Skip to main content
main-content

01.12.2017 | Letter | Ausgabe 1/2017 Open Access

Critical Care 1/2017

What is the risk of acquiring bacteria from prior intensive care unit bed occupants?

Zeitschrift:
Critical Care > Ausgabe 1/2017
Autoren:
Vincenzo Russotto, Andrea Cortegiani, Santi Maurizio Raineri, Pasquale Iozzo, Cesare Gregoretti, Antonino Giarratano
Wichtige Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.​1186/​s13054-017-1652-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Abbreviations
CI
Confidence interval
HAI
Hospital-acquired infections
ICU
Intensive care unit
MDR
Multidrug resistant
OR
Odds ratio
Contamination of inanimate surfaces and equipment may play a role in cross-transmission of bacteria in the intensive care unit (ICU), despite current standards of terminal cleaning [13]. This is particularly relevant due to the high prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) colonization of critically ill patients and the virulence and invasiveness of bacteria, which frequently present multidrug resistance to antimicrobials (e.g. Staphylococcus aureus, Acinetobacter baumanii, Klebsiella pneumoniae). Moreover, colonization has been identified as a risk factor for subsequent infections in critically ill patients [4, 5].
We searched Medline, Scopus, and CINHAL databases for either prospective or retrospective studies reporting data on ICU-acquired bacterial species and carriage status of the same species by the prior bed occupant. An exclusion criterion was the non-ICU setting due to differences in terminal cleaning procedures and the hospital environment of the patients. We applied no language restrictions and did not consider gray literature. We performed a random-effect meta-analysis (Mantel-Haenszel method) of included studies and calculated the odds ratio (OR) for acquiring specific microorganisms as well as from the pooled data (Fig. 1). We assessed the heterogeneity among studies by the I 2 statistic.
The full search strategy can be found as Additional file 1. Our search strategy found a total of 2264 articles from inception to 1 January 2017 (1247 Medline, 654 Scopus, 363 CINHAL). Two authors (VR and AC) independently performed the search and extracted the data. In case of disagreement, it was solved by consensus with another author (SMR). We used Review Manager 5.3.
We selected six studies for inclusion (two prospective cohort study, one post-hoc analysis of a prospective interventional cross-over study, and three retrospective studies) for a total of 33,494 patients. The list of included studies and references is available as Additional file 2. Among 3838 patients admitted to ICU beds with prior infected/colonized occupants, 230 acquired bacteria compared to 954 among 29,656 in the control group. The overall pooled OR of acquiring a bacterial pathogen from prior ICU bed occupants was 2.13 (95% confidence interval 1.62–2.81). We observed a substantial heterogeneity among included studies (I 2 = 61%, P = 0.01). Figure 1 shows the forest plot of meta-analysis of studies with subgroup analyses according to microorganisms and pooled data.
Patients admitted to ICU beds of prior occupants who were carrying bacterial pathogens should be considered at increased risk of ICU-acquisition compared to other ICU patients. It should be highlighted that these results refer to acquisition of bacteria and not to infection. However, it may be argued that acquiring bacteria may lead to colonization and nosocomial infections during the ICU stay due to disruption of natural barriers for invasive procedures (e.g., insertion of central venous catheters, arterial lines), use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, and impaired immunological function. A possible explanation for these results is that bacteria frequently encountered in the ICU, especially MDR, may have the ability to survive standard terminal cleaning procedures in the environment close to the patients after discharge. Further research should evaluate the role of bacteria acquisition from prior ICU bed occupants in terms of patient-related outcomes and the impact of new strategies for terminal cleaning to reduce hospital-acquired infection.

Acknowledgement

None

Funding

The authors did not receive any funding for this article.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

VR, AC, PI, SMR, CG, and AG conceived the content of the letter. AC, VR, PI, and SMR performed the systematic review and meta-analysis. VR and AC wrote the text. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Zusatzmaterial
Additional file 1: Search strategy. Search strategy adopted for the systematic review. (PDF 34 kb)
13054_2017_1652_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Additional file 2: List of included studies. Table reporting the studies included in the meta-analysis. (PDF 62 kb)
13054_2017_1652_MOESM2_ESM.pdf
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

Critical Care 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe


 

Neu im Fachgebiet AINS

Meistgelesene Bücher aus dem Fachgebiet AINS

  • 2014 | Buch

    Komplikationen in der Anästhesie

    Fallbeispiele Analyse Prävention

    Aus Fehlern lernen und dadurch Zwischenfälle vermeiden! Komplikationen oder Zwischenfälle in der Anästhesie können für Patienten schwerwiegende Folgen haben. Häufig sind sie eine Kombination menschlicher, organisatorischer und technischer Fehler.

    Herausgeber:
    Matthias Hübler, Thea Koch
  • 2013 | Buch

    Anästhesie Fragen und Antworten

    1655 Fakten für die Facharztprüfung und das Europäische Diplom für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin (DESA)

    Mit Sicherheit erfolgreich in Prüfung und Praxis! Effektiv wiederholen und im entscheidenden Moment die richtigen Antworten parat haben - dafür ist dieses beliebte Prüfungsbuch garantiert hilfreich. Anhand der Multiple-Choice-Fragen ist die optimale Vorbereitung auf das Prüfungsprinzip der D.E.A.A. gewährleistet.

    Autoren:
    Prof. Dr. Franz Kehl, Dr. Hans-Joachim Wilke
  • 2011 | Buch

    Pharmakotherapie in der Anästhesie und Intensivmedizin

    Wie und wieso wirken vasoaktive Substanzen und wie werden sie wirksam eingesetzt Welche Substanzen eignen sich zur perioperativen Myokardprojektion? 
    Kenntnisse zur Pharmakologie und deren Anwendung sind das notwendige Rüstzeug für den Anästhesisten und Intensivmediziner. Lernen Sie von erfahrenen Anästhesisten und Pharmakologen.

    Herausgeber:
    Prof. Dr. Peter H. Tonner, Prof. Dr. Lutz Hein
  • 2013 | Buch

    Anästhesie und Intensivmedizin – Prüfungswissen

    für die Fachpflege

    Fit in Theorie, Praxis und Prüfung! In diesem Arbeitsbuch werden alle Fakten der Fachweiterbildung abgebildet. So können Fachweiterbildungsteilnehmer wie auch langjährige Mitarbeiter in der Anästhesie und Intensivmedizin ihr Wissen gezielt überprüfen, vertiefen und festigen.

    Autor:
    Prof. Dr. Reinhard Larsen

Mail Icon II Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update AINS und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Bildnachweise