Previous studies have shown that osteoarthritis (OA) and sarcopenia (SP) are closely related to each other, but the causal relationships between them have not been established. The aim of this study was to investigate the causal associations between OA and SP via a bi-directional Mendelian randomization (MR) approach.
Methods
A bi-directional two-sample MR was adopted to research the causal relationship between SP and OA. The instrumental variables for SP and four types of OA: KOA, HOA, total knee replacement (TKR) and total hip replacement (THR) were derived from published large genome-wide association studies (GWAS). The inverse variance weighted (IVW), MR-Egger and weighted median estimator (WME) methods were used to estimate bi-directional causal effects.
Results
Low grip strength (GS) did not have a causal effect on four types of OA (KOA: OR = 1.205, 95% CI 0.837–1.734, p = 0.316; HOA: OR = 1.090, 95% CI 0.924–1.609, p = 0.307; TKR: OR = 1.190, 95% CI 1.084–1.307, p = 0.058; THR: OR = 1.035, 95% CI 0.792–1.353, p = 0.798), while appendicular lean mass (ALM) had a causal effect on four types of OA (KOA: OR = 1.104, 95% CI 1.041–1.171, p = 0.001; HOA: OR = 1.151, 95% CI 1.071–1.237, p < 0.001; TKR: OR = 1.114, 95% CI 1.007–1.232, p < 0.001; THR: OR = 1.203, 95% CI 1.099–1.316, p < 0.001). In the reverse direction, KOA or HOA did not have a significant causal effect on both GS and ALM (KOA-GS: OR = 1.077, 95% CI 0.886–1.309, p = 0.458; KOA-ALM: Beta = 0.004, p = 0.892; HOA-GS: OR = 1.038, 95% CI 0.981–1.099, p = 0.209; HOA-ALM: Beta = − 0.017, p = 0.196; TKR-GS: OR = 0.999, 95% CI 0.739–1.351, p = 0.997; TKR-ALM: Beta = 0.018, p = 0.501; THR-GS: OR = 1.037, 95% CI 0.978–1.101, p = 0.222; THR-ALM: Beta = − 0.023, p = 0.081).
Conclusions
The present study suggests that SP may have a causal effect on OA through changes in muscle composition rather than muscle strength, while little evidence was provided for the causal effect of OA on SP.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Introduction
With a worldwide population aging, chronic musculoskeletal disorders have imposed a tremendous burden on society [1]. Among them, osteoarthritis (OA) and sarcopenia (SP) are two common diseases. OA is characterized by the destruction and loss of articular cartilage as its main pathological feature, but all joint tissues and even extra-articular structures are involved in some form [2, 3]. The two most common types in clinical practice are knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and hip osteoarthritis (HOA). Sarcopenia was originally defined in 1989 as the age-related loss of muscle mass, but gradually expanded to include muscle strength, muscle mass and physical performance [4, 5]. As two age-related diseases, the prevalence of OA and SP is annually increasing [6, 7]. Unfortunately, at present, we do not have an effective treatment for these two diseases [8, 9]. Moreover, the coexistence of these two conditions: sarcopenic OA, which is frequently seen in clinical practice, could exacerbate the risk of falls and compromise the quality of life [10, 11].
Preliminary clinical studies have shown a strong correlation between OA and SP and suggested that one condition can increase the possibility of developing the other, especially in the OA of the lower limbs [12‐14]. Initially, OA and SP are interconnected by biomechanical factors represented by muscle strength [15‐17]. With the in-depth study of bone-muscle crosstalk, the researchers found that the relationship between OA and SP can also be mediated biologically [18‐20]. The balance between lean mass and fat mass in muscle would lead to the dysregulation of multiple myokines. These myokines consequently affect cartilage gene expression in terms of formation and homeostasis [21‐23]. On the other hand, several molecules released by bone structures can also modulate muscles, such as Indian hedgehog and undercarboxylated osteocalcin [24, 25]. However, none of the previous studies demonstrated the causality relationship between OA and SP. Evaluating the causality between OA and SP may provide new strategies for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of OA, SP and sarcopenic OA.
Anzeige
Recent studies have extensively applied the Mendelian randomization (MR) approach to provide evidence for the causal relationships between exposures and outcomes [26‐28]. The identification of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with common complex diseases has been greatly facilitated by genome-wide association studies (GWAS) [29]. By applying SNPs as instrumental variables (IVs), the MR method can obtain a robust causal estimate independent of postnatal lifestyle or environmental factors [30]. Several studies have identified causal factors leading to OA or SP [26‐28], but no MR study has examined causal relationships between OA and SP. Therefore, the aim of our study was to investigate the causal associations between OA of lower limbs and SP via a bi-directional MR approach. We assumed that SP and OA have a significant casual effect on each other.
Materials and methods
Study overview
This study is based on the existing datasets of large sample genome-wide association studies. Through the two-sample MR, which was performed and reported according to the Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology using Mendelian randomization (STROBE-MR) guidelines [31], the causal relationship between sarcopenia-related traits and OA were explored using genetic variants for exposure as instrument variables (IV). In the first step of this analysis, SP-related traits were investigated as exposure, while OA and its subtypes were investigated as outcome. The second step reversed the exposure and outcome analyses (Fig. 1). To minimize bias, all participants of the selected datasets were restricted to European ancestry. Meanwhile, this analysis was conducted using data from approved studies that received informed consent from all participants.
Fig. 1
Schematic representation of the three assumptions of Mendelian randomization and current study design. Assumption 1: the IVs should be closely associated with exposures; Assumption 2: the IVs selected are not associated with potential confounders; Assumption 3: the IVs should affect results dependently through exposure, but not the direct correlation. This bi-directional MR analysis was performed in two steps: sarcopenia was studied as exposure while osteoarthritis was studied as outcome in the first step, whereas the second step was reversed. IVs instrumental variable, SP sarcopenia, OA osteoarthritis
×
Data sources
In this study, a total of four phenotypes of OA in the lower limbs were investigated: KOA, HOA, total knee replacement (TKR), and total hip replacement (THR). Summary-level data of OA were extracted from the largest genome-wide meta-analysis to date across 826,690 individuals which include the 11 OA phenotypes [32]. In the current study, the data from KOA (n = 62,497), HOA (n = 36,445), TKR (n = 18,200), THR (n = 23,021), and a max of healthy controls (n = 333,557) were used. Based on the data available in the cohort, OA was defined as self-reported, clinically diagnosed, ICD10 codes, or radiographic. OA-free or population-based controls were included or excluded based on ICD codes.
Appendicular lean mass (ALM) and grip strength (GS) are potentially important as measure of muscle mass and quality in elderly people which were selected as the sarcopenia-related traits in this study [5]. The summary‐level statistics of ALM were obtained from a genome-wide association analysis which included 450,243 UK Biobank participants [33]. ALM was measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis by Tanita BC 418ma Body Fat Analyzer, and its measurement accuracy was validated using the DEXA method. The low GS data were achieved from a previous muscle weakness-related study, which comprised 256,523 individuals of European descent aged 60 years or older [34]. GS was measured using a Jamar J00105 hydraulic hand dynamometer, and the maximum hand grip strength was recorded in whole kilogram force units, and the low GS was defined as grip strength < 30 kg for males and < 20 kg for females. The original publications provide more details about phenotypes, genotype quality control, and related association analyses.
Anzeige
Selection and validation of genetic instrumental variables
For a stable MR analysis, the selections of IVs are vital which should be strictly adhered to three assumptions: (1) the chosen IVs are robustly related to the investigation exposure; (2) no confounding variables exist between the exposure and outcome affecting the chosen IVs; (3) other than by their association with the exposure, the chosen IVs have no impact on the outcome. To satisfy these assumptions, we chose independent SNPs without linkage disequilibrium (clumping r2 = 0.001 and kb = 10,000) and associated with the exposure at the genome‐wide significance level (p < 5 × 10–8) as instrumental SNPs. Furthermore, the F statistic were calculated to evaluate the strength of selected IVs and an F < 10 was considered dubious bias which was removed in the MR analysis. F statistic was calculated via the following formula: F = [R2/(1-R2)] × [(N-K-1)/K], where N = GWAS sample size, K = number variants comprising the instrument. R2 was calculated using the following formula: R2 = [beta.exposure2]/[se.exposure2 × N + beta.exposure2], where beta.exposure = SNP exposure effect and se. exposure = standard error of SNP exposure effect [31]. Finally, we detected the associations of all SNPs with both outcome and confounders (For the SP-related traits, nutritional intake, lifestyle variables, age, sex, and chronic wasting disease are considered as confounders. While age, sex, and body mass index are potential risk factors of OA) in the Phenoscanner database (http://www.phenoscanner.medschl.cam.ac.uk/) and deleted those with p < 5 × 10−8.
Statistical analysis
We adopt the inverse variance weighted (IVW) method as the primary statistical approach to evaluate the bi-directional relation between SP and OA, which was considered to be the most robust indicator in the absence of evidence of directional pleiotropy among the selected IVs (p > 0.05 for MR-Egger cutoff) [35]. To estimate whether there was a high heterogeneity among the IVs selected for analysis, Cochran’s Q test was conducted. In the absence of significant heterogeneity, the fixed-effects model would be adopted, otherwise, a random-effects model was conducted. As complements to IVW method, MR-Egger and the weighted median estimator (WM) were also used to estimate causal effects between SP-related traits and OA. The MR-Egger method allows all SNPs with horizontal pleiotropic effects to be unbalanced or directed, while the WM method can obtain a robust causal association evaluation even with the presence of up to 50% of invalid IVs [36]. For further validation of the MR causal effect estimation, we also used the MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier (MR-PRESSO) method to detect pleiotropic effects in the sensitivity analysis which can identify and remove possible pleiotropic IVs. After remove the outliers, the IVW method was repeated [37]. In this bi-directional two-sample MR analysis, R software was used to conduct all analysis using TwoSampleMR and MR-PRESSO packages. Due to multiple testing, we adopted the Bonferroni method to adjust the significance level in the presence of multiple tests, utilizing a stricter p-value threshold of 0.05/2 × 4 = 0.00625. The analytical results with a p-value between 0.0125 and 0.05 are considered nominally significant results.
Results
Influence of sarcopenia-related traits on OA
For the GS, we initially identified 17 IVs which all had a F statistic > 10. After integrating the GWAS data of KOA, HOA, TKR, and THR and excluding SNPs associated with outcomes or confounding factors, we selected 8, 7, 6, and 7 LD-independent and appropriate instrumental variables for MR analysis of GS-KOA, HOA, TKR, and THR (Additional file 1: Tables S1–S4). According to the heterogeneity test, the random-effects model was used in the primary MR analysis of GS-KOA, TKR, and THR, and the fixed-effects model was used in the analysis of GS-HOA (Table 1). The primary IVW analyses provide no evidence for the causal relationship between the GS and four types of OA (KOA: OR = 1.205, 95% CI 0.837–1.734, p = 0.316; HOA: OR = 1.090, 95% CI 0.924–1.609, p = 0.307; TKR: OR = 1.659, 95% CI 0.983–2.803, p = 0.058; THR: OR = 1.035, 95% CI 0.792–1.353, p = 0.798). The MR pleiotropy test revealed no horizontal pleiotropy in the analysis of four types of OA. 3 outlier IVs were identified in the MR‐PRESSO analysis of GS-KOA. When the outliers were removed, the IVW results still not found a significant causal association between GS and KOA. Overall, the MR analyses supported the notion that GS was not causally associated with OA.
Table 1
MR estimates from different methods of assessing the causal effect of low grip strength on osteoarthritis
Exposures
Outcomes
No. of IVs
Heterogeneity test
MR-egger
MR results
OR (95% CI)
p
Cochran’s q (p)
Intercept (p)
Method
GS
KOA
8
65.242 (< 0.001)
0.009 (0.784)
IVW
1.205 (0.837, 1.734)
0.316
MR-egger
1.093 (0.840,1.421)
0.529
WM
1.088 (0.883,1.340)
0.431
PRESSO (3)
1.122 (0.927, 1.358)
0.304
GS
HOA
7
5.395 (0.494)
0.012 (0.540)
IVW
1.090 (0.924,1.609)
0.307
MR-egger
0.862 (0.419,1.771)
0.703
WM
1.079 (0.924,1.287)
0.501
PRESSO (0)
1.090 (0.924,1.609)
0.307
GS
TKR
6
23.799 (< 0.001)
0.016 (0.767)
IVW
1.659 (0.983,2.803)
0.058
MR-egger
1.601 (0.929,2.755)
0.774
WM
1.582 (1.102,2.272)
0.013
PRESSO (0)
1.659 (0.983,2.803)
0.058
GS
THR
7
10.208 (< 0.001)
0.003 (0.909)
IVW
1.035 (0.792,1.353)
0.798
MR-egger
1.181 (0.771,1.808)
0.003
WM
1.148 (0.849,1.553)
0.369
PRESSO (0)
1.035 (0.792,1.353)
0.798
MR Mendelian randomization, IVs instrumental variables, GS grip strength, KOA knee osteoarthritis, HOA, hip osteoarthritis, TKR total knee replacement, THR total hip replacement, ALM appendicular lean mass, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, IVW inverse variance weighted, WM weighted median, PRESSO Pleiotropy RESidual Sum and Outlier
For the ALM, we initially identified 690 SNPs which all had a F statistic > 10. Following harmonization with GWAS data for KOA, HOA, TKR, and THR and exclusion of SNPs associated with outcomes or confounders, 486, 487, 487, and 486 LD-independent and appropriate IVs were selected for MR analysis of GS-KOA, HOA, TKR, and THR (Additional file 1: Tables S5 to S8). The random-effects model was employed in the primary MR analysis of four types of OA due to the presence of heterogeneity (Table 2). The primary IVW analyses indicated that ALM had a significant causal effect on four types of OA (KOA: OR = 1.104, 95% CI 1.041–1.171, p = 0.001; HOA: OR = 1.151, 95% CI 1.071–1.237, p < 0.001; TKR: OR = 1.114, 95% CI 1.007–1.232, p = 0.036; THR: OR = 1.203, 95% CI 1.099–1.316, p < 0.001). Despite the detection of horizontal pleiotropy in the analysis of ALM-TKR and THR by the MR pleiotropy test, as well as several potential pleiotropic IVs for all four types of OA identified by MR-PRESSO, removal of outliers did not alter the significant causal association between ALM and THR revealed by IVW results. In the analysis of TKR, the removal of outliers made the difference more significant (OR = 1.114, 95% CI 1.007–1.232, p < 0.001). Based on all of the MR analyses, ALM had a significant causal effect on OA.
Table 2
MR estimates from different methods of assessing the causal effect of appendicular lean mass on osteoarthritis
Exposures
Outcomes
No. of IVs
Heterogeneity test
MR-egger
MR results
OR (95% CI)
p
Cochran’s q (p)
Intercept (p)
Method
ALM
KOA
486
993.209 (< 0.001)
0.003 (0.079)
IVW
1.104 (1.041,1.171)
0.001
MR-egger
0.967 (0.825,1.134)
0.679
WM
1.0.85 (1.009,1.166)
0.037
PRESSO (9)
1.134 (1.073, 1.199)
< 0.001
ALM
HOA
487
890.952 (< 0.001)
0.004 (0.052)
IVW
1.151 (1.071,1.237)
< 0.001
MR-egger
0.961 (0.791,1.168)
0.690
WM
1.154 (1.056,1.261)
0.002
PRESSO (7)
1.155 (1.081,1.235)
< 0.001
ALM
TKR
487
917.707 (< 0.001)
0.005 (0.034)
IVW
1.114 (1.007,1.232)
0.036
MR-egger
0.845 (0.643,1.112)
0.321
WM
1.114 (1.007,1.232)
0.098
PRESSO (11)
1.190 (1.084,1.307)
< 0.001
ALM
THR
486
894.639 (< 0.001)
0.006 (0.014)
IVW
1.203 (1.099,1.316)
< 0.001
MR-egger
0.906 (0.711,1.156)
0.429
WM
1.143 (1.020,1.281)
0.021
PRESSO (8)
1.226 (1.129,1.332)
< 0.001
MR Mendelian randomization, IVs instrumental variables, GS grip strength, KOA knee osteoarthritis, HOA hip osteoarthritis, TKR total knee replacement, THR total hip replacement, ALM appendicular lean mass, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, IVW inverse variance weighted, WM weighted median, PRESSO Pleiotropy RESidual Sum and Outlier
Influence of OA on sarcopenia-related traits
For the KOA, we initially identified 23 SNPs which all had a F statistic > 10. Following harmonization with GWAS data for GS and ALM, and exclusion of SNPs associated with outcomes or confounders, 15 and 13 LD-independent and appropriate IVs were selected for MR analysis of KOA-GS and ALM, respectively (Additional file 1: Tables S9 to S10). As indicated by the heterogeneity test, the random-effects model was adopted both in the primary MR analysis of KOA-GS and KOA-ALM (Table 3). The primary IVW analyses do not provide any evidence supporting a causal relationship between KOA and GS or ALM (KOA-GS: OR = 1.077, 95% CI 0.886–1.309, p = 0.458; KOA-ALM: Beta = 0.004, p = 0.892). The MR pleiotropy test revealed no horizontal pleiotropy. Although 3 outliers were identified in the MR‐PRESSO analysis of KOA-ALM, the IVW results were consistent with previous. Overall, the MR analyses supported the notion that KOA was not causally associated with SP-related traits.
Table 3
MR estimates from different methods of assessing the causal effect of knee and hip osteoarthritis on sarcopenia
Exposures
Outcomes
No. of IVs
Heterogeneity test
MR-egger
MR results
Beta/OR (95% CI)
p
Cochran’s q (p)
Intercept (p)
Method
KOA
GS
15
77.246 (< 0.001)
− 0.023 (0.491)
IVW
1.077 (0.886,1.309)
0.458
MR-egger
1.104 (0.956,1.275)
0.429
WM
1.175 (1.026, 1.349)
0.019
PRESSO (0)
1.077 (0.886,1.309)
0.458
KOA
ALM
13
59.001 (< 0.001)
0.003 (0.799)
IVW
0.004
0.892
MR-egger
0.058
0.789
WM
− 0.027
0.168
PRESSO (3)
0.019
0.107
HOA
GS
22
59.120 (< 0.001)
− 0.009 (0.380)
IVW
1.106 (1.023,1.196)
0.012
MR-egger
1.231 (0.962,1.557)
0.113
WM
1.035 (0.961,1.113)
0.365
PRESSO (4)
1.038 (0.981,1.099)
0.209
HOA
ALM
13
76.162 (< 0.001)
0.002(0.713)
IVW
− 0.015
0.451
MR-egger
− 0.042
0.579
WM
− 0.004
0.772
PRESSO (4)
− 0.017
0.196
MR Mendelian randomization, IVs instrumental variables, GS grip strength, KOA knee osteoarthritis, HOA hip osteoarthritis, ALM appendicular lean mass, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, IVW inverse variance weighted, WM weighted median, PRESSO Pleiotropy RESidual Sum and Outlier
For the HOA, we initially identified 29 IVs which all had a F statistic > 10. Following harmonization with GWAS data for GS and ALM, and exclusion of SNPs associated with outcomes or confounders, 22 and 13 LD-independent and appropriate IVs were selected for MR analysis of HOA-GS and ALM, respectively (Additional file 1: Tables S11 to S12). As indicated by the heterogeneity test, the random-effects model was adopted both in the primary MR analysis of HOA-GS and HOA-ALM, and the MR pleiotropy test revealed no horizontal pleiotropy. Although the primary IVW analyses revealed a significant causal relationship between HOA and GS (OR = 1.106, 95% CI 1.023–1.196, p = 0.012), the IVW results did not find a significant causal association between HOA and GS (OR = 1.038, 95% CI 0.981–1.099, p = 0.209) after removing outlier IVs identified in the MR-PRESSO analysis. In the analysis of HOA-ALM, the primary IVW analyses and removal of outliers both provided no evidence for the causal relationship between the HOA and ALM (IVW: Beta = − 0.025, p = 0.451; PRESSO: Beta = − 0.017, p = 0.196), which was also consistent with the results of other methods. In total, there was no significant causal relationship between HOA and SP-related traits.
For the TKR, we initially identified 9 IVs which all had a F statistic > 10. Following harmonization with GWAS data for GS and ALM, and exclusion of SNPs associated with outcomes or confounders, 5 LD-independent and appropriate IVs were both selected for MR analysis of HOA-GS and ALM (Additional file 1: Tables S13 to S14). As indicated by the heterogeneity test, the random-effects model was adopted both in the primary MR analysis of TKR-GS and ALM, and the MR pleiotropy test revealed no horizontal pleiotropy (Table 4). In the analysis of TKR-GS and ALM, the primary IVW analyses and other methods provided no evidence for the causal relationship between the TKR and GS or ALM (TKR-GS: OR = 0.999, 95% CI 0.739–1.351, p = 0.997; TKR-ALM: Beta = 0.018, p = 0.501). No outlier was identified in the MR‐PRESSO analysis. The overall findings indicated the absence of a statistically significant causal association between TKR and SP-related traits.
Table 4
MR estimates from different methods of assessing the causal effect of total knee and hip replacement on sarcopenia
Exposures
Outcomes
No. of IVs
Heterogeneity test
MR-egger
MR results
Beta/OR (95% CI)
p
Cochran’s q (p)
Intercept (p)
Method
TKR
GS
5
56.813(< 0.001)
0.047(0.758)
IVW
0.999(0.739,1.351)
0.997
MR-egger
1.017(0.851,1.215)
0.864
WM
1.138(0.968, 1.340)
0.019
PRESSO (0)
0.999(0.739,1.351)
0.997
TKR
ALM
5
27.341(< 0.001)
0.005(0.836)
IVW
0.018
0.501
MR-egger
0.043
0.886
WM
0.005
0.733
PRESSO (0)
0.018
0.501
THR
GS
22
59.120(< 0.001)
− 0.004(0.749)
IVW
1.037(0.978,1.101)
0.222
MR-egger
1.074(0.864,1.336)
0.528
WM
1.012(0.961,1.083)
0.519
PRESSO (0)
1.037(0.978,1.101)
0.222
THR
ALM
17
83.332 (< 0.001)
0.007(0.157)
IVW
− 0.023
0.081
MR-egger
− 0.087
0.072
WM
− 0.023
0.235
PRESSO (4)
− 0.012
0.158
MR Mendelian randomization, IVs instrumental variables, GS grip strength, KOA knee osteoarthritis, HOA hip osteoarthritis, TKR total knee replacement, THR total hip replacement, ALM appendicular lean mass, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, IVW inverse variance weighted, WM weighted median, PRESSO Pleiotropy RESidual Sum and Outlier
For the THR, we initially identified 34 IVs which all had a F statistic > 10. Following harmonization with GWAS data for GS and ALM, and exclusion of SNPs associated with outcomes or confounders, 22 and 17 LD-independent and appropriate IVs were both selected for MR analysis of THR-GS and ALM, respectively (Additional file 1: Tables S15 to S16). As indicated by the heterogeneity test, the random-effects model was adopted both in the primary MR analysis of THR-GS and ALM, and the MR pleiotropy test revealed no horizontal pleiotropy (Table 4). In the analysis of THR-GS and ALM, the primary IVW analyses and other methods provided no evidence for the causal relationship between the THR and GS or ALM (THR-GS: OR = 1.037, 95% CI 0.978–1.101, p = 0.222; THR-ALM: Beta = − 0.023, p = 0.081). Although 4 outliers were identified in the MR‐PRESSO analysis of THR-ALM, the IVW results were consistent with previous. The overall findings indicated the absence of a statistically significant causal association between THR and SP-related traits.
Anzeige
Discussion
This study aimed to explore the causal relationships between SP and OA via a bi-directional two-sample MR approach. To the best of our knowledge, our MR study is the first to evaluate the bi-directional causal link between SP and OA comprehensively. Based on our results, there is a causal effect of SP on OA, while conversely, we did not observe a significant causal effect of OA on SP. Moreover, our findings indicated a causal relationship between SP and OA through the mediation of ALM.
Previous clinical studies have demonstrated the positive correlation between SP and OA. In a cross-sectional study, Suh et al. found that high fat mass and low lower extremity muscle mass were correlated with the presence and intensity of KOA [17]. The similar results were also found in the HOA, which were featured by the proportionally higher fat mass, and lower lean body mass [38, 39]. Furthermore, with better awareness of the importance of SP on OA, multiple long follow-up, large sample cohort studies were conducted to observe the relationship between them. In a cohort of healthy older population with no clinically diagnosed, symptomatic KOA and knee pain, ALM and GS was associated with the development of KOA and knee pain 5 years later, respectively [40]. In another large longitudinal cohort study, the body composition of fat and muscle mass was also associated with KOA risk within a 60-month follow-up period [41]. Meanwhile, compared to the isolated OA, the quality of life was more compromised and the likelihood of patients being referred for surgery was higher in the presence of SP [14, 42]. However, there was still a lack of high-level evidence-based evidence for the causality of SP for OA, for instance, randomized controlled studies. Our MR study found a significant causal effect of SP on OA, which provided additional evidence to support causality between them.
A diagnosis of SP can be confirmed by the presence of both low muscle strength and low muscle quantity or quality, as one alone is not sufficient [43]. Consistent with previous observational studies mentioned above, our study showed that four types of OA were causally associated with a lower ALM. However, OA is not causally affected by low GS, unlike what is expected. This may be due to several reasons. First, in the summary-level data of GS, the low GS was defined as grip strength < 30 kg for males and < 20 kg for females, which was recommended in 2010 by The European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) [44]. However, EWGSOP2 updated the cutoff values of low GS in 2018: < 27 kg for males and < 16 kg for females [43]. While in the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Sarcopenia Project, the cutoff values of low GS are < 26 kg for males and < 16 kg for females [45]. The assessment of the causal effect of low GS on OA may have been influenced by the differences in the criteria for low GS in SP. Furthermore, although higher muscle strength can better maintain joint stability to protect the joint, some clinical studies also indicated that greater muscle strength is not always protective. Chaisson et al. reported that men and women with higher GS were both associated with a greater risk of developing incident radiographic OA at hand [46]. Similar results were also reported by Sharma et al. in KOA, in which they found greater quadriceps strength was associated with increased likelihood of OA progression in malaligned knees and lax knees [47]. Further research is required to determine the impact of muscle strength on OA.
On the other hand, muscle composition changes are believed to be the primary contributor to OA in SP. Accumulating evidence suggested muscle as a paracrine and endocrine organ which can secrete a variety of myokines to modulate the bone, including irisin, insulin-like growth factor-1, myostatin, and interleukin 6 [48]. The dysregulation of these myokines were proven to be relevant in the development and progress of OA [49, 50]. Simultaneously, the increased fat mass (decreased lean mass) is another important factor for explaining the potential causal association between SP and OA [51]. Fat tissue can secrete a variety of deleterious cytokines for both cartilage and muscle, including inflammatory cytokines, leptin, and adiponectin. The cumulative release of these cytokines eventually leads to systemic low-grade inflammation, which has also been considered the basis of OA [23, 52]. Our study results suggest that ALM has a significant causal effect on OA. Similar findings were reported by Liu et al. who found a positive causal relationship between ALM and bone mineral density. However, there was no evidence of a causal association between low GS and bone mineral density [53]. These findings suggest that changes in muscle composition may play a crucial role in the muscle–bone crosstalk mechanism.
Anzeige
In the reverse direction, although we found a nominally significant result for the relationship between HOA and GS, the rest results did not support the causal effect of OA on SP. Compared to studies on the influence of SP on OA, fewer studies have focused on the impact of OA on SP. Most recently, Francesco et al. conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of SP in KOA [54]. It is noteworthy, though, that they only included four cross-sectional studies in their analysis, even though their results indicated a greater prevalence of SP in patients with KOA than in non-KOA patients. Besides, from the perspective of bone-muscle crosstalk, there was limited research regarding the possible direct influence of chondrocytes on muscular cells in vitro and in animal research. Some researchers argued that atrophy of muscles in osteoarthritis would be caused more by the functional impairment caused by pain than by direct biomolecular factors inhibiting muscle development [50]. Therefore, well-designed epidemiological, molecular mechanism and MR experiments are required to determine the causality of OA on SP in the future.
Previously, studies have tried to analyze the causal relationship between SP and OA, but no MR analysis has been conducted to investigate bi-directional causal link between SP and OA. As a result of the MR approach, we were able to avoid most confounding factors and reverse causality associated with traditional observational studies, which always bias these studies. In the present study, we selected IVs based strictly on the three hypotheses of the MR study, which makes our results more reliable. Furthermore, we adopted various methods as well as sensitivity tests to assess the causal relationship between SP and OA, which can generate more robust results. Nevertheless, there were some limitations in our study. First, the results from other MR methods, including MR-Egger and weighted median did not fully align with the IVW method in the MR analysis. However, based on the principle of method selection, IVW estimated results can be preferred if there is no pleiotropy present. Second, only summary statistics were collected, so it was not possible to assess the effect of age or gender separately. Moreover, the selected datasets were restricted to European ancestry, it is unknown if similar results would be obtained from other ancestries. Lastly, although confounding has been addressed in this study, the potential impact of third-party factors cannot be ruled out. Therefore, the results may not follow a linear pattern and require additional verification.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the results of our MR analysis supported a causal association between SP and OA risk, while little evidence was provided for the causal effect of OA on SP. Our findings emphasize the importance of muscle mass in this causal relationship. This should be considered and validated in future OA studies to develop prevention or treatment strategies. More in-depth studies are needed in the future to demonstrate the causal effect of OA on SP.
Acknowledgements
All the data used in this study were obtained from openly available databases and consortiums. We express our sincere appreciation to them.
Anzeige
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
