Background
Gastrointestinal infections, pneumonia, and urinary tract infections are common causes of hospital admission and important causes of death [
1]. Identifying modifiable risk factors for those infections is essential since the disease burden is projected to increase due to antibiotic resistance, an aging population, and emerging pathogens [
2]. Multiple micronutrients have been established to have vital roles in the immune system and are important components for the proliferation and maturation of immune cells, cytokine release, and enzymes involved in immune cell activity for antioxidant host defense [
3]. Deficiency can significantly impair host immunity, increasing susceptibility to infections [
3].
Previous observational studies and randomized controlled trials have found that certain micronutrients reduce the risk of specific infections [
3]. However, the results are conflicting, possibly due to factors such as high variability between studies and the use of different outcomes. It can be difficult to conduct randomized controlled trials due to logistical issues and costs, and not many adequately powered trials have evaluated the effect of micronutrients and infections. Also, it can be challenging to quantify the causal effects from traditional observational studies due to residual confounding and reverse causation [
4].
Mendelian randomization (MR) provides an alternative method to determine evidence of causality. MR uses single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) identified by genome-wide association studies (GWASs) as genetic instruments to evaluate the effect of an exposure (e.g., blood levels of copper) on the risk of an outcome (e.g., gastrointestinal infection). GWASs have successfully identified several genetic variants involved in the metabolic pathway of several vitamins and minerals [
5‐
15]. Importantly, since these genetic variants are allocated randomly at conception, MR studies are much less susceptible to reverse causation and confounding than traditional observational studies [
4].
The aim of this study was to estimate the association between genetically predicted blood levels of micronutrients on the genetically predicted risk of infectious diseases. We identified eight micronutrients of interest that have previously been linked to the risk of infection and for which genetic instruments were available—copper, iron, selenium, zinc, beta-carotene, vitamin B12, vitamin C, and vitamin D—and evaluated the risk of the following three infections: gastrointestinal infections, pneumonia, and urinary tract infections.
Discussion
In this MR study of eight micronutrients and the risk of three infectious diseases, we found genetically predicted blood levels of copper to be robustly associated with the genetically predicted risk of gastrointestinal infections. We did not find a clear association between the other micronutrients and infections.
Copper plays an essential role in innate and adaptive immunity: it regulates the function of T helper cells, B cells, neutrophils, natural killer cells, and macrophages; it accumulates at sites of inflammation, including the gastrointestinal and respiratory tract and in blood and urine, and is vital for interleukin 2 production and response [
3,
48]. Blood levels of copper have not previously been robustly linked to the risk of gastrointestinal infections in humans. A small randomized controlled trial (RCT) found that supplementation with high doses of copper, zinc, and selenium significantly reduced the risk of infections among hospitalized patients with severe burns [
49]. Another trial found that copper supplementation increased the interleukin 2 production by blood cells in healthy individuals with low to normal copper levels, which is crucial for T helper cell proliferation and natural killer cell cytotoxicity [
50]. In addition, a previous study showed that cell cultures pretreated with added Cu boosted macrophage antibacterial activity and enhanced intracellular killing of
Escherichia coli [
51]. These results align with our finding that high levels of copper have a protective effect against infectious diseases and that higher blood levels of copper might lead to increased immune response.
Regarding vitamin D, a previous MR study found that lower plasma levels of this micronutrient were associated with an increased risk of pneumonia [
52], which was not supported in our study and also not supported by a systematic review of trials of vitamin D supplementation [
53]. The same MR study found no evidence of an association between vitamin D and the risk of urinary tract infections or gastroenteritis [
52]. While we also found no association between vitamin D and urinary tract infections, we did observe a nominally significant positive association between vitamin D and gastrointestinal infection. However, this finding may be a chance finding due to multiple testing, and it did not pass our stringent threshold for statistical significance.
Interestingly, we found no associations between genetically predicted circulating iron, zinc, beta-carotene, vitamin B12, and vitamin C and the risk of gastrointestinal infections, pneumonia, or urinary tract infection. Systematic reviews of RCTs have found limited evidence of micronutrient supplementation on the risk of infections but have also underscored the paucity of studies [
54‐
57]. Among those reviews, one reported no difference in the incidence of diarrhea and lower respiratory tract infection in infants with zinc supplementation [
54]. Another review found uncertain and limited evidence for vitamin C supplementation in preventing pneumonia [
55]. Two reviews found no clear evidence that emerged in favor of selenium supplementation for developing infections [
56] and the incidence of new infections [
57] among critically ill patients. This may indicate that several of these micronutrients are not important risk factors for the infections considered. Finally, high levels of serum iron have in previous MR studies been associated with skin and soft tissue infections and sepsis, but we did not find any evidence of an association for the infections that we considered [
58,
59]. This discrepancy may be due to organ-specific effects of iron (e.g., iron levels were also associated with damages to skin-related structures) and that the infectious diseases are not comparable (e.g., sepsis is an inflammatory syndrome in response to severe infection) [
59,
60].
Our study has several strengths and limitations. By applying an MR design, we reduced the risk of confounding, which often affects observational studies. Additionally, we considerably reduced random error and increased statistical power by combining summary data from multiple cohorts [
35]. However, despite the large sample sizes, several of the genetic instruments used for exposures and the outcomes, to a varying degree, suffered from low statistical power and imperfect phenotype definitions, which may contribute to the null findings of the majority of associations explored. Larger GWASs on micronutrients and infections, with more precise phenotype definitions, would be beneficial. Also, summarized data does not allow for stratification by factors such as sex, age, diet, micronutrient supplement use, or co-morbidities. Due to the use of summary-level data, we could not identify individuals with a combination of two or more infections, which might lead to bias. The quality control, genotyping, and imputation were performed using different criteria and programs for the two cohorts. Additionally, different phenotype definitions were used in the two cohorts, which may introduce heterogeneity between the association estimates. However, we observed minimal heterogeneity between the two cohorts in the meta-analysis.
The genetic instruments used as exposure for each micronutrient have widely been used to evaluate the association with other complex diseases or phenotypes, which supports their use in this study [
61‐
63]. Throughout, we tried to use data on our exposures and outcomes from separate GWASs to reduce the risk of confounding bias due to overlapping samples [
64], but this was not possible for vitamin D (since the other published GWASs for vitamin D adjusted for BMI) [
21,
65]. To reduce the risk of population stratification, we only evaluated participants of European ancestry. However, this affects our findings’ external validity to other ancestry groups. Our findings were supported by conducting a range of sensitivity analyses, including evaluating the presence of pleiotropy, and by evaluating two distinct biobanks for each outcome (i.e., UK Biobank and FinnGen). While only two instruments were available for the main MR analysis of copper, the more liberal threshold for SNP inclusion in the secondary analyses allowed for more genetic instruments to be included; these analyses were generally consistent with the main analysis. For copper and risk of gastrointestinal infections, we conducted an extended set of sensitivity analyses to evaluate the robustness of our findings, including following up our results in an additional GWAS of gastrointestinal infections, conducting multivariable MR to account for potentially pleiotropic pathways, and conducting bi-directional MR: These analyses all supported our main finding.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.