Which clinical factors should arouse suspicion of AMI in the acute abdomen?
Answer: Most patients present with abdominal pain of sudden onset. The early phase of AMI can be characterized by an initial discrepancy between the severity of the abdominal pain and minimal findings on physical examination. Patients can also present with symptoms of nausea, vomiting and initial forced evacuation, early in the course of the disease. The location of pain varies, but as ischemia progresses to infarction, it becomes diffuse. The development of transmural infarction may also be signalled by fever, bloody diarrhoea and shock.
Background: The available evidence comes from level II and III studies, with mostly small and retrospective observational case-series. However, they all consider pain as the main symptom in most cases [
14,
35]. The classical presentation has been described as pain out of proportion to the findings on clinical examination [
10,
19,
36‐
41] but in 20 to 25 % of patients the initial presentation resembles an acute abdomen from another cause [
36,
42,
43]. Other frequent symptoms associated with pain in the early course include nausea (93 %), vomiting (80 %) and diarrhoea (48 %) [
19,
40,
41]. Klass’ classical description [
44] of the onset of abdominal pain with sudden simultaneous passage of stools as a characteristic sign of AMI is also reported in recent studies [
39,
43,
45]. However, these symptoms are not specific for AMI.
Features in the patient’s medical history can be important, particularly in the elderly presenting with 2–3 h of continuous abdominal pain [
46]. A retrospective series of 215 AMI patients identified significant comorbidities that predispose to AMI such as ischaemic heart disease, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, diabetes mellitus or renal insufficiency in most patients [
47]. Another retrospective series of 47 patients over 13 years observed atrial fibrillation in all 14 patients with arterial embolism and ischemic cardiomyopathy in 18 of 20 cases of arterial thrombosis [
48]. As the disease progresses and ischemia leads to intestinal necrosis, pain becomes more diffuse and signs of peritoneal irritation [
14] and bloating appear [
39]. The patient may develop bloody diarrhoea, fever, signs of shock, multiple organ failure and a reduction in consciousness [
37,
39].
Recommendation: Acute mesenteric ischaemia (AMI) should be suspected in patients with acute abdominal pain in whom there is no clear diagnosis, particularly when the pain is disproportionate to the physical examination findings and in the elderly with a history of cardiovascular comorbidities (LOE: III).
Are there any clinical features to distinguish the aetiology of AMI?
Answer: Clinical assessment does not reliably distinguish between mesenteric arterial embolism or arterial thrombosis. However, the four aetiological types of AMI have been associated with different characteristics and risk factors (Table
2). EAMI is characterized by a sudden onset of pain and is frequently associated with atrial fibrillation. TAMI has a more indolent course and is often associated with a history of abdominal angina and weight loss suggestive of undiagnosed chronic mesenteric ischaemia. VAMI appears in younger patients, sometimes with several days of mild symptoms. It is associated with hypercoagulable states, cirrhosis, severe pancreatitis, abdominal trauma and advanced malignancy. NOMI is often silent as it occurs in patients that are critically ill and often ventilated.
Table 2
Characteristics and risk factors associated with AMI
EAMI | Heart disease (atrial fibrillation, rheumatic, myocardial infarction, prosthetic valve, ventricular aneurism, Chagas’ disease) | Acute | Diarrhoea, vomiting | Angiography |
TAMI | Arteriosclerosis, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, dehydration, antiphospholipid syndrome, estrogens | Acute, may be recurrent | Sitophobia, postprandial pain | Vascular surgery (bypass) |
VAMI | Hypercoagulable disorders, sickle cell disease, right sided heart failure, DVT, malignancies, hepatitis, pancreatitis, sepsis hepato-splenomegaly, cirrhosis | Gradual | Vague complaints | Recent abdominal surgery |
NOMI | Shock, hypovolemia, hypotension, digitalis, diuretics, beta-blockers, alpha-adrenergics, enteral nutrition, critical care support | Either acute or gradual | | |
Background: Embolism is the most frequent cause of mesenteric ischaemia (45 %) [
10]. Cardiac ischemia, tachyarrhythmia, rheumatic fever, and other conditions that predispose to the formation of atrial thrombi are risk factors of the disease [
35,
36,
38,
42,
49].
Approximately 33 % of patients present with a history of recent embolism [
36,
39] and the absence of suitable anticoagulant treatment in these patients should increase suspicion of EAMI [
21,
35,
36,
42]. The sudden onset of severe pain with spontaneous emptying of the bowel (vomiting and diarrhoea) but no significant physical findings is a classic sign of an EAMI. If a potential source of emboli can be identified, this “clinical triad” is present in 40–80 % of patients [
38].
Arterial thrombosis accounts for approximately 25 % of cases of AMI [
10]. These patients usually report prodromal symptoms of mesenteric angina [
36] (postprandial abdominal pain, nausea and weight loss) before the acute episode resulting from pre-existent vascular insufficiency [
10,
39]. The main risk factors for TAMI are atherosclerotic disease and dyslipidaemia [
49,
50]. There may be a history of other vascular events and previous vascular surgery.
Venous thrombosis represents 10 % of cases of patients with acute mesenteric ischaemia and usually occurs in a younger population. While thromboembolic AMI is more common in the over 60 s, VAMI tends to occur in people over 40 [
36,
47,
51,
52]. Although occasionally idiopathic, most patients have an identifiable risk factor [
10,
51,
53]. Up to 50 % of patients with VAMI report a previous deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism [
54]. Other risk factors include hypercoagulability states (protein C and S deficiency, polycythaemia or Leiden factor V mutation), portal hypertension, abdominal trauma, abdominal infection, acute pancreatitis, malignancy, nephrotic syndrome, cirrhosis or splenomegaly [
10,
40,
49,
51‐
53,
55‐
57]. Leiden factor V mutation is the most common associated hypercoagulability state and is reported in 20–40 % of VAMI cases [
40]. Oral contraceptives, pregnancy and the puerperium are risk factors in young women [
35,
58]. Venous vascular occlusion is usually peripheral, involving short segments of bowel [
53]. The onset of VAMI is characterized by subacute abdominal pain that may develop over a period of up to 2 weeks. Half of the patients complain of nausea and vomiting. Untreated cases may result in portal hypertension with the development of oesophageal varices [
39]. VAMI is not usually associated with postprandial syndrome, although bloating, abdominal distension, fever and occult blood in stools may be present [
59].
NOMI is responsible for about 20 % of cases of mesenteric ischaemia. It usually occurs in patients that are critically ill, sedated and artificially ventilated and is difficult to recognize. It is poorly understood, but can be explained by a combination of low cardiac output and vasoconstriction. Risk factors for NOMI include age over 50, history of acute myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, aortic insufficiency, cardiopulmonary bypass, kidney or liver disease or major abdominal surgery. Notably, many patients with NOMI may have none of these factors [
10].
The diagnosis should be suspected in patients with mesenteric hypoperfusion secondary to circulatory shock or vasoactive drugs (including amines, cocaine and digitalis) when there is a significant unexpected deterioration in their clinical course [
40,
41,
43,
60]. Acute or insidious pain (without defecation), bloating, abdominal distension and the presence of occult blood in the stools are all consistent with NOMI in a critically ill patient [
10,
21,
36,
45,
54]. Most patients display signs of sepsis and abdominal distension as a late clinical sign [
10].
Mitsuyoshi et al. [
61] suggested diagnostic criteria for NOMI in the critically ill patient consisting of 3 of: ileus or abdominal pain, need for catecholamines, episode of hypotension or rising level of transaminases. Although they were able to demonstrate early detection and improved survival, the numbers involved were small.
Large doses of vasopressors alone can cause bowel ischaemia by non-occlusive, low perfusion mechanisms (NOMI). AMI has been associated with drug toxicity. Several case reports link cardiotoxins, such as digitalis, in combination with furosemide-induced fluid depletion, calcium-channel blockers [
36], cocaine (linked to arterial thrombosis), organophosphates, ergotamine, phenobarbital, ethylene glycol or tricyclic antidepressants to NOMI in ICU patients. Snake bites have also been associated with NOMI [
62,
63].
NOMI has also been described in patients who have undergone the stress of a surgical procedure or trauma and are receiving enteral nutrition in intensive care units. The reported incidence of AMI in these patients is 0.3–8.5 % [
10,
64]. The proposed mechanism is an imbalance between demand (created by the enteral feeding) and supply (decreased by systemic hypo-perfusion and mesenteric vasoconstriction).
Recommendations: AMI secondary to an arterial embolism (EAMI) should be suspected in patients with atrial fibrillation who have a sudden onset of abdominal pain. AMI resulting from arterial thrombosis (TAMI) should be suspected in patients with evidence of atherosclerotic disease particularly with a recent history of postprandial syndrome. AMI due to venous thrombosis (VAMI) should be suspected in patients with hypercoagulable states. Non-occlusive mesenteric ischaemia (NOMI) should be suspected in critically ill patients with an unexpected deterioration in their clinical condition (LOE: III).
Can interventional procedures precipitate AMI?
Answer: Any procedure which involves vascular manipulation (even unintentional) can precipitate AMI.
Background: Acute mesenteric ischaemia has been associated with several procedures and may complicate any abdominal surgery [
21]. VAMI is a recognised complication of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. A retrospective analysis over 10 years (1069 colorectal operations) identified 37 (3.5 %) cases of AMI. Inflammatory bowel disease, ulcerative colitis, preoperative therapy with steroids, operative time longer than 220 min, ileoanal pouch anastomosis, total proctocolectomy or postoperative septic complications were associated with thrombosis. The latter two were independent predictors of thrombosis in multivariate analysis. Manipulation of mesenteric vessels and raised intra-abdominal pressure may play a role in the pathophysiology [
65].
EAMI may occur when atheromatous plaques are dislodged by angiography of the coronary or cerebral circulation [
10]. Aortic catheterization can induce cholesterol embolization [
59].
AMI may be seen after colonoscopy. The decreased intravascular volume resulting from fasting and colon preparation, reduction of vascular tone through medications used for conscious sedation and the mechanical effects of colonoscopy may work together to create a low flow state precipitating acute mesenteric ischemia [
66]. Possible predisposing conditions include connective tissue disease, advanced age, cardiovascular disease and immunosuppression.
AMI is an infrequent event after coronary bypass (1 %) or valve replacement surgery (0.2–0.4 %). It occurs particularly in older, dehydrated patients who have generalized atherosclerosis, and has a 70–100 % mortality [
67]. Several factors (low cardiac output, use of vasopressors and underlying atherosclerotic disease) contribute to severe hypoperfusion and NOMI is the most frequent pathophysiological event [
41]. Intra-aortic balloon pumps cause embolic showers particularly if placement involves excessive manipulation of a diseased aorta [
50].
Recommendation: Unexplained abdominal pain after any invasive procedure, particularly involving vascular manipulation, should lead to suspicion and investigation of AMI (LOE: III).
Can we predict prognosis at presentation, in order to help the decision making process?
Answer: It is difficult to predict prognosis at presentation based exclusively on clinical findings. However, older patients with delayed presentation and abdominal signs of peritonitis or organ failure generally have a worse prognosis. A number of scoring systems have been proposed for AMI, but these have not been validated in large-scale studies.
Background: The moribund patient with significant co-morbidities and poor performance status is unlikely to benefit from intervention. A number of factors including admission from a nursing home, or partial dependence, pre-existing ‘do not attempt resuscitation’ order, and class 4 wound before surgery are all associated with increased mortality [
68]. So too are coma, artificial ventilation, acute renal failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, myocardial infarction within the preceding 6 months as well as preoperative sepsis, major surgery, emergency procedure, duration of surgery and postoperative complications [
68].
Most of the literature considers old age and late diagnosis as bad prognostic factors for arterio-occlusive disease. However, in VAMI longer duration of symptoms before hospital admission may be related to better outcome. With arterio-occlusive AMI a cut off point of 60-65 years and 24 h from the onset of symptoms are associated with better prognosis [
7,
14,
21,
30]. One study reported thirty day survival of 81 % for patients with AMI under the age of 71. This fell to 30 % between 71 and 84 and 7 % in the over 84 s [
28]. It was associated with increasing rates of non-resectable gangrene in these age groups of 9, 45 and 79 %, respectively.
In a series of patients with AMI mortality was 10.6 % if operated in the first 24 h after onset of symptoms vs. 72.9 % if operated after 24 h [
14].
In arterial occlusion, all symptoms but abdominal pain indicate disease progression. The presence of peritoneal irritation is associated with bowel necrosis and worse prognosis [
14,
42]. Renal failure and acidosis resulting from shock and sepsis are independent risk factors for mortality [
7,
35].
In a retrospective study of 58 patients resection (at first or second look procedure) and no recent major cardiovascular intervention were associated with better survival rates [
21]. A larger retrospective series of 124 patients identified older age, bandemia, elevated serum aspartate aminotransferase, increased blood urea nitrogen and metabolic acidosis as independent predictors of death in AMI [
7].
APACHE-II and P-POSSUM are not accurate scoring systems for outcomes after emergency surgery and P-POSSUM may under-predict mortality from AMI [
69]. However, they may provide a useful indicator of morbidity and mortality. Other scoring systems for predicting outcome from AMI have shown early promise, but require validation in further studies [
2,
30,
68].
Recommendation: Management decisions should not be based exclusively on clinical findings. However, patients with advanced age, late presentation, peritonitis and signs of organ failure are unlikely to benefit from invasive procedures and should be considered for palliative care only (LOE: III).