Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Spine Journal 9/2017

27.07.2017 | Original Article

Which salvage fixation technique is best for the failed initial screw fixation at the cervicothoracic junction? A biomechanical comparison study

verfasst von: Jae Taek Hong, Takigawa Tomoyuki, Ashish Jain, Alejandro A. Espinoza Orías, Nozomu Inoue, Howard S. An

Erschienen in: European Spine Journal | Ausgabe 9/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The pedicle screw construct is the most widely used technique for instrumentation at cervicothoracic junction (CTJ) because of its high biomechanical stability. However, we may need salvage fixation options for it as there might be a situation when pedicle screw is not available or it initially fails in order to obviate the need to instrument an additional motion segment. We aimed to evaluate the ability of using salvage screw fixations at CTJ (C7, T1, T2), when the initial fixation method fails.

Methods

Fifteen fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens (C7–T2) were tested for pull-out strength (POS, N) and insertion torque (IT, Nm) of three C7 fixation techniques (lateral mass, pedicle and laminar screw) and three upper thoracic spine instrumentation (pedicle screws with straight trajectory, anatomical trajectory pedicle screws and laminar screw). Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation (SD).

Results

C7 pedicle screws generated statistically greater IT and POS than other C7 fixation techniques (P < 0.05). Similar trends were observed with pedicle fixation as a salvage procedure (P < 0.05). Laminar screws yielded significantly higher POS values than lateral mass fixation when applied as a salvage C7 fixation (mean POS: lateral mass screw—299.4 ± 173.8 N, laminar screw—629.3 ± 216.1, P = 0.013). Significant relationship was established between IT and POS for all screws using Pearson correlation coefficient analysis (r = 0.624, P < 0.01). Pedicle screw with different trajectory (anatomical vs straightforward) did not show any significant difference in terms of POS as the initial and salvage fixation of upper thoracic spine. As a salvage fixation technique, there was no significant difference between laminar screw and a pedicle screw with different trajectory (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Laminar screws appear to provide stronger and more reproducible salvage fixation than lateral mass screws for C7 fixation, if pedicle screw should fail. If failure of initial pedicle screw is verified at the upper thoracic spine, both laminar screw and pedicle screw with different trajectory could be an option of salvage fixation. Our results suggest that pedicle screws and laminar screw similarly provide a strong fixation for salvage applications in the cervicothoracic junction.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Mazel C, Hoffmann E, Antonietti P, Grunenwald D, Henry M, Williams J (2004) Posterior cervicothoracic instrumentation in spine tumors. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:1246–1253CrossRef Mazel C, Hoffmann E, Antonietti P, Grunenwald D, Henry M, Williams J (2004) Posterior cervicothoracic instrumentation in spine tumors. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:1246–1253CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat An HS, Vaccaro A, Cotler JM, Lin S (1994) Spinal disorders at the cervicothoracic junction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19:2557–2564CrossRef An HS, Vaccaro A, Cotler JM, Lin S (1994) Spinal disorders at the cervicothoracic junction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19:2557–2564CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Bozkus H, Ames CP, Chamberlain RH, Nottmeier EW, Sonntag VK, Papadopoulos SM, Crawford NR (2005) Biomechanical analysis of rigid stabilization techniques for three-column injury in the lower cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:915–922CrossRef Bozkus H, Ames CP, Chamberlain RH, Nottmeier EW, Sonntag VK, Papadopoulos SM, Crawford NR (2005) Biomechanical analysis of rigid stabilization techniques for three-column injury in the lower cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:915–922CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hong JT, Yi JS, Kim JT, Ji C, Ryu KS, Park CK (2010) Clinical and radiologic outcome of laminar screw at C2 and C7 for posterior instrumentation–review of 25 cases and comparison of C2 and C7 intralaminar screw fixation. World Neurosurg 73:112–118. doi:10.1016/j.surneu.2009.06.010 (discussion e115) CrossRefPubMed Hong JT, Yi JS, Kim JT, Ji C, Ryu KS, Park CK (2010) Clinical and radiologic outcome of laminar screw at C2 and C7 for posterior instrumentation–review of 25 cases and comparison of C2 and C7 intralaminar screw fixation. World Neurosurg 73:112–118. doi:10.​1016/​j.​surneu.​2009.​06.​010 (discussion e115) CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kretzer RM, Hu N, Umekoji H, Sciubba DM, Jallo GI, McAfee PC, Tortolani PJ, Cunningham BW (2010) The effect of spinal instrumentation on kinematics at the cervicothoracic junction: emphasis on soft-tissue response in an in vitro human cadaveric model. J Neurosurg Spine 13:435–442. doi:10.3171/2010.4.spine09995 CrossRefPubMed Kretzer RM, Hu N, Umekoji H, Sciubba DM, Jallo GI, McAfee PC, Tortolani PJ, Cunningham BW (2010) The effect of spinal instrumentation on kinematics at the cervicothoracic junction: emphasis on soft-tissue response in an in vitro human cadaveric model. J Neurosurg Spine 13:435–442. doi:10.​3171/​2010.​4.​spine09995 CrossRefPubMed
11.
13.
14.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Cardoso MJ, Dmitriev AE, Lehman RA, Helgeson M, Cooper P, Rosner MK (2008) Computed tomography and biomechanical evaluation of screw fixation options at the cervicothoracic junction: intralaminar versus intrapedicular techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:2612–2617. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818ce3ac CrossRef Cardoso MJ, Dmitriev AE, Lehman RA, Helgeson M, Cooper P, Rosner MK (2008) Computed tomography and biomechanical evaluation of screw fixation options at the cervicothoracic junction: intralaminar versus intrapedicular techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:2612–2617. doi:10.​1097/​BRS.​0b013e31818ce3ac​ CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Heller JG, Shuster JK, Hutton WC (1999) Pedicle and transverse process screws of the upper thoracic spine. Biomechanical comparison of loads to failure. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:654–658CrossRef Heller JG, Shuster JK, Hutton WC (1999) Pedicle and transverse process screws of the upper thoracic spine. Biomechanical comparison of loads to failure. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:654–658CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Lehman RA Jr, Dmitriev AE, Helgeson MD, Sasso RC, Kuklo TR, Riew KD (2008) Salvage of C2 pedicle and pars screws using the intralaminar technique: a biomechanical analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:960–965. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816c915b CrossRef Lehman RA Jr, Dmitriev AE, Helgeson MD, Sasso RC, Kuklo TR, Riew KD (2008) Salvage of C2 pedicle and pars screws using the intralaminar technique: a biomechanical analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:960–965. doi:10.​1097/​BRS.​0b013e31816c915b​ CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Cardoso MJ, Dmitriev AE, Helgeson MD, Stephens F, Campbell V, Lehman RA, Cooper P, Rosner MK (2009) Using lamina screws as a salvage technique at C-7: computed tomography and biomechanical analysis using cadaveric vertebrae. Laboratory investigation. J Neurosurg Spine 11:28–33. doi:10.3171/2009.3.spine08648 CrossRefPubMed Cardoso MJ, Dmitriev AE, Helgeson MD, Stephens F, Campbell V, Lehman RA, Cooper P, Rosner MK (2009) Using lamina screws as a salvage technique at C-7: computed tomography and biomechanical analysis using cadaveric vertebrae. Laboratory investigation. J Neurosurg Spine 11:28–33. doi:10.​3171/​2009.​3.​spine08648 CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Panjabi MM, Brand RA Jr, White AA 3rd (1976) Three-dimensional flexibility and stiffness properties of the human thoracic spine. J Biomech 9:185–192CrossRefPubMed Panjabi MM, Brand RA Jr, White AA 3rd (1976) Three-dimensional flexibility and stiffness properties of the human thoracic spine. J Biomech 9:185–192CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Wittenberg RH, Lee KS, Shea M, White AA 3rd, Hayes WC (1993) Effect of screw diameter, insertion technique, and bone cement augmentation of pedicular screw fixation strength. Clin Orthop Relat Res 296:278–287 Wittenberg RH, Lee KS, Shea M, White AA 3rd, Hayes WC (1993) Effect of screw diameter, insertion technique, and bone cement augmentation of pedicular screw fixation strength. Clin Orthop Relat Res 296:278–287
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Zindrick MR, Wiltse LL, Widell EH, Thomas JC, Holland WR, Field BT, Spencer CW (1986) A biomechanical study of intrapeduncular screw fixation in the lumbosacral spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 203:99–112 Zindrick MR, Wiltse LL, Widell EH, Thomas JC, Holland WR, Field BT, Spencer CW (1986) A biomechanical study of intrapeduncular screw fixation in the lumbosacral spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 203:99–112
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Berlemann U, Cripton PA, Rincon L, Nolte LP, Schlapfer F (1996) Pull-out strength of pedicle hooks with fixation screws: influence of screw length and angulation. Eur Spine J 5:71–73CrossRefPubMed Berlemann U, Cripton PA, Rincon L, Nolte LP, Schlapfer F (1996) Pull-out strength of pedicle hooks with fixation screws: influence of screw length and angulation. Eur Spine J 5:71–73CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Vaccaro AR, Rizzolo SJ, Allardyce TJ, Ramsey M, Salvo J, Balderston RA, Cotler JM (1995) Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. Part I: morphometric analysis of the thoracic vertebrae. J Bone Jt Surg Am 77:1193–1199CrossRef Vaccaro AR, Rizzolo SJ, Allardyce TJ, Ramsey M, Salvo J, Balderston RA, Cotler JM (1995) Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. Part I: morphometric analysis of the thoracic vertebrae. J Bone Jt Surg Am 77:1193–1199CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Vaccaro AR, Rizzolo SJ, Balderston RA, Allardyce TJ, Garfin SR, Dolinskas C, An HS (1995) Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. Part II: an anatomical and radiographic assessment. J Bone Jt Surg Am 77:1200–1206CrossRef Vaccaro AR, Rizzolo SJ, Balderston RA, Allardyce TJ, Garfin SR, Dolinskas C, An HS (1995) Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. Part II: an anatomical and radiographic assessment. J Bone Jt Surg Am 77:1200–1206CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Zdeblick TA, Kunz DN, Cooke ME, McCabe R (1993) Pedicle screw pullout strength. Correlation with insertional torque. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18:1673–1676CrossRef Zdeblick TA, Kunz DN, Cooke ME, McCabe R (1993) Pedicle screw pullout strength. Correlation with insertional torque. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18:1673–1676CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Lovick DS, Ryken TC, Traynelis VC, Dexter F (1997) Assessment of primary and salvage lateral mass screw insertion torque in a cadaveric model. J Spinal Disord 10:431–435CrossRefPubMed Lovick DS, Ryken TC, Traynelis VC, Dexter F (1997) Assessment of primary and salvage lateral mass screw insertion torque in a cadaveric model. J Spinal Disord 10:431–435CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Hostin RA, Wu C, Perra JH, Polly DW, Akesen B, Wroblewski JM (2008) A biomechanical evaluation of three revision screw strategies for failed lateral mass fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:2415–2421. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818916e3 CrossRef Hostin RA, Wu C, Perra JH, Polly DW, Akesen B, Wroblewski JM (2008) A biomechanical evaluation of three revision screw strategies for failed lateral mass fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:2415–2421. doi:10.​1097/​BRS.​0b013e31818916e3​ CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Which salvage fixation technique is best for the failed initial screw fixation at the cervicothoracic junction? A biomechanical comparison study
verfasst von
Jae Taek Hong
Takigawa Tomoyuki
Ashish Jain
Alejandro A. Espinoza Orías
Nozomu Inoue
Howard S. An
Publikationsdatum
27.07.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Spine Journal / Ausgabe 9/2017
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5239-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2017

European Spine Journal 9/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.