Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Clinical Research in Cardiology 8/2022

01.04.2022 | Original Paper

Transcatheter-based aortic valve replacement vs. isolated surgical aortic valve replacement in 2020

verfasst von: Luise Gaede, Johannes Blumenstein, Clemens Eckel, Christina Grothusen, Vedat Tiyerili, Dagmar Sötemann, Holger Nef, Albrecht Elsässer, Stephan Achenbach, Helge Möllmann

Erschienen in: Clinical Research in Cardiology | Ausgabe 8/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Based on the results of several recent randomized trials, European and American guidelines on valvular heart disease management have substantially expanded the indications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We present an all-comer data on peri-operative risk profile and in-hospital outcomes from Germany for patients treated by TAVI or isolated surgical aortic valve replacement (iSAVR) in 2020, providing an opportunity to compare study data with data from daily clinical practice.

Methods

Data concerning all isolated aortic valve procedures performed in Germany in 2020 were retrieved from the mandatory nationwide quality control program. Expected mortality was calculated with the annually revised German Aortic valve score (AKL-score) based on the data of either catheter-based (AKL-CATH) or isolated surgical (AKL-CHIR) aortic valve replacement in Germany from the previous year (2019).

Results

In 2020 21,903 TAVI procedures (20,810 transvascular (TV; vs. 2019: 22.973; − 9.4%), 1093 transapical (TA; vs. 2019: 1413; − 22.6%)) and 6144 (vs. 2019 7905; − 22.5%) iSAVR were performed in Germany. Patients who received TAVI showed a significantly higher perioperative risk profile than patients undergoing iSAVR based on older age and more severe co-morbidities. While in-hospital mortality after TAVI (2.3%) was numerically lower than in 2019 (2.5%), this difference was not significant (p = 0.11). In-hospital mortality after iSAVR was identical in 2020 and 2019 (2.8%) and thus higher than after TAVI (p = 0.003), resulting in an observed expected mortality ratio of 1.02 after TAVI and 1.05 after iSAVR. After exclusion of the emergency procedures, in-hospital mortality did not differ significantly between the groups (TAVI 2.2% vs. iSAVR 1.9%, p = 0.26).

Conclusion

Total numbers of both iSAVR and TAVI in Germany were lower in 2020 than in 2019, most likely due to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the relative number of patients treated by TAVI as compared to iSAVR continues to increase. Despite older age and more severe comorbidities compared to patients undergoing iSAVR the in-hospital mortality after TAVI continued to decrease in 2020 and remains significantly lower than after iSAVR.

Graphical Abstract

Literatur
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Bekeredjian R, Szabo G, Balaban Ü et al (2019) Patients at low surgical risk as defined by the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Score undergoing isolated interventional or surgical aortic valve implantation: In-hospital data and 1-year results from the German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY). Eur Heart J 40:1323–1330. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy699CrossRefPubMed Bekeredjian R, Szabo G, Balaban Ü et al (2019) Patients at low surgical risk as defined by the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Score undergoing isolated interventional or surgical aortic valve implantation: In-hospital data and 1-year results from the German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY). Eur Heart J 40:1323–1330. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​eurheartj/​ehy699CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, et al (2021) 2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients with Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, et al (2021) 2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients with Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Mack M, Vemulapalli S, Herrmann H et al (2020) STS-ACC TVT registry of transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 76:2492–2516CrossRef Mack M, Vemulapalli S, Herrmann H et al (2020) STS-ACC TVT registry of transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 76:2492–2516CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Aortenklappenchirurgie B zum E 2019: KK (2019) Bundesauswertung zum Erfassungsjahr 2019: Kombinierte Koronar- und Aortenklappenchirurgie. www.iqtig.org Aortenklappenchirurgie B zum E 2019: KK (2019) Bundesauswertung zum Erfassungsjahr 2019: Kombinierte Koronar- und Aortenklappenchirurgie. www.​iqtig.​org
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith C, Leon M, Mack M, Miller D, Moses J, Svnesson L, Tuzcu E, Webb J, Fontana G, Makkar R, Williams M, Dewey T, Kapadia S, Babaliaros V, Thourani V, Corso P, Pichard A, Bavaria J, Herrmann H, Akin J, Anderson W, Wang DPSD (2011) Transcatheter versus surgical aotic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 364:2187–2198CrossRef Smith C, Leon M, Mack M, Miller D, Moses J, Svnesson L, Tuzcu E, Webb J, Fontana G, Makkar R, Williams M, Dewey T, Kapadia S, Babaliaros V, Thourani V, Corso P, Pichard A, Bavaria J, Herrmann H, Akin J, Anderson W, Wang DPSD (2011) Transcatheter versus surgical aotic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 364:2187–2198CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Transcatheter-based aortic valve replacement vs. isolated surgical aortic valve replacement in 2020
verfasst von
Luise Gaede
Johannes Blumenstein
Clemens Eckel
Christina Grothusen
Vedat Tiyerili
Dagmar Sötemann
Holger Nef
Albrecht Elsässer
Stephan Achenbach
Helge Möllmann
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2022
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Clinical Research in Cardiology / Ausgabe 8/2022
Print ISSN: 1861-0684
Elektronische ISSN: 1861-0692
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-022-02006-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2022

Clinical Research in Cardiology 8/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Nach Herzinfarkt mit Typ-1-Diabetes schlechtere Karten als mit Typ 2?

29.05.2024 Herzinfarkt Nachrichten

Bei Menschen mit Typ-2-Diabetes sind die Chancen, einen Myokardinfarkt zu überleben, in den letzten 15 Jahren deutlich gestiegen – nicht jedoch bei Betroffenen mit Typ 1.

Erhöhtes Risiko fürs Herz unter Checkpointhemmer-Therapie

28.05.2024 Nebenwirkungen der Krebstherapie Nachrichten

Kardiotoxische Nebenwirkungen einer Therapie mit Immuncheckpointhemmern mögen selten sein – wenn sie aber auftreten, wird es für Patienten oft lebensgefährlich. Voruntersuchung und Monitoring sind daher obligat.

GLP-1-Agonisten können Fortschreiten diabetischer Retinopathie begünstigen

24.05.2024 Diabetische Retinopathie Nachrichten

Möglicherweise hängt es von der Art der Diabetesmedikamente ab, wie hoch das Risiko der Betroffenen ist, dass sich sehkraftgefährdende Komplikationen verschlimmern.

TAVI versus Klappenchirurgie: Neue Vergleichsstudie sorgt für Erstaunen

21.05.2024 TAVI Nachrichten

Bei schwerer Aortenstenose und obstruktiver KHK empfehlen die Leitlinien derzeit eine chirurgische Kombi-Behandlung aus Klappenersatz plus Bypass-OP. Diese Empfehlung wird allerdings jetzt durch eine aktuelle Studie infrage gestellt – mit überraschender Deutlichkeit.

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.