Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Medizinische Klinik - Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin 2/2023

07.06.2023 | Review Articles

What is new and different in the 2021 Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines

verfasst von: Hallie C. Prescott, MD MSc, Marlies Ostermann

Erschienen in: Medizinische Klinik - Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin | Sonderheft 2/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) International Guidelines for the Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock provide recommendations on the care of hospitalized adult patients with (or at risk for) sepsis. This review discusses what is new or different in the 2021 SSC adult sepsis guidelines compared to 2016. The guidelines include new weak recommendations for use of balanced fluid over saline 0.9%, use of intravenous corticosteroids for septic shock when there is ongoing vasopressor requirement, and peripheral initiation of intravenous vasopressors over delaying initiation in order to obtain central venous access. As before, there is a strong recommendation to initiate antimicrobials within 1 h of sepsis and septic shock, but there are now additional recommendations when the diagnosis is uncertain. The recommendation for initial fluid resuscitation in septic shock of 30 mL/kg crystalloid has been downgraded from strong to weak. Finally, there are 12 new recommendations addressing long-term outcomes from sepsis, including strong recommendations to screen for economic and social support and to make referrals for follow-up where available; use shared decision-making in post-intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital discharge planning; reconcile medications at both ICU and hospital discharge; provide information about sepsis and its sequelae in written and verbal hospital discharge summary; and to provide assessment and follow-up for physical, cognitive, and emotional problems after hospital discharge.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W et al (2021) Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Crit Care Med 49(11):e1063–e1143CrossRefPubMed Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W et al (2021) Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Crit Care Med 49(11):e1063–e1143CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W et al (2021) Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med 47(11):1181–1247. 10.1007/s00134-021-06506-yCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W et al (2021) Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med 47(11):1181–1247. 10.1007/s00134-021-06506-yCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM et al (2020) Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990–2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 395(10219):200–211CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM et al (2020) Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990–2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 395(10219):200–211CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Reinhart K, Daniels R, Kissoon N, Machado FR, Schachter RD, Finfer S (2017) Recognizing sepsis as a global health priority—A WHO resolution. N Engl J Med 377(5):414–417CrossRefPubMed Reinhart K, Daniels R, Kissoon N, Machado FR, Schachter RD, Finfer S (2017) Recognizing sepsis as a global health priority—A WHO resolution. N Engl J Med 377(5):414–417CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Fleischmann-Struzek C, Mikolajetz A, Schwarzkopf D et al (2018) Challenges in assessing the burden of sepsis and understanding the inequalities of sepsis outcomes between National Health Systems: secular trends in sepsis and infection incidence and mortality in Germany. Intensive Care Med 44(11):1826–1835CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fleischmann-Struzek C, Mikolajetz A, Schwarzkopf D et al (2018) Challenges in assessing the burden of sepsis and understanding the inequalities of sepsis outcomes between National Health Systems: secular trends in sepsis and infection incidence and mortality in Germany. Intensive Care Med 44(11):1826–1835CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Hartog CS, Bodechtel U, Fleischmann-Struzek C, Denke C, Weiss B, Reinhart K (2020) Sepsis: sequelae for affected patients and the health care system. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 145(4):252–259PubMed Hartog CS, Bodechtel U, Fleischmann-Struzek C, Denke C, Weiss B, Reinhart K (2020) Sepsis: sequelae for affected patients and the health care system. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 145(4):252–259PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Schunemann HJ, Wiercioch W, Brozek J et al (2017) GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks for adoption, adaptation, and de novo development of trustworthy recommendations: GRADE-ADOLOPMENT. J Clin Epidemiol 81:101–110CrossRefPubMed Schunemann HJ, Wiercioch W, Brozek J et al (2017) GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks for adoption, adaptation, and de novo development of trustworthy recommendations: GRADE-ADOLOPMENT. J Clin Epidemiol 81:101–110CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW et al (2016) The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA 315(8):801–810CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW et al (2016) The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA 315(8):801–810CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Serafim R, Gomes JA, Salluh J, Povoa P (2018) A comparison of the quick-SOFA and systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria for the diagnosis of sepsis and prediction of mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Chest 153(3):646–655CrossRefPubMed Serafim R, Gomes JA, Salluh J, Povoa P (2018) A comparison of the quick-SOFA and systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria for the diagnosis of sepsis and prediction of mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Chest 153(3):646–655CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Yealy DM, Kellum JA et al (2014) A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock. N Engl J Med 370:1683–1693CrossRefPubMed Yealy DM, Kellum JA et al (2014) A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock. N Engl J Med 370:1683–1693CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Peake SL et al (2014) Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock. N Engl J Med 371:1496–1506CrossRefPubMed Peake SL et al (2014) Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock. N Engl J Med 371:1496–1506CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Mouncey PR, Osborn TM, Power GS et al (2015) Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for septic shock. N Engl J Med 372:150317011022003CrossRef Mouncey PR, Osborn TM, Power GS et al (2015) Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for septic shock. N Engl J Med 372:150317011022003CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Rowan KM, Angus DC et al (2017) Early, goal-directed therapy for septic shock—A patient-level meta-analysis. N Engl J Med 376(23):2223–2234CrossRefPubMed Rowan KM, Angus DC et al (2017) Early, goal-directed therapy for septic shock—A patient-level meta-analysis. N Engl J Med 376(23):2223–2234CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu VX, Morehouse JW, Marelich GP et al (2016) Multicenter implementation of a treatment bundle for patients with sepsis and intermediate lactate values. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 193:1264–1270CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Liu VX, Morehouse JW, Marelich GP et al (2016) Multicenter implementation of a treatment bundle for patients with sepsis and intermediate lactate values. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 193:1264–1270CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Hernandez G, Ospina-Tascon GA, Damiani LP et al (2019) Effect of a resuscitation strategy targeting peripheral perfusion status vs serum lactate levels on 28-day mortality among patients with septic shock: the ANDROMEDA-SHOCK randomized clinical trial. JAMA 321(7):654–664CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hernandez G, Ospina-Tascon GA, Damiani LP et al (2019) Effect of a resuscitation strategy targeting peripheral perfusion status vs serum lactate levels on 28-day mortality among patients with septic shock: the ANDROMEDA-SHOCK randomized clinical trial. JAMA 321(7):654–664CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Rhee C, Kadri SS, Danner RL et al (2016) Diagnosing sepsis is subjective and highly variable: a survey of intensivists using case vignettes. Crit Care 20:89CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rhee C, Kadri SS, Danner RL et al (2016) Diagnosing sepsis is subjective and highly variable: a survey of intensivists using case vignettes. Crit Care 20:89CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Klein Klouwenberg PM, Cremer OL, van Vught LA et al (2015) Likelihood of infection in patients with presumed sepsis at the time of intensive care unit admission: a cohort study. Crit Care 19:319CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Klein Klouwenberg PM, Cremer OL, van Vught LA et al (2015) Likelihood of infection in patients with presumed sepsis at the time of intensive care unit admission: a cohort study. Crit Care 19:319CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Seymour CW, Gesten F, Prescott HC et al (2017) Time to treatment and mortality during mandated emergency care for sepsis. N Engl J Med 376(23):2235–2244CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Seymour CW, Gesten F, Prescott HC et al (2017) Time to treatment and mortality during mandated emergency care for sepsis. N Engl J Med 376(23):2235–2244CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu VX, Fielding-Singh V, Greene JD et al (2017) The timing of early antibiotics and hospital mortality in sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 196(7):856–863CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Liu VX, Fielding-Singh V, Greene JD et al (2017) The timing of early antibiotics and hospital mortality in sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 196(7):856–863CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Rochwerg B, Alhazzani W, Sindi A et al (2014) Fluid resuscitation in sepsis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 161(5):347–355CrossRefPubMed Rochwerg B, Alhazzani W, Sindi A et al (2014) Fluid resuscitation in sepsis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 161(5):347–355CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Semler MW, Self WH, Wanderer JP et al (2018) Balanced crystalloids versus saline in critically ill adults. N Engl J Med 378(9):829–839CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Semler MW, Self WH, Wanderer JP et al (2018) Balanced crystalloids versus saline in critically ill adults. N Engl J Med 378(9):829–839CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Brown RM, Wang L, Coston TD et al (2019) Balanced crystalloids versus saline in sepsis. a secondary analysis of the SMART clinical trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 200(12):1487–1495CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Brown RM, Wang L, Coston TD et al (2019) Balanced crystalloids versus saline in sepsis. a secondary analysis of the SMART clinical trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 200(12):1487–1495CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Tian DH, Smyth C, Keijzers G et al (2020) Safety of peripheral administration of vasopressor medications: A systematic review. Emerg Med Australas 32(2):220–227CrossRefPubMed Tian DH, Smyth C, Keijzers G et al (2020) Safety of peripheral administration of vasopressor medications: A systematic review. Emerg Med Australas 32(2):220–227CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Loubani OM, Green RS (2015) A systematic review of extravasation and local tissue injury from administration of vasopressors through peripheral intravenous catheters and central venous catheters. J Crit Care 30(3):653.e9–653.e17CrossRefPubMed Loubani OM, Green RS (2015) A systematic review of extravasation and local tissue injury from administration of vasopressors through peripheral intravenous catheters and central venous catheters. J Crit Care 30(3):653.e9–653.e17CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Delaney A, Finnis M, Bellomo R et al (2020) Initiation of vasopressor infusions via peripheral versus central access in patients with early septic shock: A retrospective cohort study. Emerg Med Australas 32(2):210–219CrossRefPubMed Delaney A, Finnis M, Bellomo R et al (2020) Initiation of vasopressor infusions via peripheral versus central access in patients with early septic shock: A retrospective cohort study. Emerg Med Australas 32(2):210–219CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Annane D, Renault A, Brun-Buisson C et al (2018) Hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone for adults with septic shock. N Engl J Med 378(9):809–818CrossRefPubMed Annane D, Renault A, Brun-Buisson C et al (2018) Hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone for adults with septic shock. N Engl J Med 378(9):809–818CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Venkatesh B, Finfer S, Cohen J et al (2018) Adjunctive glucocorticoid therapy in patients with septic shock. N Engl J Med 378(9):797–808CrossRefPubMed Venkatesh B, Finfer S, Cohen J et al (2018) Adjunctive glucocorticoid therapy in patients with septic shock. N Engl J Med 378(9):797–808CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Gordon AC, Mason AJ, Thirunavukkarasu N et al (2016) Effect of early vasopressin vs norepinephrine on kidney failure in patients with septic shock: the VANISH randomized clinical trial. JAMA 316(5):509–518CrossRefPubMed Gordon AC, Mason AJ, Thirunavukkarasu N et al (2016) Effect of early vasopressin vs norepinephrine on kidney failure in patients with septic shock: the VANISH randomized clinical trial. JAMA 316(5):509–518CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Rygard SL, Butler E, Granholm A et al (2018) Low-dose corticosteroids for adult patients with septic shock: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Intensive Care Med 44(7):1003–1016CrossRefPubMed Rygard SL, Butler E, Granholm A et al (2018) Low-dose corticosteroids for adult patients with septic shock: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Intensive Care Med 44(7):1003–1016CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Fang F, Zhang Y, Tang J et al (2019) Association of corticosteroid treatment with outcomes in adult patients with sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med 179(2):213–223CrossRefPubMed Fang F, Zhang Y, Tang J et al (2019) Association of corticosteroid treatment with outcomes in adult patients with sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med 179(2):213–223CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Taylor SP, Chou SH, Sierra MF et al (2020) Association between adherence to recommended care and outcomes for adult survivors of sepsis. Ann Am Thorac Soc 17(1):89–97CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Taylor SP, Chou SH, Sierra MF et al (2020) Association between adherence to recommended care and outcomes for adult survivors of sepsis. Ann Am Thorac Soc 17(1):89–97CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Govindan S, Iwashyna TJ, Watson SR, Hyzy RC, Miller MA (2014) Issues of survivorship are rarely addressed during intensive care unit stays. Baseline results from a statewide quality improvement collaborative. Ann Am Thorac Soc 11(4):587–591CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Govindan S, Iwashyna TJ, Watson SR, Hyzy RC, Miller MA (2014) Issues of survivorship are rarely addressed during intensive care unit stays. Baseline results from a statewide quality improvement collaborative. Ann Am Thorac Soc 11(4):587–591CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Prescott HC, Iwashyna TJ, Blackwood B et al (2019) Understanding and enhancing sepsis survivorship. Priorities for research and practice. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 200(8):972–981CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Prescott HC, Iwashyna TJ, Blackwood B et al (2019) Understanding and enhancing sepsis survivorship. Priorities for research and practice. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 200(8):972–981CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Coopersmith CM, De Backer D, Deutschman CS et al (2018) Surviving sepsis campaign: research priorities for sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med 46(8):1334–1356CrossRefPubMed Coopersmith CM, De Backer D, Deutschman CS et al (2018) Surviving sepsis campaign: research priorities for sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med 46(8):1334–1356CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Cassini A, Fleischmann-Struzek C, Naghavi M, Reinhart K, Allegranzi B, Group WHOSET (2021) Future directions and priorities in sepsis epidemiology research: a call for action. Bull World Health Organ 99(5):398–401CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cassini A, Fleischmann-Struzek C, Naghavi M, Reinhart K, Allegranzi B, Group WHOSET (2021) Future directions and priorities in sepsis epidemiology research: a call for action. Bull World Health Organ 99(5):398–401CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
What is new and different in the 2021 Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines
verfasst von
Hallie C. Prescott, MD MSc
Marlies Ostermann
Publikationsdatum
07.06.2023
Verlag
Springer Medizin
Erschienen in
Medizinische Klinik - Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin / Ausgabe Sonderheft 2/2023
Print ISSN: 2193-6218
Elektronische ISSN: 2193-6226
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-023-01028-5

Weitere Artikel der Sonderheft 2/2023

Medizinische Klinik - Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin 2/2023 Zur Ausgabe

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.