Introduction
High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is part of the initial therapy or salvage approaches in different hematologic malignancies and solid tumors [
1‐
6]. Since high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT are associated with prolonged neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, patients undergoing this treatment modality are at risk for the development of infectious complications and other severe adverse events that can necessitate admission to the intensive care unit (ICU).
Data on characteristics and course of patients who had high-dose chemotherapy followed by ASCT and were admitted to the ICU are scarce [
7‐
9]. This is especially true for individuals in whom ICU admission occurred during conditioning therapy or early after ASCT. We thus conducted a retrospective analysis comprising patients admitted to the ICU between the initiation of high-dose chemotherapy and day 30 after ASCT.
Patients and methods
Patients aged ≥ 18 years who had received high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT at an academic tertiary care center (University Hospital Cologne) between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2020, and had been admitted to the ICU between the initiation of high-dose chemotherapy and day 30 after ASCT were eligible for the present analysis. The institution’s ICU has of a total of 26 beds. High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy, renal replacement therapy (RRT), and vasopressor therapy can be conducted on all 26 beds, whereas the ability to conduct non-invasive ventilation therapy and mechanical ventilation (MV) is restricted to 14 beds.
Information on patient characteristics, laboratory parameters, the Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-specific Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) score at initiation of high-dose chemotherapy, treatment-related information, causes for ICU admission, the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score at ICU admission, and procedures performed during the ICU stay were extracted from the patient charts [
10,
11].
Numbers and proportions were indicated for dichotomous variables. Medians and ranges were calculated for continuous variables. Survival curves were obtained using the Kaplan–Meier method. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from ASCT until death from any cause and was censored at the date of last information for surviving patients. The influence of variables on OS was analyzed using the log-rank test (Mantel-Cox). Multivariable analysis including factors that were chosen according to their clinical relevance was performed using the Cox-regression method. Statistical significance was set to p < 0.05 (two-sided). The statistical analyses were performed using Microsoft Excel (version 16.45) and RStudio (version 2022.02.0) software for Mac.
Discussion
Data on patients admitted to the ICU during hospitalization for high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT are scarce. We therefore performed a single-center retrospective analysis comprising 79 individuals who had treatment on the ICU between the initiation of high-dose chemotherapy and day 30 after ASCT. The major findings were as follows: (1) 10.7% of patients who underwent high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT were admitted to the ICU within the first 30 days from ASCT; (2) outcome of patients included in the analysis was generally favorable with a 1-year OS of 60.3%; and (3) patients with SD/PD prior to high-dose chemotherapy and individuals who required MV during their stay on the ICU had an increased death rate.
In the present analysis, 10.7% of patients who had high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT between 2014 and 2020 were admitted to the ICU between the initiation of high-dose chemotherapy and day 30 after ASCT. The median age was 57 years, and females accounted for 38% of cases. Hence, the ICU admission rate was higher than in previous analyses. An analysis from a single institution in Germany comprising patients who underwent high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT between 2008 and 2014 indicated an ICU admission rate of 5.1%. According to an older retrospective study from Canada including patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT between 2001 and 2006, the ICU admission rate was 3.3%. The median age of patients included in the present analysis was comparable to the previous reports (64 years and 57 years, respectively), whereas the proportion of females was lower than in the earlier studies (47% and 53%, respectively) [
7,
8]. The higher ICU admission rate in the present analysis may at least in part be due to the more recent advent of data suggesting an improved OS for critically ill patients with hematologic malignancies who were admitted to the ICU early [
12].
The most common cause for ICU admission in the present analysis was sepsis (53/79 patients, 67.9%). The median SOFA score at admission to the ICU was 7. These results are in line with an earlier report from Germany indicating that sepsis was the cause for ICU admission in 67% of cases; the median SOFA score at admission to the ICU was 8 [
7]. In contrast, analyses addressing the outcome of individuals admitted to the ICU early after allogeneic stem cell transplantation revealed higher median SOFA scores up to 14 reflecting more severe illness in these patients [
13‐
15].
In the present analysis, 23/79 patients (29.1%) required MV, 4/79 patients (5.1%) had RRT, and 35/79 patients (44.3%) needed vasopressors. A retrospective study from Brazil including 301 patients who had been treated with high-dose chemotherapy followed by ASCT for a hematologic malignancy and were admitted to the ICU within 1 year from ASCT indicated similar rates for MV and vasopressor use (29.9% and 35.5%, respectively) and a slightly higher rate for RRT (17.3%) [
9]. Critically ill patients who had undergone allogeneic stem cell transplantation were reported to have a significantly higher need for MV, RRT, and vasopressors than individuals included in the present analysis. According to a retrospective study comprising 70 patients who were admitted to the ICU between the beginning of conditioning therapy and day 30 after allogeneic stem cell transplantation, MV, RRT, and vasopressors were necessary in 55.7%, 27.1%, and 64.3% of cases, respectively [
13]. A registry-based analysis from Denmark investigating characteristics and outcomes of patients who had been admitted to the ICU within 3 years from the diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) also reported higher rates for MV and RRT than observed in the present analysis. Within the time interval from 2013 to 2016, MV and RRT were required in roughly 40% and 20% of critically ill AML patients, respectively [
16].
According to the present analysis, survival rates for patients admitted to the ICU during hospitalization for high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT were better than those previously reported for patients admitted to the ICU early after allogeneic stem cell transplantation and for critically ill patients with AML. The ICU and 1-year survival rates for patients included in the present analysis were 77.2% and 60.3%, respectively, whereas 3 analyses comprising patients admitted to the ICU during hospitalization for allogeneic stem cell transplantation indicated ICU survival rates ranging between 48.6 and 64.6% and 1-year survival rates ranging between 16.2 and 33% [
13,
15,
17]. An older analysis evaluating the outcome of critically ill AML patients demonstrated an ICU survival rate of 45% [
18]. These differences in favor of the patients from the present analysis who had undergone high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT are possibly attributable to the more transient immunosuppression in comparison with individuals who had allogeneic stem cell transplantation and the lower proportion of patients with a relevant activity of the underlying malignancy in comparison with individuals with AML admitted to the ICU.
Among patients included in the present analysis, insufficient response to treatment prior to high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT and the necessity of MV were associated with an impaired OS. This result does not come unexpected since it has been demonstrated for a multitude of malignancies that patients who do not achieve a remission upon treatment prior to high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT have a poor prognosis [
19‐
21]. The necessity of MV represents a strong risk factor for a decreased survival in critically ill patients irrespective of the underlying disease [
22,
23].
The present study has some limitations due to its single-center retrospective design. Unfortunately, it was also not possible to draw valid conclusions with regard to the question of whether outcomes differ between patients with different malignancies since the respective subgroups were too small. The inability to obtain sufficient data on the outcome of patients who had undergone high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT at our institution and were not admitted to the ICU represents an additional weakness since a comparison between individuals admitted to the ICU during hospitalization for high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT and patients not necessitating treatment on the ICU could thus not be conducted.
Taken together, the present study demonstrated that patients admitted to the ICU between the initiation of high-dose chemotherapy and day 30 after ASCT have a favorable overall outcome. Therefore, these patients should not be denied admission and treatment on the ICU.
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.