Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Gut Pathogens 1/2017

Open Access 01.12.2017 | Genome Report

Whole genome sequencing-based detection of antimicrobial resistance and virulence in non-typhoidal Salmonella enterica isolated from wildlife

verfasst von: Milton Thomas, Gavin John Fenske, Linto Antony, Sudeep Ghimire, Ronald Welsh, Akhilesh Ramachandran, Joy Scaria

Erschienen in: Gut Pathogens | Ausgabe 1/2017

Abstract

The aim of this study was to generate a reference set of Salmonella enterica genomes isolated from wildlife from the United States and to determine the antimicrobial resistance and virulence gene profile of the isolates from the genome sequence data. We sequenced the whole genomes of 103 Salmonella isolates sampled between 1988 and 2003 from wildlife and exotic pet cases that were submitted to the Oklahoma Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, Stillwater, Oklahoma. Among 103 isolates, 50.48% were from wild birds, 0.9% was from fish, 24.27% each were from reptiles and mammals. 50.48% isolates showed resistance to at least one antibiotic. Resistance against the aminoglycoside streptomycin was most common while 9 isolates were found to be multi-drug resistant having resistance against more than three antibiotics. Determination of virulence gene profile revealed that the genes belonging to csg operons, the fim genes that encode for type 1 fimbriae and the genes belonging to type III secretion system were predominant among the isolates. The universal presence of fimbrial genes and the genes encoded by pathogenicity islands 1–2 among the isolates we report here indicates that these isolates could potentially cause disease in humans. Therefore, the genomes we report here could be a valuable reference point for future traceback investigations when wildlife is considered to be the potential source of human Salmonellosis.
Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s13099-017-0213-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Abkürzungen
AMR
antimicrobial resistance
NARMS
The National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System
WGS
whole genome sequencing

Background

Salmonella enterica is the leading cause of foodborne illness in the United States accounting for approximately 1.2 million infections, 23,000 hospitalizations and 450 deaths annually. Over the past few decades, Salmonella has acquired new virulence determinants that influence host-tropism which helps these organisms to adapt to a wide range of hosts [1]. Multiple serovars of S. enterica originating from mammalian, reptilian and avian hosts have been reported to cause infections in humans [1]. Wildlife and exotic pets harboring Salmonella are potential sources for human infections [1]. Transmission of Salmonella from wildlife and exotic animals to humans occurs through multiple pathways. Increasing evidence suggests that there could be a bidirectional transmission of Salmonella between domesticated and wild animals. Farm animals acquiring Salmonella from wildlife could increase the risk of human infection. Salmonella infections in humans have also been reported through direct contact with exotic pets and wildlife, especially those in captivity. Consumption of contaminated game bird meat is also a potential source for foodborne salmonellosis. Furthermore, wildlife such as rodents and birds, harboring in the proximity of food production units can act as carriers and contaminate food products leading to indirect infections.
The threat posed by salmonellosis is further compounded by the presence of resistance genes that confer resistance to multiple antimicrobial drugs. According to the National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS) integrated report, 20% of human Salmonella isolates exhibit antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella infections result in increased disease severity and longer hospitalizations in addition to economic losses [2]. Research indicates that Salmonella isolates from various wildlife species also possess AMR determinants and the prevalence rate of AMR genes in these isolates could be as high as 100% [3, 4]. Thus, Salmonella in wildlife poses a significant risk to human health underlining the need for an integrative ‘One Health’ approach for the surveillance of pathogens among humans, domestic animals, and wildlife population.
Whole genome sequencing (WGS) of foodborne pathogens could be adopted as an effective and rapid surveillance tool. Compared to conventional antimicrobial tests, WGS offers a more comprehensive information on the genotypic characteristics of pathogens including identification of AMR and virulence determinants, and serotypes. Recent studies have utilized WGS to reliably predict the antimicrobial characteristics in various pathogens including Salmonella [58]. In this study, WGS was utilized to predict AMR and virulence determinants in Salmonella isolated from exotic pets and wildlife.

Methods

Quality assurance

All strains were identified as Salmonella enterica following the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians certified laboratory. For genome sequencing, each isolate was streaked on Salmonella selective medium and a single colony was picked and used for further steps as outlined below.

Salmonella bacterial isolates

A total of 103 Salmonella isolates were revived from archival cultures obtained from exotic pet or wildlife clinical specimens submitted to the Oklahoma Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, Stillwater, Oklahoma during 1988–2003. The metadata for the samples used in this study is provided in Table 1 and the details of genome sequencing and assembly parameters are given in Additional file 1: Table S1. Isolates were streaked on Luria–Bertani agar slants and were transported to the Animal Disease Research and Diagnostic Laboratory, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota for WGS. Samples were streaked on Luria–Bertani agar plates upon arrival to the laboratory. A single bacterial colony from the agar plate was then inoculated to Luria–Bertani broth and cultured at 37 °C.
Table 1
List of Salmonella enterica strains isolated and sequenced from wild life and the corresponding metadata
Strain ID
Serovar
Year
Animal
NCBI SRA BioSample ID
NCBI SRA ID
ADRDL-001
Poona
1993
Alligator omentum
SAMN06330630
SRR5278825
ADRDL-002
Typhimurium
1993
Auodad feces
SAMN06330629
SRR5278822
ADRDL-003
Gaminara
1994
Ratite intestine
SAMN06330628
SRR5278823
ADRDL-004
Lille
1993
Gamebird embryo
SAMN06330627
SRR5278827
ADRDL-005
Typhimurium
1993
Ratite feces
SAMN06333495
SRR5278819
ADRDL-006
Typhimurium
1993
Ratite feces
SAMN06333494
SRR5278824
ADRDL-007
Thompson
1993
Ratite cecum
SAMN06333493
SRR5278802
ADRDL-008
Livington
1993
Ratite cecum
SAMN06333492
SRR5278806
ADRDL-009
Typhimurium
1993
Ratite feces
SAMN06333491
SRR5278801
ADRDL-010
Montevideo
1993
Ratite feces
SAMN06333489
SRR5278805
ADRDL-011
6,7-nonmotile
1993
Ratite intestine
SAMN06333488
SRR5278804
ADRDL-012
Arechavaleta
1994
Ratite intestine
SAMN06333486
SRR5278803
ADRDL-013
4,5,12:i-monophasic
1994
Ratite liver
SAMN06333485
SRR5380966
ADRDL-014
Berta
1994
Ratite intestine
SAMN06333484
SRR5278808
ADRDL-015
Ituri
1994
Ratite cecum
SAMN06333483
SRR5278773
ADRDL-016
Ituri
1994
Ratite intestine
SAMN06333482
SRR5278772
ADRDL-017
Heidelberg
1993
Wild turkey liver
SAMN06333481
SRR5278779
ADRDL-018
Heidelberg
1993
Wild turkey liver
SAMN06333480
SRR5278777
ADRDL-019
Godesberg
1993
Wild turkey cecum
SAMN06333479
SRR5278778
ADRDL-020
4,5,12:i-monophasic
1993
Eclectus colon
SAMN06333477
SRR5278771
ADRDL-021
Anatum
1993
Giraffe feces
SAMN06333476
SRR5278774
ADRDL-022
Anatum
1993
Giraffe feces
SAMN06333475
SRR5278780
ADRDL-023
Pomona
1993
Python abdominal swab
SAMN06333473
SRR5278767
ADRDL-024
Muenchen
1993
Ratite intestine
SAMN06333472
SRR5278776
ADRDL-025
Typhimurium
1994
Rodent intestine
SAMN06333471
SRR5278770
ADRDL-026
Hadar
1995
Wild chicken intestine
SAMN06333470
SRR5278768
ADRDL-027
Hadar
1994
Ratite intestine
SAMN06333469
SRR5278769
ADRDL-028
Typhimurium
1988
Primate intestine
SAMN06333465
SRR5278873
ADRDL-029
Albany
1988
Saiga intestine
SAMN06333464
SRR5278882
ADRDL-030
Arizona
1988
Snake
SAMN06333462
SRR5330438
ADRDL-031
Arizona
1989
Boa intestinal swab
SAMN06333460
SRR5330446
ADRDL-032
16:z10-e,n,xz15
1989
Cervine feces
SAMN06333459
SRR5330441
ADRDL-033
Enteritidis
1989
Hedgehog spleen
SAMN06333458
SRR5330440
ADRDL-034
Typhimurium(O5−)*
1992
Pigeon airsac swab
SAMN06333457
SRR5330448
ADRDL-035
Typhimurium
1989
Screech owl liver
SAMN06333455
SRR5330445
ADRDL-036
Braenderup
1989
Snow leopard intestine
SAMN06333454
SRR5330444
ADRDL-037
Saintpaul
1989
Snow leopard lung
SAMN06333453
SRR5330406
ADRDL-038
Montevideo
1992
Cervid intestine
SAMN06333451
SRR5329403
ADRDL-039
Enteriditis
1993
Emu feces
SAMN06333450
SRR5329404
ADRDL-040
Enteriditis
1993
Emu feces
SAMN06333449
SRR5380965
ADRDL-041
Worthington
1992
Quail intestine
SAMN06333448
SRR5380958
ADRDL-042
 II 43:z4,z23:- or IIIa 43:z4,z23:- or Farmingdale or IV 43:z4,z23:-*
1992
Reptile eggsac
SAMN06333447
SRR5329405
ADRDL-043
Panama
1992
Rhea intestine
SAMN06333694
SRR5409894
ADRDL-044
Ituri
1994
Ratite cecum
SAMN06333692
SRR5409893
ADRDL-045
Newport
1995
Ratite feces
SAMN06333691
SRR5409493
ADRDL-046
Newport
1995
Dolphin lung
SAMN06333689
SRR5409890
ADRDL-047
Typhimurium
1997
Psittacine lung
SAMN06333684
SRR5409485
ADRDL-048
Typhimurium
1997
Psittacine intestine
SAMN06333683
SRR5409315
ADRDL-049
Muenchen
1996
Ratite intestine
SAMN06333682
SRR5409313
ADRDL-050
Schwazengrund
1997
Ratite intestine
SAMN06333681
SRR5409312
ADRDL-051
Archavaleta
1997
Antelope intestine
 SAMN06333692
 SRR5409893
ADRDL-052
Infantis
1997
Fish water
 SAMN06645614
 SRR5398012
ADRDL-053
Bredeney
1998
Llama intestine
 SAMN06333861
 SRR5409360
ADRDL-054
Plymouth
1997
Reptile liver
 SAMN06330627
 SRR5278827
ADRDL-055
Montevideo
1997
Reptile intestine
 SAMN06645663
 SRR5398013
ADRDL-056
Branderup
1995
Wild chicken intestine
 SAMN06645590
 SRR5387496
ADRDL-057
Enteriditis
1996
Wild chicken intestine
SAMN06645569
SRR5387492
ADRDL-058
Typhimurium
1996
Wild chicken feces
SAMN06645567
SRR5387491
ADRDL-059
Bredeney
1995
Gamebird intestine
SAMN06645592
SRR5387497
ADRDL-060
Livingston
1996
Gamebird intestine
SAMN06645590
SRR5387496
ADRDL-061
Enteriditis
1995
Psittacine intestine
SAMN06645588
SRR5387490
ADRDL-062
Montevideo
1996
Psittacine liver
SAMN06645587
SRR5387493
ADRDL-063
7,14:K-monophasic
1995
Ratite intestine
SAMN06645585
SRR5387523
ADRDL-064
Anatum
1995
Ratite feces
SAMN06645654
SRR5387521
ADRDL-065
Enteriditis
1995
Ratite
SAMN06645582
SRR5387527
ADRDL-066
Thompson
1995
Ratite cloacal swab
SAMN06645594
SRR5387519
ADRDL-067
Thompson
1995
Ratite cloacal swab
SAMN06645593
SRR5387517
ADRDL-068
4,5,12: i
1995
Ratite pericardial fluid
SAMN06645652
SRR5387518
ADRDL-069
Livingston
1996
Llama intestine
SAMN06645650
SRR5387514
ADRDL-070
Uganda
1999
Cervine intestine
SAMN06645664
SRR5398014
ADRDL-071
Lille
2000
Cervine intestine
SAMN06645663
SRR5398013
ADRDL-072
Parera
1998
Iguana cloacal swab
SAMN06645662
SRR5398016
ADRDL-073
Anatum
1998
Ratite feces
SAMN06645661
SRR5398025
ADRDL-074
Anatum
1998
Ratite feces
SAMN06645615
SRR5398018
ADRDL-075
Kiambu
1998
Ratite cloacal swab
SAMN06645614
SRR5398012
ADRDL-076
Marina
2000
Reptile feces
SAMN06645660
SRR5398017
ADRDL-077
Bredeney
2003
Alpaca liver
SAMN06645613
SRR5398015
ADRDL-078
Sandiego
2003
Alpaca feces
SAMN06645612
SRR5398009
ADRDL-079
Sandiego
2003
Alpaca feces
SAMN06645611
SRR5398010
ADRDL-080
Bredeney
2003
Antelope feces
SAMN06645610
SRR5398011
ADRDL-081
Virginia or Muenchen*
2002
Ratite
SAMN06645609
SRR5398008
ADRDL-082
Newport*
2002
Ratite
SAMN06645659
SRR5398007
ADRDL-083
Enteritidis*
2002
Ratite
SAMN06645658
SRR5398001
ADRDL-084
Oranienburg
2003
Iguana cloacal swab
SAMN06645657
SRR5398006
ADRDL-085
Give
2003
Iguana cloacal swab
SAMN06658957
SRR5409330
ADRDL-086
Chameleon
2003
Iguana cloacal swab
SAMN06333875
SRR5387539
ADRDL-087
Typhimurium
2002
Llama feces
SAMN06333874
SRR5387538
ADRDL-088
Anatum
2003
Llama feces
SAMN06333873
SRR5387533
ADRDL-089
Typhimurium
2003
Llama feces
SAMN06333872
SRR5387534
ADRDL-090
Agona
2003
Marsupial intestine
SAMN06333871
SRR5387532
ADRDL-091
Miami
2001
Reptile fecal swab
SAMN06658960
SRR5409328
ADRDL-092
Arizona
2001
Reptile liver
SAMN06658959
SRR5409327
ADRDL-093
 
2001
Reptile cloacal swab
SAMN06658958
SRR5409325
ADRDL-094
Marina
2002
Reptile cloacal swab
SAMN06658962
SRR5409322
ADRDL-095
Marina
2002
Reptile abscess swab
SAMN06658961
SRR5409324
ADRDL-096
Arizona
2002
Reptile lung
SAMN06333869
SRR5387526
ADRDL-097
Parera
2002
Reptile cloacal swab
SAMN06333866
SRR5397979
ADRDL-098
Chameleon
2002
Reptile cloacal swab
SAMN06333865
SRR5397978
ADRDL-099
Senftenberg
2002
Reptile cloacal swab
SAMN06333864
SRR5397977
ADRDL-100
Arizona
2002
Reptile cloacal swab
SAMN06333863
SRR5409363
ADRDL-101
Arizona
2002
Reptile cloacal swab
SAMN06333862
SRR5409361
ADRDL-102
Kisarwe
2003
Reptile cloacal swab
SAMN06333861
SRR5409360
ADRDL-103
Newport
2003
Turtle intestine
SAMN06333859
SRR5409359
* Predicted serovar using Seqsero

Genomic DNA isolation and WGS

Genomic DNA was isolated from 1.0 mL overnight cultures using the Qiagen DNeasy kits (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) according to manufacturer’s protocol. The quality of isolated DNA was analyzed using NanoDrop™ One (Thermo Scientific™, DE) and was quantified using Qubit® 3.0 (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., MA) fluorometer and stored at − 20 °C until use. Whole-genome sequencing was performed on Illumina Miseq platform using V2 chemistry with 2 × 250 paired-end chemistry Briefly, the concentrations of genomic DNA samples were adjusted to 0.3 ng/µL concentration and were processed using Nextera XT DNA Sample Prep Kit (Illumina Inc. San Diego, CA). The libraries were normalized using bead-based procedure and pooled together at equal volume. The pooled library was denatured and sequenced using Miseq reagent version 2 (Illumina, Inc., CA).

Genome assembly and identification of resistance and virulence genes

The raw data files were de-multiplexed and converted to FASTQ files using Casava v.1.8.2. (Illumina, Inc, San Diego, CA). The FASTQ files were trimmed and assembled de novo using CLC Genomics workbench 9.4 (Qiagen Bioinformatics, CA). The antibiotic resistance genes in the assembled Salmonella genomes were identified by BLAST search against a local copy of the antibiotic resistance gene sequence data from ResFinder [9] and CARD [10]. The parameters used for BLAST search were ≥ 95% gene identity and 50% sequence length of the resistance gene. The virulence genes in the genomes were predicted using a similar approach. Salmonella virulence gene sequences were extracted from Virulence Factor Database [11] and Salmonella genome assemblies were searched against these sequences using BLAST with ≥ 90% gene identity and 50% sequence length cut off.

Serotyping and antimicrobial susceptibility test

Serotypes of the strains were determined at the National Veterinary Service Laboratory, Ames, IA. Antimicrobial susceptibility of all Salmonella isolates was determined using the Sensititre NARMS Gram Negative Plate (CMV3AGNF, Thermofisher). The antibiotics used were gentamicin, streptomycin, amoxicillin–clavulanic acid, ampicillin, cefoxitin, ceftiofur, ceftriaxone, azithromycin, chloramphenicol, nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin, sulfisoxazole, trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole, and tetracycline. The AMR was determined according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines except for azithromycin and sulfisoxazole where the data obtained was indeterminate and were not included in further analysis.

Results and discussion

Distribution of Salmonella isolates among wildlife and exotic pets

A total of 103 Salmonella isolates sampled between 1988 and 2003 from wildlife and exotic pets were included in the present study for determining the antimicrobial susceptibility using whole genome sequencing. Among 103 isolates, 52 isolates (50.48%) were from wild birds, 1 isolate (0.9%) was from fish, 25 isolates each (24.27%) were from reptiles and mammals (Table 1). The serovars of 96 isolates in this study were determined at the National Veterinary Service Laboratory, Ames, IA, and the remaining 6 serovars were predicted using Seqsero [12]. The serovar of one isolate (ADRDL-093) was not identified under Kauffmann-White classification. A total of 45 serovars were identified among the 103 isolates, of which Typhimurium (12.62%) was the most frequent serovar. Other serovars that had higher prevalence were Enteritidis (6.8%), Anatum (5.8%), Arizona (5.8%), Bredeney (3.9%) and Montevideo (3.9%). The presence of multiple serotypes in wildlife has also been reported from previous epidemiological studies. Nine Salmonella samples isolated from marine mammals and birds in California yielded 7 serovars [4]. Similar to our findings, Salmonella Typhimurium was reportedly the predominant serovar present in wildlife [1315] in various parts of the world.

Phenotypic resistance to antimicrobials

Antimicrobial susceptibility test of 103 Salmonella bacterial isolates was performed using Sensititre NARMS gram-negative plate. The results were classified into 3 categories: resistant, intermediate, or susceptible. Fifty-two out of the 103 isolates (50.48%) showed resistance to at least one antibiotic (Fig. 1a). Resistance against the aminoglycoside streptomycin was most commonly observed. Forty-eight of the 103 isolates (46.6%) exhibited this phenotype. However, only three isolates (2.9%) showed resistance to gentamicin which also belonged to the aminoglycoside class of antibiotics. The isolates with resistance against gentamicin were also resistant to streptomycin. In the beta-lactam group, ampicillin resistance was the most common phenotype and was seen in 11 of the isolates (10.67%). Among these 11 isolates, few also shared resistance against other beta-lactams such as amoxicillin–clavulanic acid (4), cefoxitin (3), and ceftiofur (3). All the isolates were susceptible to ceftriaxone except one with intermediate resistance. The isolates that were susceptible to ampicillin were also susceptible to all other beta-lactams. Chloramphenicol resistance was observed for seven isolates (6.7%), trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole resistance in 4 (3.88%) and tetracycline resistance in 19 (18.44%) of the isolates. All the isolates were susceptible to ciprofloxacin and all except one isolate was susceptible to nalidixic acid. Nine isolates were found to be multi-drug resistant having resistance against more than three antibiotics.

Genotypic resistance to antimicrobials

The presence of genes that could contribute to AMR was detected by BLAST searching the assembled Salmonella genomes against a local copy of Resfinder and CARD sequence data (Fig. 1b). Additional details on the query length and percentage of gene identity for the BLAST results are provided in Additional file 2: Table S2. Bacterial isolates showing “intermediate” resistance on antimicrobial susceptibility test was grouped with “susceptible” isolates for the calculation of sensitivity and specificity of AMR genotype. Twenty-two genes that provided resistance to aminoglycosides were detected and the genes were present in 100 isolates. The sensitivity was 100% and specificity was 5.45% for resistance against aminoglycosides. The low specificity was probably due to the lack of resistance genes being expressed in vitro. Genes responsible for resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics were detected in 11 isolates which were also resistant by antimicrobial susceptibility test. The plasmid-mediated cephalosporinase gene blaLAT-1, plasmid-borne class C beta-lactamase gene blaBIL-1, and blaCMY (Class C) genes were found together and were detected in three isolates. Genes belonging to blaTEM (class A) were found in eight isolates. Collectively, there were 280 beta-lactamase genes present in those 11 isolates. The sensitivity and specificity was 100% for beta-lactams. Phenicol resistance encoded by cat, catA1, and floR genes was present in 8 isolates. The sensitivity was 100% and specificity was 98.96% for phenicol resistance. dfrA1, dfrA10, dfrA12, sul1, sul2, and sul3 genes conferring resistance to trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole drugs were present in 12 isolates. The sensitivity was 100% and specificity was 91.92% for trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole. The sul1, sul2, and sul3 genes could also contribute to resistance against sulfisoxazole. However, a definite conclusion of genotype–phenotype correlation is lacking due to the absence of antimicrobial susceptibility test data that matches the CLSI recommended breakpoint for resistance against sulfisoxazole. Tetracycline resistance encoded by tet(A), tet(B), tet(C), and tet(D) genes for tetracycline efflux pumps were detected in 18 samples all of which were also resistant by antimicrobial susceptibility test. The sensitivity was 94.74% and specificity was 100% for tetracycline resistance. Two isolates carried the mph(A) gene which confers resistance to macrolides. However, the only macrolide that was tested was azithromycin and the genotype–phenotype relation could not be established due to lack of data from antimicrobial susceptibility test that matches with the breakpoint recommended by CLSI (> 32 mg/L).
Overall, the sensitivity for detecting AMR using genotype was 100% except for tetracycline where 1 isolate was phenotypically resistant even in the absence of the (tet) gene. The specificity for aminoglycosides had the highest degree of incongruence between genotype and phenotype. Fifty-two isolates that were positive for aminoglycoside resistance genes were phenotypically susceptible. Although not to the degree found in this study, a mismatch in phenotype-genotype correlation was also reported previously in E. coli and Salmonella for aminoglycoside resistance, especially for streptomycin [5, 16]. There was 100% phenotype-genotype correlation for beta-lactam resistance. Phenicols and tetracycline also had > 98% specificity, while trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole had lower specificity (91.2%) because of four isolates that were genotypically resistant but were phenotypically susceptible. These results are also similar to those obtained in previous studies [5, 16] where correlation approaching 100% was obtained for antimicrobials other than aminoglycosides.
In addition to the genes that confer AMR, we also analyzed the genes that could confer multi-drug resistance (Fig. 1b). The golS gene is a promoter for multidrug efflux pump, mdsABC [17] and was detected among 84.46% (n = 87) isolates. Similarly, mdsABC (multidrug transporter of Salmonella) complex which is made up of mdsA, mdsB, and mdsC units, was found in all isolates that had golS gene except one isolate which lacked mdsB and mdsC genes. The mdsABC complex is known to provide resistance against a variety of drugs and toxins and is involved in Salmonella virulence and pathogenicity [17, 18]. The mdtK gene, a multi-efflux pump which could provide resistance against norfloxacin, doxorubicin and acriflavin [18] and sdiA, a regulator for multi-drug resistance pump AcraB [19], were present in 84.46 and 86.41% of the isolates respectively. The presence of these genes could contribute to the virulence and pathogenicity of these Salmonella isolates and also indicates the potential for these isolates to resist various antibiotics and toxins.

Analysis of virulence determinants

The genes that are associated with virulence among 103 wildlife Salmonella isolates were analyzed (Fig. 2) using CLC workbench 9.4. The parameters used were the minimum identity of 90% and minimum length of 50%. Additional details on the query length and percentage of gene identity for the BLAST results are given in Additional file 3: Table S3. A total of 197 virulence genes were detected by BLAST search against a local copy of the Virulence Factor Database. The virulence-associated determinants collectively were grouped under 9 categories: fimbrial adherence determinants, macrophage inducible genes, determinants associated with magnesium uptake, nonfimbrial adherence determinants, genes associated with secretion system, serum resistance determinants, stress proteins, toxins, and two-component regulatory systems.
Among fimbrial adherence determinants, the genes belonging to two csg operons csgBAC and csgDEFG were present universally in all isolates. These genes encode for curli fimbriae or thin aggregative fimbriae and mediate binding to various serum and tissues matrix proteins [20]. Another gene cluster that was ubiquitously present were the fim genes that encodes for type 1 fimbriae. This cluster is comprised of the fimAICDHF operon and three regulatory genes fimW, fimY, and fimZ and mediates adherence to eukaryotic cells [21]. However, the fimY gene was not detected in ten isolates at the BLAST search cut-off level we used.
The genes belonging to type III secretion system (TTSS/T3SS) encoded by Salmonella pathogenicity island-1 (SPI-1) and -2 (SPI-2) were also predominantly present among the isolates. This included SPI-1 regulator genes hilACD, and SPI-1 encoded inv/spa, and prg/org operons that were detected in all the isolates. Similarly, SPI-2 regulatory gene ssrB, chaperone protein-encoding genes—sscA and sscB, and ssa genes that encode for T3SS2 apparatus were also present among 103 isolates. However, the sse genes which encode for the effectors were observed only in fewer isolates. Another set of genes that were present in all isolates were the genes that respond to magnesium level in the extracellular environment [22]. This included mgtc, which mediates magnesium uptake and phoPphoQ genes that are regulators of the two-component system.
The least abundant virulence determinants were the tcf, sta, and pef fimbrial operons and spv gene cluster. These genes belonging to the fimbrial adherence determinants category were detected in less than 25% of the isolates. Additionally, rck gene that provides protection against the complement-mediated immune response of the host was also found in low abundance. There were 16 isolates that possessed fewer than 50% of the total virulence genes in the database (Fig. 2). These isolates include ADRDL-002, -003, -019, -020, -021, -022, -023, -024, -032, -033, -042, -052, -060, -061, -075, and -076. Importantly, these isolates also had a lower abundance of genes that contributed to multi-drug resistance (Fig. 1). However, these isolates come under various serotypes and were isolated from different host species. Therefore, a common factor responsible for the observed low abundance of virulence genes is not evident. The universal presence of fimbrial genes and the genes encoded by pathogenicity islands 1–2 among the isolates we report here indicates that these isolates could potentially cause disease in humans. Therefore, the genomes we report here could be a valuable reference point for future traceback investigations in instances where wildlife may be considered as a potential source of human Salmonellosis.

Authors’ contributions

JS and AR conceived and designed the study. MT, GJF, LA and SG performed the experiments. RW originally developed the culture archive. MT analyzed the data. MT, JS and AR wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Authors thank the Section of Bacteriology, Animal Disease Research and Diagnostic Laboratory, South Dakota for helping with the antimicrobial susceptibility testing of the Salmonella isolates. We also thank Scott Talent and Leanne Tillman (Oklahoma Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, Stillwater, OK) for reviving archival cultures necessary for this study.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

Genome sequence data of 103 Salmonella enterica isolates have been submitted to NCBI Sequence Read Archive (NCBI SRA) for public access. NCBI SRA accession number for 103 isolates described in this manuscript is given in Table 1.
All authors gave the consent for publication.
Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported in part by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Hatch Projects SD00H532-14 and SD00R540-15, and the United States Food and Drug Administration GenomeTrakr project subcontract to awarded JS. The funding agencies had no role in study design, data collection, and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Krueger AL, et al. Clinical outcomes of nalidixic acid, ceftriaxone, and multidrug-resistant nontyphoidal salmonella infections compared with pansusceptible infections in FoodNet sites, 2006–2008. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2014;11(5):335–41.CrossRefPubMed Krueger AL, et al. Clinical outcomes of nalidixic acid, ceftriaxone, and multidrug-resistant nontyphoidal salmonella infections compared with pansusceptible infections in FoodNet sites, 2006–2008. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2014;11(5):335–41.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Botti V, et al. Salmonella spp. and antibiotic-resistant strains in wild mammals and birds in north-western Italy from 2002 to 2010. Vet Ital. 2013;49(2):195–202.PubMed Botti V, et al. Salmonella spp. and antibiotic-resistant strains in wild mammals and birds in north-western Italy from 2002 to 2010. Vet Ital. 2013;49(2):195–202.PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith WA, Mazet JA, Hirsh DC. Salmonella in California wildlife species: prevalence in rehabilitation centers and characterization of isolates. J Zoo Wildl Med. 2002;33(3):228–35.CrossRefPubMed Smith WA, Mazet JA, Hirsh DC. Salmonella in California wildlife species: prevalence in rehabilitation centers and characterization of isolates. J Zoo Wildl Med. 2002;33(3):228–35.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat McDermott PF, et al. Whole-genome sequencing for detecting antimicrobial resistance in nontyphoidal Salmonella. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60(9):5515–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McDermott PF, et al. Whole-genome sequencing for detecting antimicrobial resistance in nontyphoidal Salmonella. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60(9):5515–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Bradley P, et al. Rapid antibiotic-resistance predictions from genome sequence data for Staphylococcus aureus and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat Commun. 2015;6:10063.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bradley P, et al. Rapid antibiotic-resistance predictions from genome sequence data for Staphylococcus aureus and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat Commun. 2015;6:10063.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Metcalf BJ, et al. Using whole genome sequencing to identify resistance determinants and predict antimicrobial resistance phenotypes for year 2015 invasive pneumococcal disease isolates recovered in the United States. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22(12):1002e1–8.CrossRef Metcalf BJ, et al. Using whole genome sequencing to identify resistance determinants and predict antimicrobial resistance phenotypes for year 2015 invasive pneumococcal disease isolates recovered in the United States. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22(12):1002e1–8.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Metcalf BJ, et al. Short-read whole genome sequencing for determination of antimicrobial resistance mechanisms and capsular serotypes of current invasive Streptococcus agalactiae recovered in the USA. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017;23(8):574.e7–574.e14 Metcalf BJ, et al. Short-read whole genome sequencing for determination of antimicrobial resistance mechanisms and capsular serotypes of current invasive Streptococcus agalactiae recovered in the USA. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017;23(8):574.e7–574.e14
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Jia B, et al. CARD 2017: expansion and model-centric curation of the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(D1):D566–73.CrossRefPubMed Jia B, et al. CARD 2017: expansion and model-centric curation of the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(D1):D566–73.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen L, et al. VFDB 2012 update: toward the genetic diversity and molecular evolution of bacterial virulence factors. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(Database issue):D641–5.CrossRefPubMed Chen L, et al. VFDB 2012 update: toward the genetic diversity and molecular evolution of bacterial virulence factors. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(Database issue):D641–5.CrossRefPubMed
12.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Gopee NV, Adesiyun AA, Caesar K. Retrospective and longitudinal study of salmonellosis in captive wildlife in Trinidad. J Wildl Dis. 2000;36(2):284–93.CrossRefPubMed Gopee NV, Adesiyun AA, Caesar K. Retrospective and longitudinal study of salmonellosis in captive wildlife in Trinidad. J Wildl Dis. 2000;36(2):284–93.CrossRefPubMed
15.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Tyson GH, et al. WGS accurately predicts antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015;70(10):2763–9.CrossRefPubMed Tyson GH, et al. WGS accurately predicts antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015;70(10):2763–9.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Pontel LB, et al. GolS controls the response to gold by the hierarchical induction of Salmonella-specific genes that include a CBA efflux-coding operon. Mol Microbiol. 2007;66(3):814–25.CrossRefPubMed Pontel LB, et al. GolS controls the response to gold by the hierarchical induction of Salmonella-specific genes that include a CBA efflux-coding operon. Mol Microbiol. 2007;66(3):814–25.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Nishino K, Latifi T, Groisman EA. Virulence and drug resistance roles of multidrug efflux systems of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Mol Microbiol. 2006;59(1):126–41.CrossRefPubMed Nishino K, Latifi T, Groisman EA. Virulence and drug resistance roles of multidrug efflux systems of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Mol Microbiol. 2006;59(1):126–41.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Rahmati S, et al. Control of the AcrAB multidrug efflux pump by quorum-sensing regulator SdiA. Mol Microbiol. 2002;43(3):677–85.CrossRefPubMed Rahmati S, et al. Control of the AcrAB multidrug efflux pump by quorum-sensing regulator SdiA. Mol Microbiol. 2002;43(3):677–85.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Romling U, et al. Curli fibers are highly conserved between Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli with respect to operon structure and regulation. J Bacteriol. 1998;180(3):722–31.PubMedPubMedCentral Romling U, et al. Curli fibers are highly conserved between Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli with respect to operon structure and regulation. J Bacteriol. 1998;180(3):722–31.PubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Zeiner SA, Dwyer BE, Clegg S. FimA, FimF, and FimH are necessary for assembly of type 1 fimbriae on Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Infect Immun. 2012;80(9):3289–96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zeiner SA, Dwyer BE, Clegg S. FimA, FimF, and FimH are necessary for assembly of type 1 fimbriae on Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Infect Immun. 2012;80(9):3289–96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Whole genome sequencing-based detection of antimicrobial resistance and virulence in non-typhoidal Salmonella enterica isolated from wildlife
verfasst von
Milton Thomas
Gavin John Fenske
Linto Antony
Sudeep Ghimire
Ronald Welsh
Akhilesh Ramachandran
Joy Scaria
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2017
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
Gut Pathogens / Ausgabe 1/2017
Elektronische ISSN: 1757-4749
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13099-017-0213-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

Gut Pathogens 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.