Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis 1/2008

01.08.2008

Impact of preemptive warfarin dose reduction on anticoagulation after initiation of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or levofloxacin

verfasst von: Abrar Ahmed, John C. Stephens, Carol A. Kaus, William P. Fay

Erschienen in: Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis | Ausgabe 1/2008

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background Antibiotics can potentiate warfarin anticoagulation. While preemptive warfarin dose reduction (DR) upon initiation of antibiotics has been advocated by experts, there are no published data regarding the efficacy of this strategy vs. the conventional strategy of not changing warfarin dose and carefully following international normalized ratio (INR) results. Methods and Results We compared the efficacy of preemptive 10–20% DR vs. no change in warfarin dosing in 40 chronically anticoagulated patients initiating trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) or levofloxacin. Eighteen patients received preemptive warfarin DR and 22 control patients underwent no change in warfarin dosing. There was no difference between the DR and control groups in the mean INR before beginning antibiotic therapy (2.53 ± 0.12 vs. 2.52 ± 0.11; P > 0.9). Mean interval between initiation of antibiotic and next INR was 5.1 ± 0.4 vs. 4.7 ± 0.5 days for DR vs. control patients, respectively (P > 0.5). For both TMP-SMX and levofloxacin, patients managed with a preemptive warfarin DR strategy did not exhibit a statistically significant change in the INR after initiating antibiotic therapy. In contrast, for each antibiotic, control group patients exhibited a significant increase in mean post-antibiotic INR compared to mean pre-antibiotic INR, though the effect was more pronounced in patients treated with TMP-SMX than with levofloxacin. Of DR group patients who were treated with TMP-SMX, none (0/8) developed a subtherapeutic INR, while 40% (4/10) of levofloxacin-treated patients developed a sub-therapeutic INR. Supra-therapeutic INR results led to transient interruption of warfarin dosing in 2 patients (11%) in the DR group vs. 12 patients (55%) in the control group (P = 0.007). Conclusions Prophylactic warfarin DR of 10–20% is effective in maintaining therapeutic anticoagulation in patients initiating TMP-SMX. An expectant strategy consisting of no change in warfarin dosing with short-term INR follow-up appears reasonable in patients treated with levofloxacin.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hirsh J, Fuster V, Ansell J, Halperin JL (2003) American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation guide to warfarin therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 41:1633–1652PubMedCrossRef Hirsh J, Fuster V, Ansell J, Halperin JL (2003) American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation guide to warfarin therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 41:1633–1652PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Horton JD, Bushwick BM (1999) Warfarin therapy: evolving strategies in anticoagulation. Am Fam Phys 59:635–646 Horton JD, Bushwick BM (1999) Warfarin therapy: evolving strategies in anticoagulation. Am Fam Phys 59:635–646
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Whitlon DS, Sadowski JA, Suttie JW (1978) Mechanisms of coumarin action: significance of vitamin K epoxide reductase inhibition. Biochemistry 17:1371–1377PubMedCrossRef Whitlon DS, Sadowski JA, Suttie JW (1978) Mechanisms of coumarin action: significance of vitamin K epoxide reductase inhibition. Biochemistry 17:1371–1377PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Breckenridge A (1978) Oral anticoagulant drugs: pharmacokinetic aspects. Semin Hematol 15:19–26PubMed Breckenridge A (1978) Oral anticoagulant drugs: pharmacokinetic aspects. Semin Hematol 15:19–26PubMed
5.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kelly JG, O’Malley K (1979) Clinical pharmacokinetics of oral anticoagulants. Clin Pharmacokinet 4:1–15PubMedCrossRef Kelly JG, O’Malley K (1979) Clinical pharmacokinetics of oral anticoagulants. Clin Pharmacokinet 4:1–15PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Visser LE, Penning-van Bees FJ (2002) Overanticoagulation associated with combined use of antibacterial drugs and acenocoumarol or phenprocoumon anticoagulants. Thromb Haemost 88:705–710PubMed Visser LE, Penning-van Bees FJ (2002) Overanticoagulation associated with combined use of antibacterial drugs and acenocoumarol or phenprocoumon anticoagulants. Thromb Haemost 88:705–710PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Baglin T (2002) Avoiding overanticoagulation: knowing your antibiotic. Thromb Haemost 88:703–704PubMed Baglin T (2002) Avoiding overanticoagulation: knowing your antibiotic. Thromb Haemost 88:703–704PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Glasheen JJ, Fugit RV, Prochazka AV (2005) The risk of overanticoagulation with antibiotic use in outpatients on stable warfarin regimens. J Gen Intern Med 20:653–656PubMedCrossRef Glasheen JJ, Fugit RV, Prochazka AV (2005) The risk of overanticoagulation with antibiotic use in outpatients on stable warfarin regimens. J Gen Intern Med 20:653–656PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat McCall KL, Scott JC, Anderson HG (2005) Retrospective evaluation of a possible interaction between warfarin and levofloxacin. Pharmacotherapy 25:67–73PubMedCrossRef McCall KL, Scott JC, Anderson HG (2005) Retrospective evaluation of a possible interaction between warfarin and levofloxacin. Pharmacotherapy 25:67–73PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Glasheen JJ, Fugit RV, Prochazka AV (2003) Effect of levofloxacin coadministration on the international normalized ratios during warfarin therapy. Pharmacotherapy 23:1079–1080, discussion 1080PubMedCrossRef Glasheen JJ, Fugit RV, Prochazka AV (2003) Effect of levofloxacin coadministration on the international normalized ratios during warfarin therapy. Pharmacotherapy 23:1079–1080, discussion 1080PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamreudeewong W, Lower DL, Kilpatrick DM, Enlow AM, Burrows MM, Greenwood MC (2003) Effect of levofloxacin coadministration on the international normalized ratios during warfarin therapy. Pharmacotherapy 23:333–338PubMedCrossRef Yamreudeewong W, Lower DL, Kilpatrick DM, Enlow AM, Burrows MM, Greenwood MC (2003) Effect of levofloxacin coadministration on the international normalized ratios during warfarin therapy. Pharmacotherapy 23:333–338PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones CB, Fugate SE (2002) Levofloxacin and warfarin interaction. Ann Pharmacother 36:1554–1557PubMedCrossRef Jones CB, Fugate SE (2002) Levofloxacin and warfarin interaction. Ann Pharmacother 36:1554–1557PubMedCrossRef
14.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Ravnan SL, Locke C (2001) Levofloxacin and warfarin interaction. Pharmacotherapy 21:884–885PubMedCrossRef Ravnan SL, Locke C (2001) Levofloxacin and warfarin interaction. Pharmacotherapy 21:884–885PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Impact of preemptive warfarin dose reduction on anticoagulation after initiation of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or levofloxacin
verfasst von
Abrar Ahmed
John C. Stephens
Carol A. Kaus
William P. Fay
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2008
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis / Ausgabe 1/2008
Print ISSN: 0929-5305
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-742X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-007-0164-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2008

Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis 1/2008 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Erhebliches Risiko für Kehlkopfkrebs bei mäßiger Dysplasie

29.05.2024 Larynxkarzinom Nachrichten

Fast ein Viertel der Personen mit mäßig dysplastischen Stimmlippenläsionen entwickelt einen Kehlkopftumor. Solche Personen benötigen daher eine besonders enge ärztliche Überwachung.

Nach Herzinfarkt mit Typ-1-Diabetes schlechtere Karten als mit Typ 2?

29.05.2024 Herzinfarkt Nachrichten

Bei Menschen mit Typ-2-Diabetes sind die Chancen, einen Myokardinfarkt zu überleben, in den letzten 15 Jahren deutlich gestiegen – nicht jedoch bei Betroffenen mit Typ 1.

15% bedauern gewählte Blasenkrebs-Therapie

29.05.2024 Urothelkarzinom Nachrichten

Ob Patienten und Patientinnen mit neu diagnostiziertem Blasenkrebs ein Jahr später Bedauern über die Therapieentscheidung empfinden, wird einer Studie aus England zufolge von der Radikalität und dem Erfolg des Eingriffs beeinflusst.

Costims – das nächste heiße Ding in der Krebstherapie?

28.05.2024 Onkologische Immuntherapie Nachrichten

„Kalte“ Tumoren werden heiß – CD28-kostimulatorische Antikörper sollen dies ermöglichen. Am besten könnten diese in Kombination mit BiTEs und Checkpointhemmern wirken. Erste klinische Studien laufen bereits.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.