Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Community Health 4/2018

10.02.2018 | Original Paper

Why Public Health Researchers Should Consider Using Disability Data from the American Community Survey

verfasst von: Carlos Siordia, Lori A. Hoepner, Allen N. Lewis

Erschienen in: Journal of Community Health | Ausgabe 4/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The United States (US) federal government allocates hundreds of billions of dollars to provide resources to Americans with disabilities, older adults, and the poor. The American Community Survey (ACS) influences the distribution of those resources. The specific aim of the project is to introduce health researchers to Public Use Microdata Sample file from 2009 to 2011. The overall goal of our paper is to promote the use of ACS data relevant to disability status. This study provides prevalence estimates of three disability related items for the population at or over the age of 15 years who reside in one of the continental states. When population weights are applied to the 7,198,221 individuals in the sample under analysis, they are said to represent 239,641,088 of their counterparts in the US population. Detailed tabulations by state (provided as Microsoft Excel® spreadsheets in ACS output) clearly show disability prevalence varies from state-to-state. Because analyses of the ACS data have the ability to influence resources aiding individuals with physical mobility challenges, its use should be promoted. Particular attention should be given to monetary allocations which will improve accessibility of the existing built environment for the individuals with mobility impairment.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Siordia, C. (2014). Number of people in the United States experiencing ambulatory and independent living difficulties. Journal of Social Work and Disability and Rehabilitation, 13(3), 261–267.CrossRef Siordia, C. (2014). Number of people in the United States experiencing ambulatory and independent living difficulties. Journal of Social Work and Disability and Rehabilitation, 13(3), 261–267.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Reamer, A. D. (2010). Surveying for dollars: The role of the American Community Survey in the geographic distribution of federal funds. Washington, D.C.: Metropolitan Policy Program at Brookings. Reamer, A. D. (2010). Surveying for dollars: The role of the American Community Survey in the geographic distribution of federal funds. Washington, D.C.: Metropolitan Policy Program at Brookings.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Herman, E. (2008). The American Community Survey: An introduction to the basics. Government Information Quarterly, 25(3), 504–519.CrossRef Herman, E. (2008). The American Community Survey: An introduction to the basics. Government Information Quarterly, 25(3), 504–519.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Siordia, C. (2014). Detecting “real” population changes with American Community Survey data: The implicit assumption of treating between-year differences as “trends”. Journal of Sociological Research, 4(2), 494–509.CrossRef Siordia, C. (2014). Detecting “real” population changes with American Community Survey data: The implicit assumption of treating between-year differences as “trends”. Journal of Sociological Research, 4(2), 494–509.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Siordia, C. (2013). Are health insurance item allocations in the American Community Survey missing completely at random? Journal of Frailty and Aging, 2(4), 198–204.PubMed Siordia, C. (2013). Are health insurance item allocations in the American Community Survey missing completely at random? Journal of Frailty and Aging, 2(4), 198–204.PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Siordia, C. (2015). Disability estimates between same-sex and different-sex couples: Data from the American Community Survey (2009-2011). Sexuality and Disability, 33(1), 107–121.CrossRefPubMed Siordia, C. (2015). Disability estimates between same-sex and different-sex couples: Data from the American Community Survey (2009-2011). Sexuality and Disability, 33(1), 107–121.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Siordia, C., & Young, R. L. (2013). Methodological note: Allocation of disability items in the American Community Survey. Disability and Health Journal, 6(2), 149–153.CrossRefPubMed Siordia, C., & Young, R. L. (2013). Methodological note: Allocation of disability items in the American Community Survey. Disability and Health Journal, 6(2), 149–153.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Siordia, C., & Fox, A. (2013). Public use microdata area fragmentation: Research and policy implications of polygon discontiguity. Spatial Demography, 1(1), 42–56.CrossRef Siordia, C., & Fox, A. (2013). Public use microdata area fragmentation: Research and policy implications of polygon discontiguity. Spatial Demography, 1(1), 42–56.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat World Health Organization. (2001). The international classification of functioning, disability, and health. Geneva: World Health Organization. World Health Organization. (2001). The international classification of functioning, disability, and health. Geneva: World Health Organization.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Siordia, C., & Farias, R. A. (2013). A multilevel analysis on latino’s economic inequality: a test of the minority group threat theory. In R. Verdugo (Ed.), The economic status: Volume of the hispanic population (pp. 65–79). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing. Siordia, C., & Farias, R. A. (2013). A multilevel analysis on latino’s economic inequality: a test of the minority group threat theory. In R. Verdugo (Ed.), The economic status: Volume of the hispanic population (pp. 65–79). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
16.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Clarke, P., Ailshire, J. A., & Lantz, P. (2009). Urban built environments and trajectories of mobility disability: Findings from a national sample of community-dwelling American adults (1986-2001). Social Science & Medicine, 69, 964–970.CrossRef Clarke, P., Ailshire, J. A., & Lantz, P. (2009). Urban built environments and trajectories of mobility disability: Findings from a national sample of community-dwelling American adults (1986-2001). Social Science & Medicine, 69, 964–970.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Clarke, P., Ailshire, J. A., Bader, M., Morenoff, J. D., & House, J. S. (2008). Mobility disability and the built environment. American Journal of Epidemiology, 168(5), 506–513.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Clarke, P., Ailshire, J. A., Bader, M., Morenoff, J. D., & House, J. S. (2008). Mobility disability and the built environment. American Journal of Epidemiology, 168(5), 506–513.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Botticello, A. L., Rohrbach, T., & Cobbold, N. (2015). Differences in the community built environment influence poor perceived health among persons with spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96, 1583–1590.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Botticello, A. L., Rohrbach, T., & Cobbold, N. (2015). Differences in the community built environment influence poor perceived health among persons with spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96, 1583–1590.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Sund, T., Iwarsson, S., Anttila, H., & Brandt, A. (2015). Effectiveness of powered mobility devices in enabling community mobility-related participation: A prospective study among people with mobility restrictions. Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 7, 859–870. Sund, T., Iwarsson, S., Anttila, H., & Brandt, A. (2015). Effectiveness of powered mobility devices in enabling community mobility-related participation: A prospective study among people with mobility restrictions. Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 7, 859–870.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Hammel, J., Magasi, S., Heinemann, A., et al. (2015). Environmental barriers and supports to everyday participation: A qualitative insider perspective from people with disabilities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96, 578–588.CrossRefPubMed Hammel, J., Magasi, S., Heinemann, A., et al. (2015). Environmental barriers and supports to everyday participation: A qualitative insider perspective from people with disabilities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96, 578–588.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Ripat, J. D., Brown, C. L., & Ethans, K. D. (2015). Barriers to wheelchair use in the winter. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96, 1117–1122.CrossRefPubMed Ripat, J. D., Brown, C. L., & Ethans, K. D. (2015). Barriers to wheelchair use in the winter. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96, 1117–1122.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Bazuin, J. T., & Fraser, J. C. (2013). How the ACS gets it wrong: The story of the American Community Survey and a small, inner city neighborhood. Applied Geography, 45, 292–302.CrossRef Bazuin, J. T., & Fraser, J. C. (2013). How the ACS gets it wrong: The story of the American Community Survey and a small, inner city neighborhood. Applied Geography, 45, 292–302.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Krahn, G. L., Fujiura, G., Drum, C. E., Cardinal, B. J., & Nosek, M. A. (2009). The dilemma of measuring perceived health status in the context of disability. Disability and Health Journal, 2(2), 49–56.CrossRefPubMed Krahn, G. L., Fujiura, G., Drum, C. E., Cardinal, B. J., & Nosek, M. A. (2009). The dilemma of measuring perceived health status in the context of disability. Disability and Health Journal, 2(2), 49–56.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Tate, R. L. (2014). Measuring outcomes using the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) model, with special reference to participation and environmental factors. In H. S. Levin, D. H. K. Shum & R. C. K. Chan (Eds.), Understanding traumatic brain injury: Current research and future directions (pp. 163–189). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Tate, R. L. (2014). Measuring outcomes using the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) model, with special reference to participation and environmental factors. In H. S. Levin, D. H. K. Shum & R. C. K. Chan (Eds.), Understanding traumatic brain injury: Current research and future directions (pp. 163–189). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
26.
Zurück zum Zitat McDermott, S., & Turk, M. A. (2011). The myth and reality of disability prevalence: measuring disability for research and service. Disability and Health Journal, 4(1), 1–5.CrossRefPubMed McDermott, S., & Turk, M. A. (2011). The myth and reality of disability prevalence: measuring disability for research and service. Disability and Health Journal, 4(1), 1–5.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Norwich, B. (2008). Dilemmas of difference, inclusion and disability: international perspectives and future directions. New York, NY: Routledge. Norwich, B. (2008). Dilemmas of difference, inclusion and disability: international perspectives and future directions. New York, NY: Routledge.
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Koutsogeorgou, E., Leonardi, M., Bickenbach, J. E., Cerniauskaite, M., Quintas, R., & Raggi, A. (2014). Social capital, disability, and usefulness of the international classification of functioning, disability and health for the development and monitoring of policy interventions. Disability & Society, 29(7), 1104–1116.CrossRef Koutsogeorgou, E., Leonardi, M., Bickenbach, J. E., Cerniauskaite, M., Quintas, R., & Raggi, A. (2014). Social capital, disability, and usefulness of the international classification of functioning, disability and health for the development and monitoring of policy interventions. Disability & Society, 29(7), 1104–1116.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Dorsey, R., & Graham, G. (2011). New HHS data standards for race, ethnicity, sex, primary language, and disability status. JAMA, 306(21), 2378–2379.CrossRefPubMed Dorsey, R., & Graham, G. (2011). New HHS data standards for race, ethnicity, sex, primary language, and disability status. JAMA, 306(21), 2378–2379.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Gibney, K., Sinclair, M., O’Toole, J., et al. (2013). Using disability-adjusted life years to set health-based targets: A novel use of an established burden of disease metric. Journal of Public Health Policy, 34(3), 439–446.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gibney, K., Sinclair, M., O’Toole, J., et al. (2013). Using disability-adjusted life years to set health-based targets: A novel use of an established burden of disease metric. Journal of Public Health Policy, 34(3), 439–446.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Fairchild, A., Rosner, L., Colgrove, D., Bayer, J., Fried, R., L (2010). The EXODUS of public health what history can tell us about the future. American Journal of Public Health, 100(1), 54–63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fairchild, A., Rosner, L., Colgrove, D., Bayer, J., Fried, R., L (2010). The EXODUS of public health what history can tell us about the future. American Journal of Public Health, 100(1), 54–63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Why Public Health Researchers Should Consider Using Disability Data from the American Community Survey
verfasst von
Carlos Siordia
Lori A. Hoepner
Allen N. Lewis
Publikationsdatum
10.02.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Community Health / Ausgabe 4/2018
Print ISSN: 0094-5145
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3610
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-018-0478-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2018

Journal of Community Health 4/2018 Zur Ausgabe