Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
Erschienen in: Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 5/2018

22.11.2017 | Invited Reviews

Why do children and adolescents bully their peers? A critical review of key theoretical frameworks

verfasst von: Hannah J. Thomas, Jason P. Connor, James G. Scott

Erschienen in: Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology | Ausgabe 5/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Bullying is a significant public health problem for children and adolescents worldwide. Evidence suggests that both being bullied (bullying victimisation) and bullying others (bullying perpetration) are associated with concurrent and future mental health problems. The onset and course of bullying perpetration are influenced by individual as well as systemic factors. Identifying effective solutions to address bullying requires a fundamental understanding of why it occurs. Drawing from multi-disciplinary domains, this review provides a summary and synthesis of the key theoretical frameworks applied to understanding and intervening on the issue of bullying. A number of explanatory models have been used to elucidate the dynamics of bullying, and broadly these correspond with either system (e.g., social-ecological, family systems, peer-group socialisation) or individual-level (e.g., developmental psychopathology, genetic, resource control, social-cognitive) frameworks. Each theory adds a unique perspective; however, no single framework comprehensively explains why bullying occurs. This review demonstrates that the integration of theoretical perspectives achieves a more nuanced understanding of bullying which is necessary for strengthening evidence-based interventions. Future progress requires researchers to integrate both the systems and individual-level theoretical frameworks to further improve current interventions. More effective intervention across different systems as well as tailoring interventions to the specific needs of the individuals directly involved in bullying will reduce exposure to a key risk factor for mental health problems.
Literatur
1.
Craig W, Harel-Fisch Y, Fogel-Grinvald H et al (2009) A cross-national profile of bullying and victimization among adolescents in 40 countries. Int J Public Health 54(2):216–224PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
2.
3.
Olweus D (2010) Understanding and researching bullying: some critical issues. In: Jimerson SR, Swearer S, Espelage DL (eds) Handbook of bullying in schools: an International perspective. Routledge, London, pp 9–33
4.
Haynie DL, Nansel T, Eitel P et al (2001) Bullies, victims, and bully/victims: distinct groups of at-risk youth. J Early Adolesc 21(1):29–49CrossRef
5.
6.
Moore SE, Norman RE, Suetani S, Thomas HJ, Sly PD, Scott JG (2017) Consequences of bullying victimization in childhood and adolescence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Psychiatry 7(1):60–76PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
7.
Scott JG, Moore SE, Sly PD, Norman RE (2014) Bullying in children and adolescents: a modifiable risk factor for mental illness. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 48(3):209–212PubMedCrossRef
8.
Rivara F, Le Menestrel S (2016) Individuals withn social contexts. In: Rivara F, Le Menestrel S (eds) Preventing bullying through science, policy, and practice. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, pp 69–112
9.
Greif JL, Furlong MJ (2006) The assessment of school bullying. J Sch Violence 5(3):33–50CrossRef
10.
11.
Volk AA, Camilleri JA, Dane AV, Marini ZA (2012) Is adolescent bullying an evolutionary adaptation? Aggress Behav 38(3):222–238PubMedCrossRef
12.
von Bertalanffy L (1968) General systems theory. Braziller, New York
13.
Bronfenbrenner U (1979) The ecology of human development: experiments by design and nature. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
14.
Bronfenbrenner U (1977) Toward an experimental ecology of human development. Am Psychol 32(7):513–531CrossRef
15.
Hernandez de Frutos T (2013) Five independent variables affecting bullying: neighborhood, family, school, gender-age and mass media. Sociol Mind 03:10
16.
Minuchin P (1985) Families and individual development: provocations from the field of family therapy. Child Dev 56(2):289–302PubMedCrossRef
17.
Harris JR (1998/2009) The nuture assumption: why children turn out the way they do. Free Press, New York
18.
Kandel DB (1978) Homophily, selection, and socialization in adolescent friendships. Am J Sociol 84(2):427–436CrossRef
19.
Perkins HW, Berkowitz AD (1986) Perceiving the community norms of alcohol use among students: some research implications for campus alcohol education programming. Int J Addict 21(9–10):961–976PubMedCrossRef
20.
Tajfel H, Turner JC (1986) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Psychology of intergroup relations. Nelson-Hall, Chicago, pp 2–24
21.
Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50(2):179–211CrossRef
22.
Johnson DW, Johnson RT (2009) An educational psychology success story: social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educ Res 38(5):365–379CrossRef
23.
Bandura A (2000) Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 9(3):75–78CrossRef
24.
Cicchetti D, Toth SL (1991) A developmental perspective on internalizing and externalizing disorders. In: Cicchetti D, Toth SL (eds) Internalizing and externalizing expressions of dysfunction: rochester symposum on developmental psychopathology. Erlbaum, New York, pp 1–19
25.
Main M, Kaplan N, Cassidy J (1985) Security in infancy, childhood, and adulthood: a move to the level of representation. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev 50(1/2):66–104CrossRef
26.
Bandura A (1986) Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
27.
Ball HA, Arseneault L, Taylor A, Maughan B, Caspi A, Moffitt TE (2008) Genetic and environmental influences on victims, bullies and bully-victims in childhood. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 49(1):104–112PubMedCrossRef
28.
Hawley PH (1999) The ontogenesis of social dominance: a strategy-based evolutionary perspective. Dev Rev 19(1):97–132CrossRef
29.
Sidanius J, Pratto F (1999) Social dominance. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef
30.
Pratto F, Sidanius J, Levin S (2006) Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: taking stock and looking forward. Eur Rev Soc Psychol 17(1):271–320CrossRef
31.
Ryan RM, Deci EL (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol 55(1):68–78PubMedCrossRef
32.
Agnew R (1992) Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology 30(1):47–88CrossRef
33.
Bandura A (2002) Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. J Moral Educ 31(2):101–119CrossRef
34.
Crick NR, Dodge KA (1994) A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment. Psychol Bull 115(1):74–101CrossRef
35.
Swearer SM, Espelage DL (2011) Expanding the social-ecological framework of bullying among youth: lessons learned from the past and directions for the future. In: Espelage DL, Swearer SM (eds) Bullying in North American schools. Routledge, New York, pp 3–9
36.
Olweus D (1993) Bullying at school: what we know and what we can do. Blackwell, Oxford
37.
Olweus D (1993) Bullies on the playground: the role of victimization. In: Hart CH (ed) Children on playgrounds: research perspectives and applications Albany. State University of New York Press, New York, pp 85–128
38.
Swearer SM, Hymel S (2015) Understanding the psychology of bullying: moving toward a social-ecological diathesis–stress model. Am Psychol 70(4):344–353PubMedCrossRef
39.
Elgar FJ, Craig W, Boyce W, Morgan A, Vella-Zarb R (2009) Income inequality and school bullying: multilevel study of adolescents in 37 countries. J Adolesc Health 45(4):351–359PubMedCrossRef
40.
Cook CR, Williams KR, Guerra NG, Kim TE, Sadek S (2010) Predictors of bullying and victimization in childhood and adolescence: a meta-analytic investigation. School Psychol Q 25(2):65–83CrossRef
41.
Schumann L, Craig W, Rosu A (2014) Power differentials in bullying: individuals in a community context. J Interpers Violence 29(5):846–865PubMedCrossRef
42.
Espelage DL, Bosworth K, Simon TR (2000) Examining the social context of bullying behaviors in early adolescence. J Couns Dev 78(3):326–333CrossRef
43.
Boel-Studt S, Renner LM (2013) Individual and familial risk and protective correlates of physical and psychological peer victimization. Child Abuse Neglect 37(12):1163–1174PubMedCrossRef
44.
Espelage DL, Swearer SM (2003) Research on school bullying and victimization: what have we learned and where do we go from here? Sch Psychol Rev 32(3):365–383
45.
Arseneault L, Bowes L, Shakoor S (2010) Bullying victimization in youths and mental health problems: ‘Much ado about nothing’? Psychol Med 40(05):717–729PubMedCrossRef
46.
Hong JS, Espelage DL, Grogan-Kaylor A, Allen-Meares P (2012) Identifying potential mediators and moderators of the association between child maltreatment and bullying perpetration and victimization in school. Educ Psychol Rev 24(2):167–186CrossRef
47.
Barboza GE, Schiamberg LB, Oehmke J, Korzeniewski SJ, Post LA, Heraux CG (2009) Individual characteristics and the multiple contexts of adolescent bullying: an ecological perspective. J Youth Adolesc 38(1):101–121PubMedCrossRef
48.
Holt MK, Espelage DL (2007) Perceived social support among bullies, victims, and bully-victims. J Youth Adolesc 36(8):984–994CrossRef
49.
Shields A, Cicchetti D (2001) Parental maltreatment and emotion dysregulation as risk factors for bullying and victimization in middle childhood. J Clin Child Psychol 30(3):349–363PubMedCrossRef
50.
Demaray MK, Malecki CK (2003) Perceptions of the frequency and importance of social support by students classified as victims, bullies, and bully/victims in an urban middle school. Sch Psychol Rev 32(3):471–489
51.
Rigby K (2005) Why do some children bully at school? The contributions of negative attitudes towards victims and the perceived expectations of friends, parents and teachers. Sch Psychol Int 26(2):147–161CrossRef
52.
Duffy AL, Nesdale D (2009) Peer groups, social identity, and children’s bullying behavior. Soc Dev 18(1):121–139CrossRef
53.
Bowes L, Arseneault L, Maughan B, Taylor A, Caspi A, Moffitt TE (2009) School, neighborhood, and family factors are associated with children’s bullying involvement: a nationally representative longitudinal study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 48(5):545–553PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
54.
Hemphill SA, Tollit M, Herrenkohl TI (2014) Protective factors against the impact of school bullying perpetration and victimization on young adult externalizing and internalizing problems. J Sch Violence 13(1):125–145PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
55.
Kljakovic M, Hunt C (2016) A meta-analysis of predictors of bullying and victimisation in adolescence. J Adolesc 49:134–145PubMedCrossRef
56.
Ttofi MM, Farrington DP (2009) What works in preventing bullying: effective elements of anti-bullying programmes. J Aggress Confl Peace Res 1(1):13–24CrossRef
57.
Yeager DS, Fong CJ, Lee HY, Espelage DL (2015) Declines in efficacy of anti-bullying programs among older adolescents: theory and a three-level meta-analysis. J Appl Dev Psychol 37:36–51CrossRef
58.
Evans CBR, Fraser MW, Cotter KL (2014) The effectiveness of school-based bullying prevention programs: a systematic review. Aggress Violent Beh 19(5):532–544CrossRef
59.
Cross D, Barnes A (2014) Using systems theory to understand and respond to family influences on children’s bullying behavior: friendly schools friendly families program. Theory Into Practice 53(4):293–299CrossRef
60.
Straus MA (1973) A general systems theory approach to a theory of violence between family members. Information (Int Soc Sci Counc) 12(3):105–125CrossRef
61.
Wolke D, Tippett N, Dantchev S (2015) Bullying in the family: sibling bullying. The Lancet Psychiatry 2(10):917–929PubMedCrossRef
62.
Lereya ST, Samara M, Wolke D (2013) Parenting behavior and the risk of becoming a victim and a bully/victim: a meta-analysis study. Child Abuse Neglect 37(12):1091–1108PubMedCrossRef
63.
Duncan RD (2011) Family relationships of bullies and victims. In: Espelage Dorothy L, Swearer SM (eds) Bullying in North American schools. Erlbaum, New York, pp 191–204
64.
Salmivalli C, Lagerspetz K, Björkqvist K, Österman K, Kaukiainen A (1996) Bullying as a group process: participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggress Behav 22(1):1–15CrossRef
65.
Salmivalli C (1999) Participant role approach to school bullying: implications for interventions. J Adolesc 22(4):453–459PubMedCrossRef
66.
Pepler D, Craig WM, O’Connell P (1999) Understanding bullying from a dynamic systems perspective. In: Slater A, Muir D (eds) The Blackwell reader in development psychology. Blackwell, Malden, pp 400–451
67.
O’Connell P, Pepler D, Craig W (1999) Peer involvement in bullying: insights and challenges for intervention. J Adolesc 22(4):437–452PubMedCrossRef
68.
Garandeau CF, Lee IA, Salmivalli C (2014) Inequality matters: classroom status hierarchy and adolescents’ bullying. J Youth Adolesc 43(7):1123–1133PubMedCrossRef
69.
Espelage DL, Holt MK, Henkel RR (2003) Examination of peer–group contextual effects on aggression during early adolescence. Child Dev 74(1):205–220PubMedCrossRef
70.
Hymel S, McClure R, Miller M, Shumka E, Trach J (2015) Addressing school bullying: insights from theories of group processes. J Appl Dev Psychol 37:16–24CrossRef
71.
Berger C, Rodkin PC (2012) Group influences on individual aggression and prosociality: early adolescents who change peer affiliations. Soc Dev 21(2):396–413CrossRef
72.
Perkins HW, Craig DW, Perkins JM (2011) Using social norms to reduce bullying. Group Process Intergr Relat 14(5):703–722CrossRef
73.
Sandstrom M, Makover H, Bartini M (2013) Social context of bullying: do misperceptions of group norms influence children’s responses to witnessed episodes? Soc Influence 8(2–3):196–215CrossRef
74.
Hawley PH, Stump KN, Ratliff JM (2011) Sidestepping the jingle fallacy: bullying, aggression, and the importance of knowing the difference. In: Espelage Dorothy L, Swearer SM (eds) Bullying in North American schools, 2nd edn. Routledge, New York
75.
Salmivalli C, Kaukiainen A, Voeten M (2005) Anti-bullying intervention: implementation and outcome. Br J Educ Psychol 75(3):465–487PubMedCrossRef
76.
Rodkin PC, Espelage DL, Hanish LD (2015) A relational framework for understanding bullying: developmental antecedents and outcomes. Am Psychol 70(4):311–321PubMedCrossRef
77.
Hawley PH (2014) The duality of human nature. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 23(6):433–438CrossRef
78.
Monks CP, Smith PK, Swettenham J (2005) Psychological correlates of peer victimisation in preschool: social cognitive skills, executive function and attachment profiles. Aggress Behav 31(6):571–588CrossRef
79.
Kennedy JH, Kennedy CE (2004) Attachment theory: implications for school psychology. Psychol Sch 41(2):247–259CrossRef
80.
Law AK-y (2013) Fung AL-c. Different forms of online and face-to-face victimization among schoolchildren with pure and co-occurring dimensions of reactive and proactive aggression. Comput Hum Behav 29(3):1224–1233CrossRef
81.
Bushman BJ, Huesmann LR (2010) Aggression. In: Fiske ST, Gilbert DT, Lindzey G (eds) Handbook of social psychology. Wiley, Hoboken 833–863
82.
Silberg JL, Copeland W, Linker J, Moore AA, Roberson-Nay R, York TP (2016) Psychiatric outcomes of bullying victimization: a study of discordant monozygotic twins. Psychol Med 46(9):1875–1883PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
83.
84.
Hawley PH (2003) Prosocial and coercive configurations of resource control in early adolescence: a case for the well-adapted machiavellian. Merrill-Palmer Q 49(3):279–309CrossRef
85.
Little TD, Henrich CC, Jones SM, Hawley PH (2003) Disentangling the “whys” from the “whats” of aggressive behaviour. Int J Behav Dev 27(2):122–133CrossRef
86.
Pellegrini AD (2002) Bullying, victimization, and sexual harassment during the transition to middle school. Educ Psychol 37(3):151–163CrossRef
87.
Swearer SM, Espelage DL (2012) Bullying prevention and intervention: realistic strategies for schools. Guilford, New York
88.
Neal JW (2010) Social aggression and social position in middle childhood and early adolescence: burning bridges or building them? J Early Adolesc 30(1):122–137CrossRef
89.
Bukowski WM, Abecassis M (2007) Self, other, and aggression: the never-ending search for the roots of adaptation. In: Hawley PH, Little TD, Rodkin PC (eds) Aggression and adaptation: the bright side to bad behavior. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 185–209
90.
Pellegrini AD, Long JD, Solberg D et al (2010) Bullying and social status during school transitions. In: Swearer SM, Espelage Dorothy L (eds) Handbook of bullying in schools: an international perspective. Routledge, New York, pp 199–210
91.
Reijntjes A, Vermande M, Goossens FA et al (2013) Developmental trajectories of bullying and social dominance in youth. Child Abuse Negl 37(4):224–234PubMedCrossRef
92.
Kärnä A, Voeten M, Little TD, Poskiparta E, Alanen E, Salmivalli C (2011) Going to scale: a nonrandomized nationwide trial of the KiVa antibullying program for Grades 1–9. J Consult Clin Psychol 79(6):796–805PubMedCrossRef
93.
Salmivalli C, Poskiparta E, Ahtola A, Haataja A (2013) The implementation and effectiveness of the KiVa antibullying program in Finland. Eur Psychol 18(2):79–88CrossRef
94.
95.
Lemerise EA, Arsenio WF (2000) An integrated model of emotion processes and cognition in social information processing. Child Dev 71(1):107–118PubMedCrossRef
96.
Card NA, Isaacs J, Hodges EVE (2009) Aggression and victimization in children’s peer groups: a relationship perspective. In: Vangelisti A (ed) Feeling hurt in close relationships. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 235–259CrossRef
97.
Card NA, Little TD (2007) Differential relations of instrumental and reactive aggression with maladjustment: does adaptivity depend on function? In: Hawley PH, Little TD, Rodkin PC (eds) Aggression and adapatation: the brightside to bad behaviour. Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates, Mahwah, pp 107–134
98.
Sutton J, Smith PK, Swettenham J (1999) Bullying and ‘Theory of Mind’: a critique of the ‘social skills deficit’ view of anti-social behaviour. Soc Dev 8(1):117–127CrossRef
99.
Crick NR, Dodge KA (1996) Social information-processing mechanisms in reactive and proactive aggression. Child Dev 67(3):993–1002PubMedCrossRef
100.
Salmivalli C, Peets K (2011) Bullies, victim, and bully-victim relationships in middle childhood and early adolesence. In: Rubin KH, Bukowski WM, Laursen BP (eds) Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups. Guilford Press, New York, pp 322–340
101.
Ettekal I, Kochenderfer-Ladd B, Ladd GW (2015) A synthesis of person- and relational-level factors that influence bullying and bystanding behaviors: toward an integrative framework. Aggress Violent Beh 23:75–86CrossRef
102.
Guy A, Lee K, Wolke D (2017) Differences in the early stages of social information processing for adolescents involved in bullying. Aggress Behav 43(6):578–587PubMedCrossRef
103.
Jolliffe D, Farrington DP (2011) Is low empathy related to bullying after controlling for individual and social background variables? J Adolesc 34(1):59–71PubMedCrossRef
104.
Menesini E, Sanchez V, Fonzi A, Ortega R, Costabile A, Lo Feudo G (2003) Moral emotions and bullying: a cross-national comparison of differences between bullies, victims and outsiders. Aggress Behav 29(6):515–530CrossRef
105.
Barchia K, Bussey K (2011) Individual and collective social cognitive influences on peer aggression: exploring the contribution of aggression efficacy, moral disengagement, and collective efficacy. Aggress Behav 37(2):107–120PubMedCrossRef
106.
Gini G, Pozzoli T, Hymel S (2014) Moral disengagement among children and youth: a meta-analytic review of links to aggressive behavior. Aggress Behav 40(1):56–68PubMedCrossRef
107.
Nocentini A, Menesini E (2016) KiVa anti-bullying program in italy: evidence of effectiveness in a randomized control trial. Prev Sci 17:1–12CrossRef
108.
Cross D, Shaw T, Hadwen K et al (2016) Longitudinal impact of the cyber friendly schools program on adolescents’ cyberbullying behavior. Aggress Behav 42(2):166–180PubMedCrossRef
109.
110.
Bradshaw CP (2015) Translating research to practice in bullying prevention. Am Psychol 70(4):322–332PubMedCrossRef
111.
Durlak JA, Weissberg RP, Dymnicki AB, Taylor RD, Schellinger KB (2011) The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: a meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Dev 82(1):405–432PubMedCrossRef
112.
Espelage DL, Low S, Polanin JR, Brown EC (2015) Clinical trial of Second Step© middle-school program: impact on aggression and victimization. J Appl Dev Psychol 37:52–63CrossRef
113.
Hawkins JL, Bravo P, Gobat N et al (2016) Group motivational interviewing in schools: development of a health promotion intervention. Health Educ J 75(5):513–527CrossRef
114.
Thornberg R, Jungert T (2017) Callous-unemotional traits, harm-effect moral reasoning, and bullying among Swedish children. Child Youth Care Forum 46(4):559–575PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
115.
Vreeman RC, Carroll AE (2007) A systematic review of school-based interventions to prevent bullying. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 161(1):78–88PubMedCrossRef
116.
Hunt C (2015) Understanding and combating school-based bullying from an individual-level perspective: a review. Aust Psychol 50(3):182–185CrossRef
117.
Healy KL, Sanders MR (2014) Randomized controlled trial of a family intervention for children bullied by peers. Behav Ther 45(6):760–777PubMedCrossRef
118.
Hawley PH, Williford A (2015) Articulating the theory of bullying intervention programs: views from social psychology, social work, and organizational science. J Appl Dev Psychol 37:3–15CrossRef
119.
Hymel S, Swearer SM (2015) Four decades of research on school bullying: an introduction. Am Psychol 70(4):293–299PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Why do children and adolescents bully their peers? A critical review of key theoretical frameworks
verfasst von
Hannah J. Thomas
Jason P. Connor
James G. Scott
Publikationsdatum
22.11.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology / Ausgabe 5/2018
Print ISSN: 0933-7954
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-9285
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-017-1462-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2018

Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 5/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Original Paper

Early vulnerabilities for psychiatric disorders in elementary schoolchildren from four Brazilian regions

Correction

Correction to: Potentially traumatic events have negative and positive effects on loneliness, depending on PTSD-symptom levels: evidence from a population-based prospective comparative study

Original Paper

Lifelong robbery victimisation and mental disorders at age 18 years: Brazilian population-based study

Review

Resilience and protective factors among people with a history of child maltreatment: a systematic review

Original Paper

Association between spousal emotional abuse and reproductive outcomes of women in India: findings from cross-sectional analysis of the 2005–2006 National Family Health Survey

Original Paper

Mental health burden in a national sample of American Indian and Alaska Native adults: differences between multiple-race and single-race subgroups

Neu im Fachgebiet Psychiatrie

23.04.2024 | Demenz | Nachrichten

Demenzkranke durch Antipsychotika vielfach gefährdet

23.04.2024 | Depression antepartal oder postpartal | Nachrichten

Weniger postpartale Depressionen nach Esketamin-Einmalgabe

22.04.2024 | DGIM 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

„Psychotherapie ist auch bei sehr alten Menschen hochwirksam!“

22.04.2024 | DGIM 2024 | Nachrichten

Auf diese Krankheiten bei Geflüchteten sollten Sie vorbereitet sein
weitere anzeigen

Update Psychiatrie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen