nach oben

International Ophthalmology

Erschienen in:

01.12.2024 | Original Paper

Comparison of keratometric values and anterior segment parameters measured using Scheimpflug Sirius topography and Lenstar biometry

verfasst von: Hande Hüsniye Telek, Rabia Büşra Akden Bilen, Yaprak Arzu Özdemir, Damla Nur Dinç, Osman Çelikay

Erschienen in: International Ophthalmology | Ausgabe 1/2024

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the consistency of preoperative keratometric values, anterior segment, and intraocular lens (IOL) power measurements in patients with cataract and no comorbidities using the Sirius topography device (CSO, Italy) and Lenstar LS 900 (Haag–Streit AG, Köeniz, Switzerland).

Methods

Patients with grade 2 and 3 cataracts who applied to Ophthalmology Clinic of Dışkapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences and planned for cataract surgery were included the study. Forty eyes with cataract from 40 patients were taken in the study. All patients underwent preoperative assessment using a combined Scheimpflug–Placido disc-based tomography device (Sirius) and Lenstar before cataract surgery. Keratometric measurements, such as flat keratometry (K1), steep keratometry (K2), and maximum keratometry (Kmax), and anterior segment parameters, white-to-white (WTW) distance, IOL power, astigmatism (AST), anterior chamber depth (ACD), aqueous depth (AD), and central cornea thickness (CCT), were recorded.

Results

There were significant differences between K1_Lenstar and K1_Sirius, K2_Lenstar and K2_Sirius, Kmax_Lenstar and Kmax_Sirius, WTW_Lenstar and WTW_Sirius, and IOL power_Lenstar versus IOL power_Sirius. However, there were insignificant differences between AST_Lenstar and AST_Sirius, ACD_Lenstar versus ACD_Sirius, AD_Lenstar and AD_Sirius, and CCT_Lenstar and CCT_Sirius variables. Furthermore, it was found that Sirius measured significantly higher than Lenstar, especially in terms of IOL power.

Conclusion

Significant differences were observed between Lenstar and Sirius in terms of keratometric values, WTW distance, and IOL power. The IOL power value measured with Sirius was found to be higher than the IOL power value measured with Lenstar.

Lopez de la Fuente C, Sanchez-Cano A, Segura F, Pinilla I (2014) Comparison of anterior segment measurements obtained by three different devices in healthy eyes. Biomed Res Int 2014:498080. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/498080CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Gurlevik U, Yasar E (2021) Evaluation of the agreement of optical biometry and Scheimpflug corneal topography with different axial lengths. J Fr Ophtalmol 44:1576–1583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfo.2021.06.005CrossRefPubMed

Finis D, Ralla B, Karbe M, Borrelli M, Schrader S, Geerling G (2015) Comparison of two different Scheimpflug devices in the detection of keratoconus, regular astigmatism, and healthy corneas. J Ophthalmol 2015:315281. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/315281CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Wang X, Wu Q (2013) Investigation of the human anterior segment in normal Chinese subjects using a dual Scheimpflug analyzer. Ophthalmology 120:703–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.09.034CrossRefPubMed

Prasad A, Fry K, Hersh PS (2011) Relationship of age and refraction to central corneal thickness. Cornea 30:553–555. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181fb880cCrossRefPubMed

Li C, Zhang J, Yin X, Li J, Cao Y, Lu P (2019) Distribution and related factors of corneal regularity and posterior corneal astigmatism in cataract patients. Clin Ophthalmol 13:1341–1352. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S212946CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Masoud M, Livny E, Bahar I (2015) Repeatability and intrasession reproducibility obtained by the Sirius anterior segment analysis system. Eye Contact Lens 41:107–110. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000000074CrossRefPubMed

Hernández-Camarena JC, Chirinos-Saldaña P, Navas A, Ramirez-Miranda A, de la Mota A, Jimenez-Corona A, Graue-Hernández EO (2014) Repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement between three different Scheimpflug systems in measuring corneal and anterior segment biometry. J Refract Surg 30:616–621. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20140815-02CrossRefPubMed

Chen W, McAlinden C, Pesudovs K, Wang Q, Lu F, Feng Y, Chen J, Huang J (2012) Scheimpflug-Placido topographer and optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer: repeatability and agreement. J Cataract Refract Surg 38(9):1626–1632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.04.031CrossRefPubMed

10.

Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8CrossRefPubMed

11.

Ryu S, Yoon SH, Jun I, Seo KY, Kim EK, Kim TI (2022) Anterior ocular biometrics using Placido-scanning-slit system, rotating Scheimpflug tomography, and swept-source optical coherence tomography. Korean J Ophthalmol 36:264–273. https://doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2021.0120CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Baikoff G (2006) Anterior segment OCT and phakic intraocular lenses: A perspective. J Cataract Refract Surg 32:1827–1835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.08.025CrossRefPubMed

13.

Kim JW, Eom Y, Yoon EG, Choi Y, Song JS, Jeong JW, Park SK, Kim HM (2022) Algorithmic intraocular lens power calculation formula selection by keratometry, anterior chamber depth and axial length. Acta Ophthalmol 100:e701–e709. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.14956CrossRefPubMed

14.

Yin S, Guo C, Qiu K, Ng TK, Li Y, Du Y, Chen B, Wang H, Zhang M (2022) Assessment of the influence of keratometry on intraocular lens calculation formulas in long axial length eyes. Int Ophthalmol 42:3211–3219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02322-5CrossRefPubMed

15.

De Bernardo M, Cione F, Capasso L, Coppola A, Rosa N (2022) A formula to improve the reliability of optical axial length measurement in IOL power calculation. Sci Rep 12:18845. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23665-0ADSCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Srivannaboon S, Chirapapaisan C, Chirapapaisan N, Lertsuwanroj B, Chongchareon M (2013) Accuracy of Holladay 2 formula using IOLMaster parameters in the absence of lens thickness value. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 251:2563–2567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-013-2439-8CrossRefPubMed

17.

Sorkin N, Achiron A, Abumanhal M, Abulafia A, Cohen E, Gutfreund S, Mandelblum J, Varssano D, Levinger E (2022) Comparison of two new integrated SS-OCT tomography and biometry devices. J Cataract Refract Surg 48:1277–1284. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000974CrossRefPubMed

18.

Savini G, Taroni L, Hoffer KJ (2020) Recent developments in intraocular lens power calculation methods-update 2020. Ann Transl Med 8:1553. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-2290CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Teshigawara T, Meguro A, Mizuki N (2018) Influence of pupil dilation on predicted postoperative refraction and recommended IOL to obtain target postoperative refraction calculated by using third- and fourth-generation calculation formulas. Clin Ophthalmol 12:1913–1919. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S172846CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Simon NC, Farooq AV, Zhang MH, Riaz KM (2020) The effect of pharmacological dilation on calculation of targeted and ideal IOL power using multivariable formulas. Ophthalmol Ther 9:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-020-00261-xCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Berjandy F, Nabovati P, Hashemi H, Yekta A, Ostadimoghaddam H, Sardari S, Khabazkhoob M (2021) Predicting initial base curve of the rigid contact lenses according to Javal keratometry findings in patients with keratoconus. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 44:101340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2020.05.009CrossRefPubMed

22.

Young G, Hall L, Sulley A, Osborn-Lorenz K, Wolffsohn JS (2017) Inter-relationship of soft contact lens diameter, base curve radius, and fit. Optom Vis Sci 94:458–465. https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000001048CrossRefPubMed

23.

Matsuda J, Hieda O, Kinoshita S (2008) Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by Orbscan II and Pentacam after corneal refractive surgery. Jpn J Ophthalmol 52:245–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-008-0550-xCrossRefPubMed

24.

Garcia Marin YF, Alonso-Caneiro D, Vincent SJ, Collins MJ (2022) Anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) image analysis methods and applications: A systematic review. Comput Biol Med 146:105471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105471CrossRefPubMed

25.

Morishige N, Magome K, Ueno A, Matsui TA, Nishida T (2019) Relations among corneal curvature, thickness, and volume in keratoconus as evaluated by anterior segment-optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 60:3794–3802. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.19-27619CrossRefPubMed

26.

Olsen T (2007) Calculation of intraocular lens power: A review. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 85:472–485. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.00879.xCrossRefPubMed

27.

Huang J, Liao N, Savini G, Bao F, Yu Y, Lu W, Hu Q, Wang Q (2014) Comparison of anterior segment measurements with Scheimpflug/Placido photography-based topography system and IOLMaster partial coherence interferometry in patients with cataracts. J Ophthalmol 2014:540760. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/540760CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

28.

Chen Y-A, Hirnschall N, Findl O (2011) Evaluation of 2 new optical biometry devices and comparison with the current gold standard biometer. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:513–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.10.041CrossRefPubMed

29.

Wang Q, Savini G, Hoffer KJ, Xu Z, Feng Y, Wen D, Hua Y, Yang F, Pan C, Huang J (2012) A comprehensive assessment of the precision and agreement of anterior corneal power measurements obtained using 8 different devices. PLoS ONE 7:e45607. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045607ADSCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Elbaz U, Barkana Y, Gerber Y, Avni I, Zadok D (2007) Comparison of different techniques of anterior chamber depth and keratometric measurements. Am J Ophthalmol 143:48–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2006.08.031CrossRefPubMed

31.

Koranyi G, Lydahl E, Norrby S, Taube M (2002) Anterior chamber depth measurement: a-scan versus optical methods. J Cataract Refract Surg 28:243–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(01)01039-2CrossRefPubMed

32.

Obstfeld H (1989) Crystalline lens accommodation and anterior chamber depth. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 9:36–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.1989.tb00802.xCrossRefPubMed

33.

Savini G, Carbonelli M, Sbreglia A, Barboni P, Deluigi G, Hoffer KJ (2011) Comparison of anterior segment measurements by 3 Scheimpflug tomographers and 1 Placido corneal topographer. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:1679–1685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.03.055CrossRefPubMed

34.

Milla M, Piñero DP, Amparo F, Alió JL (2011) Pachymetric measurements with a new Scheimpflug photography-based system: Intraobserver repeatability and agreement with optical coherence tomography pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:310–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.08.038CrossRefPubMed

35.

Cruysberg LPJ, Doors M, Verbakel F, Berendschot TTJM, De Brabander J, Nuijts RMMA (2010) Evaluation of the Lenstar LS 900 non-contact biometer. Br J Ophthalmol 94:106–110. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2009.161729CrossRefPubMed

36.

Buckhurst PJ, Wolffsohn JS, Shah S, Naroo SA, Davies LN, Berrow EJ (2009) A new optical low coherence reflectometry device for ocular biometry in cataract patients. Br J Ophthalmol 93:949–953. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2008.156554CrossRefPubMed

37.

Şahin A, Gürsoy H, Başmak H, Yildirim N, Usalp Z, Çolak E (2011) Reproducibility of ocular biometry with a new non-contact optical low-coherence reflectometer in children. Eur J Ophthalmol 21:194–198. https://doi.org/10.5301/EJO.2010.1298CrossRefPubMed

38.

Huang J, Pesudovs K, Wen D, Chen D, Chen S, Wright T, Wang X, Li Y, Wang Q (2011) Comparison of anterior segment measurements with rotating Scheimpflug photography and partial coherence reflectometry. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:341–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.08.044CrossRefPubMed

39.

Meinhardt B, Stachs O, Stave J, Beck R, Guthoff R (2006) Evaluation of biometric methods for measuring the anterior chamber depth in the non-contact mode. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 244:559–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-005-0103-7CrossRefPubMed

40.

Rabsilber TM, Becker KA, Frisch IB, Auffarth GU (2003) Anterior chamber depth in relation to refractive status measured with the Orbscan II topography system. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:2115–2121. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(03)00409-7CrossRefPubMed

41.

Gursoy H, Sahin A, Basmak H, Ozer A, Yildirim N, Colak E (2011) Lenstar versus ultrasound for ocular biometry in a pediatric population. Optom Vis Sci 88:912–919. https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0b013e31821cc4d6CrossRefPubMed

42.

Zhao Y, Wei W, Zhang CN (2014) Comparison of anterior segment parameters with Lenstar 900 and Sirius system. Int Eye Sci 14(7):1250–1252. https://doi.org/10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2014.07.20CrossRef

Titel: Comparison of keratometric values and anterior segment parameters measured using Scheimpflug Sirius topography and Lenstar biometry
verfasst von: Hande Hüsniye Telek
Rabia Büşra Akden Bilen
Yaprak Arzu Özdemir
Damla Nur Dinç
Osman Çelikay
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2024
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: International Ophthalmology / Ausgabe 1/2024
Print ISSN: 0165-5701
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2630
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-024-03046-4

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Metastase in der periokulären Region

Metastasen Leitthema

Orbitale und periokuläre metastatische Tumoren galten früher als sehr selten. Aber mit der ständigen Aktualisierung von Medikamenten und Nachweismethoden für die Krebsbehandlung werden neue Chemotherapien und Strahlenbehandlungen eingesetzt. Die …

Staging und Systemtherapie bei okulären und periokulären Metastasen

Metastasen Leitthema

Metastasen bösartiger Erkrankungen sind die häufigsten Tumoren, die im Auge diagnostiziert werden. Sie treten bei ungefähr 5–10 % der Patienten mit soliden Tumoren im Verlauf der Erkrankung auf. Besonders häufig sind diese beim Mammakarzinom und …

Wundheilung nach Trabekulektomie

Trabekulektomie CME-Artikel

Die überschießende Wundheilung in der filtrierenden Glaukomchirurgie ist ein zentraler Faktor für ein operatives Versagen. Nach der Einführung der Trabekulektomie in den 1960er-Jahren wurden viele Faktoren erkannt, die mit einer vermehrten …

„standard operating procedures“ (SOP) – Vorschlag zum therapeutischen Management bei periokulären sowie intraokulären Metastasen

Metastasen Leitthema

Peri- sowie intraokuläre Metastasen sind insgesamt gesehen selten und meist Zeichen einer fortgeschrittenen primären Tumorerkrankung. Die Therapie ist daher zumeist palliativ und selten kurativ. Zudem ist die Therapiefindung sehr individuell. Die …

Update Augenheilkunde

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Springer Medizin

Comparison of keratometric values and anterior segment parameters measured using Scheimpflug Sirius topography and Lenstar biometry

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Metastase in der periokulären Region

Staging und Systemtherapie bei okulären und periokulären Metastasen

Wundheilung nach Trabekulektomie

„standard operating procedures“ (SOP) – Vorschlag zum therapeutischen Management bei periokulären sowie intraokulären Metastasen

Update Augenheilkunde

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2024

Corneal biomechanics and their association with severity of lens dislocation in Marfan syndrome

Applications of photodynamic therapy in keratitis

Development and evaluation of Order of Magnitude (OM): a virtual reality-based visual field analyzer for glaucoma detection

The effect of combination therapy with intravitreal bevacizumab and topical timolol–dorzolamide eye drops on diabetic macular edema: a double-blind randomized controlled trial

Accuracy of intraocular lens formulas in combined phacovitrectomy

In vivo assessment of the ocular biomechanical properties in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Metastase in der periokulären Region

Staging und Systemtherapie bei okulären und periokulären Metastasen

Wundheilung nach Trabekulektomie

„standard operating procedures“ (SOP) – Vorschlag zum therapeutischen Management bei periokulären sowie intraokulären Metastasen

Update Augenheilkunde