Skip to main content
Log in

Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a review

  • Knee Arthroplasty
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lateral unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) has been utilized as a treatment for isolated lateral tibiofemoral osteoarthritis (OA) since the first description of UKA in the 1970s. To date, there remains some controversy on UKA procedures. As indications for lateral UKA are usually rare, surgeon experience seems to be the key factor for a successful intervention. Better understanding of biomechanics of the knee joint, recent developments in prosthesis design, surgical techniques and indications may add to improved outcomes of lateral UKA. Alternatives that are applied to treat lateral tibiofemoral OA include arthroscopic interventions, osteotomies and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In comparison with TKA, potential advantages of UKA include a minimally or less invasive approach, less bone resection, preservation of the cruciate ligaments, preservation of the medial tibiofemoral and the patellofemoral compartments, shorter rehabilitation, and physiological knee kinematics. This review aims to summarize the current concepts of implant designs as well as indications and contraindications for lateral UKA. The literature will be presented and discussed as well as results and realistic expectations on both the surgeon’s and the patient’s side. Alternative treatments and future concepts for lateral UKA will be presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McAlindon TE, Snow S, Cooper C, Dieppe PA (1992) Radiographic patterns of osteoarthritis of the knee joint in the community: the importance of the patellofemoral joint. Ann Rheum Dis 51(7):844–849

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sah AP, Scott RD (2007) Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty through a medial approach. Study with an average five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(9):1948–1954

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Scott RD (2005) Lateral unicompartmental replacement: a road less traveled. Orthopedics 28(9):983–984

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Laskin RS (2001) Unicompartmental knee replacement: some unanswered questions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:267–271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pennington DW, Swienckowski JJ, Lutes WB, Drake GN (2006) Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: survivorship and technical considerations at an average follow-up of 12.4 years. J Arthroplasty 21(1):13–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Skolnick MD, Bryan RS, Peterson LF (1975) Unicompartmental polycentric knee arthroplasty: description and preliminary results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 112:208–214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Marmor L (1976) The Modular (Marmor) knee: case report with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 120:86–94

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Scott RD, Santore RF (1981) Unicondylar unicompartmental replacement for osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 63(4):536–544

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Insall J, Walker P (1976) Unicondylar knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 120:83–85

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Insall J, Aglietti P (1980) A five to seven-year follow-up of unicondylar arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 62(8):1329–1337

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Laskin RS (1978) Unicompartmental tibiofemoral resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60(2):182–185

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Marmor L (1984) Lateral compartment arthroplasty of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 186:115–121

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Argenson JN, Chevrol-Benkeddache Y, Aubaniac JM (2002) Modern unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with cement: a three to ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am A 84(12):2235–2239

    Google Scholar 

  14. Parratte S, Argenson JN, Dumas J, Aubaniac JM (2007) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for avascular osteonecrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 464:37–42

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cartier P, Sanouiller JL, Grelsamer RP (1996) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty surgery. 10-year minimum follow-up period. J Arthroplasty 11(7):782–788

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Engh GA (2002) Orthopaedic crossfire—can we justify unicondylar arthroplasty as a temporizing procedure? in the affirmative. J Arthroplasty 17(4 Suppl 1):54–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sculco TP (2002) Orthopaedic crossfire—can we justify unicondylar arthroplasty as a temporizing procedure? in opposition. J Arthroplasty 17(4 Suppl 1):56–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ashraf T, Newman JH, Evans RL, Ackroyd CE (2002) Lateral unicompartmental knee replacement survivorship and clinical experience over 21 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84(8):1126–1130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ohdera T, Tokunaga J, Kobayashi A (2001) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for lateral gonarthrosis: midterm results. J Arthroplasty 16(2):196–200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. O’Rourke MR, Gardner JJ, Callaghan JJ, Liu SS, Goetz DD, Vittetoe DA, Sullivan PM, Johnston RC (2005) The John Insall Award: unicompartmental knee replacement: a minimum twenty-one-year followup, end-result study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 440:27–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gunther T, Murray D, Miller R (1996) Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with Oxford meniscal knee. Knee 3:33–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Argenson JN, Parratte S, Bertani A, Flecher X, Aubaniac JM (2008) Long-term results with a lateral unicondylar replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466(11):2686–2693

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Berger RA, Nedeff DD, Barden RM, Sheinkop MM, Jacobs JJ, Rosenberg AG, Galante JO (1999) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clinical experience at 6- to 10-year followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 367:50–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Squire MW, Callaghan JJ, Goetz DD, Sullivan PM, Johnston RC (1999) Unicompartmental knee replacement. A minimum 15 year followup study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 367:61–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rougraff BT, Heck DA, Gibson AE (1991) A comparison of tricompartmental and unicompartmental arthroplasty for the treatment of gonarthrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 273:157–164

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Knutson K, Lindstrand A, Lidgren L (1986) Survival of knee arthroplasties. A nation-wide multicentre investigation of 8000 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 68(5):795–803

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Robertsson O, Borgquist L, Knutson K, Lewold S, Lidgren L (1999) Use of unicompartmental instead of tricompartmental prostheses for unicompartmental arthrosis in the knee is a cost-effective alternative. 15,437 primary tricompartmental prostheses were compared with 10,624 primary medial or lateral unicompartmental prostheses. Acta Orthop Scand 70(2):170–175

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Laurencin CT, Zelicof SB, Scott RD, Ewald FC (1991) Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in the same patient. A comparative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 273:151–156

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hill PF, Vedi V, Williams A, Iwaki H, Pinskerova V, Freeman MA (2000) Tibiofemoral movement 2: the loaded and unloaded living knee studied by MRI. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82(8):1196–1198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Karrholm J, Brandsson S, Freeman MA (2000) Tibiofemoral movement 4: changes of axial tibial rotation caused by forced rotation at the weight-bearing knee studied by RSA. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82(8):1201–1203

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Karrholm J, Selvik G, Elmqvist LG, Hansson LI (1988) Active knee motion after cruciate ligament rupture. Stereoradiography. Acta Orthop Scand 59(2):158–164

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Jonsson H, Karrholm J (1994) Three-dimensional knee joint movements during a step-up: evaluation after anterior cruciate ligament rupture. J Orthop Res 12(6):769–779

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Weidow J, Pak J, Karrholm J (2002) Different patterns of cartilage wear in medial and lateral gonarthrosis. Acta Orthop Scand 73(3):326–329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wimmer MA, Andriacchi TP, Natarajan RN, Loos J, Karlhuber M, Petermann J, Schneider E, Rosenberg AG (1998) A striated pattern of wear in ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene components of Miller-Galante total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 13(1):8–16

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Keyes GW, Carr AJ, Miller RK, Goodfellow JW (1992) The radiographic classification of medial gonarthrosis. Correlation with operation methods in 200 knees. Acta Orthop Scand 63(5):497–501

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. White SH, Ludkowski PF, Goodfellow JW (1991) Anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73(4):582–586

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hudek R, Schmutz S, Regenfelder F, Fuchs B, Koch PP (2009) Novel measurement technique of the tibial slope on conventional MRI. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(8):2066–2072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Servien E, Saffarini M, Lustig S, Chomel S, Neyret P (2008) Lateral versus medial tibial plateau: morphometric analysis and adaptability with current tibial component design. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16(12):1141–1145

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Harrington IJ (1983) Static and dynamic loading patterns in knee joints with deformities. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65(2):247–259

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Argenson JN, Komistek RD, Aubaniac JM, Dennis DA, Northcut EJ, Anderson DT, Agostini S (2002) In vivo determination of knee kinematics for subjects implanted with a unicompartmental arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17(8):1049–1054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ahlback S, Bauer GC, Bohne WH (1968) Spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee. Arthritis Rheum 11(6):705–733

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Gibson PH, Goodfellow JW (1986) Stress radiography in degenerative arthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 68(4):608–609

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Rosenberg TD, Paulos LE, Parker RD, Coward DB, Scott SM (1988) The forty-five-degree posteroanterior flexion weight-bearing radiograph of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 70(10):1479–1483

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hauptmann SM, Kreul U, Mazoochian F, Schulze-Pellengahr CV, Jansson V, Muller PE (2005) Influence of patellofemoral osteoarthritis on functional outcome after unicondylar knee arthroplasty. Orthopade 34(11):1088, 1090–1093

    Google Scholar 

  45. Beard DJ, Pandit H, Gill HS, Hollinghurst D, Dodd CA, Murray DW (2007) The influence of the presence and severity of pre-existing patellofemoral degenerative changes on the outcome of the Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(12):1597–1601

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Beard DJ, Pandit H, Ostlere S, Jenkins C, Dodd CA, Murray DW (2007) Pre-operative clinical and radiological assessment of the patellofemoral joint in unicompartmental knee replacement and its influence on outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(12):1602–1607

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. McDonnell SM, Bottomley NJ, Hollinghurst D, Rout R, Thomas G, Pandit H, Ostlere S, Murray DW, Beard DJ, Price AJ (2009) Skyline patellofemoral radiographs can only exclude late stage degenerative changes. Knee (Epub ahead of print)

  48. Moller JT, Weeth RE, Keller JO, Nielsen S (1985) Unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee. Cadaver study of the importance of the anterior cruciate ligament. Acta Orthop Scand 56(2):120–123

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Deschamps G, Lapeyre B (1987) Rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament: a frequently unrecognized cause of failure of unicompartmental knee prostheses. Apropos of a series of 79 Lotus prostheses with a follow-up of more than 5 years. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 73(7):544–551

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Argenson JN, Parratte S, Flecher X, Aubaniac JM (2007) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: technique through a mini-incision. Clin Orthop Relat Res 464:32–36

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O’Connor JJ (1998) The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80(6):983–989

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Komistek RD, Dennis DA, Mahfouz M (2003) In vivo fluoroscopic analysis of the normal human knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 410:69–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Robinson BJ, Rees JL, Price AJ, Beard DJ, Murray DW, McLardy Smith P, Dodd CA (2002) Dislocation of the bearing of the Oxford lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty. A radiological assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84(5):653–657

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Bare JV, Gill HS, Beard DJ, Murray DW (2006) A convex lateral tibial plateau for knee replacement. Knee 13(2):122–126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Pennington DW, Swienckowski JJ, Lutes WB, Drake GN (2003) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients sixty years of age or younger. J Bone Joint Surg Am A 85(10):1968–1973

    Google Scholar 

  56. Lewold S, Robertsson O, Knutson K, Lidgren L (1998) Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: outcome in 1,135 cases from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty study. Acta Orthop Scand 69(5):469–474

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Scott RD, Cobb AG, McQueary FG, Thornhill TS (1991) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Eight- to 12-year follow-up evaluation with survivorship analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 271:96–100

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. W-Dahl A, Robertsson O, Lidgren L, Miller L, Davidson D, Graves S (2010) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients aged less than 65. Acta Orthop 81(1):90–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Padgett DE, Stern SH, Insall JN (1991) Revision total knee arthroplasty for failed unicompartmental replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73(2):186–190

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. McAuley JP, Engh GA, Ammeen DJ (2001) Revision of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:279–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Rolston L, Moore C (2010) Conversion of lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty to anterior cruciate retaining tricompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee 17(3):249–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Cameron HU, Hunter GA, Welsh RP, Bailey WH (1981) Unicompartmental knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 160:109–113

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Chatain F, Richard A, Deschamps G, Chambat P, Neyret P (2004) Revision total knee arthroplasty after unicompartmental femorotibial prosthesis: 54 cases. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 90(1):49–57

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Murray PB, Rand JA (1993) Symptomatic valgus knee: the surgical options. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1(1):1–9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Griffin T, Rowden N, Morgan D, Atkinson R, Woodruff P, Maddern G (2007) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for the treatment of unicompartmental osteoarthritis: a systematic study. Aust N Z J Surg 77(4):214–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Chatain F, Adeleine P, Chambat P, Neyret P (2003) A comparative study of medial versus lateral arthroscopic partial meniscectomy on stable knees: 10-year minimum follow-up. Arthroscopy 19(8):842–849

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Elkus M, Ranawat CS, Rasquinha VJ, Babhulkar S, Rossi R, Ranawat AS (2004) Total knee arthroplasty for severe valgus deformity. Five to fourteen-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am A 86(12):2671–2676

    Google Scholar 

  68. Rolston L, Bresch J, Engh G, Franz A, Kreuzer S, Nadaud M, Puri L, Wood D (2007) Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a bone-sparing, ligament-sparing, and minimally invasive alternative for active patients. Orthopedics 30(8 Suppl):70–73

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Heyse TJ, Khefacha A, Cartier P (2009) UKA in combination with PFR at average 12-year follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (Epub ahead of print)

  70. Cameron HU, Botsford DJ, Park YS (1997) Prognostic factors in the outcome of supracondylar femoral osteotomy for lateral compartment osteoarthritis of the knee. Can J Surg 40(2):114–118

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Johnson EW Jr, Bodell LS (1981) Corrective supracondylar osteotomy for painful genu valgum. Mayo Clin Proc 56(2):87–92

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Koeck FX, Perlick L, Luring C, Handel M, Beckmann J, Linhardt O, Grifka J (2009) Leg axis correction with ConforMIS iForma (interpositional device) in unicompartmental arthritis of the knee. Int Orthop 33(4):955–960

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Clarius M, Becker JF, Schmitt H, Seeger JB (2009) The UniSpacer: correcting varus malalignment in medial gonarthrosis. Int Orthop (Epub ahead of print)

  74. Laskin RS (2003) An oxidized Zr ceramic surfaced femoral component for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 416:191–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Robertsson O, Knutson K, Lewold S, Lidgren L (2001) The routine of surgical management reduces failure after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83(1):45–49

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Philippe Cartier for his excellence in teaching and performing unicondylar knee arthroplasty in the last decades. This work was inspired by his philosophy on knee surgery.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas J. Heyse.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heyse, T.J., Tibesku, C.O. Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a review. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130, 1539–1548 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-010-1137-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-010-1137-9

Keywords

Navigation