Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Typ-2-Diabetes und Adipositas Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
World Journal of Surgery
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 4/2015

01.04.2015 | Scientific Review

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Open Abdomen and Temporary Abdominal Closure Techniques in Non-trauma Patients

verfasst von: J. J. Atema, S. L. Gans, M. A. Boermeester

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 4/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Several challenging clinical situations in patients with peritonitis can result in an open abdomen (OA) and subsequent temporary abdominal closure (TAC). Indications and treatment choices differ among surgeons. The risk of fistula development and the possibility to achieve delayed fascial closure differ between techniques. The aim of this study was to review the literature on the OA and TAC in peritonitis patients, to analyze indications and to assess delayed fascial closure, enteroatmospheric fistula and mortality rate, overall and per TAC technique.

Methods

Electronic databases were searched for studies describing the OA in patients of whom 50 % or more had peritonitis of a non-traumatic origin.

Results

The search identified 74 studies describing 78 patient series, comprising 4,358 patients of which 3,461 (79 %) had peritonitis. The overall quality of the included studies was low and the indications for open abdominal management differed considerably. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) was the most frequent described TAC technique (38 of 78 series). The highest weighted fascial closure rate was found in series describing NPWT with continuous mesh or suture mediated fascial traction (6 series, 463 patients: 73.1 %, 95 % confidence interval 63.3–81.0 %) and dynamic retention sutures (5 series, 77 patients: 73.6 %, 51.1–88.1 %). Weighted rates of fistula varied from 5.7 % after NPWT with fascial traction (2.2–14.1 %), 14.6 % (12.1–17.6 %) for NPWT only, and 17.2 % after mesh inlay (17.2–29.5 %).

Conclusion

Although the best results in terms of achieving delayed fascial closure and risk of enteroatmospheric fistula were shown for NPWT with continuous fascial traction, the overall quality of the available evidence was poor, and uniform recommendations cannot be made.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Tsuei BJ, Skinner JC, Bernard AC, Kearney PA, Boulanger BR (2004) The open peritoneal cavity: etiology correlates with the likelihood of fascial closure. Am Surg 70(7):652–656PubMed
2.
Quyn AJ, Johnston C, Hall D et al (2012) The open abdomen and temporary abdominal closure systems–historical evolution and systematic review. Colorectal Dis 14(8):e429–e438CrossRefPubMed
3.
van Boele HP, Wind J, Dijkgraaf MG, Busch OR, Goslings JC (2009) Temporary closure of the open abdomen: a systematic review on delayed primary fascial closure in patients with an open abdomen. World J Surg 33(2):199–207. doi:10.​1007/​s00268-008-9867-3 CrossRef
4.
Trevelyan SL, Carlson GL (2009) Is TNP in the open abdomen safe and effective? J Wound Care 18(1):24–25CrossRefPubMed
5.
Rao M, Burke D, Finan PJ, Sagar PM (2007) The use of vacuum-assisted closure of abdominal wounds: a word of caution. Colorectal Dis 9(3):266–268CrossRefPubMed
6.
Fischer JE (2008) A cautionary note: the use of vacuum-assisted closure systems in the treatment of gastrointestinal cutaneous fistula may be associated with higher mortality from subsequent fistula development. Am J Surg 196(1):1–2CrossRefPubMed
7.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 62(10):1006–1012CrossRefPubMed
8.
Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D et al (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17(1):1–12CrossRefPubMed
9.
10.
Carlson GL, Patrick H, Amin AI et al (2013) Management of the open abdomen: a national study of clinical outcome and safety of negative pressure wound therapy. Ann Surg 257:1154–1159CrossRefPubMed
11.
Rasilainen SK, Mentula PJ, Leppaniemi AK (2012) Vacuum and mesh-mediated fascial traction for primary closure of the open abdomen in critically ill surgical patients. Br J Surg 99(12):1725–1732CrossRefPubMed
12.
Pliakos I, Papavramidis TS, Michalopoulos N et al (2012) The value of vacuum-assisted closure in septic patients treated with laparostomy. Am Surg 78(9):957–961PubMed
13.
Martinez-Ordaz JL, Cruz-Olivo PA, Chacon-Moya E et al (2004) Management of the abdominal wall in sepsis. Comparison of two techniques. Rev Gastroenterol Mex 69(2):88–93PubMed
14.
Garcia Iniguez JA, Orozco CF, Mucino Hernandez MI et al (2004) Complications of the management of secondary peritonitis with contained-open abdomen. Comparison of the Bogota’s bag vs polypropylene mesh. Rev Gastroenterol Mex 69(3):147–155PubMed
15.
16.
Barker DE, Green JM, Maxwell RA et al (2007) Experience with vacuum-pack temporary abdominal wound closure in 258 trauma and general and vascular surgical patients. J Am Coll Surg 204(5):784–792CrossRefPubMed
17.
Oetting P, Rau B, Schlag PM (2006) Abdominal vacuum device with open abdomen. Chirurg 77(7):586, 588–6, 593
18.
Tremblay LN, Feliciano DV, Schmidt J et al (2001) Skin only or silo closure in the critically ill patient with an open abdomen. Am J Surg 182(6):670–675CrossRefPubMed
19.
Kritayakirana K, Maggio M, Brundage S et al (2010) Outcomes and complications of open abdomen technique for managing non-trauma patients. J Emerg Trauma Shock 3(2):118–122CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
20.
Prichayudh S, Sriussadaporn S, Samorn P et al (2011) Management of open abdomen with an absorbable mesh closure. Surg Today 41(1):72–78CrossRefPubMed
21.
22.
Robledo FA, Luque-de-Leon E, Suarez R et al (2007) Open versus closed management of the abdomen in the surgical treatment of severe secondary peritonitis: a randomized clinical trial. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 8(1):63–72CrossRef
23.
Gentile AT, Feliciano PD, Mullins RJ et al (1998) The utility of polyglycolic acid mesh for abdominal access in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis. J Am Coll Surg 186(3):313–318CrossRefPubMed
24.
Adkins AL, Robbins J, Villalba M, Bendick P, Shanley CJ (2004) Open abdomen management of intra-abdominal sepsis. Am Surg 70(2):137–140PubMed
25.
Amin AI, Shaikh IA (2009) Topical negative pressure in managing severe peritonitis: a positive contribution? World J Gastroenterol 15(27):3394–3397CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
26.
Anderson ED, Mandelbaum DM, Ellison EC, Carey LC, Cooperman M (1983) Open packing of the peritoneal cavity in generalized bacterial peritonitis. Am J Surg 145(1):131–135CrossRefPubMed
27.
Bailey CM, Thompson-Fawcett MW, Kettlewell MG, Garrard C, Mortensen NJ (2000) Laparostomy for severe intra-abdominal infection complicating colorectal disease. Dis Colon Rectum 43(1):25–30CrossRefPubMed
28.
Bosscha K, Hulstaert PF, Visser MR, van Vroonhoven TJ, van der Werken C (2000) Open management of the abdomen and planned reoperations in severe bacterial peritonitis. Eur J Surg 166(1):44–49CrossRefPubMed
29.
Cipolla J, Stawicki SP, Hoff WS et al (2005) A proposed algorithm for managing the open abdomen. Am Surg 71(3):202–207PubMed
30.
Fortelny RH, Hofmann A, Gruber-Blum S, Petter-Puchner AH, Glaser KS (2013) Delayed closure of open abdomen in septic patients is facilitated by combined negative pressure wound therapy and dynamic fascial suture. Surg Endosc. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-013-3251-6
31.
Gonullu D, Koksoy FN, Demiray O et al (2009) Laparostomy in patients with severe secondary peritonitis. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 15(1):52–57PubMed
32.
Hakkiluoto A, Hannukainen J (1992) Open management with mesh and zipper of patients with intra-abdominal abscesses or diffuse peritonitis. Eur J Surg 158(8):403–405PubMed
33.
Hubens G, Lafaire C, De PM et al (1994) Staged peritoneal lavages with the aid of a Zipper system in the treatment of diffuse peritonitis. Acta Chir Belg 94(3):176–179PubMed
34.
Kafka-Ritsch R, Birkfellner F, Perathoner A et al (2012) Damage control surgery with abdominal vacuum and delayed bowel reconstruction in patients with perforated diverticulitis Hinchey III/IV. J Gastrointest Surg 16(10):1915–1922CrossRefPubMed
35.
Kleif J, Fabricius R, Bertelsen CA, Bruun J, Gogenur I (2012) Promising results after vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction. Dan Med J 59(9):A4495PubMed
36.
Koniaris LG, Hendrickson RJ, Drugas G, Abt P, Schoeniger LO (2001) Dynamic retention: a technique for closure of the complex abdomen in critically ill patients. Arch Surg 136(12):1359–1362CrossRefPubMed
37.
Lopez-Quintero L, Evaristo-Mendez G, Fuentes-Flores F, Ventura-Gonzalez F, Sepulveda-Castro R (2010) Treatment of open abdomen in patients with abdominal sepsis using the vacuum pack system. Cir Cir 78(4):322–326PubMed
38.
Padalino P, Dionigi G, Minoja G et al (2010) Fascia-to-fascia closure with abdominal topical negative pressure for severe abdominal infections: preliminary results in a department of general surgery and intensive care unit. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 11(6):523–528CrossRef
39.
Pliakos I, Michalopoulos N, Papavramidis TS et al (2013) The effect of vacuum-assisted closure in bacterial clearance of the infected abdomen. Surg Infect (Larchmt). doi:10.​1089/​sur.​2012.​156
40.
Reimer MW, Yelle JD, Reitsma B et al (2008) Management of open abdominal wounds with a dynamic fascial closure system. Can J Surg 51(3):209–214PubMedCentralPubMed
41.
Schmelzle M, Alldinger I, Matthaei H et al (2010) Long-term vacuum-assisted closure in open abdomen due to secondary peritonitis: a retrospective evaluation of a selected group of patients. Dig Surg 27(4):272–278CrossRefPubMed
42.
Wondberg D, Larusson HJ, Metzger U, Platz A, Zingg U (2008) Treatment of the open abdomen with the commercially available vacuum-assisted closure system in patients with abdominal sepsis: low primary closure rate. World J Surg 32(12):2724–2729. doi:10.​1007/​s00268-008-9762-y CrossRefPubMed
43.
Dietz UA, Wichelmann C, Wunder C et al (2012) Early repair of open abdomen with a tailored two-component mesh and conditioning vacuum packing: a safe alternative to the planned giant ventral hernia. Hernia 16(4):451–460CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
44.
Hedderich GS, Wexler MJ, McLean AP, Meakins JL (1986) The septic abdomen: open management with Marlex mesh with a zipper. Surgery 99(4):399–408PubMed
45.
Ivatury RR, Nallathambi M, Rao PM, Rohman M, Stahl WM (1989) Open management of the septic abdomen: therapeutic and prognostic considerations based on APACHE II. Crit Care Med 17(6):511–517CrossRefPubMed
46.
Kirshtein B, Roy-Shapira A, Lantsberg L, Mizrahi S (2007) Use of the “Bogota bag” for temporary abdominal closure in patients with secondary peritonitis. Am Surg 73(3):249–252PubMed
47.
Losanoff J, Kjossev K (1997) Palisade dorsoventral lavage for neglected peritonitis. Am J Surg 173(2):134–135CrossRefPubMed
48.
49.
Manterola C, Moraga J, Urrutia S (2011) Contained laparostomy with a Bogota bag. Results of case series. Cir Esp 89(6):379–385CrossRefPubMed
50.
Zingales F, Moschino P, Carniato S et al (2001) Laparostomy in the treatment of severe peritonitis: a review of 60 cases. Chir Ital 53(6):821–826PubMed
51.
Tons C, Schachtrupp A, Rau M, Mumme T, Schumpelick V (2000) Abdominal compartment syndrome: prevention and treatment. Chirurg 71(8):918–926CrossRefPubMed
52.
Haddock C, Konkin DE, Blair NP (2013) Management of the open abdomen with the abdominal reapproximation anchor dynamic fascial closure system. Am J Surg 205(5):528–533CrossRefPubMed
53.
Khan A, Hsee L, Mathur S, Civil I (2013) Damage-control laparotomy in nontrauma patients: review of indications and outcomes. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 75(3):365–368CrossRefPubMed
54.
Hollender LF, Bur F, Schwenck D, Pigache P (1983) The “left-open abdomen”. Technic, indication and results. Chirurg 54(5):316–319PubMed
55.
Brock WB, Barker DE, Burns RP (1995) Temporary closure of open abdominal wounds: the vacuum pack. Am Surg 61(1):30–35PubMed
56.
Caro A, Olona C, Jimenez A et al (2011) Treatment of the open abdomen with topical negative pressure therapy: a retrospective study of 46 cases. Int Wound J 8(3):274–279CrossRefPubMed
57.
Fieger AJ, Schwatlo F, Mundel DF et al (2011) Abdominal vacuum therapy for the open abdomen: a retrospective analysis of 82 consecutive patients. Zentralbl Chir 136(1):56–60CrossRefPubMed
58.
Horwood J, Akbar F, Maw A (2009) Initial experience of laparostomy with immediate vacuum therapy in patients with severe peritonitis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 91(8):681–687CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
59.
Ozguc H, Paksoy E, Ozturk E (2008) Temporary abdominal closure with the vacuum pack technique: a 5-year experience. Acta Chir Belg 108(4):414–419PubMed
60.
Perez D, Wildi S, Demartines N et al (2007) Prospective evaluation of vacuum-assisted closure in abdominal compartment syndrome and severe abdominal sepsis. J Am Coll Surg 205(4):586–592CrossRefPubMed
61.
Perez DL, Pardellas RH, Caceres AN et al (2012) Vacuum assisted closure in open abdomen and deferred closure: experience in 23 patients. Cir Esp 90(8):506–512CrossRef
62.
Plaudis H, Rudzats A, Melberga L et al (2012) Abdominal negative-pressure therapy: a new method in countering abdominal compartment and peritonitis: prospective study and critical review of literature. Ann Intensive Care 2(Suppl 1):S23CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
63.
Shaikh IA, Ballard-Wilson A, Yalamarthi S, Amin AI (2010) Use of topical negative pressure in assisted abdominal closure does not lead to high incidence of enteric fistulae. Colorectal Dis 12(9):931–934CrossRefPubMed
64.
Smith LA, Barker DE, Chase CW et al (1997) Vacuum pack technique of temporary abdominal closure: a four-year experience. Am Surg 63(12):1102–1107PubMed
65.
Wilde JM, Loudon MA (2007) Modified Opsite sandwich for temporary abdominal closure: a non-traumatic experience. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 89(1):57–61CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
66.
Zielinski MD, Goussous N, Schiller HJ, Jenkins D (2013) Chemical components separation with botulinum toxin A: a novel technique to improve primary fascial closure rates of the open abdomen. Hernia 17(1):101–107CrossRefPubMed
67.
Bertelsen CA, Fabricius R, Kleif J, Kristensen B, Gogenur I (2013) Outcome of negative-pressure wound therapy for open abdomen treatment after nontraumatic lower gastrointestinal surgery: analysis of factors affecting delayed fascial closure in 101 patients. World J Surg. doi:10.​1007/​s00268-013-2360-7
68.
Richter S, Dold S, Doberauer JP, Mai P, Schuld J (2013) Negative pressure wound therapy for the treatment of the open abdomen and incidence of enteral fistulas: a retrospective bicentre analysis. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2013:730829CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
69.
Kafka-Ritsch R, Zitt M, Schorn N et al (2012) Open abdomen treatment with dynamic sutures and topical negative pressure resulting in a high primary fascia closure rate. World J Surg 36(8):1765–1771. doi:10.​1007/​s00268-012-1586-0 CrossRefPubMed
70.
Acosta S, Bjarnason T, Petersson U et al (2011) Multicentre prospective study of fascial closure rate after open abdomen with vacuum and mesh-mediated fascial traction. Br J Surg 98(5):735–743CrossRefPubMed
71.
72.
Schachtrupp A, Hoer J, Tons C et al (2002) Intra-abdominal pressure: a reliable criterion for laparostomy closure? Hernia 6(3):102–107CrossRefPubMed
73.
Sokmen S, Atila K, Bora S et al (2002) Evaluation of prosthetic mesh closure in semiopen-abdomen patients. Hernia 6(3):124–129CrossRefPubMed
74.
Doyon A, Devroede G, Viens D et al (2001) A simple, inexpensive, life-saving way to perform iterative laparotomy in patients with severe intra-abdominal sepsis. Colorectal Dis 3(2):115–121CrossRefPubMed
75.
Ercan F, Korkmaz A, Aras N (1993) The zipper-mesh method for treating delayed generalized peritonitis. Surg Today 23(3):205–214CrossRefPubMed
76.
Salman AE, Yetisir F, Aksoy M et al (2012) Use of dynamic wound closure system in conjunction with vacuum-assisted closure therapy in delayed closure of open abdomen. Hernia. doi:10.​1007/​s10029-012-1008-0 PubMed
77.
78.
Wittmann DH (2000) Staged adbominal repair: development and current practice of an advanced operative technique for diffuse suppurative peritonitis. Acta Chir Austriaca 32:171–178
79.
Wittmann DH, Aprahamian C, Bergstein JM (1990) Etappenlavage: advanced diffuse peritonitis managed by planned multiple laparotomies utilizing zippers, slide fastener, and Velcro analogue for temporary abdominal closure. World J Surg 14(2):218–226. doi:10.​1007/​BF01664876 CrossRefPubMed
80.
Jansen JO, Loudon MA (2007) Damage control surgery in a non-trauma setting. Br J Surg 94(7):789–790CrossRefPubMed
81.
van Ruler O, Mahler CW, Boer KR et al (2007) Comparison of on-demand vs planned relaparotomy strategy in patients with severe peritonitis: a randomized trial. JAMA 298(8):865–872CrossRefPubMed
82.
Goussous N, Kim BD, Jenkins DH, Zielinski MD (2012) Factors affecting primary fascial closure of the open abdomen in the nontrauma patient. Surgery 152(4):777–783CrossRefPubMed
83.
84.
Pliakos I, Papavramidis TS, Mihalopoulos N et al (2010) Vacuum-assisted closure in severe abdominal sepsis with or without retention sutured sequential fascial closure: a clinical trial. Surgery 148(5):947–953CrossRefPubMed
85.
Angus DC, van der Poll T (2013) Severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 369(9):840–851CrossRefPubMed
86.
87.
Bertelsen CA, Fabricius R, Kleif J, Kristensen B, Gogenur I (2013) Outcome of negative-pressure wound therapy for open abdomen treatment after nontraumatic lower gastrointestinal surgery: analysis of factors affecting delayed fascial closure in 101 patients. World J Surg. doi:10.​1007/​s00268-013-2360-7
88.
Balentine C, Subramanian A, Palacio CH et al (2009) AVAS Best Clinical Resident Award (Tied): management and outcomes of the open abdomen in nontrauma patients. Am J Surg 198(5):588–592CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Open Abdomen and Temporary Abdominal Closure Techniques in Non-trauma Patients
verfasst von
J. J. Atema
S. L. Gans
M. A. Boermeester
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 4/2015
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2883-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2015

World Journal of Surgery 4/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Original Scientific Report

How’s the Weather? Relationship Between Weather and Trauma Admissions at a Level I Trauma Center

Editorial Perspective

What is the Best Anti-Reflux Operation? All Fundoplications are Not Created Equal

Invited Commentary

Facilitating Optimal Wound Care

OriginalPaper

Wound Management in Disaster Settings

Original Scientific Report

Blood Transfusion is Associated with Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Hepatectomy in Child–Pugh Class A Patients

Original Scientific Report

Ventral Segment-Preserving Right Hepatectomy in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Vorsicht, erhöhte Blutungsgefahr nach PCI!

10.05.2024 Koronare Herzerkrankung Nachrichten

Nach PCI besteht ein erhöhtes Blutungsrisiko, wenn die Behandelten eine verminderte linksventrikuläre Ejektionsfraktion aufweisen. Das Risiko ist umso höher, je stärker die Pumpfunktion eingeschränkt ist.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Deutlich weniger Infektionen: Wundprotektoren schützen!

08.05.2024 Postoperative Wundinfektion Nachrichten

Der Einsatz von Wundprotektoren bei offenen Eingriffen am unteren Gastrointestinaltrakt schützt vor Infektionen im Op.-Gebiet – und dient darüber hinaus der besseren Sicht. Das bestätigt mit großer Robustheit eine randomisierte Studie im Fachblatt JAMA Surgery.

Chirurginnen und Chirurgen sind stark suizidgefährdet

07.05.2024 Suizid Nachrichten

Der belastende Arbeitsalltag wirkt sich negativ auf die psychische Gesundheit der Angehörigen ärztlicher Berufsgruppen aus. Chirurginnen und Chirurgen bilden da keine Ausnahme, im Gegenteil.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.
Bildnachweise