Skip to main content
main-content

30.04.2018 | Original Article | Ausgabe 3/2018 Open Access

Perspectives on Medical Education 3/2018

When to trust our learners? Clinical teachers’ perceptions of decision variables in the entrustment process

Zeitschrift:
Perspectives on Medical Education > Ausgabe 3/2018
Autoren:
Chantal C. M. A. Duijn, Lisanne S. Welink, Harold G. J. Bok, Olle T. J. ten Cate

Abstract

Introduction

Clinical training programs increasingly use entrustable professional activities (EPAs) as focus of assessment. However, questions remain about which information should ground decisions to trust learners. This qualitative study aimed to identify decision variables in the workplace that clinical teachers find relevant in the elaboration of the entrustment decision processes. The findings can substantiate entrustment decision-making in the clinical workplace.

Methods

Focus groups were conducted with medical and veterinary clinical teachers, using the structured consensus method of the Nominal Group Technique to generate decision variables. A ranking was made based on a relevance score assigned by the clinical teachers to the different decision variables. Field notes, audio recordings and flip chart lists were analyzed and subsequently translated and, as a form of axial coding, merged into one list, combining the decision variables that were similar in their meaning.

Results

A list of 11 and 17 decision variables were acknowledged as relevant by the medical and veterinary teacher groups, respectively. The focus groups yielded 21 unique decision variables that were considered relevant to inform readiness to perform a clinical task on a designated level of supervision. The decision variables consisted of skills, generic qualities, characteristics, previous performance or other information. We were able to group the decision variables into five categories: ability, humility, integrity, reliability and adequate exposure.

Discussion

To entrust a learner to perform a task at a specific level of supervision, a supervisor needs information to support such a judgement. This trust cannot be credited on a single case at a single moment of assessment, but requires different variables and multiple sources of information. This study provides an overview of decision variables giving evidence to justify the multifactorial process of making an entrustment decision.
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2018

Perspectives on Medical Education 3/2018 Zur Ausgabe