nach oben

International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health

Erschienen in:

04.08.2018 | Review

Implementation, mechanisms and effects of maternity protection legislation: a realist narrative review of the literature

verfasst von: Isabelle Probst, Alessia Zellweger, Maria-Pia Politis Mercier, Brigitta Danuser, Peggy Krief

Erschienen in: International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health | Ausgabe 8/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Most industrialized countries have introduced maternity protection legislation (MPL) to protect the health of pregnant workers and their unborn children from workplace exposure. This review aimed to assess this legislation’s level of implementation, barriers and facilitators to it, and its expected or unexpected effects.

Methods

A realist narrative review was conducted. Keyword searches of the PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, MIDIRS, Sociological abstracts and Google Scholar electronic databases were performed in March 2018.

Results

The 42 publications included show that the implementation of MPL is deficient in most countries. Allowing pregnant women to withdraw from work on preventive leave or sick leave is favored over workplace adaptations or worker reassignments. The publications highlight mechanisms which encourage or obstruct the enforcement of legislation at the levels of the individual, the physical and social environment, and the macrosocial context. The delay between the conception and implementation of maternity protection measures appears to be a major barrier to the efficacy of MPL. The literature also suggests that unexpected adverse effects, such as degradation in working relationships or discrimination can obstruct the implementation of protective measures.

Conclusions

This study showed the need for a better implementation of MPL during pregnancy. Further research and recommendations for improvements in MPL should consider the diverse mechanisms and effects of its implementation. Barriers and adverse effects of this implementation do not only ensure a lack of information or awareness about MPL, but are also linked to contradictions between requirements to protect employment and protect pregnancy.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

This also implies that, in several countries, the present legislative framework is different from the regulations in force when the studies included in this review were made.

The ILO defines informal sectors as those where “the salaried and unsalaried activities of intentionally unregistered or partially registered companies do not respect labor and social protection regulations: illegal work, clandestine sweatshops.” (Adair 2009 p. 1121). Translated by the authors.

Translated by the authors.

All quotations of Legrand (2015) translated by the authors.

Translated by the authors.

Restrictions lifted by the implementation of European Council Directive 92/85/EC.

Translated by the authors.

Adair P (2009) Économie non observée et emploi informel dans les pays de l’Union européenne. Une comparaison des estimations et des déterminants. Rev Econ 60(5):1117–1153. https://doi.org/10.3917/reco.605.1117 CrossRef

Adams L et al (2016a) Pregnancy and maternity-related discrimination and disadvantage: experiences of employers. Department for Business, Innovation and Skills and the Equality and Human Rights Commission, London

Adams L et al (2016b) Pregnancy and maternity-related discrimination and disadvantage: experiences of mothers. Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, Equality and Human Rights Commission, London

Aellen G, Nicollier L, Outdili Z, Ribeiro K, Stritt K (2013) Application de l’Ordonnance sur la protection de la maternité chez les femmes médecins. Rev Med Suisse 393:1433–1434

Andersen HR et al (2008) Impaired reproductive development in sons of women occupationally exposed to pesticides during pregnancy. Environ Health Perspect 116(4):566–572. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.10790 CrossRef

Andersen HR, Debes F, Wohlfahrt-Veje C, Murata K, Grandjean P (2015) Occupational pesticide exposure in early pregnancy associated with sex-specific neurobehavioral deficits in the children at school age. Neurotoxicol Teratol 47:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ntt.2014.10.006 CrossRef

Artazcoz L, Borrell C, Cortes I, Escriba-Aguir V, Cascant L (2007) Occupational epidemiology and work related inequalities in health: a gender perspective for two complementary approaches to work and health research. J Epidemiol Community Health 61(Suppl 2):ii39–i45. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2007.059774 CrossRef

Aune H (2016) Country report, gender equality: how are EU rules transposed into national law? Norway 2015. Justice and consumer edn. European Commission, Brussels, p 58

Aviles-Palacios C, Lopez-Quero M, Garcia-Lopez M-J (2013) Gender and maternity considerations and techniques in occupational health services: the Spanish case. Saf Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.03.011 CrossRef

Bay R, Simonetti C (2013) Evaluation des connaissances des mesures légales de protection de la maternité au travail (OProma) chez les femmes enceintes et chez les gynécologues (Travail de Maîtrise universitaire en médecine). Université de Lausanne. Retrieved from https://serval.unil.ch/resource/serval:BIB_85D3B31F5248.P001/REF. Accessed Apr 2017

Belin A, Zamparutti T, Tull K, Hernandez G, Graveling R (2011) Occupational health and safety risks for the most vulnerable workers. European Parliament’s Committee on Employment and Social Affairs, Brussels

Berg RC, Nanavati J (2016) Realist review: current practice and future prospects. J Res Pract 12:1–28

Bilhartz T-D, Bilhartz P (2013) Occupation as a risk factor for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. J Womens Health 22(2):188a–188i. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2012.3975 CrossRef

Bläuer Herrmann A, Murier T (2016) Enquête suisse sur la population active. Les mères sur le marché du travail. In: Dfdli DFI (ed) Office fédéral de la statistique (OFS) edn, Neuchâtel

Blondel B, Lelong N, Kermarrec M, Goffinet F (2012) La santé périnatale en France métropolitaine de 1995 à 2010. Résultats des enquêtes nationales périnatales. J Gynécol Obstétr Biol Reprod 41(2):151–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgyn.2011.11.008 CrossRef

Bonzini M, Coggon D, Godfrey K, Inskip H, Crozier S, Palmer KT (2009) Occupational physical activities, working hours and outcome of pregnancy: findings from the Southampton Women’s Survey. Occup Environ Med 66(10):685–690. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2008.043935 CrossRef

Bouchard P, Turcotte G (1986) La maternité en milieu de travail ou pourquoi les Québécoises sont-elles si nombreuses à demander un retrait préventif? Sociol Soc 18(2):113–128

Brady S, Monaghan K (2007) Working through pregnancy: the experiences of Irish hospital-based physiotherapists. Physiother Irel 28(2):11–20

Bretin H, De Koninck M, Saurel-Cubizolles M-J (2004) Conciliation travail/famille: quel prix pour l’emploi et le travail des femmes? À propos de la protection de la grossesse et de la maternité en France et au Québec. Santé Soc Solidar 3(2):149–160. https://doi.org/10.3406/oss.2004.1006 CrossRef

Campos-Serna J, Ronda-Perez E, Artazcoz L, Moen BE, Benavides FG (2013) Gender inequalities in occupational health related to the unequal distribution of working and employment conditions: a systematic review. Int J Equity Health 12:57. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-12-57 CrossRef

Casas M et al (2015) Maternal occupation during pregnancy, birth weight, and length of gestation: combined analysis of 13 European birth cohorts. Scand J Work Environ Health 41(4):384–396. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3500 CrossRef

Cheng PL et al (2009) Back pain of working pregnant women: Identification of associated occupational factors. Appl Ergon 40(3):19084818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2008.11.002 ppCrossRef

Commission of the European Communities (1999) Report from the Commission on the implementation of Council Directive 92/85/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the health and safety at work of pregnant workers and workers who have recently given birth or are breastfeeding. Brussels

Croteau A, Marcoux S, Brisson C (2006) Work activity in pregnancy, preventive measures, and the risk of delivering a small-for-gestational-age infant. Am J Public Health 96(5):846–855. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2004.058552 CrossRef

Croteau A, Marcoux S, Brisson C (2007) Work activity in pregnancy, preventive measures, and the risk of preterm delivery. Am J Epidemiol 166(8):951–965. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwm171 CrossRef

De Koninck M, Malenfant R (2001) Les rapports sociaux et l’application de mesures sociales. Le cas de la conciliation grossesse/travail. Rech Sociogr 42(1):9–32. https://doi.org/10.7202/057413ar CrossRef

Dixon-Woods M et al (2006) Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Med Res Methodol 6:35. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-6-35 CrossRef

Dørheim SK, Bjorvatn B, Eberhard-Gran M (2013) Sick leave during pregnancy: a longitudinal study of rates and risk factors in a Norwegian population. BJOG 120(5):521–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12035 CrossRef

Fanello C, Ripault B, Drüker S, Moisan S, Parot E, Fontbonne D (2005) Déroulement des grossesses du personnel d’un établissement hospitalier. Evolution en vingt ans. Arch Mal Prof Environ 66(3):244–251

Figà-Talamanca I (2006) Occupational risk factors and reproductive health of women. Occup Med 56(8):521–531. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kql114 CrossRef

Fowler JR, Culpepper L (2018) Working during pregnancy. UpToDate. Retrieved from UpToDate website. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/working-during-pregnancy. Accessed 23 Mar 2018

Frey G, Schuster M, Oberlinner C, Queiser-Wahrendorf A, Lang S, Yong M (2015) Pregnant employee protection program in a large chemical company. J Occup Environ Med. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.000000000000050526340285 CrossRef

Gatchel RJ, Schultz IZ (eds) (2012) Handbook of occupational health and wellness. Springer, New York

Goldman RH, Wylie JB (2017) Overview of occupational and environmental risks to reproduction in females. UpToDate. Retrieved from UpToDate website: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/overview-of-occupational-and-environmental-risks-to-reproduction-in-females. Accessed 16 May 2018

Gravel AR, Malenfant R (2012) Gérer les risques liés au travail durant la grossesse. Vers un nouveau modèle de gestion de la santé et sécurité des travailleuses enceintes. Perspect Interdiscip Trav Santé. https://doi.org/10.4000/pistes.2578 CrossRef

Gravel AR, Riel J, Messing K (2017) Protecting pregnant workers while fighting sexism: work–pregnancy balance and pregnant nurses’ resistance in Quebec hospitals. New Solut 27(3):424–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/1048291117724847 CrossRef

Greenhalgh T, Thorne S, Malterud K (2018) Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? Eur J Clin Invest. https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.12931 CrossRef

Grolimund-Berset D, Krief P, Praz-Christinaz S (2011) Difficultés pratiques de la mise en application de l’Ordonnance sur la protection maternité (Oproma) en Suisse à la lumière de deux cas cliniques. Arch Mal Prof Environ 73(3):524–525

Hansen M, Thulstrup A, Juhl M, Kristensen J, Ramlau-Hansen C (2015) Occupational exposures and sick leave during pregnancy: results from a Danish cohort study. Scandin 41(4):397–406

Hansson SH, Schenk L (2016) Protection without discrimination: pregnancy and occupational health regulations. Eur J Risk Regul 7(2):404–412. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1867299X00005808 CrossRef

Henrotin JB, Vaissiere M, Etaix M, Dziurla M, Malard S, Lafon D (2017) Exposure to occupational hazards for pregnancy and sick leave in pregnant workers: a cross-sectional study. Ann Occup Environ Med. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40557-017-0170-3 CrossRef

International Labour Organization (2010) Maternity at work: a review of national legislation: findings from the ILO database of conditions of work and employment laws. Geneva

Kaerlev L, Jacobsen LB, Olsen J, Bonde JP (2004) Long-term sick leave and its risk factors during pregnancy among Danish hospital employees. Scand J Public Health 32(2):111–117

Kristensen P, Nordhagen R, Wergeland E, Bjerkedal T (2008) Job adjustment and absence from work in mid-pregnancy in the Norwegian mother and child cohort study (MoBa). Occup Environ Med 65(8):560–566

Lafon D (2010) Grossesse et travail: quels sont les risques pour l’enfant à naître? EDP Sciences edn. Institut National de recherche et de Sécurité (INRS), Les Ulis

Legrand E (2015) Santé reproductive et travail: la prévention des risques reprotoxiques. Rapport final dans le cadre du Programme national de recherche Environnement-Santé Travail. Université du Havre, Le Havre

Lembrechts L, Valgaeren E (2010) Grossesse au travail. Le vécu et les obstacles rencontrés par les travailleuses en Belgique. Etude quantitative et qualitative. Institut pour l’égalité des femmes et des hommes, Bruxelles

Lippel K (1998) Preventive reassignment of pregnant or breast-feeding workers: the Quebec model. New Solut 8(2):267–280

Lippel K et al (2011) Legal protections governing the occupational safety and health and workers’ compensation of temporary employment agency workers in Canada: reflections on regulatory effectiveness. Policy Pract Health Saf 9(2):69–90

Lupton D (2012) Precious cargo’: foetal subjects, risk and reproductive citizenship. Crit Public Health 22(3):329–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2012.657612 CrossRef

Makowiec-Dabrowska T, Hanke W, Radwan-Wlodarczyk Z, Koszada-Wlodarczyk W, Sobala W (2003a) Working condition of pregnant women. Departures from regulation on occupations especially noxious or hazardous to women. Med Pracy 54(1):33–43

Makowiec-Dabrowska T, Hanke W, Sobala W, Radwan-Wlodarczyk Z, Koszada-Wlodarczyk W (2003b) Risk of certain obstetric pathologies in women employed in working conditions non-complying with the current legal status on work load and working conditions appropriate for pregnant women. Med Pracy 54(5):415–425

Malenfant R (1996) Cachez ce ventre… La grossesse en milieu de travail. Lien Soc Polit 36:103–110

Malenfant R (1998) Risque et gestion du social: le retrait de l’activité professionnelle durant la grossesse. Rech Sociogr 39(1):39–57

Malenfant R (2009) Risk, control and gender: Reconciling production and reproduction in the risk society. Org Stud 30(2–3):205–226

Malenfant R, De Koninck M (2002) Production and reproduction: the issues involved in reconciling work and pregnancy. New Solut 12(1):61–77

Malenfant R, Gravel A-R, Laplante N, Plante R (2011) Grossesse et travail: au-delà des facteurs de risques pour la santé. Rev Multidiscip Emploi Synd Trav 6(2):50–72

Marcinkiewicz A, Hanke W (2012) Preventive care of pregnant employees. Is there a need to set rules of cooperation between occupational and gynecologist-obstetricians? Med Pracy 63(5):591–598

McDonald AD (1994) The “retrait préventif”: an evaluation. Can J Public Health 85(2):136–139

Messing K, Boutin S (1997) Les conditions difficiles dans les emplois des femmes et les instances gouvernementales en santé et en sécurité du travail. Ind Rel 52(2):333–363. https://doi.org/10.7202/051169ar CrossRef

Palmer KT, Bonzini M, Bonde J-PE (2013) Pregnancy: occupational aspects of management: concise guidance. Clin Med 13(1):75–79

Pawson R, Greenhalgh T, Harvey G, Walshe K (2005) Realist review–a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. J Health Serv Res Policy 10(Suppl 1):21–34. https://doi.org/10.1258/1355819054308530 CrossRef

Plante R (2004) Le retrait préventif de la travailleuse enceinte: le point. Le Med Québec 39(11):71–77

Plante R, Malenfant R (1998) Reproductive health and work: different experiences. J Occup Environ Med 40(11):964–968

Polanska K, Jurewicz J, Marcinkiewicz A, Makowiec-Dabrowska T, Hanke W (2014) Occupational activity during pregnancy based on the Polish mother and child cohort study. Med Pracy 65(1):65–72

Praz-Christinaz SM, Chouanière D, Danuser B (2008) Protection des travailleuses enceintes et des enfants à naître: ce que doit savoir le médecin. Rev Med Suisse 4:2166–2171

Robert E, Ridde V (2013) L’approche réaliste pour l’évaluation de programmes et la revue systématique: de la théorie à la pratique. Mes Eval Educ 36(3):79–108

Romano D, Moreno N (2010) Barriers for the prevention of chemical exposures in pregnant and breast-feeding workers? J Epidemiol Community Health 64(3):193. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2008.085282 CrossRef

Romito P, Saurel-Cubizolles MJ (1992) Fair law, unfair practices? Benefiting from protective legislation for pregnant workers in Italy and France. Soc Sci Med 35(12):1485–1495

Rudin M, Stutz H, Bischof S, Jäggi J, Bannwart L (2018) Erwerbsunterbrüche vor der Geburt. Bundesamt für Sozialversicherungen (BSV), Bern

Saurel-Cubizolles MJ, Kaminski M (1987) Pregnant women’s working conditions and their changes during pregnancy: a national study in France. Br J Ind Med 44(4):236–243

Snijder CA et al (2012) Physically demanding work, fetal growth and the risk of adverse birth outcomes. The generation R study. Occup Environ Med 69(8):543–550. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2011-100615 CrossRef

Stocker LJ, Macklon NS, Cheong YC, Bewley SJ (2014) Influence of shift work on early reproductive outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 124(1):99–110. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000000321 CrossRef

Story M, Kaphingst KM, Robinson-O’Brien R, Glanz K (2008) Creating healthy food and eating environments: policy and environmental approaches. Annu Rev Public Health 29:253–272. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.090926 CrossRef

Tarchi M, Bartoli D, Demi A, Dini F, Farina GA, Sannino G (2007) Emerging problems in enforcement of safe maternity and feeding protection at work: a public prevention service experience. G Ital Med Lavoro ed Ergon 29(3 Suppl):385–386

Taskinen HK, Olsen J, Bach B (1995) Experiences in developing legislation protecting reproductive health. J Occup Environ Med 37:974–979

Turcotte G (1992) How pregnant workers see their work, its risks and the right to precautionary leave in Quebec. Women health 18(3):79–95

Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhorp G, Buckingham J, Pawson R (2013) RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses. BMC Med 11:21. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-11-21 CrossRef

Titel: Implementation, mechanisms and effects of maternity protection legislation: a realist narrative review of the literature
verfasst von: Isabelle Probst
Alessia Zellweger
Maria-Pia Politis Mercier
Brigitta Danuser
Peggy Krief
Publikationsdatum: 04.08.2018
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health / Ausgabe 8/2018
Print ISSN: 0340-0131
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1246
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-018-1339-y

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Implementation, mechanisms and effects of maternity protection legislation: a realist narrative review of the literature

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2018

Effort-reward imbalance among students at German universities: associations with self-rated health and mental health

Impact of workplace bullying on missed nursing care and quality of care in the eldercare sector

Metabolites of the alkyl pyrrolidone solvents NMP and NEP in 24-h urine samples of the German Environmental Specimen Bank from 1991 to 2014

Health effects among a cohort exposed to low-level arsenic in a geothermal area of Tuscany, Italy

Underemployment, overemployment and deterioration of mental health: the role of job rewards

The relation between social capital and burnout: a longitudinal study