nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.10.2011 | Original Article

Ghost ileostomy after anterior resection for rectal cancer: a preliminary experience

verfasst von: Nino Gullà, Stefano Trastulli, Carlo Boselli, Roberto Cirocchi, Davide Cavaliere, Giorgio Maria Verdecchia, Umberto Morelli, Daniele Gentile, Emilio Eugeni, Daniela Caracappa, Chiara Listorti, Francesco Sciannameo, Giuseppe Noya

Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Ausgabe 7/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to describe and evaluate the feasibility and the eventual advantages of ghost ileostomy (GI) versus covering stoma (CS) in terms of complications, hospital stay and quality of life of patients and their caregivers after anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Methods

In this prospective study, we included patients who had rectal cancer treated with laparotomic anterior resection and confectioning a stoma (GI or CS), in the period comprised between January 2008 and January 2009. Short-term and long-term surgery-related mortality and morbidity after primary surgery (including that stoma-related and colorectal anastomosis-related) and consequent to the intervention of intestinal recanalization (CS group) and GI closure were evaluated. We evaluated hospital stay and quality of life of patients and their caregivers.

Results

Stoma-related morbidity rate was higher in the CS group than in GI group (37% vs. 5.5%, respectively, P = 0.04). Morbidity rate after intestinal recanalization in the CS group was 25.9% and 0% after GI closure (P = 0.08). Overall stoma morbidity rate was significantly lower in the GI group with respect to CS group (5.5% vs. 40.7%, respectively, P = 0.03). CS group was characterized by a significantly longer recovery time (P = 0.0002). Caregivers and stoma-related quality of life were better in the GI group than in CS group (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0005, respectively).

Conclusions

GI is feasible, characterized by shorter recovery, lesser degree of total, as well as anastomosis-related morbidity and higher quality of life of patients and the caregivers in respect to CS. We suggest that GI (should be evaluated as an alternative to conventional ileostomy) could be indicated in selected patients that do not present risk factors, but require caution for anastomotic leakage for the low level of colorectal anastomosis.

Matthiessen P, Hallbook O, Andersson M, Rutegard J, Sjodahl R (2004) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum. Colorectal Dis 6:462–469PubMedCrossRef

Lipska MA, Bissett IP, Parry BR, Merrie AE (2006) Anastomotic leakage after lower gastrointestinal anastomosis: men are at a higher risk. ANZ J Surg 76:579–585PubMedCrossRef

Pakkastie TE, Luukkonen PE, Jarvinen HJ (1994) Anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum. Eur J Surg 160:293–297, Discussion 9–300PubMed

Montedori A, Cirocchi R, Farinella E, Sciannameo F, Abraha I (2010) Covering ileo- or colostomy in anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD006878

Tan WS, Tang CL, Shi L, Eu KW (2009) Meta-analysis of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 96:462–472PubMedCrossRef

Daluvoy S, Gonzalez F, Vaziri K, Sabnis A, Brody F (2008) Factors associated with ostomy reversal. Surg Endosc 22:2168–2170PubMedCrossRef

Mansfield SD, Jensen C, Phair AS, Kelly OT, Kelly SB (2008) Complications of loop ileostomy closure: a retrospective cohort analysis of 123 patients. World J Surg 32:2101–2106PubMedCrossRef

Moore AK, Esquibel KA, Thal W (2008) Ostomy options for clients with ileostomies. Gastroenterol Nurs 31:418–420, quiz 21–2PubMedCrossRef

Tsikitis VL, Larson DW, Poola VP, Nelson H, Wolff BG, Pemberton JH et al (2009) Postoperative morbidity with diversion after low anterior resection in the era of neoadjuvant therapy: a single institution experience. J Am Coll Surg 209:114–118PubMedCrossRef

10.

Grabham JA, Moran BJ, Lane RH (1995) Defunctioning colostomy for low anterior resection: a selective approach. Br J Surg 82:1331–1332PubMedCrossRef

11.

Marusch F, Koch A, Schmidt U, Geibetaler S, Dralle H, Saeger HD et al (2002) Value of a protective stoma in low anterior resections for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1164–1171PubMedCrossRef

12.

Fielding LP, Stewart-Brown S, Hittinger R, Blesovsky L (1984) Covering stoma for elective anterior resection of the rectum: an outmoded operation? Am J Surg 147:524–530PubMedCrossRef

13.

Machado M, Hallbook O, Goldman S, Nystrom PO, Jarhult J, Sjodahl R (2002) Defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection with colonic pouch for rectal cancer: a comparison between two hospitals with a different policy. Dis Colon Rectum 45:940–945PubMedCrossRef

14.

Miccini M, Amore Bonapasta S, Gregori M, Barillari P, Tocchi A (2010) Ghost ileostomy: real and potential advantages. Am J Surg 200:55–57CrossRef

15.

Edge SB, Compton CC (2010) The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol 17:1471–1474PubMedCrossRef

16.

Marquis P, Marrel A, Jambon B (2003) Quality of life in patients with stomas: the Montreux Study. Ostomy/Wound Management 49:48–55PubMed

17.

Weitzner MA, Jacobsen PB, Wagner H Jr, Friedland J, Cox C (1999) The Caregiver Quality of Life Index-Cancer (CQOLC) scale: development and validation of an instrument to measure quality of life of the family caregiver of patients with cancer. Qual Life Res 8:55–63PubMedCrossRef

18.

Greenland S, Robins JM (1985) Estimation of a common effect parameter from sparse follow-up data. Biometrics 41:55–68PubMedCrossRef

19.

Mantel N, Haenszel W (1959) Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 22:719–748PubMed

20.

Ratto C, Ricci R, Rossi C, Morelli U, Vecchio FM, Doglietto GB (2002) Mesorectal microfoci adversely affect the prognosis of patients with rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 45:733–742, discussion 42–3PubMedCrossRef

21.

Hirsch CJ, Gingold BS, Wallack MK (1997) Avoidance of anastomotic complications in low anterior resection of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 40:42–46PubMedCrossRef

22.

Paun BC, Cassie S, MacLean AR, Dixon E, Buie WD (2010) Postoperative complications following surgery for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 251:807–818PubMedCrossRef

23.

Nesbakken A, Nygaard K, Lunde OC, Blucher J, Gjertsen O, Dullerud R (2005) Anastomotic leak following mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: true incidence and diagnostic challenges. Colorectal Dis 7:576–581PubMedCrossRef

24.

Eckmann C, Kujath P, Schiedeck TH, Shekarriz H, Bruch HP (2004) Anastomotic leakage following low anterior resection: results of a standardized diagnostic and therapeutic approach. Int J Colorectal Dis 19:128–133PubMedCrossRef

25.

Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, Heald RJ, Moran B, Ulrich A et al (2010) Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery 147:339–351PubMedCrossRef

26.

Rodriguez-Ramirez SE, Uribe A, Ruiz-Garcia EB, Labastida S, Luna-Perez P (2006) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after preoperative chemoradiation therapy and low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for locally advanced rectal cancer. Rev Invest Clin 58:204–210PubMed

27.

Borowski DW, Bradburn DM, Mills SJ, Bharathan B, Wilson RG, Ratcliffe AA et al (2010) Volume-outcome analysis of colorectal cancer-related outcomes. Br J Surg 97:1416–1430PubMedCrossRef

28.

Taflampas P, Christodoulakis M, Tsiftsis DD (2009) Anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: facts, obscurity, and fiction. Surg Today 39:183–188PubMedCrossRef

29.

Bell SW, Walker KG, Rickard MJ, Sinclair G, Dent OF, Chapuis PH et al (2003) Anastomotic leakage after curative anterior resection results in a higher prevalence of local recurrence. Br J Surg 90:1261–1266PubMedCrossRef

30.

Law WL, Choi HK, Lee YM, Ho JW, Seto CL (2007) Anastomotic leakage is associated with poor long-term outcome in patients after curative colorectal resection for malignancy. J Gastrointest Surg 11:8–15PubMedCrossRef

31.

Kanellos I, Blouhos K, Demetriades H, Pramateftakis MG, Mantzoros I, Zacharakis E et al (2004) The failed intraperitoneal colon anastomosis after colon resection. Tech Coloproctol 8(Suppl 1):s53–s55PubMedCrossRef

32.

Hignett S, Parmar CD, Lewis W, Makin CA, Walsh CJ (2011) Ileostomy formation does not prolong hospital length of stay after open anterior resection when performed within an enhanced recovery programme. Colorectal Dis (in press)

33.

Chude GG, Rayate NV, Patris V, Koshariya M, Jagad R, Kawamoto J et al (2008) Defunctioning loop ileostomy with low anterior resection for distal rectal cancer: should we make an ileostomy as a routine procedure? A prospective randomized study. Hepatogastroenterology 55:1562–1567PubMed

34.

Matthiessen P, Hallbook O, Rutegard J, Simert G, Sjodahl R (2007) Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg 246:207–214PubMedCrossRef

35.

Huser N, Michalski CW, Erkan M, Schuster T, Rosenberg R, Kleeff J et al (2008) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of defunctioning stoma in low rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 248:52–60PubMedCrossRef

36.

Alatise OI, Lawal OO, Adesunkanmi AK, Osasan SA (2009) Surgical outcome of abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer in a Nigerian tertiary institution. World J Surg 33:233–239, discussion 40–1PubMedCrossRef

37.

Guenaga KF, Lustosa SA, Saad SS, Saconato H, Matos D (2007) Ileostomy or colostomy for temporary decompression of colorectal anastomosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD004647

38.

Rullier E, Laurent C, Garrelon JL, Michel P, Saric J, Parneix M (1998) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 85:355–358PubMedCrossRef

39.

Dehni N, Schlegel RD, Cunningham C, Guiguet M, Tiret E, Parc R (1998) Influence of a defunctioning stoma on leakage rates after low colorectal anastomosis and colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 85:1114–1117PubMedCrossRef

40.

Gastinger I, Marusch F, Steinert R, Wolff S, Koeckerling F, Lippert H (2005) Protective defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 92:1137–1142PubMedCrossRef

41.

Wong NY, Eu KW (2005) A defunctioning ileostomy does not prevent clinical anastomotic leak after a low anterior resection: a prospective, comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum 48:2076–2079PubMedCrossRef

42.

Lauder C, Hemmingway D, Sutton C (2003) Recurrence and survival after mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 90:1610PubMedCrossRef

43.

Kasperk R, Philipps B, Vahrmeyer M, Willis S, Schumpelick V (2000) Risk factors for anastomosis dehiscence after very deep colorectal and coloanal anastomosis. Chirurg 71:1365–1369PubMedCrossRef

44.

Law WI, Chu KW, Ho JW, Chan CW (2000) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision. Am J Surg 179:92–96PubMedCrossRef

45.

Lefebure B, Tuech JJ, Bridoux V, Costaglioli B, Scotte M, Teniere P et al (2008) Evaluation of selective defunctioning stoma after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:283–288PubMedCrossRef

46.

Poon RT, Chu KW, Ho JW, Chan CW, Law WL, Wong J (1999) Prospective evaluation of selective defunctioning stoma for low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision. World J Surg 23:463–467, discussion 7–8PubMedCrossRef

47.

Ding PR, An X, Pan ZZ, Wan DS, Fang YJ, Wu XJ et al (2009) Meta-analysis of selective defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection. Ai Zheng 28:756–761PubMed

48.

Pata G, D'Hoore A, Fieuws S, Penninckx F (2009) Mortality risk analysis following routine vs. selective defunctioning stoma formation after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 11:797–805PubMedCrossRef

49.

Park JJ, Del Pino A, Orsay CP, Nelson RL, Pearl RK, Cintron JR et al (1999) Stoma complications: the Cook County Hospital experience. Dis Colon Rectum 42:1575–1580PubMedCrossRef

50.

Gooszen AW, Geelkerken RH, Hermans J, Lagaay MB, Gooszen HG (1998) Temporary decompression after colorectal surgery: randomized comparison of loop ileostomy and loop colostomy. Br J Surg 85:76–79PubMedCrossRef

51.

O'Toole GC, Hyland JM, Grant DC, Barry MK (1999) Defunctioning loop ileostomy: a prospective audit. J Am Coll Surg 188:6–9PubMedCrossRef

52.

Kairaluoma M, Rissanen H, Kultti V, Mecklin JP, Kellokumpu I (2002) Outcome of temporary stomas. A prospective study of temporary intestinal stomas constructed between 1989 and 1996. Dig Surg 19:45–51PubMedCrossRef

53.

Chow A, Tilney HS, Paraskeva P, Jeyarajah S, Zacharakis E, Purkayastha S (2009) The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6,107 cases. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:711–723PubMedCrossRef

54.

Kaiser AM, Israelit S, Klaristenfeld D, Selvindoss P, Vukasin P, Ault G et al (2008) Morbidity of ostomy takedown. J Gastrointest Surg 12:437–441PubMedCrossRef

55.

Enker WE, Merchant N, Cohen AM, Lanouette NM, Swallow C, Guillem J et al (1999) Safety and efficacy of low anterior resection for rectal cancer: 681 consecutive cases from a specialty service. Ann Surg 230:544–552, discussion 52–4PubMedCrossRef

56.

Law WL, Chu KW (2004) Anterior resection for rectal cancer with mesorectal excision: a prospective evaluation of 622 patients. Ann Surg 240:260–268PubMedCrossRef

57.

de la Quintana Jimenez P, Pastor Juan C, Prados Herrero I, Perez Lopez C, Gonzalez Fuentes M, de Mena Casaseca C et al (2010) A prospective, longitudinal, multicenter, cohort quality-of-life evaluation of an intensive follow-up program for patients with a stoma. Ostomy/Wound Management 56:44–52PubMed

Titel: Ghost ileostomy after anterior resection for rectal cancer: a preliminary experience
verfasst von: Nino Gullà
Stefano Trastulli
Carlo Boselli
Roberto Cirocchi
Davide Cavaliere
Giorgio Maria Verdecchia
Umberto Morelli
Daniele Gentile
Emilio Eugeni
Daniela Caracappa
Chiara Listorti
Francesco Sciannameo
Giuseppe Noya
Publikationsdatum: 01.10.2011
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Ausgabe 7/2011
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-011-0793-8

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Vorsicht, erhöhte Blutungsgefahr nach PCI!

10.05.2024 Koronare Herzerkrankung Nachrichten

Nach PCI besteht ein erhöhtes Blutungsrisiko, wenn die Behandelten eine verminderte linksventrikuläre Ejektionsfraktion aufweisen. Das Risiko ist umso höher, je stärker die Pumpfunktion eingeschränkt ist.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Deutlich weniger Infektionen: Wundprotektoren schützen!

08.05.2024 Postoperative Wundinfektion Nachrichten

Der Einsatz von Wundprotektoren bei offenen Eingriffen am unteren Gastrointestinaltrakt schützt vor Infektionen im Op.-Gebiet – und dient darüber hinaus der besseren Sicht. Das bestätigt mit großer Robustheit eine randomisierte Studie im Fachblatt JAMA Surgery.

Chirurginnen und Chirurgen sind stark suizidgefährdet

07.05.2024 Suizid Nachrichten

Der belastende Arbeitsalltag wirkt sich negativ auf die psychische Gesundheit der Angehörigen ärztlicher Berufsgruppen aus. Chirurginnen und Chirurgen bilden da keine Ausnahme, im Gegenteil.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Springer Medizin

Ghost ileostomy after anterior resection for rectal cancer: a preliminary experience