Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Spatial and spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity of normal and glaucoma eyes

  • Clinical Investigations
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The spatial contrast sensitivity (CS) to static patterns was tested in the central retina of 156 normal subjects. It showed a decrease above 50 years of age at all spatial frequencies tested which was slightly more pronounced in females than in males. The spatial CS was also studied in 32 glaucoma eyes: Small reductions were found only in the group below 50 but not in eyes of patients above 50. The spatiotemporal CS to phase-reversing patterns was tested in four retinal quadrants of 99 normal subjects. It showed no age dependence in males whereas in females it decreased significantly beyond 50 years at all spatial frequencies tested. The spatiotemporal CS was studied also in 21 glaucoma eyes: Strong losses were again noted only in patients below 50. Spatiotemporal CS losses and perimetric losses were also compared in the four quadrants: For both measures the severest losses were found in the lower nasal and the mildest in the upper temporal quadrant. The spatiotemporal CS test of the peripheral retina seems to be a more powerful tool in glaucoma research than the spatial CS test of the central retina; however, effects of age and gender have to be considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arden GB (1978) The importance of measuring contrast sensitivity in cases of visual disturbance. Br J Ophthalmol 62:198–209

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arden GB, Jacobson JJ (1978) A simple grating test for contrast sensitivity: preliminary results indicate value in screening for glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 17:23–32

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arundale K (1978) An investigation into the variation of human contrast sensitivity with age and ocular pathology. Br J Ophthalmol 62:213–215

    Google Scholar 

  4. Atkin A, Bodis-Wollner I, Wolkstein M, Moss A, Podos SM (1979) Abnormalities of central contrast sensitivity in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 88:205–211

    Google Scholar 

  5. Atkin A, Wolkstein M, Bodis-Wollner I, Anders M, Kels B, Podos SM (1980) Interocular comparison of contrast sensitivities in glaucoma patients and suspects. Br J Ophthalmol 64:858–862

    Google Scholar 

  6. Aulhorn E (1979) Pros and cons of quick-test in glaucoma perimetry. In: Kriegelstein GK, Leydhecker W (eds) Glaucoma update. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 79–92

    Google Scholar 

  7. Beazley LD, Illingworth DJ, Jahn A, Greer DV (1980) Contrast sensitivity in children and adults. Br J Ophthalmol 64:863–866

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bodis-Wollner I (1972) Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in patients with cerebral lesions. Science 178:769–771

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bradley A, Freeman RD (1982) Contrast sensitivity in children. Vision Res 22: 553–559

    Google Scholar 

  10. Campbell FW, Robson JG (1968) Application of Fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings. J Physiol 197:551–566

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cooper RL, Constable I, Terrell A (1980) Mass screening for glaucoma and other eye disease using the Arden grating test. Aust J Opthalmol 8:131–137

    Google Scholar 

  12. Daitch JM, Green DG (1969) Contrast sensitivity of the human peripheral retina. Vision Res 9:947–952

    Google Scholar 

  13. Derefeldt G, Lennerstrand G, Lundh B (1979) Age variations in normal human contrast sensitivity. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 57:679–690

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dressler M, Rassow B (1981) Neural contrast sensitivity measurements with a laser interference system for clinical and screening application. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 21:737–744

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ginsburg AP, Cannon MW (1983) Comparison of three methods for rapid determination of threshold contrast sensitivity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 24:798–802

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hitchings RA, Powell DJ, Arden GB, Carter RM (1981) Contrast sensitivity gratings in glaucoma family screening. Br J Ophthalmol 65:515–517

    Google Scholar 

  17. Littmann H (1984) Zur Bestimmung der wahren Größe eines Objektes auf dem Augenhintergrund des lebenden Auges. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 180:286–289

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lundh BL, Lennerstrand G (1981) Eccentric contrast sensitivity loss in glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 59:21–24

    Google Scholar 

  19. McGrath C, Morrison JD (1981) The effects of age on spatial frequency perception in human subjects. Q J Exp Physiol 66:253–261

    Google Scholar 

  20. Motolko M, Drance SM, Douglas GR (1982) The early psycho-physical disturbances in chronic open-angle glaucoma. A study of visual functions with asymmetric cupping. Arch Ophthalmol 100:1632–1634

    Google Scholar 

  21. Owsley C, Sekuler R, Siemsen D (1983) Contrast sensitivity throughout adulthood. Vision Res 23:689–699

    Google Scholar 

  22. Owsley C, Gardner I, Sekuler R, Lieberman H (1985) Role of the crystalline lens in the spatial vision loss of the elderly. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 26:1165–1170

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ross JE, Bron AJ, Clarke DD (1984) Contrast sensitivity and visual disability in chronic simple glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 68:821–827

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ross JE, Bron AJ, Reeves BC, Emmerson PG (1985) Detection of optic nerve damage in ocular hypertension. Br J Ophthalmol 69:897–903

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ross JE, Clarke DD, Bron AJ (1985) Effect of age on contrast sensitivity function: uniocular and binocular findings. Br J Ophthalmol 69:51–56

    Google Scholar 

  26. Schade OH (1956) Optical and photoelectric analog of the eye. J Opt Soc Am [A] 46: 721–739

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sekuler R, Hutman LP (1980) Spatial vision and aging. I: Contrast sensitivity. J Gerontol 35:692–699

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sekuler R, Hutman LP, Owsley CJ (1980) Human aging and spatial vision. Science 209:1255–1256

    Google Scholar 

  29. Singh H, Cooper RL, Alder VA, Crawford GJ, Terrell A, Constable IJ (1981) The Arden grating acuity: effects of age and optical factors in the normal patient, with prediction of the false-negative rate in screening for glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 65:518–524

    Google Scholar 

  30. Skalka HW (1980) Effect of age on Arden grating acuity. Br J Ophthalmol 64:21–23

    Google Scholar 

  31. Skrandies W (1985) Human contrast sensitivity: regional retinal differences. Hum Neurobiol 4:97–99

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sokol S, Domar A, Moskowitz A (1980) Utility of the Arden grating test in glaucoma screening: high false-positive rate in normals over 50 years of age. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 19: 1529–1533

    Google Scholar 

  33. Stamper RL, Hsu-Winges C, Sopher M (1982) Arden contrast sensitivity testing in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 100:947–950

    Google Scholar 

  34. Tyler CW (1981) Specific deficits of flicker sensitivity in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 20:204–212

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tyler CW, Ryu S, Stamper R (1984) The relation between visual sensitivity and intraocular pressure in normal eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 25:103–105

    Google Scholar 

  36. Vaegan, Halliday BL (1982) A forced-choice test improves clinical contrast sensitivity testing. Br J Ophthalmol 66:477–491

    Google Scholar 

  37. Weale RA (1975) Senile changes in visual acuity. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 95:36–38

    Google Scholar 

  38. Weatherhead RG (1980) Use of the Arden grating test for screening. Br J Ophthalmol 64: 591–596

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Augenklinik der Universität, Schwabachanlage 6, D-8520, Erlangen, Federal Republic of Germany

    Matthias Korth, Folkert Horn, Brigitte Storck & Jost B. Jonas

Authors
  1. Matthias Korth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Folkert Horn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Brigitte Storck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jost B. Jonas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This research was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Ko 510/3-3) and by the J. and F. Marohn Foundation of the University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, FRG

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Korth, M., Horn, F., Storck, B. et al. Spatial and spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity of normal and glaucoma eyes. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 227, 428–435 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02172893

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02172893

Keywords

Search

Navigation