Introduction
Influenza and SARS-CoV-2 viruses have cocirculated since 2020. Both pathogens have high variability rate, cause millions of cases every year, and can coinfect individuals with increased risk of complications [
1,
2]. Annual vaccination is the most effective strategy to control influenza epidemics. The development of a bivalent vaccine against influenza and SARS-CoV-2 is highly relevant since the existing system of annual influenza immunization can be easily adjusted for prophylaxis of both infections.
While there is much interest in this idea, quite a variety of bivalent vaccines are being developed. An adenovirus-based bivalent vaccine encoding SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain (RBD) and H7N9 influenza HA conserved stalk domain protected mice against challenge with influenza and induced neutralizing antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 [
3]. Another viral vector-based bivalent vaccine was developed using vesicular stomatitis virus; this vaccine expressed SARS-CoV-2 full-length spike or RBD and influenza M2, and demonstrated promising results in animal studies [
4]. Furthermore, influenza VLP-based vaccine with addition of (GPI)-anchored SARS-CoV-2 RBD fused to GM-CSF had protective potential against both viruses [
5], and even inactivated influenza virus with the RBD conjugated onto its surface was immunogenic in preclinical studies [
6]. Notably, the Moderna’s mRNA-1083 vaccine candidate demonstrated positive results in a phase I/II clinical trial (NCT05827926) [
7], shortly after Pfizer and BioNTech mRNA vaccines against influenza and SARS-CoV-2 were reported also to be safe and well-tolerated (NCT05596734) [
8].
The design of such bivalent vaccines using influenza virus as a viral vector is an attractive idea, as there is established system with annual influenza vaccinations, and because influenza virus-based vector platforms have been well studied and characterized. The most popular SARS-CoV-2 antigen in influenza-based vaccines is the RBD of the viral spike protein, because of limited capacity of the vector, and proven effectiveness of the RBD as an antigen for COVID-19 vaccines. The bivalent vaccine based on attenuated H1N1pdm virus is being developed by a group of scientists from China [
9]. In this development, the RBD is embedded in the NS gene, while the virus lacks the NS1 protein. This vaccine showed promising results in protection studies during preclinical evaluation, even despite the low level of immune response recorded in the neutralization test. Furthermore, this vaccine was proven to be safe, well-tolerated and immunogenic in a phase I clinical trial [
10].
An NA-deficient influenza vector with RBD embedded into NA was developed by Loes et al. [
11]. In this construct, the RBD is targeted to membrane expression, and mouse studies confirmed that such vaccines are immunogenic in terms of the induction of RBD-specific antibodies. Later, the same RBD cassette was inserted into the NS gene of the M2-deficient H3N2 influenza virus vector [
12], also leading to high level of membrane expression of the RBD. Another interesting influenza vector design is developed by a group of scientists from Nanjing Agricultural University [
13]. In this development, RBD is incorporated into the virus membrane, whereas the HA and NA proteins of the virus are substituted by the influenza C hemagglutinin-esterase-fusion glycoprotein. The incorporation of the RBD into the virus particle provided immunogenicity against SARS-CoV-2 but the potential of this vaccine as an influenza vaccine is controversial due to the absence of major antigens that are necessary for protection against influenza A infection. Another design exploiting HA UTRs and transmembrane domain was developed in Thailand [
14]. This virus is characterized by a single-cycle replication, due to the absence of the HA sequence in the vector genome, and hence the vaccine requires HA-expressing cell line for production. An additional strategy of RBD incorporation in influenza particles is described by Chaparian et al. [
15], where the RBD-encoding fragment fused with the transmembrane domain from the influenza NA is inserted into the HA gene through the P2A self-cleavage site.
Despite the wide list of bivalent influenza and COVID-19 vaccines under development, there are no such vaccines licensed for mass immunization yet, and the development of new candidate vaccines based on well-characterized backbones seems to be relevant. In this work, we used a licensed live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) backbone virus [
16] as a vector to incorporate SARS-CoV-2 RBD fragments. Several types of RBD-encoding cassettes were inserted into the HA or NS genes of influenza virus. Nine variants of recombinant vaccine candidate strains were rescued and assessed in in vitro experiments, as well as in animal models. The most promising vaccine candidate was investigated in an experiment on golden Syrian hamsters, challenged by SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses.
Discussion
This paper describes the development of a bivalent viral-vectored vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 and influenza based on attenuated strain of live influenza vaccine as a vector, with an inserted RBD-based immunogenic fragment of SARS-CoV-2. We investigated a list of modifications of influenza virus by inserting immunogenic material into HA and NS genes using different strategies. Furthermore, we assessed several modifications of the RBD insert that differed by the length and the targeting signals. All rescued candidate vaccine strains were studied in vitro, and immunogenicity was evaluated in a mouse model to select the most promising candidate for further challenge experiments in Syrian hamsters.
Various published works have been thoroughly evaluated to support our choice of the RBD-based antigen design for further incorporation into influenza virus genome. The most important issue to consider when developing vaccines that use RBD is antigen design – e.g. which fragment will be inserted into the vaccine, as this will affect the spatial structure of the fragment, as well as the repertoire of the T-cell epitopes in the final antigen structure. Boundaries of the RBD mapped on the reference strain sequence YP_009724390 are indicated as amino acid residues 330-583 of the Spike protein. In five of our constructs exploring various targeting strategies, we tested the prolonged variant of RBD 278 cassette (319-596). This construct was designed by BIOCAD JSC (Russia) [
19] and was highly immunogenic as an AAV-vectored vaccine candidate. A similar CHO-expressed RBD
319-591 fragment induced virus-neutralizing antibody response [
56].
In a study by Lan et al. [
32], RBD is indicated at residues 319-541, which corresponds to the RBD 223 insert used in our study in variants FluCoVac-20, 35 and 41. Recombinant protein vaccines [
57] and influenza VLP-based vaccines [
5] based on the RBD
319-541 fragment were shown to be immunogenic for animals and correctly folded, which was established in tests with COVID-19 convalescent sera. Similar RBD
319-545 fragment was expressed in a baculovirus system [
58].
The resolved structure of RBD complex with the ACE2 receptor indicated that residues 333-527 are involved in interactions with the receptor and the structure formation [
32]. Thus, this is minimal variant of RBD that was tested in our study as the RBD 194 fragment, which was embedded in the influenza HA molecule, thus producing the FluCoVac-19 candidate. Specifically, we used residues 333 to 526, because the P527 connected to the linker could result in artificial folding of the RBD fragment fused to the HA1 subunit via the (G
4S)
2 linker. A similar truncated structure of RBD domain (331-524) was studied as an immunogenic mRNA vaccine [
59]. Prolonged variants were also successful: recombinant RBD
330-532 fused to the Fc-fragment of IgG1 induced the formation of RBD-specific neutralizing antibodies in mice [
60]; in addition, the RBD
331-531 was shown to be immunogenic in an influenza-vectored vaccine [
11,
12].
In this study, we used two fundamentally different strategies to design the LAIV-RBD recombinant viruses: incorporation of RBD-encoding material into the HA ORF, and insertion of RBD-encoding cassettes into truncated NS1 gene. The first strategy should lead to the exposure of a large number of the RBD copies on the surface of the virion as a part of the chimeric HA glycoprotein; however, the size of the insert is limited in such designs, since too large insertion can significantly reduce virus infectivity [
31]. Of the two RBD variants incorporated into the HA molecule (RBD 194 and RBD 223), only the RBD 194 was proven successful since this variant indeed expressed the inserted fragment as a stable fusion HA+RBD protein. Strikingly, the RBD 223-based variant failed to express the target antigen as a fusion HA+RBD protein, although high level of RBD protein expression was detected in virus-infected cells. Since the correct folding of the RBD
319-541 alone was confirmed in other studies [
5,
57], we assumed that the RBD fragment could be cleaved post-translationally by some proteases. The RBD 194-based variant, FluCoVac-19, was proved to be safe and immunogenic when administered intranasally to Syrian hamsters, and the induced immune responses to the influenza and SARS-CoV-2 antigens afforded combined protection of animals against both infections.
Similar strategies exploiting incorporation of RBD into influenza virus particle outer membrane was used by other scientific groups. A non-replicating virus vector lacking the HA ORF, with modified HA and M genetic segments was studied by Koonpaew et al. [
14]. The cassette encoding RBD
325-532 with tPA signal sequence and HA transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains was inserted under influenza segment 4 UTRs. The vaccine induced SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies and anti-influenza serum IgG response, but the T-cell responses to influenza HA were not remarkable due to the non-replicating vector. The other limitation of this vaccine is the requirement of special HA-expressing cells for virus production. In another development, a replicating influenza virus encoded the RBD fragment which was inserted in-frame with HA protein via the P2A autocleavage site [
15]. The incorporation of RBD into the membrane is afforded by the addition of cytoplasmic tail and transmembrane domain of NA. Notably, the immunization with inactivated virus did not protect animals against SARS-CoV-2 challenge, whereas using this virus as a live vaccine significantly increased its protective potential. This is consistent with the significant impact of the local immune response and T-cell-mediated immunity on SARS-CoV-2 protection [
61,
62]. The peculiarity of live virus-vectored vaccines is the direct stimulation of the antiviral T-cell response, and intranasal application provides effective stimulation of local immunity. It should be noted that none of the influenza virus vectors used by other research groups have been used in a licensed influenza vaccine product marketed for human use, which is in contrast to the Len/17-based LAIV platform used in our study.
Using the second strategy with modification of NS, we designed several variants of NS gene modifications and cassette targeting. We were unable to detect RBD expression in MDCK cells infected with any NS-based prototype, as well as the induction of RBD-specific antibodies in immunized mice. A similar design was used in the dNS1-RBD vaccine developed in China [
9]. In this vaccine, the cold-adapted A/California/04/2009 (H1N1pdm09) virus lacking NS1 was used as a vector [
63], and the fragment encoding RBD
316-550 with B2M signal peptide and foldon with the V5 tag was incorporated into the NS gene instead of the NS1 ORF [
9]. The results of Phase I and II of clinical trials demonstrated that this vaccine was safe and well-tolerated [
10]. Importantly, this vaccine did not induce neutralizing antibody response in mice, and the levels of anti-RBD serum IgG antibodies were comparable to our results obtained for the FluCoVac-19 candidate, whereas protective efficacy of the vaccine was demonstrated in Syrian hamsters using the virus transmission model. In our experiments, we use direct virus inoculation model that allows the higher dose of the virus to enter the airways simultaneously. The growth characteristics of the recombinant dNS1-RBD virus were decreased compared to those of the non-modified influenza virus. In our experiments, viruses with modified NSs also had decreased titers compared to the classical LAIV, whereas no negative effect of the RBD insert on viral growth characteristics was observed compared to the vector virus with truncated NS. The detailed analysis of the immune response on dNS1-RBD demonstrated high importance of the cell-mediated immunity, especially in the lungs. Therefore, in our further experiments, we plan to evaluate T-cell immunity to the NS-based chimeric viruses, with special attention to the lung-localized memory T cells [
64].
One of the reasons for the lower immunogenicity of the RBD-based recombinant influenza viruses based on A/Leningrad/17 backbone compared to the other backbones could be the inability of the Len/17-based viruses to efficiently replicate in the mouse respiratory tract, especially with NS1 modifications [
17]. For example, A/PR/8/34-based influenza viruses, even in the case of truncated NS1, replicate well in the lungs [
65], thus producing higher levels of virus-specific serum antibodies. We suppose that the NS-based LAIV-RBD vaccine prototypes can be further improved, because this strategy seems to be effective in designing vectored vaccines against other diseases [
9,
12,
22,
35,
64,
66], and also because this strategy is promising in terms of annual updates of seasonal influenza vaccines.
Our study has several limitations. In this study, we did not assess the durability of the antibody responses and the maintenance of protective effect of immunization with FluCoVac-19 vaccine candidate. However, it is known that the effect of LAIV immunization is mediated by a complex of immunological barriers, including long-lived tissue resident memory cells, and it lasts for at least one year [
67]. The persistence of immune responses were assessed for the dNS1-based SARS-CoV-2 chimeric vaccine, and they lasted for at least 3 months [
9]. We studied the protective effect of only one vaccine candidate with established expression of RBD protein and pronounced immunogenicity in pilot animal experiments, since the presence of correctly folded protein is a prerequisite of the induction of functional antibody responses to the target spatial epitopes. Unexpectedly, we couldn’t confirm the expression of RBD in NS-based candidates, and the exact reason for this was not yet established; it could be artificial folding of the expressed protein or quick proteasome degradation of the RBD-based construct. In this case, T-cell immunity could have provided protection even in the absence of detectable RBD expression. We plan to study this in details in our future experiments.
The strategy we used provided protection of the animals challenged with homologous strains of influenza and SARS-CoV-2 viruses. Seasonal influenza vaccines for human use are currently updated twice a year, before the epidemic seasons in Nothern and Southern hemispheres. For SARS-CoV-2, the updates are also of current interest, because of high mutations rate in circulating omicron subvariants. The development of the LAIV-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine which can be regularly updated to make it a promising bivalent vaccine for influenza and SARS-CoV-2 prevention is a major focus of our future research.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.