Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal 8/2012

01.08.2012 | Editorial

While we wait for a new regulatory framework for surgical mesh

verfasst von: Gunnar Lose, Søren Gräs

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 8/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

Gynaecologists have since the 1990s used surgical mesh for transvaginal repair of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) [1]. During the past decade, introduction of new mesh and surgical “kits” (surgical mesh products that includes tools to aid in the delivery and insertion of the mesh) has been endless and ongoing. This situation has three main reasons (1) the current premarket notification program for clearance of surgical mesh, which (2) the mesh manufacturers have used to bring new products on the market without clinical data on efficacy and safety, and (3) the willingness of many gynaecologists to adopt new untried and unproved techniques into clinical practices. …
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat FDA (2011) Urogynecologic Surgical Mesh: Update on the Safety and Effectiveness of Transvaginal Placement for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Center for Devices and Radiological Health FDA (2011) Urogynecologic Surgical Mesh: Update on the Safety and Effectiveness of Transvaginal Placement for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Center for Devices and Radiological Health
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Challoner DR, Vodra WW (2011) Medical devices and health—creating a new regulatory framework for moderate-risk devices. N Engl J Med 365(11):977–979PubMedCrossRef Challoner DR, Vodra WW (2011) Medical devices and health—creating a new regulatory framework for moderate-risk devices. N Engl J Med 365(11):977–979PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Ulmsten U, Henriksson L, Johnson P et al (1996) An ambulatory surgical procedure under local anesthesia for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Int Urogyunecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 7:81–86CrossRef Ulmsten U, Henriksson L, Johnson P et al (1996) An ambulatory surgical procedure under local anesthesia for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Int Urogyunecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 7:81–86CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Maher CM, Feiner B, Baessler K, Glazener CMA (2011) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: the updated summary version Cochrane review. Int Urogynecol J 22:1445–1457PubMedCrossRef Maher CM, Feiner B, Baessler K, Glazener CMA (2011) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: the updated summary version Cochrane review. Int Urogynecol J 22:1445–1457PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Abed H, Rahn DD, Lowenstein L, Balk EM, Clemons JL, Rogers RG (2011) For the systematic review group of the society of gynecologic surgeons. Incidence and management of graft erosion, wound granulation, and dyspareunia following vaginal prolapse repair with graft materials: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J 22:789–798PubMedCrossRef Abed H, Rahn DD, Lowenstein L, Balk EM, Clemons JL, Rogers RG (2011) For the systematic review group of the society of gynecologic surgeons. Incidence and management of graft erosion, wound granulation, and dyspareunia following vaginal prolapse repair with graft materials: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J 22:789–798PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Feiner B, Jelovsek JE, Maher C (2008) Efficacy and safety of transvaginal mesh kits in the treatment of prolapse of the vaginal apex: a systematic review. BJOG 116(1):15–24 Feiner B, Jelovsek JE, Maher C (2008) Efficacy and safety of transvaginal mesh kits in the treatment of prolapse of the vaginal apex: a systematic review. BJOG 116(1):15–24
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Ethics in Obstetrics and Gynecology, second edition. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Women’s Health Care Physicians (2004) Ethics in Obstetrics and Gynecology, second edition. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Women’s Health Care Physicians (2004)
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Mucowski SJ, Jurnalov C, Phelps JY (2010) Use of vaginal mesh in the face of recent FDA warnings and litigation. AJOG 203:103.e1–4CrossRef Mucowski SJ, Jurnalov C, Phelps JY (2010) Use of vaginal mesh in the face of recent FDA warnings and litigation. AJOG 203:103.e1–4CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Innovative Practice: Ethical Guidelines. Committee Opinion, ACOG Committee on Ethics. 2006; 352: 1–7 Innovative Practice: Ethical Guidelines. Committee Opinion, ACOG Committee on Ethics. 2006; 352: 1–7
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Lose G (2007) Urogynaecological research: current and future developments. Int Urogynecol J 18:599–601CrossRef Lose G (2007) Urogynaecological research: current and future developments. Int Urogynecol J 18:599–601CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Lose G, Ostergard DR (1999) Medical technology assessment and surgery for stress incontinence. IUJ 10:351–352 Lose G, Ostergard DR (1999) Medical technology assessment and surgery for stress incontinence. IUJ 10:351–352
Metadaten
Titel
While we wait for a new regulatory framework for surgical mesh
verfasst von
Gunnar Lose
Søren Gräs
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2012
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 8/2012
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1846-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2012

International Urogynecology Journal 8/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.