Abstract
Stress-related bone injuries are common in athletes who are exposed to increased frequency, duration and intensity of activity. They are most common in the weight-bearing bones of the lower extremities, especially the posteromedial tibia. Under physiological circumstances, increasing the load on a bone will increase its strength through bone remodeling. When remodeling is unable to keep up with repetitive loading, a stress fracture will occur. The distinction between high-risk and low-risk stress fractures has prognostic and therapeutic consequences in athletes. Several extrinsic and intrinsic risk factors have been recognized. Overall, women are more sensitive to stress fractures than men. Conventional radiographs, despite having a low sensitivity, are used as a first-line test. Magnetic resonance imaging is the most sensitive and specific imaging modality for stress fractures. Computed tomography can be used as a problem solver in case of inconclusive MRI, and to better display fracture lines in a few specific locations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott A, Bird ML, Wild E et al (2019) Part I: epidemiology and risk factors for stress fractures in female athletes. Phys Sportsmed 11:1–8
Aicale R, Tarantino D, Maffulli N et al (2018) Overuse injuries in sport: a comprehensive overview. J Orthop Surg Res 13:1–11
Anderson MW, Greenspan A (1996) Stress fractures. Radiology 199:1–12
Barrack MT, Gibbs JC, De Souza MJ et al (2014) Higher incidence of bone stress injuries with increasing female athlete triad-related risk factors: a prospective multisite study of exercising girls and women. Am J Sports Med 42:949–958
Behrens SB, Deren ME, Matson A et al (2013) Stress fractures of the pelvis and legs in athletes: a review. Sports Health 5:164–174
Bennell KL, Brukner PD (1997) Epidemiology and site specificity of stress fractures. Clin Sports Med 16:179–196
Cheung KK, Dhawan RT, Wilson LF et al (2018) Pars interarticularis injury in elite athletes—the role of imaging in diagnosis and management. Eur J Radiol 108:28–42
Chisin R, Milgrom C, Giladi M et al (1987) Clinical significance of nonfocal scintigraphic findings in suspected tibial stress fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 220:200–205
Clarke B (2008) Normal bone anatomy and physiology. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 3:131–139
Davey T, Lanham-New SA, Shaw AM et al (2015) Fundamental differences in axial and appendicular bone density in stress fractured and uninjured Royal Marine recruits—a matched case-control study. Bone 73:120–126
Diehl JJ, Best TM, Kaeding CC (2006) Classification and return-to-play considerations for stress fractures. Clin Sports Med 25:17–28
Fredericson M, Bergman AG, Hoffmann KL et al (1995) Tibial stress reaction in runners. Correlation of clinical symptoms and scintigraphy with a new magnetic resonance imaging grading system. Am J Sports Med 23:472–481
Fukushima Y, Ray J, Kraus E et al (2018) A review and proposed rationale for the use of ultrasonography as a diagnostic modality in the identification of bone stress injuries. J Ultrasound Med 37:2297–2307
Glaudemans AW, Dierckx RA, Gielen LM et al (eds) (2015) Nuclear medicine and radiologic imaging in sports injuries. Springer, Heidelberg
Ha S, Hong SH, Paeng JC et al (2015) Comparison of SPECT/CT and MRI in diagnosing symptomatic lesions in ankle and foot pain patients: diagnostic performance and relation to lesion type. PLoS One 10(2):e0117583
Haverstock BD (2001) Stress fractures of the foot and ankle. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 18:273–284
Kijowski R, Choi J, Shinki K et al (2012) Validation of MRI classification system for tibial stress injuries. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198:898–884
Lauder TC, Dixit S, Pezzin LE et al (2000) The relation between stress fractures and bone mineral density: evidence from active-duty army women. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 81:73–79
Mallinson PI, Coupal TM, McLaughlin PD et al (2016) Dual-energy CT for the musculoskeletal system. Radiology 281:690–707
Mandell JC, Khurana B, Smith SE (2017a) Stress fractures of the foot and ankle, part 1: biomechanics of bone and principles of imaging and treatment. Skelet Radiol 46:1012–1029
Mandell JC, Khurana B, Smith SE (2017b) Stress fractures of the foot and ankle, part 2: site-specific etiology, imaging, and treatment, and differential diagnosis. Skelet Radiol 46:1165–1186
Marshall RA, Mandell JC, Weaver MJ (2018) Imaging features and management of stress, atypical and pathologic fractures. Radiographics 38:2173–2192
Moreira CA, Bilezikian JP (2017) Stress fractures: concepts and therapeutics. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 102:525–534
Nattiv A, Loucks AB, Manore MM (2007) American College of Sports Medicine position stand. The female athletic triad. Med Sci Sports Exerc 39:1967–1882
Nussbaum ED, Bjornaraa J, Gatt CJ Jr (2019) Identifying factors that contribute to adolescent bony stress injury in secondary school athletes: a comparative analysis with a healthy athletic control group. Sports Health 11:375–379
Palm HG, Lang P, Hackenbroch C et al (2019) Dual-energy CT as an innovative method for diagnosing fragility fractures of the pelvic ring: a retrospective comparison with MRI as the gold standard. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 140:473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-019-03283-8
Pathria MN, Chung CB, Resnick DL (2016) Acute and stress-related injuries of bone and cartilage: pertinent anatomy, basic biomechanics, and imaging perspective. Radiology 280:21–38
Pelletier-Galarneau M, Martineau P, Goudreault M et al (2015) Review of running injuries of the foot and ankle: clinical presentation and SPECT-CT imaging patterns. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 5:305–316
Resnick D (1996) Bone and joint imaging, 2nd edn. WB Saunders, Philadelphia
Rizzone KH, Ackerman KE, Roos KG et al (2017) The epidemiology of stress fractures in collegiate student-athletes, 2004–2005 through 2013–2014 academic years. J Athl Train 52:966–975
Romani WA, Gieck JH, Perrin DH et al (2002) Mechanisms and management of stress fractures in physically active persons. J Athl Train 37:306–314
Roub LW, Gumerman LW, Hanley EN Jr et al (1979) Bone stress: a radionuclide imaging perspective. Radiology 132:431–438
Vanhoenacker FM (2021) Bone marrow edema in sports injuries/general concept. Med Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/174_2020_241
Wright AA, Hegedus EJ, Lenchik L et al (2016) Diagnostic accuracy of various imaging modalities for suspected lower extremity stress fractures: a systematic review with evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice. Am J Sports Med 44:255–263
Zwas ST, Elkanovitch R, Frank G (1987) Interpretation and classification of bone scintigraphic findings in stress fractures. J Nucl Med 28:452–457
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lefere, M., Demeyere, A., Vanhoenacker, F. (2021). Overuse Bone Trauma and Stress Fractures. In: Vanhoenacker, F.M., Maas, M., Gielen, J.L. (eds) Imaging of Orthopedic Sports Injuries. Medical Radiology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/174_2020_240
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/174_2020_240
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-75361-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-75362-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)