European child and adolescent psychiatry—endorse the importance of prospective longitudinal study designs

Excerpt

This current issue of European child and adolescent psychiatry (ECAP) presents a substantial number of relevant publications. More specifically, two studies on psychopathology present results from Korea [11, 18], one from Finland [19] and one from the Netherlands [20]. Over the years the methodological standards of studies published in ECAP have vastly improved, e.g., in sample size or by implementing a longitudinal design. The value of the latter as well as other methodological improvements has been highlighted by Sir Michael Rutter [16] in ECAP in his review “Child and adolescent psychiatry: past scientific achievements and challenges for the future”. The present longitudinal study by Shin et al. [18] is a prime example of these aforementioned advancements. They conducted a baseline examination of parental ratings of 3,808 children aged 6.85 years using the Korean version of the child behavior checklist (K-CBCL). To identify the predictors of juvenile delinquent tendencies, they administered the Korean youth self-report (K-YSR) at the 6- to 8-year follow-up for at least 1,821 adolescents aged 13.75 years. This current issue also presents findings by Lee et al. [11] who investigated a large sample, i.e. a total of 4,899 Korean students aged 13–18 years by implementing several self-report forms of questionnaires to identify possible relationships between the Type D personality construct and other mental health measures. Type D personality is characterized by both normal and stable personality traits, negative affectivity (NA, the tendency to experience negative emotions), and social inhibition (SI, the tendency to inhibit expression of emotions). The authors concluded that the administered validated Korean version of the Type D Personality-14 scale (DS14) can be useful in a community mental health program designed for adolescents. Taking into consideration that validity and reliability of the DS14 have been verified in both European and Korean populations, this raises the question as to why the authors, as many others previously, did not conduct a cross-cultural study in an attempt to gain further insights regarding the Type D construct. This shortfall could be seen as a reflection of the small amount of available studies on cross-cultural comparisons of psychopathology constructs. Nevertheless, exceptions can be found, also in this issue of ECAP. Veen et al. [21] compared mental health issues between incarcerated adolescents of Dutch and Moroccan origin. Their findings indicate that native Dutch adolescent offenders show higher levels of mental health problems than incarcerated adolescents with an ethnic minority (Moroccan) background. Meanwhile there exists an excellent basic list of steps to be taken to achieve valid assessment across cultures [15]. …