Skip to main content
Log in

Continent diversion with the Mainz pouch

  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

From 1983 until July 1994, 561 patients in 2 urology departments (Mainz and Wuppertal) underwent a Mainz pouch 1 procedure. The Mainz pouch 1 was used for bladder augmentation in 60 patients, for orthotopic bladder substitution in 61 patients, and for continent cutaneous urinary diversion in 440 patients. In the group of continent cutaneous urinary diversion, the continence mechanism applied was an ileal intussusception nipple in 270 patients, an appendix stoma in 146 patients, a submucosal seromuscular bowel-flap tube in 14 patients, and a submucosal full-thickness bowel-flap tube in 10 patients. Indications for urinary diversion were bladder cancer in 339 patients, anatomical or functional loss of bladder capacity in 179 patients, and other primary or secondary malignancies of the bladder or true pelvis in 43 patients. After a mean follow-up period of 57 months (range, 3–127 months), early and late complications were encountered in 12% and 37% of the patients, respectively. In the bladder-augmentation group, 93% of the patients are completely continent day and night. All but three patients, who empty their reservoir by intermittent self-catheterization (CIC), void spontaneously by abdominal straining. In the orthotopic bladder-substitution group, 95% of the patients are continent during the daytime. To prevent urinary leakage, 13% have to empty their reservoirs regularly at 4-h intervals and 13% have to perform CIC to avoid residual urine. Among the patients treated with continent cutaneous urinary diversion, stoma failure occurred in 11%, stoma stenosis was encountered in 13% and required open revision in 2%, endoscopical incision in 10%, and conservative treatment (dilation) in 1% of cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams MC, Mitchell ME, Rink RC (1988) Gastrocystoplasty: an alternative solution to the problem of urological reconstruction in severely compromised patients. J Urol 140:1152–1156

    Google Scholar 

  2. Coffey RC (1991) Physiologic implantation of the severed ureter or common bile-duct into the intestine. JAMA 56:397–403

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fisch M, Wammack R, Spies F, Müller SC, Mokthar A, Ghoneim M, Hohenfellner R (1994) Ileocecal valve reconstruction during continent urinary diversion. J Urol 151:861–865

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ghoneim MA, Shebab El-Din AB, Ashamallah A, Gaballah MA (1981) Evolution of the rectal bladder as a method for urinary diversion. J Urol 126:737–740

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goldwasser B, Barrett DM, Benson RC Jr (1986) Bladder replacement with use of a detubularized right colonic segment: preliminary report of a new technique. Mayo Clin Proc 61:615–617

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hautmann RE, Egghart G, Frohneberg D, Miller K (1988) The ileal neobladder. J Urol 139:39–42

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hohenfellner R, Thüroff JW, Fisch M, Lippert C-M (1992) Der Mainz-Pouch (mixed augmentation ileum and cecum). Operative Technik, Variationen und “Troubleshooting”. Aktuelle Urol 23:I-XXVI

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kock NG, Nilson AE, Nilsson LO, Norlén LJ, Philipson BM (1982) Urinary diversion via a continent ileal reservoir: clinical results in 12 patients. J Urol 128:469–475

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lampel A, Hohenfellner M, Schultz-Lampel D, Thüroff JW (1995) In-situ tunneled bowel flap tubes: two new techniques of continent outlet for Mainz-pouch cutaneous diversion. J Urol 153:308–315

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lapides J, Diokno A, Lowe BS, Kalish MD (1974) Follow up on unsterile intermittent self-catheterization. J Urol 111:184–187

    Google Scholar 

  11. Reddy PK, Lange PH, Fraley EE (1991) Total bladder replacement using detubularized sigmoid colon: technique and results. J Urol 145:51–55

    Google Scholar 

  12. Riedmiller H, Bürger R, Müller S, Hohenfellner R (1990) Continent appendix stoma — a modification of the Mainz-pouch technique. J Urol 143:1115–1117

    Google Scholar 

  13. Riedmiller H, Thüroff J, Hohenfellner R (1991) Continent urinary diversion: the MAINZ-pouch procedure. In: Rowland RG (ed) Problems in urology, vol 5. J. B. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 269–291

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rowland RG, Mitchell ME, Bihrle R (1985) The cecoileal continent urinary reservoir. World J Urol 3:185–190

    Google Scholar 

  15. Thüroff JW, Alken P, Engelmann U, Riedmiller H, Jacobi GH, Hohenfellner R (1985) The MAINZ pouch (mixed augmentation ileum and zoecum) for bladder augmentation and continent urinary diversion. Eur Urol 11:152–160

    Google Scholar 

  16. Thüroff JW, Alken P, Riedmiller H, Jacobi GH, Hohenfellner R (1988) 100 cases of MAINZ pouch: continuing experience and evolution. J Urol 140:283–288

    Google Scholar 

  17. Verhoogen J (1908) Néostomie urétéro-caecale. Formation d'une nouvelle poche vésicale et d'un nouvel urètre. Assoc Fr Urol 12:362–365

    Google Scholar 

  18. Verhoogen J, De Graeuwe A (1908) La cystectomie totale. Folia Urol 3:629–678

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lampel, A., Fisch, M., Stein, R. et al. Continent diversion with the Mainz pouch. World J Urol 14, 85–91 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00182563

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00182563

Keywords

Navigation