Background
In December 2019, a novel beta-coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), emerged in Wuhan city, China. The infectious disease caused by this novel coronavirus was named “coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)” by WHO in February 2020. One month later in March 2020, WHO officially declared the disease a globally pandemic and COVID-19 has been a global health crisis for more than two years [
1]. The clinical spectrum of SARS-CoV-2 infection ranges from asymptomatic patients to critically ill ones with acute respiratory distress syndrome and multiorgan dysfunction [
2]. Male individuals, elderly people, and patients with comorbidities such as diabetes, hypertension, obesity, and cardiovascular disease are at higher risk of poor COVID-19 outcomes and require more attention [
3‐
7].
Early in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic there was a growing concern about the outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients who developed COVID-19. COPD, a common cause of disability and death worldwide, is a persistent dysfunction of the lung characterized by airflow limitation due to inflammation of the airway and/or alveolar abnormalities. COVID-19 patients with preexisting COPD are among high-risk groups due to various complications. These complications include virus-induced exacerbations, impaired lung function, compromised immune responses, and upregulation of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE-2) receptor. ACE-2 receptor facilitates SARS-CoV-2 entry into cells putting these patients at higher risk of COVID-19 infection [
8‐
13].
Chest computed tomography (CT) is an effective modality for COVID-19 diagnosis and monitoring the progression of the disease. Studies have discussed that CT imaging has a sensitivity higher than RT-PCR (98% compared to 71%); therefore, chest CT can be used as a screening tool in suspected cases of COVID-19. According to previous studies, ground glass opacities and consolidations with peripheral and subpleural distribution are two main CT findings in COVID-19 [
14‐
19]. The extent and nature of these findings are predictive of prognosis [
15]. There are several studies that use a chest CT-based scoring system to determine the risk of disease deterioration and poor outcomes in patients with COVID-19. These studies have demonstrated that higher scores in patients’ CT are associated with higher mortality and severe forms of COVID-19 [
18,
20‐
24]. However, there are limited data on predictive value of a CT severity score in COVID-19 patients who have preexisting COPD. Taking that into consideration, the aim of the current study was to investigate the severity of the disease of COVID-19 in patients with COPD history based on CT severity score and to evaluate its predictive power in the mortality of patients.
Methods
This was a single-center retrospective study conducted on COPD patients diagnosed with COVID-19 who were hospitalized in Ardabil Imam Khomeini hospital, northwestern Iran from March 2020 to February 2022. All patients who underwent chest CT scan within 24 h of admission in the radiology department of the hospital, included in this study. The diagnosis of COVID-19 was confirmed with a positive RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 based on nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs. Exclusion was determined by certain conditions: (a) patients with a negative RT-PCR, (b) absence of CT findings in mild patients, (c) inadequate quality of chest CT images for analysis, and (d) age below 18 years. This study was approved by the ethics committee (IR.ARUMS.REC.1400.312).
Data collection
Data including demographic information, duration of hospitalization, inpatient department, comorbidities, and outcome of the disease (recovered or dead) were obtained from each patient’s electronic medical records. Comorbidities included hypertension, chronic kidney disease, chronic liver disease, diabetes mellitus, and coronary artery disease. Based on disease severity patients divided into 3 groups, moderate, severe, and critical cases. Moderate disease included patients with symptoms and signs of pneumonia such as fever, cough, and dyspnea but no signs of severe pneumonia; severe disease additionally met the following criteria––oxygen saturation at rest ⩽ 93% and arterial blood oxygen partial pressure (PaO2)/oxygen concentration (FiO2) ⩽ 300 mmHg; and the critical disease included patients who were admitted to ICU, were in need of mechanical ventilation, and had signs of multiorgan failure.
Chest CT interpretation
All patients’ chest CT images were evaluated by two certified radiologists. Both radiologists were blinded to the patients’ data and the final assessments were made by consensus. Definitions of radiological findings were based on the Fleischner Society recommendations, published in 2008 [
25]. In this study we used a chest CT severity scoring system first proposed by Ooi et al.[
26] in 2004 for SARS. According to this system, each lung was evaluated in 3 levels: upper (above the carina), middle (below the carina up to the upper limit of the pulmonary vein), and lower (below the inferior pulmonary vein). Each level was evaluated separately. Levels were assessed in both nature and extents of the involvement. For evaluating the nature of the involvement grading was as follows: 1 for no pulmonary involvement; 2 for at least 75% GGO/crazy-paving pattern; 3 for a combination of GGO/crazy-paving pattern and consolidation with less than 75% involvement for each; and 4 for at least 75% consolidation.
The score for evaluating the extent of involvement ranged from 0 to 4 as follows: 0 for no involvement, 1 for 1–24%, 2 for 25–49%, 3 for 50–74%, and 4 for more than 75%. The score for each level was calculated by multiplying these two scores, and final score was determined by adding up the scores at these levels in both lungs (ranging from 0 to 96). When present, other lung abnormalities such as septal thickening, reticulation, air bronchogram, pleural thickening, halo sign, lymphadenopathy, and bronchiectasis were also described. Distribution of pulmonary findings were classified as central, peripheral, or diffuse. Findings were also described as unilateral or bilateral.
Statistical analysis
Data were investigated with SPSS version 21 and MedCalc version 19.4.1 software. Normally distributed variables are expressed by mean ± standard deviation (SD) and categorical variables by percentages. The t-test was used to compare the continuous variables. As for the categorical variables the chi-squared test was used. For estimating the optimal cut-off score, a Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was performed (according to Youden’s index for maximizing sensitivity and specificity). Survival probability for CT severity score was estimated using the means of the Kaplan–Meier curves, with the endpoint being death. Cox proportional hazards regression was performed for both univariate and multivariate analyses. The P-value was considered significant when less than 0.05 in all analyses.
Discussion
The most important findings of the current study were as follows: 1- The mean CT severity score in patients who died was detectably higher than those who recovered. 2- Based on the ROC and Kaplan–Meier survival curves, it was revealed that CT severity score was a valuable criteria in the diagnosis of mortality in COPD patients with COVID-19. 3- Results from multivariate Cox regression model indicated that lower lung lobes severity score were significantly associated with survival.
Many studies have been conducted to identify the role of a quantitative CT scoring system in predicting disease severity in COVID-19 patients. To the best of our knowledge this is the first study that focuses on COPD patients infected by SARS- CoV-2 to evaluate CT findings based on a quantitative scoring system. A previous study used a quantitative CT emphysema score to examine its association with clinical outcome in COPD and COVID-19 patients, which demonstrated that scores higher than 5% are associated with disease severity. However, this study did not include COVID-19 specific radiologic findings in the scoring system [
27]. According to current data COPD is not a frequent comorbidity in COVID-19 patients [
22,
28]. In contrast, some studies have demonstrated that COPD patients were more susceptible to the critical form of COVID-19 [
29,
30]. This can be due to impaired lung function in COPD patients and higher ACE-2 expression in these patients which may facilitate viral entry.
The results of the current study revealed that the mean CT score was higher in the non-survival patients in comparison to the survival group. Patients with severe and critical disease also had higher CT scores than moderate cases. This was in agreement with previous studies that suggested higher CT scores in COVID-19 patients are associated with higher mortality and increase the risk of developing severe and critical types of the disease [
21,
31]. In addition, it was found that GGO, a crazy-paving pattern, and consolidations are the most frequent findings in COPD patients with COVID-19 and the findings are more predominant in peripheral and they are mostly bilateral, which was consistent with recent studies [
14,
16,
17,
19].
During the coronavirus pandemic, the use of different indicators to diagnose the disease prognosis in patients with COVID-19 has been of interest. In our previous study, systemic inflammation indices were used to diagnose the severity of the disease in COVID-19 patients [
32‐
35]. On the other hand, the effectiveness of severity score in patients with COVID-19 has been reported in some studies [
18,
36‐
39]. The results of the current study showed that CT severity score was a valuable measure in diagnosing the severity of the disease in COPD patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. Although all the levels of the right and left lungs (upper, middle, and lower) based on ROC and Kaplan–Meier curves were useful in diagnosing the mortality of patients, the lower levels of the lungs were very efficient.
To our best knowledge, multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that among the different levels of the right and left lung (upper, middle, and lower), the lower level of the right lung remained with survival. It seems that in COPD patients with COVID-19, the involvement of the lower parts of the lungs is associated with a poor prognosis of the disease, which requires further studies.
The limitations of the study were as follows: 1- This study was conducted retrospectively and in a single center. 2- The sample size for the evaluation of COPD patients with COVID-19 was moderate, and a large number of patients is required for more detailed investigations. 3- Although the CT severity score of patients at admission is used to determine the prognosis of the disease, but each patient may be hospitalized with a different severity of the disease. 4- Different stages of COPD may have influenced the results of the study, which could not be evaluated due to the lack of spirometry findings. 5- Medicines used by patients to treat COPD before hospitalization could not be reported due to lack of registration.
Conclusion
COPD patients are particularly vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 infection as a result of their specific treatments and accompanying illnesses. Establishing the intensity of the disease at the start of hospitalization in COPD patients can manage their treatment effectively. The current study demonstrated that the CT severity scoring system can be used as a beneficial tool for estimating disease severity and predict prognosis in COVID-19 COPD patients. Interestingly, the lower lobes of lung involvement showed an excellent predictive power for mortality rates in the case of COPD patients infected with COVID-19.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.