Background
Domestic violence and abuse (DVA) is a public health and human rights concern that can be defined as “any form of abuse, mistreatment or neglect that a child or adult experiences from a family member, or from someone with whom they have an intimate relationship.” [
1].
Victims of DVA are at an increased risk of chronic physical and mental illness, drug addiction, economic crisis, social exclusion, and further victimization [
2]. In literature, terms such as “Family Violence” or “Domestic and Family Violence” are used interchangeably with DVA.
DVA can be experienced at any age. The most frequently observed forms of DVA are child abuse and neglect (CAN), intimate partner violence (IPV), and elder abuse and neglect (EAN) [
2]. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) defines CAN as “any act or series of acts of commission or omission by a parent or other caregiver (e.g., clergy, coach, teacher) that results in harm, potential for harm, or threat of harm to a child.” [
3]; IPV as “physical violence, sexual violence, stalking and psychological aggression (including coercive acts) by a current or former intimate partner.” [
4]; and EAN as “an intentional act, or failure to act, by a caregiver or another person in a relationship involving an expectation of trust that causes or creates a risk of harm to an older adult (an older adult is defined as someone age 60 or older).” [
5] All three forms of DVA can manifest as physical, emotional, sexual, and/or financial abuse as well as intentional or unintentional neglect [
3‐
5].
In Canada, the General Social Survey is conducted every five years to capture information on Canadians’ experiences of victimization. The most recent cycle found that in 2014, 33% of Canadians aged 15 and older reported having experienced childhood abuse [
6]. The health care system is an important point of contact, where victims of DVA can be identified and provided support. Health care professionals, specifically in emergency rooms (ERs), are often victims’ first point of contact with the health care system. This is an opportunity for health care professionals to not only treat the current DVA-related medical condition/injury, but also to provide support in mitigating the risk of its recurrence in the future through safety referral, who can provide emotional support, crisis counselling, and information and assistance with urgent moves [
7,
8]. Quantifying the number and understanding the demographic characteristics of DVA-related visits made to ERs is a crucial step for estimating how much the burden of this public health issue is and where is it more concentrated [
9]. Further, a better understanding of the impact of DVA-related ER visits will inform the importance of ongoing public health surveillance in the area of DVA, assessment of resource allocation required for its appropriate management and development of future preventative healthcare strategies to mitigate the burden in Canada.
Jurisdictional variation and certain indicators of marginalization (e.g. gender, ethnicity and deprivation) have been shown to increase an individual’s vulnerability to DVA [
10‐
12]. Assessing if jurisdictional variation or levels of marginalization predict DVA-associated ER visits is crucial for directing public health and health care-related efforts aimed at mitigating inequities. Further, it is important to understand the pattern and severity of injuries sustained as a result of DVA to support ER health professionals in recognizing associated signs and symptoms. This study endeavors to fill these evidentiary gaps. To understand the overall burden and geographical distribution of DVA in the province of Ontario, our primary objective was to quantify the number of DVA-related ER visits, overall and in individual health regions of the province. To support health care professionals in understanding who bears the burden of domestic violence more, what kind of injuries are expected among DVA victims, and how severe such injuries can be, we had some secondary objectives, which included assessing the distribution of DVA-related ER visits by level of marginalization, specific injury sites involved during such visits, and disposition status of such visits (discharged, hospitalization or death).
Discussion
Using health administrative data, we estimated that 10,935 DVA-related ER visits were made in Ontario between 2012 and 2016. This is equivalent to approximately six DVA-related ER visits per day in Ontario. This burden is large enough to warrant timely public health interventions in ERs, including capacitating healthcare professionals to recognize clinical manifestations of DVA and make appropriate referral for their patients.
While not all DVA-related incidents will require physician attention in an ER, it is likely that the true burden of DVA-related ER visits is higher than the rates of identified cases reported in this paper. In 2015 alone, 25,929 cases of IPV (not including CAN and EAN) were reported to police in Ontario, which is an average of 71 cases per day [
6]. Further, it is estimated that under one-third (31%) of victimization is reported to the police [
17]. There can be various reasons for not reporting victimization including fear of retaliation, shame, stigma, and fear of discussing such a personal issue [
18‐
20]. Child victimization is especially under-reported to police, as children may be fearful of consequences of reporting, lack social support to file a report, or may be unaware of the criminal nature of the abuse/act they experience [
14]. It is also estimated that less than 20% of victims report their DVA associated injuries to their family physicians [
21].
Our data shows that females made more DVA-related ER visits compared to males, which is consistent with findings from other international jurisdictions, [
22‐
25] and also corroborates Canadian police data [
6]. This trend, however, was reversed among infants 0–1 years old. Other studies have also found physical abuse to be higher among male infants [
26,
27]. Importantly, irrespective of sex, the rates of DVA-related visits among children < 15 years of age are the highest for infants. Further research is needed to confirm and elucidate the factors influencing higher rates of visits among younger children.
Geographically, the highest rates of DVA-related ER visits were observed in the North West LHIN and the lowest in the Waterloo-Wellington LHIN. Census data from 2001 indicate that the North West LHIN had a higher unemployment rate and a larger proportion of residents who did not complete a high school education in comparison to Ontario overall [
28]. The opposite was observed for the Waterloo Wellington region during this period [
29]. Since there is evidence to suggest that these social determinants of health shape individuals’ vulnerability to DVA, this could help explain these findings to a certain extent [
30‐
32]. Nevertheless, further explorations to understand contextual differences would be beneficial for customizing local public health interventions.
In our investigation, area-level residential instability and material deprivation were found to be associated with higher rates of DVA-related ER visits in Ontario. Although relevant empirical studies conducted in a Canadian context is limited, the association between individual and neighbourhood level housing instability and intimate partner violence has been well established in the U.S. literature [
33,
34]. Many co-occurring challenges related to IPV and residential instability shape the relationship between the two [
35]. For instance, there is evidence to suggest that residential instability is linked to weakened social ties, which may prevent neighbours from collectively intervening during cases of violence [
36‐
38]. The association between individual and neighbourhood level material deprivation and DVA is also well established in the U.S. literature [
25,
39‐
42]. As is the case for residential instability, there are likely many factors that influence the relationship between material deprivation and DVA. For instance, economic instability could shape vulnerability to DVA through various direct and indirect pathways such as: continuing in abusive relationships due to economic dependence on partners, [
43] being the victim of CAN due to parental stress associated with financial hardship, [
42] and experiencing increased susceptibility to EAN due to low-levels of social support (which is associated with low socioeconomic status among older adults) [
44].
Approximately 4% of DVA related-ER visits resulted in hospitalization between 2012 and 2016 in Ontario. Two studies examining assault-related ER visits among adult patients observed comparable numbers. One study conducted in the U.S. found that about 5% of ER visits due to IPV resulted in hospitalization [
25]. Similarly, a Denmark study found that 6% of violence-related ER visits lead to hospitalization [
45]. A higher proportion of male visits than female visits resulted in hospitalization, indicating their injuries are more likely to be severe enough to warrant hospital admission. Also, among DVA-related visits, a higher proportion of males, irrespective of age, presented with CMF trauma. National and international studies examining CMF trauma in hospital departments have also observed similar results in general [
46‐
49]. By age, higher hospitalization rates were found among younger (< 4 years) and older age groups (70+). Other studies have also observed similar trends [
50,
51]. Potential explanations for this pattern include these populations being more vulnerable to the impact of injuries sustained during abusive episodes and/or more likely to delay seeking medical attention until becoming more severely injured [
48,
50,
52].
A limitation of our data is that it is based on ER visits where DVA has been identified and documented. Previous studies have shown that ER visits caused by DVA go underreported by as much as 87%, suggesting that our estimates are much lower than the actual number of DVA-related ER visits [
22]. One Ontario study found that one fifth of the children with abuse-related injuries had been missed during initial medical visits [
53]. Although these cases were eventually detected in subsequent medical encounters, the study was unable to include cases of abusive fractures that had never been detected in medical settings, indicating that the actual number could be even higher [
53]. Coding inaccuracies can be another limitation of the data available. Another limitation was that the ON-Marg used data as recent as 2011; however, since our report examines data from 2012 to 2016 any Dissemination Area level changes occurring after 2011 will not have been captured by our analysis. Also, patients’ individual socioeconomic situation or family condition were not considered in this study; variables of geographic marginalization and individual’s socioeconomic or family status could be related and/or interacted, which could not be captured in these observations. Future studies, both qualitative and quantitative, can include these dimensions to further assess factors attributing to the vulnerability of victims.
Irrespective of these limitations, this is the first Canadian study, to our knowledge, to examine the province-wide DVA-related ER visit data. Estimates from other provinces would be helpful in developing nation-wide strategy to curb this public health epidemic.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.