Although every school district faces unique challenges when considering a policy shift towards later school start times, resistance to school start time change is largely centered on logistical challenges associated with different aspects of community life, including concerns about bussing, extracurricular activities, childcare for younger siblings, student jobs, and impacts of scheduling changes on the broader community, including traffic patterns and safety [
110]. Yet, experiences from schools that have delayed start times have shown that it is possible to work through these expected challenges [
111,
112•]. For instance, transportation logistics are one of the key considerations in delaying school start times. Indeed, many districts, due to financial considerations associated with transportation, employ a multi-tiered bus schedule (i.e., staggered bell times) instead of a delivery system (i.e., similar bell times across levels) [
110]. A large number of districts with the successful implementation of later school start times have utilized the “flipped busing” model, whereby the secondary/high school and elementary bell schedules are flipped [
110,
111,
112•]. Some other strategies to facilitate later school start time for high school students include carpooling, encouraging the use of public transportation, and allowing middle and high school students to share buses [
110,
112•]. In fact, in school districts that high school students use public transportation (e.g., public bus system), transportation logistics are less of an issue [
113].
To address logistical challenges anticipated by the community, in general, it is crucial to identify implementation characteristics of districts that have successfully delayed school start times and improved sleep time and functioning among adolescents. Yet, the specific implementation plans of each district will differ depending on the communities they serve. One important strategy is to engage the community early in the decision-making process and not only explain the rationale behind this decision but also prepare to address biases and questions raised by various stakeholders [
111,
112•,
114]. As the first step, it is important to identify the concerns and obstacles that may hinder moving to later school start times and generate solutions for such concerns before announcing any changes [
111]. Next, the districts may benefit from educating the entire community (e.g., students, parents, fellow administrators, and teachers) and explaining the “why” or the rationale behind later school start times, the benefits of this decision, possible challenges, and finally, solutions to the raised concerns. It is of considerable importance to highlight the benefits of obtaining more sleep for adolescents' academic functioning, safety, and physical and mental health [
110,
114] and this has been an important role adopted by many sleep scientists who have embraced the opportunity to work collaboratively with advocacy groups and to educate communities about the intersection between sleep science and school start times [
69•,
115]. Indeed, the mandated school start time in California provides ample opportunities to examine strategies to delay school start times. In 2019, California legislators passed a law mandating public high schools begin classes no earlier than 8:30 a.m., allowing public school districts 3 years to transition to later start times (Bill Text - SB-328 Pupil attendance: school start time. (ca.gov)) and Florida passed a similar law in May of 2023. Other state legislators including New Jersey, New York, Massachusetts, and the Virgin Islands are currently considering mandated school start time changes. An important lesson from the districts that have delayed school start times is that the expected challenges about the impact of this change on transportation, childcare, student jobs, and other scheduling changes on the broader community are worse in anticipation than in reality and are largely addressable with stakeholders’ involvement and community education at low or no cost [
69•,
110,
116]. For instance, the CaSTLES, a large-scale and longitudinal study conducted among elementary and secondary school students, provides strong evidence that “flipping” elementary and secondary school start times to accommodate transportation schedules is not only a logistically and financially feasible option but also is a significant and effective strategy to improve sleep duration among secondary school students with a minimal impact of earlier start times on elementary school students [
78•]. Nevertheless, every community has different sets of needs, concerns, and goals, which highlights the importance of implementation strategies that effectively engage diverse stakeholders throughout the process and that allows sufficient time to work through implementation challenges as well as sufficient time to evaluate the impact of the policy change.