Anzeige
Erschienen in:
01.04.2014 | Original Research
Internists’ Attitudes About Assessing and Maintaining Clinical Competence
Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Ausgabe 4/2014
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhaltenABSTRACT
BACKGROUND
Important changes are occurring in how the medical profession approaches assessing and maintaining competence. Physician support for such changes will be essential for their success.
OBJECTIVE
To describe physician attitudes towards assessing and maintaining competence.
DESIGN
Cross-sectional internet survey.
PARTICIPANTS
Random sample of 1,000 American College of Physicians members who were eligible to participate in the American Board of Internal Medicine Maintenance of Certification program.
MAIN MEASURES
Questions assessed physicians’ attitudes and experiences regarding: 1) self-regulation, 2) feedback on knowledge and clinical care, 3) demonstrating knowledge and clinical competence, 4) frequency of use and effectiveness of methods to assess or improve clinical care, and 5) transparency.
KEY RESULTS
Surveys were completed by 446 of 943 eligible respondents (47 %). Eighty percent reported it was important (somewhat/very) to receive feedback on their knowledge, and 94 % considered it important (somewhat/very) to get feedback on their quality of care. However, only 24 % reported that they receive useful feedback on their knowledge most/all of the time, and 27 % reported receiving useful feedback on their clinical care most/all of the time. Seventy-five percent agreed that participating in programs to assess their knowledge is important to staying up-to-date, yet only 52 % reported participating in such programs within the last 3 years. The majority (58 %) believed physicians should be required to demonstrate their knowledge via a secure examination every 9–10 years. Support was low for Specialty Certification Boards making information about physician competence publically available, with respondents expressing concern about patients misinterpreting information about their Board Certification activities.
CONCLUSIONS
A gap exists between physicians’ interest in feedback on their competence and existing programs’ ability to provide such feedback. Educating physicians about the importance of regularly assessing their knowledge and quality of care, coupled with enhanced systems to provide such feedback, is needed to close this gap.