Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal 6/2016

23.12.2015 | Original Article

What is normal bladder neck anatomy?

verfasst von: Cristina Naranjo-Ortiz, Ka Lai Shek, Andrew James Martin, Hans Peter Dietz

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 6/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Functional anatomy of the bladder neck and proximal urethra has been studied extensively because of the belief that it is important for urinary continence. The aim of this study was to explore the limits of normality for pelvic floor ultrasound parameters of bladder neck and urethral mobility associated with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and urodynamic stress incontinence (USI).

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted on 589 women seen for urodynamic testing in a tertiary urogynaecology clinic. All women were assessed following a protocol including interview, clinical examination, flowmetry, urodynamic testing and 4D pelvic floor ultrasound. Volume data sets were analysed offline to assess for bladder neck descent (BND), urethral rotation and the retrovesical angle (RVA) on maximal Valsalva.

Results

After excluding women with previous incontinence or prolapse surgery, 429 datasets were available. SI was significantly associated with the RVA (p = 0.033) and BND (p = 0.036); USI was associated with urethral rotation (p = 0.021) and BND (p < 0.001). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, controlling for confounders including age, BMI, parity, previous hysterectomy and maximal urethral pressure, the association between SUI and BND remained significant (OR [per 10 mm] = 1.23; 95 % CI: 1.01 to 1.51; p = 0.043), as did the association between USI and BND (OR [per 10 mm] = 1.58; 95 % CI: 1.3 to 1.91; p < 0.001). ROC statistics for BND suggested a cut-off of 25 mm in describing the limit of normality.

Conclusions

Measures of functional bladder neck anatomy are weakly associated with SUI and USI (with association between BND and USI being the strongest). It is suggested that a BND of 25 mm or higher be defined as abnormal (“hypermobile”) on the basis of its association with USI.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hunskaar S, Arnold EP, Burgio K, Diokno AC, Herzog AR, Mallett VT (2000) Epidemiology and natural history of urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 11(5):301–319CrossRef Hunskaar S, Arnold EP, Burgio K, Diokno AC, Herzog AR, Mallett VT (2000) Epidemiology and natural history of urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 11(5):301–319CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Dietz HP, Nazemian K, Shek KL, Martin A (2013) Can urodynamic stress incontinence be diagnosed by ultrasound? Int Urogynecol J 24(8):1399–1403CrossRefPubMed Dietz HP, Nazemian K, Shek KL, Martin A (2013) Can urodynamic stress incontinence be diagnosed by ultrasound? Int Urogynecol J 24(8):1399–1403CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Pirpiris A, Shek KL, Dietz HP (2010) Urethral mobility and urinary incontinence. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 36(4):507–511CrossRefPubMed Pirpiris A, Shek KL, Dietz HP (2010) Urethral mobility and urinary incontinence. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 36(4):507–511CrossRefPubMed
5.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hall AF, Theofrastous JP, Cundiff GW, Harris RL, Hamilton LF, Swift SE, Bump RC (1996) Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the proposed International Continence Society, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, and American Urogynecologic Society pelvic organ prolapse classification system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175(6):1467–1470CrossRefPubMed Hall AF, Theofrastous JP, Cundiff GW, Harris RL, Hamilton LF, Swift SE, Bump RC (1996) Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the proposed International Continence Society, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, and American Urogynecologic Society pelvic organ prolapse classification system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175(6):1467–1470CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Schafer W, Abrams P, Liao L, Mattiasson A, Pesce F, Spangberg A, Sterling AM, Zinner NR, van Kerrebroeck P (2002) Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies. Neurourol Urodyn 21(3):261–274CrossRefPubMed Schafer W, Abrams P, Liao L, Mattiasson A, Pesce F, Spangberg A, Sterling AM, Zinner NR, van Kerrebroeck P (2002) Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies. Neurourol Urodyn 21(3):261–274CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Dietz HP (2004) Ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor. I. Two-dimensional aspects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 23(1):80–92CrossRefPubMed Dietz HP (2004) Ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor. I. Two-dimensional aspects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 23(1):80–92CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Oerno AK, Dietz HP (2007) Levator co-activation is a significant confounder of pelvic organ descent on Valsalva maneuver. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30(3):346–350CrossRef Oerno AK, Dietz HP (2007) Levator co-activation is a significant confounder of pelvic organ descent on Valsalva maneuver. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30(3):346–350CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Orejuela FJ, Shek KL, Dietz HP (2012) The time factor in the assessment of prolapse and levator ballooning. Int Urogynecol J 23(2):175–178CrossRefPubMed Orejuela FJ, Shek KL, Dietz HP (2012) The time factor in the assessment of prolapse and levator ballooning. Int Urogynecol J 23(2):175–178CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Tan L, Shek KL, Guzman Rojas RA, Dietz HP (2015) The repeatability of sonographic measures of functional pelvic floor anatomy. Int Urogynecol J 6(11):1667–1672CrossRef Tan L, Shek KL, Guzman Rojas RA, Dietz HP (2015) The repeatability of sonographic measures of functional pelvic floor anatomy. Int Urogynecol J 6(11):1667–1672CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Shek KL, Dietz HP (2008) The urethral motion profile: a novel method to evaluate urethral support and mobility. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 48(3):337–342CrossRefPubMed Shek KL, Dietz HP (2008) The urethral motion profile: a novel method to evaluate urethral support and mobility. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 48(3):337–342CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Dietz HP, Hoyte LPJ, Steensma AB (2008) Atlas of pelvic floor ultrasound. Springer, LondonCrossRef Dietz HP, Hoyte LPJ, Steensma AB (2008) Atlas of pelvic floor ultrasound. Springer, LondonCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Dietz HP, Lekskulchai O (2007) Ultrasound assessment of prolapse: the relationship between prolapse severity and symptoms. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 29:688–691CrossRefPubMed Dietz HP, Lekskulchai O (2007) Ultrasound assessment of prolapse: the relationship between prolapse severity and symptoms. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 29:688–691CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang X, Shek KL, Dietz HP (2015) How large does a rectocele have to be to cause symptoms? A 3D/4D ultrasound study. Int Urogynecol J 26(9):1355–1359 Zhang X, Shek KL, Dietz HP (2015) How large does a rectocele have to be to cause symptoms? A 3D/4D ultrasound study. Int Urogynecol J 26(9):1355–1359
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Dietz HP, Eldridge A, Grace M, Clarke B (2004) Pelvic organ descent in young nulligravid women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191(1):95–99CrossRefPubMed Dietz HP, Eldridge A, Grace M, Clarke B (2004) Pelvic organ descent in young nulligravid women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191(1):95–99CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Reed H, Freeman RM, Waterfield A, Adekanmi O (2003) Prevalence of bladder neck mobility in asymptomatic non-pregnant nulliparous volunteers. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 111(2):172–175CrossRef Reed H, Freeman RM, Waterfield A, Adekanmi O (2003) Prevalence of bladder neck mobility in asymptomatic non-pregnant nulliparous volunteers. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 111(2):172–175CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Mulder F, Shek K, Dietz H (2012) The pressure factor in the assessment of pelvic organ mobility. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 52:282–285CrossRefPubMed Mulder F, Shek K, Dietz H (2012) The pressure factor in the assessment of pelvic organ mobility. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 52:282–285CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Peschers UM, Fanger G, Schaer GN, Vodusek DB, DeLancey JO, Schuessler B (2001) Bladder neck mobility in continent nulliparous women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 108(3):320–324 Peschers UM, Fanger G, Schaer GN, Vodusek DB, DeLancey JO, Schuessler B (2001) Bladder neck mobility in continent nulliparous women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 108(3):320–324
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Dietz HP, Clarke B (2001) The urethral pressure profile and ultrasound imaging of the lower urinary tract. Int Urogynecol J 12(1):38–41CrossRef Dietz HP, Clarke B (2001) The urethral pressure profile and ultrasound imaging of the lower urinary tract. Int Urogynecol J 12(1):38–41CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Dietz HP, Clarke B, Herbison P (2002) Bladder neck mobility and urethral closure pressure as predictors of genuine stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 13(5):289–293CrossRef Dietz HP, Clarke B, Herbison P (2002) Bladder neck mobility and urethral closure pressure as predictors of genuine stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 13(5):289–293CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
What is normal bladder neck anatomy?
verfasst von
Cristina Naranjo-Ortiz
Ka Lai Shek
Andrew James Martin
Hans Peter Dietz
Publikationsdatum
23.12.2015
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 6/2016
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2916-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2016

International Urogynecology Journal 6/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Urogynecology digest

Urogynecology digest

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.