nach oben

European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry

Erschienen in:

01.04.2013 | Original Scientific Article

A comparative study of clinical effectiveness of fissure sealing with and without bonding systems: 3-year results

verfasst von: C. Sakkas, L. Khomenko, I. Trachuk

Erschienen in: European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry | Ausgabe 2/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Aim

This prospective clinical study evaluated the sealant retention rate and caries-preventive efficacy of two fissure sealing techniques over a 3-year period.

Methods

Subjects (87) aged between 6.5 and 11.5 years were enrolled into two groups. In Group I (41 subjects), a resin-based fissure sealant (Fissurit FX, VOCO, Germany) was placed on all four sound permanent first molars (FPM-164 teeth) of each subject and in Group II (46 subjects) on 4 caries-free premolars (P_1–2 182 teeth),using the following adhesives systems: Optibond FL (Kerr, USA), Optibond Solo plus (Kerr, USA), Prompt-L-Pop (3 M ESPE, USA) or the conventional acid-etch technique. Sealed teeth were evaluated at baseline, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36-month intervals with regard to retention and new caries development. Sealant retention was scored as: (1) complete retention; (2) partial loss; (3) complete loss of sealant.

Statistics

Wilcoxon-signed rank test was used to analyse the data.

Results

The complete retention rate was: Optibond FL/sealant 80.01–82.92 %, Optibond Solo plus/sealant 73.78–74.27 %, Prompt-L-Pop/sealant 42.84–53.65 % versus acid-etch technique 62.86–71.44 % on FPM and P_1–2 (p < 0.05). The fissure caries incidence rate was: Optibond FL/sealant 2.43–2.85 %, Optibond Solo plus/sealant 2.85–4.76 %, Prompt-L-Pop/sealant 24.40–34.28 % versus acid-etch technique 16.66–17.14 % (p < 0.05) on FPM and P_1–2. A statistically significant difference in sealant retention rate was observed between FPM and P_1–2, using the self-etching adhesive system Prompt-L-Pop and acid-etch technique.

Conclusion

It may be concluded that the use of adhesive systems Optibond FL and Optibond Solo plus yielded better fissure sealing performance.

Al-Sarheed MA. Evaluation of shear bond strength and SEM observation of fissure sealant. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2006;7:9–16.PubMed

Asselin ME, Fortin D, Sibon Y, Rompre PH. Marginal micro leakage of a sealant applied to permanent enamel: evaluation of 3 application protocols. Pediatr Dent. 2008;30:29–33.PubMed

Burbridge LA, Nugent Z, Deery C. Randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of a one step conditioning agent in fissure sealant. Eur Arch Pediatr Dent. 2007;8:49–54.CrossRef

Burrow MF, Makinson OF. Pits and fissures: remnant organic debris after acid-etching. ASDC J Dent Child. 1990;57:348–51.PubMed

Burrow JF, Burrow MF, Makinson OF. Pits and fissures: relative space contribution in fissures from sealants, prophylaxis pastes and organic remnants. Aust Dent J. 2003;48:175–9.PubMedCrossRef

Cehreli ZC, Gungor HC. Quantitative microleakage evaluation of fissure sealants applied with or without a bonding agent: results after four-year water storage in vitro. J Adhes Dent. 2008;10:379–84.PubMed

Celiberti P, Lussi A. Use of a self-etching adhesive on previously etched intact enamel and its effect on sealant microleakage and tag formation. J Dent. 2005;33:163–71.PubMedCrossRef

dos Santos KT, Sundfeld RH, Garbin CA, et al. Length of resin tags in pit-and-fissure sealants: all-in-one self-etching adhesive vs. phosphoric acid etching. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2008;29:186–92.PubMed

Erickson RL, De Gee AJ, Feilzer AJ. Effect of pre-etching enamel on fatigue of self-etch adhesive bonds. Dent Mater. 2008;24:117–23.PubMedCrossRef

Erickson RL, Barkmeier WW, Kimmes NS. Fatigue of enamel bonds with self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater. 2009;25:716–20.PubMedCrossRef

Feigal RJ, Hitt J, Splieth C. Retaining sealant on salivary contaminated enamel. JADA. 1993;124:88–97.PubMed

Feigal RJ, Quelhas I. Clinical trial of a self etching adhesive for sealant application: success at 24 months with Prompt-L-Pop. Am J Dent. 2003;16:249–51.PubMed

Fuks AB, Kupietzky A. Assessment of two curing systems in a self etching primer adhesive sealant: a preliminary study for a clinical trial. Eur Arch Pediatr Dent. 2007;8:171–4.CrossRef

Grégoire G, Ahmed Y. Evaluation of the enamel etching capacity of six contemporary self-etching adhesives. J Dent. 2007;35:388–97.PubMedCrossRef

Greene JC, Vermillion JR. The simplified oral hygiene index. J Am Dent Assoc. 1964;68:7–13.PubMed

Hannig M, Bock H, Bott B, Hoth-Hannig W. Inter-crystallite nanoretention of self-etching adhesives at enamel imaged by transmission electron microscopy. Eur J Oral Sci. 2002;110:464–70.PubMedCrossRef

Hebling J, Feigal RJ. Use of one-bottle adhesive as an intermediate bonding layer to reduce sealant microleakage on saliva contaminated enamel. Am J Dent. 2000;13:187–91.PubMed

Hipólito VD, Alonso RC, Carrilho MR, et al. Microtensile bond strength test and failure analysis to assess bonding characteristics of different adhesion approaches to ground versus unground enamel. Braz Dent J. 2011;22:122–8.PubMedCrossRef

Kakaboura A, Matthaiou L, Papagiannoulis L. In vitro study of penetration of flowable resin composite and compomer into occlusal fissures. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2002;3:205–9.PubMed

Locker D, Jokovic A, Kay EJ. Prevention. Part 8: the use of pit and fissure sealants in preventing caries in the permanent dentition of children. Br Dent J. 2003;195:375–8.PubMedCrossRef

Lührs AK, Guhr S, Schilke R, et al. Shear bond strength of self-etch adhesives to enamel with additional phosphoric acid etching. Oper Dent. 2008;33:155–62.PubMedCrossRef

Lussi A, Hibst R, Paulus R. DIAGNOdent: an optical method for caries detection. J Dent Res 2004;83(Spec No C):80–3.

Mascarenhas AK, Nazar H, Al-Mutawaa S, Soparkar P. Effectiveness of primer and bond in sealant retention and caries prevention. Pediatr Dent. 2008;30:25–8.PubMed

Nagayassu MP, Shintome LK, Arana-Chavez VE, Fava M. Micro-shear bond strength of different adhesives to human dental enamel. Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011;35:301–4.

Pashley DH, Tay FR. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives. Part II: etching effects on unground enamel. Dent Mater. 2001;17:430–44.PubMedCrossRef

Perdigão J, Fundingsland JW, Duarte S Jr, Lopes M. Microtensile adhesion of sealants to intact enamel. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2005;15:342–8.PubMedCrossRef

Perdigão J, Lopes MM, Gomes G. In vitro bonding performance of self-etch adhesives: II—ultramorphological evaluation. Oper Dent. 2008;33:534–49.PubMedCrossRef

Peutzfeldt A, Nielsen LA. Bond strength of a sealant to primary and permanent enamel: phosphoric acid versus self-etching adhesive. Pediatr Dent. 2004;26:240–4.PubMed

Pinar A, Sepet E, Aren C, et al. Clinical performance of sealants with and without a bonding agent. Quintessence Int. 2005;36:355–60.PubMed

Ram D, Mamber E, Fuks AB. Clinical performance of a non-rinse conditioning sealant in three paediatric dental practices: a retrospective study. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2005;15:61–6.PubMedCrossRef

Simonsen RJ. Cost effectiveness of pit and fissure sealant at 10 years. Quintessence Int. 1989;20:75–82.PubMed

Suh BI, Feng L, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and chemically-cured or dual-cured composites. Part III. Effect of acidic resin monomers. J Adhes Dent. 2003;5:267–82.PubMed

Sundfeld RH, De Oliveira CH, Da Silva AM, Briso AL, Sundfeld ML. Resin tag length of one step and self etching adhesives bonded to unground enamel. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2005;46:43–9.PubMedCrossRef

Taschner M, Nato F, Mazzoni A, et al. Role of preliminary etching for one-step self-etch adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci. 2010;11:517–24.CrossRef

Tay FR, Pashley DH. Etched enamel structure and topography: Interface with materials. In: Eliades G, Watts DC, Eliades T, editors. Dental hard tissues and bonding. Berlin: Springer; 2005. p. 3–33.CrossRef

Trevor FJ. What’s new in dentine bonding? Self-etch adhesives. Dent Update. 2004;31:580–9.

Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentine: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent. 2003;28:215–35.PubMed

Venker DJ, Kuthy RA, Qian F, Kanellis MJ. Twelve-month sealant retention in a school-based program using a self-etching primer/adhesive. J Public Health Dent. 2004;64:191–7.PubMedCrossRef

Yamada Y, Hossain M, Kimura Y, et al. Removal of organic debris from occlusal fissures: advantage of Carisolv system over sodium hypochlorite. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2010;35:75–9.PubMed

Yazici AR, Karaman E, Baseren M, et al. Clinical evaluation of a nanofilled fissure sealant placed with different adhesive systems: 24-month results. Oper Dent. 2009;34:642–7.PubMedCrossRef

Titel: A comparative study of clinical effectiveness of fissure sealing with and without bonding systems: 3-year results
verfasst von: C. Sakkas
L. Khomenko
I. Trachuk
Publikationsdatum: 01.04.2013
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry / Ausgabe 2/2013
Print ISSN: 1818-6300
Elektronische ISSN: 1996-9805
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-013-0022-y

Update Zahnmedizin

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

A comparative study of clinical effectiveness of fissure sealing with and without bonding systems: 3-year results

Abstract