Background
Methods
Recruitment
Focus group topic guide
Data management
Results
UK | England | Scotland | Northern Ireland | Wales | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age group | |||||
11–15 year olds | 30 | 20 | 5 | 5 | 0 |
16–24 year olds | 33 | 19 | 2 | 9 | 3 |
Gender | |||||
Male | 20 | 15 | 2 | 3 | 0 |
Female | 43 | 24 | 5 | 11 | 3 |
• Young people’s experiences of research participation | |
◦ Experience of research participation as children ◦ Feedback on research participation ◦ Altruism as a motivator for research participation | |
• Beliefs about and experiences of young people being involved in research | |
◦ Motivations for involvement ◦ Role of experience of condition in involvement ◦ Experience of involvement | |
• Challenges to, and facilitators of, young people’s involvement | |
◦ Being taken seriously by and listened to by researchers ◦ Access to research and researchers ◦ Clear roles and importance of co-production ◦ Flexibility in involvement approaches | |
• Practical considerations when involving young people in research | |
◦ Timing of involvement ◦ Convenience of activity ◦ Role of incentives ◦ Patient-led versus researcher-led involvement |
Young people’s experiences of research participation
Examples of quotes | |
---|---|
3a. Experience of research in childhood - Degree of understanding regarding the purpose of research when a child | F: I am 18 and I think I did one about a year and a half ago, and there was someone in the Children’s Hospital that kept asking for my saliva yeah. It did become a running joke between me and my dad that she just wants my germs! So yeah, I think I have (England over 16) |
3b. Experience of research in childhood - Challenges of recalling research participation in childhood | F: Yes I have when I was younger, I can’t quite remember all the details, I think it was research in how metal joints affect the blood and that and when they test blood, they try and see whether or not they can judge how far…how worn out the joint is (Wales 16 and over) |
3c. Experience of research in childhood - Parents taking control of research consent process when younger | F - The X study was okay because I was young enough that my mum came and kind of took control. (Northern Ireland 16 and over) |
3d. Lack of feedback on research participation | F - The University one was slightly different. It was quite daunting, I had a one-to-one interview. Mine lasted just over three hours. But I could see the benefits of why I actually should do it, but I still haven’t actually received anything back from it. Sometimes you need to see what’s come off your participation. (Northern Ireland 16 and over) |
3e. Lack of feedback on research participation | F: it is like taking a test and never getting your grade (Northern Ireland under 16) |
3f. Lack of feedback on research participation | F – But I think it would be useful if people who have it know like what’s been found so they kind of like have got an idea of where it is all going (England under 16) |
3g. Importance of feeling that your contribution to research is meaningful | M- I think it’s a trade-off between convenience and impact, if it’s going to really be helpful or if it’s really going to have a big impact. I feel that if I am just going to be a data point then it really doesn’t impress me that it is important. It was conveyed to me that it was a really important factor in their research, I think I’d put a lot more effort into it (England over 16) |
3h. Reasons for research participation - Altruism | Facilitator – Why did you decide to take part? M- Well I’ve got it may as well help other people who have it. (England over 16) |
3i. Reasons for research participation – Altruism | F- I kind of decided, because it took me probably three or four years to get diagnosed, I was thinking whether if it was easier for someone else to just be diagnosed straight away, So that’s kind of why I helped a bit. (England under 16) |
3j. Reasons for research participation – Altruism | M- Not being rude but I think you are stupid if you don’t take part in research. If you’re upset about something and you want to get better, surely you would take part in something that might make you better in the long run and help others (England under 16) |
3k. Reasons for research participation – Altruism – wanting to make things better | F: Exactly the reason I agreed to take part in this is so that young people won’t be in the same situation I was when I was diagnosed. (Wales over 16) |
Beliefs about and experiences of, young people being involved in research
Theme | Example quotes |
---|---|
4a. Motivations for involvement – young people’s views and experience are different than adults | F- I would do it because adults and people our age they think differently and they don’t always consider the things that we consider and because we’re the ones getting involved I think it’s good that we have a say. (England under 16) |
4b. Motivations for involvement - altruism | M- If someone came to me I’d instantly say, yeah, I’ll take part in it. I don’t care if it’s a bit boring because it’s for the benefit of others. So there needs to be like a Facebook page or something, you know like an online poll and stuff like that (England over 16) |
4c.Experience as a young person – Providing a different perspective to researchers | M- I disagree because they should give ideas on how the research is done, because it’s your opinion and if you’re going through something you should have a say on what the researchers are actually focusing on, because it’s happening to you. It would be useless if they were focusing on something that isn’t important to you. (England under 16) |
4d. Experience of condition- Importance and value of young people’s experiences of their condition | F: Researchers think they are the best but sometimes they are not, young people have the problems in their body and they know more things about their condition than researchers do. (Northern Ireland under 16) |
4e. Experience of condition - Importance and value of young people’s experiences of their condition | M: I think also it is quite important that we have experience. We have experience in the service, we have experience with the doctors and we have kind of had all or quite a substantial part of our life in the service so we know what it is like and we have had good experiences and bad experiences. (England 16 and over) |
4f. Experience of condition - Importance and value of young people’s experiences of their condition to research | M: it is like a better thing as well, as you have the doctors who know about the thing, they know about condition and how to treat it but they don’t know what it is like to cope with something like that. (Scotland 16 and over) |
4g. Experiences of involvement - Involved but unclear what in | F – He’s called M, he’s 17 and he’s been involved M – I think I have F – You’ve come on advisory groups for disease specific JIA and I’m sure there’s questionnaires and stuff. You’ve done involvement and the research side (England over 16) |
4h. Experiences of involvement – involved but in a limited way | Facilitator - the other question was whether you’ve ever given your thoughts on how research is done M- Yeah, once or twice, but that’s only speaking to a researcher at the hospital, that just comes and talks to me (England under 16) |
4i. Experiences of involvement – uncertain about whether played a useful role in advisory groups – | Two or three of you have said that you have taken part in advisory groups- have you had the chance to really have a say? F- I had a big rant one time, I don’t know, it was like one of those next door. I went so off topic and just ranted about the NHS really. F- it’s addressing things like mental health aspects, which might be more personal than information from blood samples (England over 16) |
4j. Experiences of involvement – uncertainty on how or whether to input | M- I never talk during the advisory group thing … I just had nothing to say basically, They were saying things that I was thinking of saying but didn’t end up saying because they got there first. (England over 16) |
4k. Experiences of involvement - challenges to participating in advisory groups | F- The last one I think was one of the better ones, because as I said there was less people there, but also because it was kind of like, sometimes in the bigger groups you can hear someone say something that you disagree with, but it’s a bit awkward because you don’t know them well enough to disagree with them, because you just don’t want to get into an argument. But that one, because we were basically all the same age and had the exact same thing, it was better. (England over 16) |
5a. Flexible approaches to involvement – role of social media and online approaches | F-. So I mean you’ve Facebook, you’ve twitter, which I’m pretty sure at least everyone in this room has at least one. Even the younger group. There would be some way of getting in contact with them in that manner. And it’s a free way of getting in contact with them; it can be monitored as well. And its instant results. And it means that you are not going to have the idea that you can’t go along as you can’t meet this person’s schedule, not a problem, use that. (Northern Ireland over 16) |
5b. Flexible approaches to involvement – role of social media and online approaches | F: Maybe consulting more groups like us, we can maybe video conference if you wanted to give it a group discussion about something and the same for all different regions. (Wales over 16) |
5c. Continued importance of face to face involvement | M- Yeah I like face to face, because it’s good to learn about other people, (England under 16) |
5d. Clear roles and importance of co-production of research | M- I think both people should contribute and agree with what’s going on... it shouldn’t be just the doctors decision, it should be the patients’ as well. (England over 16) |
5e. Access to research and researchers | M: I think there is I don’t know what the word is a barrier maybe between, you know, young people and researchers. And how you contact each other and even if we did sort of have to, how would we kind of work together? And put that into research. (Scotland over 16) |
5f. Being taken seriously by researchers and feeling listened to | F- I think they have to take people who are actually suffering with it seriously, and how they are feeling it like, and they have to have some consideration for what they are doing. And to think whether it will actually benefit them in some way what they are actually researching into. (England over 16) |
Theme | Example quotes |
---|---|
6a.Timing of involvement | M- I would probably say week days, because obviously people have like college or school or work or whatever. So like today (Saturday) there was no problem for me to come here (England over 16) |
6b.Timing of involvement | F: Probably during holidays and all that, I have quite heavy workload with college and I have exams coming up and stuff so probably holiday kind of times. (Scotland over 16) |
6c.Timing of involvement activity | F- I think as soon as you’ve been diagnosed, I think is probably the worst time, because I don’t think you know the disease yourself. So I think if like in the future people are getting diagnosed, I think they should wait a while until they’re familiar with their own disease before they start research. (England under 16) |
6d.Convenience - Combining involvement with other things young people are doing | M- The most important thing about why you get involved with research is convenience, so try and maybe do what they did, because if I was to be asked to do this separately once every couple of months, I would probably think that this is going to be hassle. So rather than setting up a separate group, try and maybe go along to some other groups, like that lupus group or other support groups (England over 16) |
6e.Incentives for involvement | M- People are going to be more receptive if they think there is a reward at the end. Because you could put out notices saying we need people to come and help and you’ll only get those people who are actively involved or who actively seek out these type of opportunities. But if you set some sort of incentive, you may get people who think it’s not the normal thing they do but they’re willing to help out. (Northern Ireland over 16) |
6f.Patient led or researcher led involvement | M: I think that it would be better if someone was there for ad/medical stuff as and when needed, but we were allowed to just get on with the thing. Like you might need someone to give stimulus and ask a couple of questions. But generally I think it should be like it is today, with just us talking, just the patients. (England 16 and over) |
6g. Patient led or researcher led involvement | F: So it is interesting the continuity and management of it and stuff, so you set that up so it is a patient led thing and that is different to having a researcher-led thing, as researchers can’t do a lot of obviously, it is time consuming… (England 16 and over) |
Discussion
Conclusions
What is known about this subject?
What this study adds?
-
This study highlights the need to increase the culture of research in some clinical specialities (including Rheumatology) to improve young people’s access to research participation and involvement opportunities
-
Providing support and training to researchers to increase their confidence in involving young people in their work is also likely to increase the number of research involvement opportunities available.
-
Being flexible in the range of approaches used to involve young people in research may increase the likelihood that a more diverse group of young people will become involved.