Summany
The purpose of this study was to non-invasively evaluate the homuncular organization of the motor cortex in man. We used transcranial magnetic stimulation to induce motor evoked potentials (MEP's) in Abductor Pollicis Brevis (APB) and Biceps Brachii (BB) muscles of 10 healthy volunteers. The practicality and accuracy of magnetic stimulation to scalp sites one cm apart was increased by the application to the scalp of a flexible nylon grid with grid size of 1×1 cm. Responsive scalp sites collectively contributed to distinct but overlapping muscle representational areas for the two muscles. The topography of these motor maps along and slightly anterior to the central fissure corresponds to the homuncular configuration as described by Penfield and Boldrey in 1937.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amassian, V.E., Cracco, R.Q. and Maccabee, P.J. Focal stimulation of human cerebral cortex with the magnetic coil: a comparison with electrical stimulation. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1989, 74: 401–416.
Asanuma, H. and Rosen, I. Topographical organization of cortical efferent zones projecting to distal forelimb muscles in the monkey. Exp. Brain Res., 1972, 14: 243–256.
Barker, A.T., Jalinous, R. and Freeston, I.L. Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex. Lancet, 1985: 1106–1107.
Bates, J.A.V. The individuality of the motor cortex. Brain, 1960, 83: 654–667.
Cohen, L.G. and Hallett, M. Noninvasive mapping of human motor cortex. Neurology, 1988a, 63: 904–909.
Cohen, L.G. and Hallett, M. Methodology for non-invasive mapping of human motor cortex with electrical stimulation. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1988b, 69: 403–411.
Cohen, L.G., Roth, B.J., Nilsson, J., Dang, N., Panizza, M., Bandinelli, S., Friauf, W. and Hallett, M. Effects of coil design on delivery of focal magnetic stimulation. Technical considerations. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1990, 75: 350–357.
Fuhr, P., Cohen, L.G., Roth, B.J. and Hallett, M. Latency of motor evoked potentials to focal transcranial stimulation varies as a function of scalp positions stimulated. Elctroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1991, 81: 81–89.
Hess, C.W., Mills, K.R. and Murray, N.M.F. Percutaneous stimulation of the human brain: a comparison of electrical and magnetic stimuli. J. Physiol., 1986, 378: 35P.
Homan, R.W., Herman, J. and Purdy, P. Cerebral location of international 10–20 system electrode placement. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1987, 66: 376–382.
Jasper, HH. Report of Committee on Methods of Clinical Examination in Electroencephalography. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1958, 10: 370–375.
Levy, W.J., Amassian, V.E., Schmid, U.D. and Jungreis, C. Mapping of motor cortex gyral sites non-invasively by transcranial magnetic stimulation in normal subjects and patients. In: W.J. Levy, R.Q. Cracco, A.T. Barker and J. Rothwell (Eds), Magnetic motor stimulation: Basic principles and clinical experience (EEG Suppl. 43). Elsevier Science Publishers, B.V., 1991: 51–75.
Leyton, A.S.F. and Sherrington, C.S. Observations of the excitable cortex of the chimpanzee, orang-utan and gorilla. QJ. Exp. Physiol., 1917, II: 135–222.
Lüders, H., Lesser, R.P., Dinner, D.S., Morris, H.H., Hahn, J.F., Friedman, I., Skipper, G., Wyllie, E. and Friedman, D. Commentary: Chronic intracranial recording and stimulation with subdural electrodes. In: J.J. Engel (Ed.), Surgical Treatment of the Epilepsies. Raven Press, New York, 1987: 297–321.
Merton, P.A. and Morton, H.B. Stimulation of the cerebral cortex in the intact human subject. Nature, 1980, 285: 227.
Murphy, J.T., Kwan, H.C., Mackay, W.A. and Wong, Y.C. Spatial organization of precentral cortex in awake primates. III. Input-output coupling. J. Neurophysiol., 1978, 41: 1132–1139.
Murray, N.M.F. The clinical usefulness of magnetic cortical stimulation. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1992, 85 (2): 81–85.
Pascual-Leone, A., Cohen, L.G., Brasil-Neto, J. and Hallett, M. Noninvasive mapping of optimal current directions for activation of different hand muscles in human motor cortex. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. (Abstract) 1992, 83: 85P.
Penfield, W. and Boldrey, E. Somatic motor and sensory representation in the cerebral cortex of man as studied by electrical stimulation. Brain, 1937, LX: 389–443.
Phillips, C.G. and Porter, R. Corticospinal neurones, their role in movement. Monogr. Physiol. Soc. 1977, 34: 450.
Rossini, P.M. and Marsden, C.D. Non-Invasive Stimulation of Brain and Spinal Cord. Fundamentals and Clinical Applications. Alan Liss, New York, 1988.
Roth, B.J., Saypol, J.M., Hallett, M and Cohen, L.G. A theoretical calculation of the electrical field induced in the cortex during magnetic stimulation. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1991, 81: 47–56.
Sessle, B.J. and Wiesendanger, M.S. Structural and functional definition of the motor cortex in monkey (Macaca fascicularis). J. Physiol. (Lond.) 1982, 323: 245–265.
Toleikis, J.R., Sloan, T.B. and Ronai, A.K. Optimal transcranial magnetic stimulation sites for the assessment of motor function. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1991, 81: 443–449.
Wassermann, E.M., McShane, L.M., Hallett, M. and Cohen, L.G. Noninvasive mapping of muscle representations in human motor cortex. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1992, 85: 1–8.
Woolsey, C.N., Erickson, T.C. and Gilson, W.E. Localization in somatic sensory and motor areas of human cerebral cortex as determined by direct recording of evoked potentials and electrical stimulation. J. Neurosurg. 1979, 51: 476–506.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Metman, L.V., Bellevich, J.S., Jones, S.M. et al. Topographic mapping of human motor cortex with transcranial magnetic stimulation: Homunculus revisited. Brain Topogr 6, 13–19 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01234122
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01234122