone.

Methods

The following clinical and MRI findings were assessed: age, gender, pain, pain attributable to lesion, tumour location, tumour length, presence, depth of endosteal scalloping, bone marrow oedema, soft tissue oedema, cortical destruction, periosteal reaction, bone expansion, macroscopic fat, calcification, soft tissue mass, haemorrhage, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Clinical and MRI findings were compared with histopathological grading.

Results

Sixty patients with central chondroid tumours were included (27 enchondromas, 10 cartilaginous lesions of unknown malignant potential, 15 grade 1 chondrosarcomas, 8 high-grade chondrosarcomas). Pain attributed to lesion, tumour length, endosteal scalloping > 2/3, cortical destruction, bone expansion and soft tissue mass were differentiating features between enchondromas and grade 1 chondrosarcomas. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI could not differentiate enchondromas from grade 1 chondrosarcomas.

Conclusions

Previously reported imaging signs of chondrosarcomas are useful in the diagnosis of grade 1 lesions but have lower sensitivity than in higher grade lesions. Deep endosteal scalloping is the most sensitive imaging sign of grade 1 chondrosarcomas. Pain due to the lesion is an important clinical sign of grade 1 chondrosarcomas. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI is not useful in differentiating enchondromas from grade 1 chondrosarcomas.

Key Points

Differentiation of enchondroma from low-grade chondrosarcoma is challenging for radiologists and pathologists.
The utility of clinical assessment, conventional and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI was uncertain.
Clinical assessment and conventional MRI aid in differentiating enchondromas from low-grade chondrosarcoma.
Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI cannot differentiate enchondromas from grade 1 chondrosarcoma.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hogendoorn PCW, Bovee J, Nielsen GP (2013) World health organization classification of tumours of soft tissue and bone. In: Fletcher CDM, Bridge JA, Hogendoorn PCW, Mertens F (ed). IARCPress, Lyon, pp 264–268 Hogendoorn PCW, Bovee J, Nielsen GP (2013) World health organization classification of tumours of soft tissue and bone. In: Fletcher CDM, Bridge JA, Hogendoorn PCW, Mertens F (ed). IARCPress, Lyon, pp 264–268
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hong ED, Carrino JA, Weber KL, Fayad LM (2011) Prevalence of shoulder enchondromas on routine MR imaging. Clin Imaging 35:378–384CrossRefPubMed Hong ED, Carrino JA, Weber KL, Fayad LM (2011) Prevalence of shoulder enchondromas on routine MR imaging. Clin Imaging 35:378–384CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Walden MJ, Murphey MD, Vidal JA (2008) Incidental enchondromas of the knee. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:1611–1615CrossRefPubMed Walden MJ, Murphey MD, Vidal JA (2008) Incidental enchondromas of the knee. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:1611–1615CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat (2007) Reliability of histopathologic and radiologic grading of cartilaginous neoplasms in long bones. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:2113–2123 (2007) Reliability of histopathologic and radiologic grading of cartilaginous neoplasms in long bones. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:2113–2123
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Eefting D, Schrage YM, Geirnaerdt MJ et al (2009) Assessment of interobserver variability and histologic parameters to improve reliability in classification and grading of central cartilaginous tumors. Am J Surg Pathol 33:50–57CrossRefPubMed Eefting D, Schrage YM, Geirnaerdt MJ et al (2009) Assessment of interobserver variability and histologic parameters to improve reliability in classification and grading of central cartilaginous tumors. Am J Surg Pathol 33:50–57CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Logie CI, Walker EA, Forsberg JA, Potter BK, Murphey MD (2013) Chondrosarcoma: a diagnostic imager's guide to decision making and patient management. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 17:101–115CrossRefPubMed Logie CI, Walker EA, Forsberg JA, Potter BK, Murphey MD (2013) Chondrosarcoma: a diagnostic imager's guide to decision making and patient management. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 17:101–115CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Murphey MD, Flemming DJ, Boyea SR, Bojescul JA, Sweet DE, Temple HT (1998) Enchondroma versus chondrosarcoma in the appendicular skeleton: differentiating features. Radiographics 18:1213–1237, quiz 1244-1215CrossRefPubMed Murphey MD, Flemming DJ, Boyea SR, Bojescul JA, Sweet DE, Temple HT (1998) Enchondroma versus chondrosarcoma in the appendicular skeleton: differentiating features. Radiographics 18:1213–1237, quiz 1244-1215CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi BB, Jee WH, Sunwoo HJ et al (2013) MR differentiation of low-grade chondrosarcoma from enchondroma. Clin Imaging 37:542–547CrossRefPubMed Choi BB, Jee WH, Sunwoo HJ et al (2013) MR differentiation of low-grade chondrosarcoma from enchondroma. Clin Imaging 37:542–547CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferrer-Santacreu EM, Ortiz-Cruz EJ, Gonzalez-Lopez JM, Perez Fernandez E (2012) Enchondroma versus low-grade chondrosarcoma in appendicular skeleton: clinical and radiological criteria. J Oncol 2012:437958CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ferrer-Santacreu EM, Ortiz-Cruz EJ, Gonzalez-Lopez JM, Perez Fernandez E (2012) Enchondroma versus low-grade chondrosarcoma in appendicular skeleton: clinical and radiological criteria. J Oncol 2012:437958CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Crim J, Schmidt R, Layfield L, Hanrahan C, Manaster BJ (2015) Can imaging criteria distinguish enchondroma from grade 1 chondrosarcoma? Eur J Radiol 84:2222–2230CrossRefPubMed Crim J, Schmidt R, Layfield L, Hanrahan C, Manaster BJ (2015) Can imaging criteria distinguish enchondroma from grade 1 chondrosarcoma? Eur J Radiol 84:2222–2230CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Grimer RJ, Carter SR, Tillman RM, Mangham DC, Abudu A, Fiorenza F (2000) Chondrosarcoma of bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82-A:1203–1204CrossRefPubMed Grimer RJ, Carter SR, Tillman RM, Mangham DC, Abudu A, Fiorenza F (2000) Chondrosarcoma of bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82-A:1203–1204CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee FY, Mankin HJ, Fondren G et al (1999) Chondrosarcoma of bone: an assessment of outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:326–338CrossRefPubMed Lee FY, Mankin HJ, Fondren G et al (1999) Chondrosarcoma of bone: an assessment of outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:326–338CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Campanacci DA, Scoccianti G, Franchi A et al (2013) Surgical treatment of central grade 1 chondrosarcoma of the appendicular skeleton. J Orthop Traumatol 14:101–107CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Campanacci DA, Scoccianti G, Franchi A et al (2013) Surgical treatment of central grade 1 chondrosarcoma of the appendicular skeleton. J Orthop Traumatol 14:101–107CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Hanna SA, Whittingham-Jones P, Sewell MD et al (2009) Outcome of intralesional curettage for low-grade chondrosarcoma of long bones. Eur J Surg Oncol 35:1343–1347CrossRefPubMed Hanna SA, Whittingham-Jones P, Sewell MD et al (2009) Outcome of intralesional curettage for low-grade chondrosarcoma of long bones. Eur J Surg Oncol 35:1343–1347CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Souna BS, Belot N, Duval H, Langlais F, Thomazeau H (2010) No recurrences in selected patients after curettage with cryotherapy for grade I chondrosarcomas. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:1956–1962CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Souna BS, Belot N, Duval H, Langlais F, Thomazeau H (2010) No recurrences in selected patients after curettage with cryotherapy for grade I chondrosarcomas. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:1956–1962CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Verdegaal SH, Brouwers HF, van Zwet EW, Hogendoorn PC, Taminiau AH (2012) Low-grade chondrosarcoma of long bones treated with intralesional curettage followed by application of phenol, ethanol, and bone-grafting. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:1201–1207CrossRefPubMed Verdegaal SH, Brouwers HF, van Zwet EW, Hogendoorn PC, Taminiau AH (2012) Low-grade chondrosarcoma of long bones treated with intralesional curettage followed by application of phenol, ethanol, and bone-grafting. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:1201–1207CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Geirnaerdt MJ, Hogendoorn PC, Bloem JL, Taminiau AH, van der Woude HJ (2000) Cartilaginous tumors: fast contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 214:539–546CrossRefPubMed Geirnaerdt MJ, Hogendoorn PC, Bloem JL, Taminiau AH, van der Woude HJ (2000) Cartilaginous tumors: fast contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 214:539–546CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Bui KL, Ilaslan H, Bauer TW, Lietman SA, Joyce MJ, Sundaram M (2009) Cortical scalloping and cortical penetration by small eccentric chondroid lesions in the long tubular bones: not a sign of malignancy? Skelet Radiol 38:791–796CrossRef Bui KL, Ilaslan H, Bauer TW, Lietman SA, Joyce MJ, Sundaram M (2009) Cortical scalloping and cortical penetration by small eccentric chondroid lesions in the long tubular bones: not a sign of malignancy? Skelet Radiol 38:791–796CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Douis H, Singh L, Saifuddin A (2014) MRI differentiation of low-grade from high-grade appendicular chondrosarcoma. Eur Radiol 24:232–240CrossRefPubMed Douis H, Singh L, Saifuddin A (2014) MRI differentiation of low-grade from high-grade appendicular chondrosarcoma. Eur Radiol 24:232–240CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoo HJ, Hong SH, Choi JY et al (2009) Differentiating high-grade from low-grade chondrosarcoma with MR imaging. Eur Radiol 19:3008–3014CrossRefPubMed Yoo HJ, Hong SH, Choi JY et al (2009) Differentiating high-grade from low-grade chondrosarcoma with MR imaging. Eur Radiol 19:3008–3014CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Douis H, Jeys L, Grimer R, Vaiyapuri S, Davies AM (2015) Is there a role for diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) in the diagnosis of central cartilage tumors? Skelet Radiol. doi:10.1007/s00256-015-2123-7 Douis H, Jeys L, Grimer R, Vaiyapuri S, Davies AM (2015) Is there a role for diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) in the diagnosis of central cartilage tumors? Skelet Radiol. doi:10.​1007/​s00256-015-2123-7
Metadaten
Titel
What are the differentiating clinical and MRI-features of enchondromas from low-grade chondrosarcomas?
verfasst von
Hassan Douis
M. Parry
S. Vaiyapuri
A. M. Davies
Publikationsdatum
10.07.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-4947-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

European Radiology 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.