Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 6/2014

01.12.2014 | Editorial

Why Correcting the Literature with Errata and Retractions is Good Medical Practice?

verfasst von: Gautam N. Allahbadia

Erschienen in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India | Ausgabe 6/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

The National Library of Medicine, USA (NLM) has a long-standing tradition of providing access to information in the biomedical literature [1]. One of the ways NLM assists users is to add subsequent notices of and/or linkages between citations for errata, retractions, partial retractions, corrected and republished articles, duplicate publications, comments (including author replies and expressions of concern), updated versions of articles, patient summaries, and republished (reprinted) articles indexed and available in NLM’s online MEDLINE database. Users who search MEDLINE will be informed if they retrieved a citation for an article that has been corrected by an erratum notice, retracted or partially retracted, corrected and republished; been found to duplicate another article; generated a separately published commenting article; been updated by a subsequent article; and if a summary for patients has been published, or has been republished (reprinted) in another journal. …
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat National Library of Medicine. Fact sheet: errata, retractions, partial retractions, corrected and republished articles, duplicate publications, comments (including author replies), updates, patient summaries, and republished (reprinted) articles policy for MEDLINE. Available at: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/factsheets/errata.html Accessed 30 Oct 2014. National Library of Medicine. Fact sheet: errata, retractions, partial retractions, corrected and republished articles, duplicate publications, comments (including author replies), updates, patient summaries, and republished (reprinted) articles policy for MEDLINE. Available at: http://​www.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​pubs/​factsheets/​errata.​html Accessed 30 Oct 2014.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Furman JL, Jensen K, Murray F. Governing knowledge in the scientific community: exploring the role of retractions in biomedicine. Res Policy. 2012;41(2):276–90.CrossRef Furman JL, Jensen K, Murray F. Governing knowledge in the scientific community: exploring the role of retractions in biomedicine. Res Policy. 2012;41(2):276–90.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Wager E, Williams P. Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988–2008. J Med Ethics. 2011;37(9):567–70.PubMedCrossRef Wager E, Williams P. Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988–2008. J Med Ethics. 2011;37(9):567–70.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. Available at http://www.icmje.org/ Accessed 30 Oct 2014. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. Available at http://​www.​icmje.​org/​ Accessed 30 Oct 2014.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat NISO/ALPSP Journal article versions (JAV) Technical Working Group. Journal article versions (JAV): Recommendations of the NISO/ALPSP JAV Technical Working Group. April 2008. NISO-RP-8-2008. NISO/ALPSP Journal article versions (JAV) Technical Working Group. Journal article versions (JAV): Recommendations of the NISO/ALPSP JAV Technical Working Group. April 2008. NISO-RP-8-2008.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Budd JM, Sievert ME, Schultz TR, et al. Effects of article retraction on citation and practice in medicine. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1999;87(4):437–43.PubMedCentralPubMed Budd JM, Sievert ME, Schultz TR, et al. Effects of article retraction on citation and practice in medicine. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1999;87(4):437–43.PubMedCentralPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Trikalinos NA, Evangelou E, Ioannidis JP. Falsified papers in high-impact journals were slow to retract and indistinguishable from nonfraudulent papers. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(5):464–70.PubMedCrossRef Trikalinos NA, Evangelou E, Ioannidis JP. Falsified papers in high-impact journals were slow to retract and indistinguishable from nonfraudulent papers. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(5):464–70.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kakuk P. The legacy of the Hwang Case: research misconduct in biosciences. Sci Eng Ethics. 2009;15(4):545–62.PubMedCrossRef Kakuk P. The legacy of the Hwang Case: research misconduct in biosciences. Sci Eng Ethics. 2009;15(4):545–62.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Horton R. Scientific misconduct: exaggerated fear but still real and requiring a proportionate response. Lancet. 1999;354(9172):7–8.PubMedCrossRef Horton R. Scientific misconduct: exaggerated fear but still real and requiring a proportionate response. Lancet. 1999;354(9172):7–8.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Sox HC, Rennie D. Research misconduct, retraction, and cleansing the medical literature: lessons from the Poehlman case. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(8):609–613.PubMedCrossRef Sox HC, Rennie D. Research misconduct, retraction, and cleansing the medical literature: lessons from the Poehlman case. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(8):609–613.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Why Correcting the Literature with Errata and Retractions is Good Medical Practice?
verfasst von
Gautam N. Allahbadia
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2014
Verlag
Springer India
Erschienen in
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India / Ausgabe 6/2014
Print ISSN: 0971-9202
Elektronische ISSN: 0975-6434
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-014-0643-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2014

The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 6/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Invited Book Review

Atlas of Gynecologic Surgery

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.