Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 3/2019

11.10.2018 | Health Services Research and Global Oncology

Why Travel for Complex Cancer Surgery? Americans React to ‘Brand-Sharing’ Between Specialty Cancer Hospitals and Their Affiliates

verfasst von: Alexander S. Chiu, MD, MPH, Benjamin Resio, MD, Jessica R. Hoag, PhD, Andres F. Monsalve, MD, Justin D. Blasberg, MD, Lawrence Brown, MPH, Audrey Omar, MA, Marney A. White, PhD, MS, Daniel J. Boffa, MD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

Leading cancer hospitals have increasingly shared their ‘brand’ with smaller hospitals through affiliations. Because each brand evokes a distinct reputation for the care provided, ‘brand-sharing’ has the potential to impact the public’s ability to differentiate the safety and quality within hospital networks. The general public was surveyed to determine the perceived similarities and differences in the safety and quality of complex cancer surgery performed at top cancer hospitals and their smaller affiliate hospitals.

Methods

A national, web-based KnowledgePanel (GfK) survey of American adults was conducted. Respondents were asked about their beliefs regarding the quality and safety of complex cancer surgery at a large, top-ranked cancer hospital and a smaller, local hospital, both in the presence and absence of an affiliation between the hospitals.

Results

A total of 1010 surveys were completed (58.1% response rate). Overall, 85% of respondents felt ‘motivated’ to travel an hour for complex surgery at a larger hospital specializing in cancer, over a smaller local hospital. However, if the smaller hospital was affiliated with a top-ranked cancer hospital, 31% of the motivated respondents changed their preference to the smaller hospital. When asked to compare leading cancer hospitals and their smaller affiliates, 47% of respondents felt that surgical safety, 66% felt guideline compliance, and 53% felt cure rates would be the same at both hospitals.

Conclusions

Approximately half of surveyed Americans did not distinguish the quality and safety of surgical care at top-ranked cancer hospitals from their smaller affiliates, potentially decreasing their motivation to travel to top centers for complex surgical care.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hillner BE, Smith TJ, Desch CE. Hospital and physician volume or specialization and outcomes in cancer treatment: importance in quality of cancer care. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(11):2327–2340.CrossRefPubMed Hillner BE, Smith TJ, Desch CE. Hospital and physician volume or specialization and outcomes in cancer treatment: importance in quality of cancer care. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(11):2327–2340.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EVA, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(15):1128–1137.CrossRef Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EVA, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(15):1128–1137.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Reames BN, Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB. Hospital volume and operative mortality in the modern era. Ann Surg. 2014;260(2):244–251.CrossRefPubMed Reames BN, Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB. Hospital volume and operative mortality in the modern era. Ann Surg. 2014;260(2):244–251.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Ejaz A, Spolverato G, Bridges JF, Amini N, Kim Y, Pawlik TM. Choosing a cancer surgeon: analyzing factors in patient decision making using a best-worst scaling methodology. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(12):3732–3738.CrossRefPubMed Ejaz A, Spolverato G, Bridges JF, Amini N, Kim Y, Pawlik TM. Choosing a cancer surgeon: analyzing factors in patient decision making using a best-worst scaling methodology. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(12):3732–3738.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Pope DG. Reacting to rankings: evidence from “America’s Best Hospitals”. J Health Econ. 2009;28(6):1154–1165.CrossRefPubMed Pope DG. Reacting to rankings: evidence from “America’s Best Hospitals”. J Health Econ. 2009;28(6):1154–1165.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Dafny L. Hospital industry consolidation: still more to come? N Engl J Med. 2014;370(3):198–199.CrossRefPubMed Dafny L. Hospital industry consolidation: still more to come? N Engl J Med. 2014;370(3):198–199.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Marth NJ, Goodman DC. Regionalization of high-risk surgery and implications for patient travel times. JAMA. 2003;290(20):2703–2708.CrossRefPubMed Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Marth NJ, Goodman DC. Regionalization of high-risk surgery and implications for patient travel times. JAMA. 2003;290(20):2703–2708.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Hanauer DA, Zheng K, Singer DC, Gebremariam A, Davis MM. Public awareness, perception, and use of online physician rating sites. JAMA. 2014;311(7):734–735.CrossRefPubMed Hanauer DA, Zheng K, Singer DC, Gebremariam A, Davis MM. Public awareness, perception, and use of online physician rating sites. JAMA. 2014;311(7):734–735.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Tomlinson T, De Vries R, Ryan K, Kim HM, Lehpamer N, Kim SY. Moral concerns and the willingness to donate to a research biobank. JAMA. 2015;313(4):417–419.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tomlinson T, De Vries R, Ryan K, Kim HM, Lehpamer N, Kim SY. Moral concerns and the willingness to donate to a research biobank. JAMA. 2015;313(4):417–419.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Chiong W, Kim AS, Huang IA, Farahany NA, Josephson SA. Testing the presumption of consent to emergency treatment for acute ischemic stroke. JAMA. 2014;311(16):1689–1691.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chiong W, Kim AS, Huang IA, Farahany NA, Josephson SA. Testing the presumption of consent to emergency treatment for acute ischemic stroke. JAMA. 2014;311(16):1689–1691.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Grande D, Mitra N, Shah A, Wan F, Asch DA. Public preferences about secondary uses of electronic health information. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(19):1798–1806.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Grande D, Mitra N, Shah A, Wan F, Asch DA. Public preferences about secondary uses of electronic health information. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(19):1798–1806.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Rhodes DJ, Radecki Breitkopf C, Ziegenfuss JY, Jenkins SM, Vachon CM. Awareness of breast density and its impact on breast cancer detection and risk. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(10):1143–1150.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rhodes DJ, Radecki Breitkopf C, Ziegenfuss JY, Jenkins SM, Vachon CM. Awareness of breast density and its impact on breast cancer detection and risk. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(10):1143–1150.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat GfK. Knowledge panel design summary. Palo Alto, CA: GfK; 2013. GfK. Knowledge panel design summary. Palo Alto, CA: GfK; 2013.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Cutler DM, Scott Morton F. Hospitals, market share, and consolidation. JAMA. 2013;310(18):1964–1970.CrossRefPubMed Cutler DM, Scott Morton F. Hospitals, market share, and consolidation. JAMA. 2013;310(18):1964–1970.CrossRefPubMed
16.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB. Potential benefits of the new leapfrog standards: effect of process and outcomes measures. Surgery. 2004;135(6):569–575.CrossRefPubMed Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB. Potential benefits of the new leapfrog standards: effect of process and outcomes measures. Surgery. 2004;135(6):569–575.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsai TC, Jha AK. Hospital consolidation, competition, and quality: is bigger necessarily better? JAMA. 2014;312(1):29–30.CrossRefPubMed Tsai TC, Jha AK. Hospital consolidation, competition, and quality: is bigger necessarily better? JAMA. 2014;312(1):29–30.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Dranove D, Lindrooth R. Hospital consolidation and costs: another look at the evidence. J Health Econ. 2003;22(6):983–997.CrossRefPubMed Dranove D, Lindrooth R. Hospital consolidation and costs: another look at the evidence. J Health Econ. 2003;22(6):983–997.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsai TC, Joynt KE, Orav EJ, Gawande AA, Jha AK. Variation in surgical-readmission rates and quality of hospital care. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(12):1134–1142.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tsai TC, Joynt KE, Orav EJ, Gawande AA, Jha AK. Variation in surgical-readmission rates and quality of hospital care. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(12):1134–1142.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Funk LM, Gawande AA, Semel ME, et al. Esophagectomy outcomes at low-volume hospitals: the association between systems characteristics and mortality. Ann Surg. 2011;253(5):912–917.CrossRefPubMed Funk LM, Gawande AA, Semel ME, et al. Esophagectomy outcomes at low-volume hospitals: the association between systems characteristics and mortality. Ann Surg. 2011;253(5):912–917.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Emmert M, Schlesinger M. Patients’ awareness, usage and impact of hospital report cards in the US. Patient. 2017;10(6):729–738.PubMed Emmert M, Schlesinger M. Patients’ awareness, usage and impact of hospital report cards in the US. Patient. 2017;10(6):729–738.PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Mulvey GK, Wang Y, Lin Z, et al. Mortality and readmission for patients with heart failure among U.S. News & World Report’s top heart hospitals. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009;2(6):558–565. Mulvey GK, Wang Y, Lin Z, et al. Mortality and readmission for patients with heart failure among U.S. News & World Report’s top heart hospitals. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009;2(6):558–565.
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang OJ, Wang Y, Lichtman JH, Bradley EH, Normand SL, Krumholz HM. “America’s Best Hospitals” in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(13):1345–1351.CrossRefPubMed Wang OJ, Wang Y, Lichtman JH, Bradley EH, Normand SL, Krumholz HM. “America’s Best Hospitals” in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(13):1345–1351.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Escarce JJ, Kapur K. Do patients bypass rural hospitals? Determinants of inpatient hospital choice in rural California. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2009;20(3):625–644.CrossRefPubMed Escarce JJ, Kapur K. Do patients bypass rural hospitals? Determinants of inpatient hospital choice in rural California. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2009;20(3):625–644.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Buczko W. Bypassing of local hospitals by rural Medicare beneficiaries. J Rural Health. 1994;10(4):237–246.CrossRefPubMed Buczko W. Bypassing of local hospitals by rural Medicare beneficiaries. J Rural Health. 1994;10(4):237–246.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Tai W-TC, Porell FW, Adams EK. Hospital choice of rural medicare beneficiaries: patient, hospital attributes, and the patient–physician relationship. Health Serv Res. 2004;39(6 Pt 1):1903–1922.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tai W-TC, Porell FW, Adams EK. Hospital choice of rural medicare beneficiaries: patient, hospital attributes, and the patient–physician relationship. Health Serv Res. 2004;39(6 Pt 1):1903–1922.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Roh C-Y, Moon MJ. Nearby, but not wanted? The bypassing of rural hospitals and policy implications for rural health care systems. Policy Stud J. 2005;33(3):377–394.CrossRef Roh C-Y, Moon MJ. Nearby, but not wanted? The bypassing of rural hospitals and policy implications for rural health care systems. Policy Stud J. 2005;33(3):377–394.CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Finlayson SR, Birkmeyer JD, Tosteson AN, Nease RF, Jr. Patient preferences for location of care: implications for regionalization. Med Care. 1999;37(2):204–209.CrossRefPubMed Finlayson SR, Birkmeyer JD, Tosteson AN, Nease RF, Jr. Patient preferences for location of care: implications for regionalization. Med Care. 1999;37(2):204–209.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Why Travel for Complex Cancer Surgery? Americans React to ‘Brand-Sharing’ Between Specialty Cancer Hospitals and Their Affiliates
verfasst von
Alexander S. Chiu, MD, MPH
Benjamin Resio, MD
Jessica R. Hoag, PhD
Andres F. Monsalve, MD
Justin D. Blasberg, MD
Lawrence Brown, MPH
Audrey Omar, MA
Marney A. White, PhD, MS
Daniel J. Boffa, MD
Publikationsdatum
11.10.2018
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6868-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

Annals of Surgical Oncology 3/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.