nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.10.2012 | Leitlinien

S3-Leitlinie Extracranielle Carotisstenose

Kapitel 7: Symptome und Diagnostik von Carotisstenosen

verfasst von: P. Ringleb, M. Görtler, D.G. Nabavi, C. Arning, D. Sander, Prof. Dr. H.-H. Eckstein, A. Kühnl, J. Berkefeld, R. Diel, A. Dörfler, I. Kopp, R. Langhoff, H. Lawall, M. Storck

Erschienen in: Gefässchirurgie | Ausgabe 6/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Auszug

Christian Arning: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ultraschall in der Medizin (DEGUM) …

Liapis CD, Bell PR, Mikhailidis D et al (2009) ESVS guidelines. Invasive treatment for carotid stenosis: indications, techniques. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 37:1–19PubMedCrossRef

Hanger HC, Wilkinson T, Keeling S, Sainbury R (2004) New Zealand guideline for management of stroke. N Z Med J 117:U863PubMed

Cina CS, Clase CM, Haynes RB (2000) Carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD001081

Chambers BR, Donnan GA (2005) Carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD001923

Rothwell PM, Eliasziw M, Gutnikov SA et al (2004) Endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis in relation to clinical subgroups and timing of surgery. Lancet 363:915–924PubMedCrossRef

Hobson RW II, Weiss DG, Fields WS et al (1993) Efficacy of carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. The Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group. N Engl J Med 328:221–227PubMedCrossRef

Toole JF, Baker WH, Castaldo JE et al (1995) Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. J Am Med Assoc 273:1421–1428CrossRef

Halliday A, Mansfield A, Marro J et al (2004) Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 363:1491–502PubMedCrossRef

European Carotid Surgery Trialists‘ Collaborative Group (1998) Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: Final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet (North American Edition) 351:1379–1387

10.

(o A) (1991) Clinical alert: benefit of carotid endarterectomy for patients with high-grade stenosis of the internal carotid artery. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Stroke and Trauma Division. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) investigators. Stroke 22:816–817

11.

Mayberg MR, Wilson SE, Yatsu F et al (1991) Carotid endarterectomy and prevention of cerebral ischemia in symptomatic carotid stenosis. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program 309 Trialist Group. JAMA 266:3289–3294PubMedCrossRef

12.

Halliday A, Mansfield A, Marro J, Menken M (2004) Immediate carotid endarterectomy reduced non-perioperative stroke in severe asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Evid Based Med 9:145CrossRef

13.

Easton JD, Saver JL, Albers GW et al (2009) Definition and evaluation of transient ischemic attack: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council; Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention; Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; and the Interdisciplinary Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease. The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this statement as an educational tool for neurologists. Stroke 40:2276–2293PubMedCrossRef

14.

Brott T, Tomsick T, Feinberg W et al (1994) Baseline silent cerebral infarction in the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. Stroke 25:1122–1129PubMedCrossRef

15.

Schellinger PD, Fiebach JB, Hacke W (2003) Imaging-based decision making in thrombolytic therapy for ischemic stroke: present status. Stroke 34:575–583PubMedCrossRef

16.

Fairhead JF, Mehta Z, Rothwell PM (2005) Population-based study of delays in carotid imaging and surgery and the risk of recurrent stroke. Neurology 65:371–375PubMedCrossRef

17.

Rothwell PM, Eliasziw M, Gutnikov SA et al (2004) Sex difference in the effect of time from symptoms to surgery on benefit from carotid endarterectomy for transient ischemic attack and nondisabling stroke. Stroke 35:2855–2861PubMedCrossRef

18.

Hennerici M, Daffertshofer M, Jakobs L (1998) Failure to identify cerebral infarct mechanisms from topography of vascular territory lesions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 19:1067–1074PubMed

19.

http://www.nihstrokescale.org. In; 2011

20.

National Health and Medical Research Council Australia (1997) Prevention of stroke: Clinical practice guidelines: the role of Anticoagulants, Antiplatelet Agents and Carotid Endarterectomy. Clinical Practice Guidelines. http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/publications/attachments/cp45.pdf.

21.

Hankey GJ, Warlow CP (1990) Symptomatic carotid ischaemic events: safest and most cost effective way of selecting patients for angiography, before carotid endarterectomy. BMJ 300:1485–1491PubMedCrossRef

22.

AbuRahma AF, Robinson PA (1990) Prospective clinicopathophysiologic follow-up study of asymptomatic neck bruit. Am Surg 56:108–113PubMed

23.

Goldstein LB, Bushnell CD, Adams RJ et al (2011) Guidelines for the primary prevention of stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 42:517–584PubMedCrossRef

24.

Tendera M, Aboyans V, Bartelink ML et al (2011) ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of peripheral artery diseases: Document covering atherosclerotic disease of extracranial carotid and vertebral, mesenteric, renal, upper and lower extremity arteries. The Task Force on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Artery Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 32:2851–906PubMedCrossRef

25.

Ricotta JJ, AbuRahma A, Ascher E et al (2011) Updated Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines for management of extracranial carotid disease. J Vasc Surg 54:e1–e31PubMedCrossRef

26.

National Stroke Foundation Melbourne Australia (2010) Clinical guidelines for stroke management. Melbourne Australia (www.strokefoundation.com.au)

27.

Royal College of Physicians Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party (2008) National clinical guidelines for stroke. Third ed. Royal College of Physicians, London (http://bookshop.rcplondon.ac.uk/details.aspx?e=250)

28.

Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (2008) Management of patients with stroke or TIA: assessment, investigation, immediate management and secondary prevention. (www.sign.ac.uk/pdf/sign108.pdf)

29.

Wardlaw JM, Chappell FM, Best JJ et al (2006) Non-invasive imaging compared with intra-arterial angiography in the diagnosis of symptomatic carotid stenosis: a meta-analysis. Lancet 367:1503–1512PubMedCrossRef

30.

European Stroke Organisation (ESO) Executive Committee and ESO Writing Committee (2008) Guidelines for management of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack 2008. Cerebrovasc Dis 25:457–507CrossRef

31.

Pickett CA, Jackson JL, Hemann BA, Atwood JE (2010) Carotid bruits and cerebrovascular disease risk: a meta-analysis. Stroke 41:2295–2302PubMedCrossRef

32.

Pickett CA, Jackson JL, Hemann BA, Atwood JE (2008) Carotid bruits as a prognostic indicator of cardiovascular death and myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis. Lancet 371:1587–1594PubMedCrossRef

33.

Jahromi AS, Cina CS, Liu Y, Clase CM (2005) Sensitivity and specificity of color duplex ultrasound measurement in the estimation of internal carotid artery stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Vasc Surg 41:962–972PubMedCrossRef

34.

Guzman RP (1998) Appropriate imaging before carotid endarterectomy. Can J Surg 41:218–223PubMed

35.

King A, Markus HS (2009) Doppler embolic signals in cerebrovascular disease and prediction of stroke risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 40:3711–3717PubMedCrossRef

36.

Ratchford EV, Jin Z, Di Tullio MR et al (2009) Carotid bruit for detection of hemodynamically significant carotid stenosis: the Northern Manhattan Study. Neurol Res 31:748–752PubMedCrossRef

37.

Sauve JS, Thorpe KE, Sackett DL et al (1994) Can bruits distinguish high-grade from moderate symptomatic carotid stenosis? The North American symptomatic carotid endarterectomy trial. Ann Intern Med 120:633–637PubMed

38.

Sharma JC (2001) Scanning for symptomatic carotid stenosis. CME J Geriatr Med 3:63–65

39.

Touze E (2008) Natural history of asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Rev Neurol (Paris) 164:793–800

40.

Cosottini M, Pingitore A, Puglioli M et al (2003) Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography of atherosclerotic internal carotid stenosis as the noninvasive imaging modality in revascularization decision making. Stroke 34:660–664PubMedCrossRef

41.

Nederkoorn PJ, Elgersma OE, van der Graaf Y et al (2003) Carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography for diagnosis. Radiology 228:677–682PubMedCrossRef

42.

Remonda L, Senn P, Barth A et al (2002) Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 23:213–219PubMed

43.

Serfaty JM, Chirossel P, Chevallier JM et al (2000) Accuracy of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography in the assessment of extracranial carotid artery disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:455–463PubMed

44.

Johnson MB, Wilkinson ID, Wattam J et al (2000) Comparison of Doppler ultrasound, magnetic resonance angiographic techniques and catheter angiography in evaluation of carotid stenosis. Clin Radiol 55:912–920PubMedCrossRef

45.

Clifton AG (2000) MR angiography. Br Med Bull 56:367–377PubMedCrossRef

46.

King-Im JM, Trivedi RA, Cross JJ et al (2004) Measuring carotid stenosis on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: diagnostic performance and reproducibility of 3 different methods. Stroke 35:2083–2088CrossRef

47.

King-Im JM, Trivedi RA, Sala E et al (2004) Evaluation of carotid stenosis with axial high-resolution black-blood MR imaging. Eur Radiol 14:1154–1161

48.

JM UK-I, Hollingworth W, Trivedi RA et al (2004) Contrast-enhanced MR angiography vs intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography for carotid imaging: activity-based cost analysis. Eur Radiol 14:730–735CrossRef

49.

Debrey SM, Yu H, Lynch JK et al (2008) Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography for internal carotid artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 39:2237–2248PubMedCrossRef

50.

Ertl-Wagner B, Bruning R, Hoffmann RT et al (2004) Diagnostic evaluation of carotid artery stenoses with multislice CT angiography. Review of the literature and results of a pilot study. Radiologe 44:960–966PubMedCrossRef

51.

Subba R, Uma DM, Nagamani P et al (2003) Transcranial color coded Doppler evaluation of intracranial circulation in extracranial internal carotid artery occlusion. Asian Oceanian J Radiol 8:103–108

52.

Binaghi S, Maeder P, Uske A et al (2001) Three-dimensional computed tomography angiography and magnetic resonance angiography of carotid bifurcation stenosis. Eur Neurol 46:25–34PubMedCrossRef

53.

Bucek RA, Puchner S, Haumer M et al (2006) Grading of internal carotid artery stenosis: Comparative analysis of different flow velocity criteria and multidetector computed tomographic angiography. J Endovasc Ther 13:182–189PubMedCrossRef

54.

Ghandehari K, Saqqur M, Shuaib A (2004) Validation of carotid duplex and power M-mode transcranial Doppler for detection of internal carotid artery stenosis. 7:182–185

55.

Josephson SA, Bryant SO, Mak HK et al (2004) Evaluation of carotid stenosis using CT angiography in the initial evaluation of stroke and TIA. Neurology 63:457–460PubMedCrossRef

56.

Paciaroni M, Caso V, Cardaioli G et al (2003) Is ultrasound examination sufficient in the evaluation of patients with internal carotid artery severe stenosis or occlusion? Cerebrovasc Dis 15:173–176PubMedCrossRef

57.

Staikov IN, Nedeltchev K, Arnold M et al (2002) Duplex sonographic criteria for measuring carotid stenoses. J Clin Ultrasound 30:275–281PubMedCrossRef

58.

Keberle M, Jenett M, Wittenberg G et al (2001) Comparison of 3D power doppler ultrasound, color doppler ultrasound and digital subtraction angiography in carotid stenosis. Rofo 173:133–138PubMedCrossRef

59.

Keberle M, Jenett M, Beissert M et al (2000) Three-dimensional power Doppler sonography in screening for carotid disease artery. J Clin Ultrasound 28:441–451PubMedCrossRef

60.

Kablak-Ziembicka A, Tracz W, Hlawaty M et al (2001) Ultrasound diagnosis of carotid stenosis. Polski Przeglad Kardiologiczny 3:53–58

61.

Wong JKL, Gibson RN, Mitchell PJ (1999) Comparison of two Doppler ultrasound criteria for grading cervical internal carotid artery stenosis. Australas Radiol 43:153–155PubMedCrossRef

62.

Arning C, Hammer E, Kortmann H et al (2003) Quantifying stenosis of the internal carotid artery: which ultrasound criteria are relevant? Ultraschall Med 24:233–238PubMedCrossRef

63.

Kubale R, Arning C (2004) Stellenwert der Doppler-sonographischen Verfahren zur Diagnose der Karotisstenosen. Radiologe 44:946–959PubMedCrossRef

64.

Lewis RF, Abrahamowicz M, Cote R, Battista RN (1997) Predictive power of duplex ultrasonography in asymptomatic carotid disease. Ann Intern Med 127:13–20PubMed

65.

Kappelle LJ, Eliasziw M, Fox AJ et al (1999) Importance of intracranial atherosclerotic disease in patients with symptomatic stenosis of the internal carotid artery. The North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trail. Stroke 30:282–286PubMedCrossRef

66.

Rothwell PM, Slattery J, Warlow CP (1997) Clinical and angiographic predictors of stroke and death from carotid endarterectomy: Systematic review. Br Med J 315:1571–1577CrossRef

67.

Rouleau PA, Huston J III, Gilbertson J et al (1999) Carotid artery tandem lesions: frequency of angiographic detection and consequences for endarterectomy. Am J Neuroradiol 20:621–625PubMed

68.

Kuroda S, Houkin K, Kamiyama H et al (2001) Long-term prognosis of medically treated patients with internal carotid or middle cerebral artery occlusion: can acetazolamide test predict it? Stroke 32:2110–2116PubMedCrossRef

69.

Markus H, Cullinane M (2001) Severely impaired cerebrovascular reactivity predicts stroke and TIA risk in patients with carotid artery stenosis and occlusion. Brain 124:457–467PubMedCrossRef

70.

Momjian-Mayor I, Baron JC (2005) The pathophysiology of watershed infarction in internal carotid artery disease: review of cerebral perfusion studies. Stroke 36:567–577PubMedCrossRef

71.

Abbott AL, Chambers BR, Stork JL et al (2005) Embolic signals and prediction of ipsilateral stroke or transient ischemic attack in asymptomatic carotid stenosis: a multicenter prospective cohort study. Stroke 36:1128–1133PubMedCrossRef

72.

Droste DW, Dittrich R, Kemeny V et al (1999) Prevalence and frequency of microembolic signals in 105 patients with extracranial carotid artery occlusive disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 67:525–528PubMedCrossRef

73.

Georgiadis D, Schwab S, Baumgartner RW (2002) Clinical relevance of detection of microembolism signals with transcranial Doppler ultrasound diagnosis. Nervenarzt 73:125–132PubMedCrossRef

74.

Redgrave JN, Coutts SB, Schulz UG et al (2007) Systematic review of associations between the presence of acute ischemic lesions on diffusion-weighted imaging and clinical predictors of early stroke risk after transient ischemic attack. Stroke 38:1482–1488PubMedCrossRef

75.

Spence JD, Tamayo A, Lownie SP et al (2005) Absence of microemboli on transcranial Doppler identifies low-risk patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Stroke 36:2373–2378PubMedCrossRef

76.

Magyar MT, Nam EM, Csiba L et al (2002) Carotid artery auscultation – anachronism or useful screening procedure? Neurol Res 24:705–708PubMedCrossRef

77.

Tegeler CH, Ratanakorn D, Kim J (2006) Advances in carotid ultrasound. Seminars in cerebrovascular diseases and stroke 5:74–82CrossRef

78.

Arning C (2001) Does cw Doppler ultrasound still have a value for cerebrovascular diagnosis today? Nervenarzt 72:625–628PubMedCrossRef

79.

Arning C, Widder B, Reutern GM von et al (2010) Revision of DEGUM ultrasound criteria for grading internal carotid artery stenoses and transfer to NASCET measurement. Ultraschall Med 31:251–257PubMedCrossRef

80.

Koelemay MJW, Nederkoorn PJ, Reitsma JB, Majoie CB (2004) Systematic review of computed tomographic angiography for assessment of carotid artery disease. Stroke 35:2306–2312PubMedCrossRef

81.

Blakeley DD, Oddone EZ, Hasselblad V et al (1995) Noninvasive carotid artery testing. A meta-analytic review. Ann Intern Med 122:360–367PubMed

82.

Young GR, Humphrey PR, Shaw MD et al (1994) Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography, duplex ultrasound, and digital subtraction angiography in assessment of extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 57:1466–1478PubMedCrossRef

83.

U-King-Im JM, Trivedi RA, Graves MJ et al (2004) Contrast-enhanced MR angiography for carotid disease: diagnostic and potential clinical impact. Neurology 62:1282–1290PubMedCrossRef

84.

Hankey GJ, Warlow CP, Molyneux AJ (1990) Complications of cerebral angiography for patients with mild carotid territory ischaemia being considered for carotid endarterectomy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 53:542–548PubMedCrossRef

85.

Rothwell PM, Eliasziw M, Gutnikov SA et al (2003) Analysis of pooled data from the randomised controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Lancet 361:107–116PubMedCrossRef

86.

Nicolaides AN, Kakkos SK, Griffin M et al (2005) Severity of asymptomatic carotid stenosis and risk of ipsilateral hemispheric ischaemic events: results from the ACSRS study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 30:275–284PubMedCrossRef

87.

Wardlaw JM, Chappell FM, Stevenson M et al (2006) Accurate, practical and cost-effective assessment of carotid stenosis in the UK. Health Technol Assess 10:iii-iv, ix-x, 1–182PubMed

88.

Widder B, Goertler M (2004) Doppler- und Duplexsonografie der hirnversorgenden Arterien. Springer, Berlin

89.

Nicolaides A, Sabetai M, Kakkos SK et al (2003) The Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis and Risk of Stroke (ACSRS) study. Aims and results of quality control. Int Angiol 22:263–272PubMed

90.

Connors JJ III, Sacks D, Furlan AJ et al (2009) Training, competency, and credentialing standards for diagnostic cervicocerebral angiography, carotid stenting, and cerebrovascular intervention: a joint statement from the American Academy of Neurology, the American Association of Neurological Surgeons, the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, the American Society of Neuroradiology, the Congress of Neurological Surgeons, the AANS/CNS Cerebrovascular Section, and the Society of Interventional Radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol 20:292–301CrossRef

91.

Ringleb PA, Kunze A, Allenberg JR et al (2004) The Stent-Supported Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Carotid Artery vs. Endarterectomy Trial. Cerebrovasc Dis 18:66–68PubMedCrossRef

92.

Ringelstein EB, Droste DW, Babikian VL et al (1998) Consensus on microembolus detection by TCD. International Consensus Group on Microembolus Detection. Stroke 29:725–729PubMedCrossRef

93.

Silvestrini M, Vernieri F, Pasqualetti P et al (2000) Impaired cerebral vasoreactivity and risk of stroke in patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA 283:2122–2127PubMedCrossRef

94.

Moulakakis KG, Mylonas SN, Sfyroeras GS, Andrikopoulos V (2009) Hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid revascularization. J Vasc Surg 49:1060–8106PubMedCrossRef

95.

Lacroix P, Aboyans V, Criqui MH et al (2006) Type-2 diabetes and carotid stenosis: a proposal for a screening strategy in asymptomatic patients. Vasc Med 11:93–99PubMedCrossRef

96.

King-Im JM, Hollingworth W, Trivedi RA et al (2005) Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies prior to carotid endarterectomy. Ann Neurol 58:506–515CrossRef

97.

Dodick DW, Meissner I, Meyer FB, Cloft HJ (2004) Evaluation and management of asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Mayo Clinic proceedings 79:937–944PubMedCrossRef

98.

Yin DP, Carpenter JP (1998) Cost-effectiveness of screening for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. J Vasc Surg 27:245–255PubMedCrossRef

99.

Cina CS, Safar HA, Maggisano R et al (2002) Prevalence and progression of internal carotid artery stenosis in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg 36:75–82PubMedCrossRef

100.

Durand DJ, Perler BA, Roseborough GS et al (2004) Mandatory versus selective preoperative carotid screening: a retrospective analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 78:159–166PubMedCrossRef

101.

Mansour MA, Littooy FN, Watson WC et al (1999) Outcome of moderate carotid artery stenosis in patients who are asymptomatic. J Vasc Surg 29:217–225PubMedCrossRef

102.

Wolff T, Guirguis-Blake J, Miller T et al (2007) Screening for carotid artery stenosis: an update of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 147:860–870PubMed

103.

Aboyans V, Lacroix P (2009) Indications for carotid screening in patients with coronary artery disease. Presse Med 38:977–986PubMedCrossRef

104.

Steinvil A, Sadeh B, Arbel Y et al (2011) Prevalence and predictors of concomitant carotid and coronary artery atherosclerotic disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 57:779–783PubMedCrossRef

105.

Liapis CD, Kakisis JD, Kostakis AG (2001) Carotid stenosis: factors affecting symptomatology. Stroke 32:2782–2786PubMedCrossRef

106.

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurologie (2008) Primär- und Sekundärprävention der zerebralen Ischämie. Gemeinsame Leitlinie der DGN und der Deutschen Schlaganfallgesellschaft. http://www.dgn.org/images/stories/dgn/leitlinien/LL2008/ll08kap_024.pdf

107.

Qureshi AI, Abou-Chebl A, Jovin TG (2008) Qualification requirements for performing neurointerventional procedures: a Report of the Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society of Neuroimaging and the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology. J Neuroimaging 18:433–447PubMedCrossRef

108.

Diener HC, Allenberg JR, Bode C et al (2005) Primär- und Sekundärprävention der zerebralen Ischämie. In: Diener HC (Hrsg) Leitlinien für Diagnostik und Therapie in der Neurologie. Thieme, Stuttgart

109.

Aichner FT, Topakian R, Alberts MJ et al (2009) High cardiovascular event rates in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis: the REACH Registry. EurJ Neurol 16:902–908CrossRef

110.

Dick P, Sherif C, Sabeti S et al (2005) Gender differences in outcome of conservatively treated patients with asymptomatic high grade carotid stenosis.Stroke 36:1178–1183PubMedCrossRef

111.

Kakkos SK, Nicolaides A, Griffin M et al (2005) Factors associated with mortality in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis: results from the ACSRS Study. Int Angiol 24:221–230PubMed

112.

Rother J, Alberts MJ, Touze E et al (2008) Risk factor profile and management of cerebrovascular patients in the REACH Registry. Cerebrovasc Dis 25:366–374PubMedCrossRef

113.

Narins CR, Illig KA (2006) Patient selection for carotid stenting versus endarterectomy: A systematic review. J Vasc Surg 44:661–672PubMedCrossRef

114.

Blaser T, Hofmann K, Buerger T et al (2002) Risk of stroke, transient ischemic attack, and vessel occlusion before endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. Stroke 33:1057–1062PubMedCrossRef

115.

King BN, Scher LA, Lipsitz EC (2009) Refractory in-stent restenosis following carotid artery stenting: a case report and review of operative management. Vasc Endovascular Surg 43:306–311PubMedCrossRef

Titel: S3-Leitlinie Extracranielle Carotisstenose
Kapitel 7: Symptome und Diagnostik von Carotisstenosen
verfasst von: P. Ringleb
M. Görtler
D.G. Nabavi
C. Arning
D. Sander
Prof. Dr. H.-H. Eckstein
A. Kühnl
J. Berkefeld
R. Diel
A. Dörfler
I. Kopp
R. Langhoff
H. Lawall
M. Storck
Publikationsdatum: 01.10.2012
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: Gefässchirurgie / Ausgabe 6/2012
Print ISSN: 0948-7034
Elektronische ISSN: 1434-3932
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00772-012-1052-1

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Vorsicht, erhöhte Blutungsgefahr nach PCI!

10.05.2024 Koronare Herzerkrankung Nachrichten

Nach PCI besteht ein erhöhtes Blutungsrisiko, wenn die Behandelten eine verminderte linksventrikuläre Ejektionsfraktion aufweisen. Das Risiko ist umso höher, je stärker die Pumpfunktion eingeschränkt ist.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Deutlich weniger Infektionen: Wundprotektoren schützen!

08.05.2024 Postoperative Wundinfektion Nachrichten

Der Einsatz von Wundprotektoren bei offenen Eingriffen am unteren Gastrointestinaltrakt schützt vor Infektionen im Op.-Gebiet – und dient darüber hinaus der besseren Sicht. Das bestätigt mit großer Robustheit eine randomisierte Studie im Fachblatt JAMA Surgery.

Chirurginnen und Chirurgen sind stark suizidgefährdet

07.05.2024 Suizid Nachrichten

Der belastende Arbeitsalltag wirkt sich negativ auf die psychische Gesundheit der Angehörigen ärztlicher Berufsgruppen aus. Chirurginnen und Chirurgen bilden da keine Ausnahme, im Gegenteil.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Springer Medizin

S3-Leitlinie Extracranielle Carotisstenose

Kapitel 7: Symptome und Diagnostik von Carotisstenosen

Auszug

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Vorsicht, erhöhte Blutungsgefahr nach PCI!

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Deutlich weniger Infektionen: Wundprotektoren schützen!

Chirurginnen und Chirurgen sind stark suizidgefährdet

Update Chirurgie

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Springer Medizin

Auszug

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2012