Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Intensive Care Medicine 4/2017

11.08.2016 | Editorial

Will all ARDS patients be receiving mechanical ventilation in 2035? Yes

verfasst von: Ignacio Martin-Loeches, Lieuwe D. Bos, Ewan C. Goligher

Erschienen in: Intensive Care Medicine | Ausgabe 4/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

Intensive care has historically been synonymous with the provision of mechanical ventilation (MV). While extracorporeal techniques for supporting lung function (extracorporeal life support, ECLS) are attracting increasing interest, we hold that MV will remain the mainstay of care for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in 2035. Whilst ECLS technology will improve, some complications are likely to remain unavoidable even in 2035 (cannula-related complications including hemorrhage or infection, and neurological complications including hemorrhage, infarction, etc.). We argue that continued improvements in the delivery of ventilatory support would ensure that MV remains safer and more feasible than ECLS. Furthermore, we argue that MV is required to avoid injury from spontaneous breathing in ARDS. …
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Patel BK, Wolfe KS, Pohlman AS et al (2016) Effect of non-invasive ventilation delivered by helmet vs face mask on the rate of endotracheal intubation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 315:2435–2441. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.6338 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Patel BK, Wolfe KS, Pohlman AS et al (2016) Effect of non-invasive ventilation delivered by helmet vs face mask on the rate of endotracheal intubation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 315:2435–2441. doi:10.​1001/​jama.​2016.​6338 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T et al (2016) Epidemiology, patterns of care, and mortality for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care units in 50 countries. JAMA 315:788–800. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.0291 CrossRefPubMed Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T et al (2016) Epidemiology, patterns of care, and mortality for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care units in 50 countries. JAMA 315:788–800. doi:10.​1001/​jama.​2016.​0291 CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Serpa Neto A, Cardoso SO, Manetta JA et al (2012) Association between use of lung-protective ventilation with lower tidal volumes and clinical outcomes among patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis. JAMA 308:1651–1659. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.13730 CrossRefPubMed Serpa Neto A, Cardoso SO, Manetta JA et al (2012) Association between use of lung-protective ventilation with lower tidal volumes and clinical outcomes among patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis. JAMA 308:1651–1659. doi:10.​1001/​jama.​2012.​13730 CrossRefPubMed
13.
14.
Metadaten
Titel
Will all ARDS patients be receiving mechanical ventilation in 2035? Yes
verfasst von
Ignacio Martin-Loeches
Lieuwe D. Bos
Ewan C. Goligher
Publikationsdatum
11.08.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Intensive Care Medicine / Ausgabe 4/2017
Print ISSN: 0342-4642
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1238
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-016-4461-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2017

Intensive Care Medicine 4/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.