Skip to main content
main-content

21.06.2017 | Original Article | Ausgabe 5/2018

European Spine Journal 5/2018

Worsening trends in analgesics recommended for spinal pain in primary care

Zeitschrift:
European Spine Journal > Ausgabe 5/2018
Autoren:
Stephanie Mathieson, Lisa Valenti, Christopher G. Maher, Helena Britt, Qiang Li, Andrew J. McLachlan, Chung-Wei Christine Lin
Wichtige Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.​1007/​s00586-017-5178-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Abstract

Purpose

Limited evidence exists on secular trends of analgesics for spinal pain. We investigated general practitioner’s (GP) recommendations of analgesic medicines for spinal pain and investigated characteristics associated with their recommendation.

Methods

We accessed data on spinal pain consultations from the Bettering the Evaluation and Care of Health (BEACH) database, a nationally representative database on GP activity in Australia. Data extracted included consultation details and management provided. Medicines recommended were grouped as simple analgesics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), opioid analgesics or neuropathic pain medicines. Multivariate logistic regression determined if patient characteristics and GP characteristics were associated with medication recommendations.

Results

We analysed BEACH data for 9100 GPs who managed 39,303 patients with spinal pain between 2004 and 2014. Over the decade, analgesic recommendations increased. After accounting for patient and GP characteristics, there was a significant increase in the rate single-ingredient opioid analgesics [annual relative increase of 6% (RR 1.06 (95% CI 1.05–1.07), P < 0.001)] and neuropathic pain medicines [annual relative increase of 19% (RR 1.19 (95% CI 1.16–1.22), P < 0.001)] were recommended; and a significant decrease in the rate NSAIDs were recommended [annual relative decrease of 4% (RR 0.96 (95% CI 0.95–0.97), P < 0.001)]. Logistic regression identified several patient and GP characteristics associated with medicine recommendations, e.g. stronger opioids were less likely recommended for Indigenous patients [odds ratio 0.15 (95% CI 0.04–0.56)].

Conclusions

GP’s analgesic recommendations for spinal pain have become increasingly divergent from guideline recommendations over time.

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

★ PREMIUM-INHALT
e.Med Interdisziplinär

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de. Zusätzlich können Sie eine Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl in gedruckter Form beziehen – ohne Aufpreis.

Weitere Produktempfehlungen anzeigen
Zusatzmaterial
Online Appendix Table 1 The proportion (%) each medicine category contributed to the yearly total of medicine recommendation rate for spinal pain problems managed by GPs in Australia between 2004 and 2014 (PDF 13 kb)
586_2017_5178_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2018

European Spine Journal 5/2018 Zur Ausgabe
  1. Das kostenlose Testabonnement läuft nach 14 Tagen automatisch und formlos aus. Dieses Abonnement kann nur einmal getestet werden.

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Mail Icon II Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Bildnachweise