Implications in the difference of anti-Mi-2 and -p155/140 autoantibody prevalence in two dermatomyositis cohorts from Mexico City and Guadalajara

Autoantibodies in polymyositis/dermatomyositis (PM/DM) are clinically useful biomarkers. Anti-Jo-1 antibodies that recognize histidyl-tRNA synthetase is a well established serological biomarker for PM/DM [1, 2] known for more than 30 years and commercial tests have been widely available to clinicians [3]. There are many other autoantibodies specific for a diagnosis of PM/DM (myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs)) and that are also associated with unique subsets of the disease and help in predicting organ involvement, treatment outcome and prognosis [1, 2]; however, their clinical usage is limited because their standard screening test is radioimmunoprecipitation, which has been performed only at a limited number of institutions in US, UK and a few other European countries, and Japan. Thus, information on the prevalence and clinical association of other MSAs is based on data from limited sources because data on MSAs in other countries are scarce. Nevertheless, based on available information, the prevalence of MSAs appears to be quite different in different countries [4‐8] or even within the same country [9‐11], suggesting an interesting interaction of genetic and environmental factors in the production of MSAs. In particular, a few previous studies [5, 6] reported an increased percentage of DM and prevalence of anti-Mi-2 antibodies in PM/DM patients in Central America and suggested a role of UV radiation in the development of DM and anti-Mi-2 antibodies. We aimed at determining the prevalence and clinical association of MSAs in two Mexican cohorts with PM/DM, focusing on anti-Mi-2 autoantibodies.

DM was dominant in Mexican patients with PM/DM representing 69% (66/95), consistent with the high percentage of DM in Mexico reported in the literature [6]. The percentage of DM in Mexico City and Guadalajara was similar; 69% (46/67) and 71% (20/28), respectively. During screening of the serum samples by IP, it was apparent that anti-Mi-2 [16] and -p155/140 (TIF-1γ/α) [17, 18] were the two main autoantibody specificities in this cohort (Figure 1A). Anti-Jo-1 which is the most common MSA in the majority of studies from other countries [4, 19], was only 4% while anti-Mi-2 was 35% and anti-p155/140 was 11% (Table 1). Other MSA specificities listed were a few percent each and antibodies to aminoacyl tRNA synthetases (ARS) other than Jo-1, such as PL-7, PL-12, EJ and OJ, were not found. As in all previous reports in the literature, anti-Mi-2 (45% in DM versus 10% in PM, P < 0.0001) and - p155/140 (15% versus 0%, P < 0.05) were mainly found in DM (Table 1). Anti-MJ and SAE (small ubiquitin-like modifier activating enzyme) that are also associated with DM [8, 20] were found in 5% and 3%, respectively, of DM patients but not in PM patients. Patients negative for MSA were 21% in DM and 69% in PM cohorts (P < 0.0001). Other autoantibodies not specific for PM/DM, such as anti-Su/Ago2 [21], Ro60 and Ro52, were found in both PM and DM. DM patients were classified into adult-onset DM and JDM (Table 1) and only adult-onset DM patients were further analyzed comparing patients from Mexico City versus Guadalajara (Table 2). Adult-onset DM patients from Guadalajara were slightly younger than those from Mexico City and striking differences in the prevalence of autoantibodies between the two cohorts were noted; the prevalence of anti-Mi-2 was 59% (95% CI, 43.3 to 73.7) in the Mexico City cohort but only 12% (95% CI, 1.5 to 36.4) in the Guadalajara cohort (P = 0.0012 by the Fisher exact test, Table 2). In contrast, the prevalence of anti-p155/140 showed an opposite trend in which the prevalence was 9% (95% CI, 2.5 to 21.7) in Mexico City DM patients versus 35% (95% CI, 14.2 to 61.7) in Guadalajara DM patients (P = 0.02). No other significant differences in prevalence of MSA were noted between the two cohorts. Since the majority of anti-Mi-2 positive patients had DM (30 DM, 3 PM), the clinical features of the anti-Mi-2 positive patients were compared with those of the anti-Mi-2 negative patients, only in DM patients (Table 3, left). Since the number of JDM is small (two from Mexico City and three from Guadalajara), and most of them were close to age 18 and some were already older than age 18, JDM cases were included in this analysis. One each from the two cohorts was positive for anti-Mi-2. In all DM patients (Table 3, left), men appeared to be more common in anti-Mi-2 (+) versus (-) (37% versus 22%) but this was not statistically significant. Among DM features, the shawl sign was more common in anti-Mi-2 (+) (86% versus 61% in anti-Mi-2 (-), P < 0.05) but the prevalence of heliotrope rash and the Gottrön sign was similar. However, the prevalence of the shawl sign was similar when anti-Mi-2 (+) versus (-) Mexico City DM patients were compared (85% versus 78%); the difference was due to the low prevalence of the shawl sign in anti-Mi-2 (-) DM patients from Guadalajara (Mexico City versus Guadalajara, 78% versus 40%, P < 0.05). Malignancy was found in two cases of PM (a case of cervical cancer from Guadalajara, no MSA; a case of breast cancer from Mexico City, anti-Jo-1) and two cases in anti-Mi-2 (-) DM from Mexico City (a case of breast cancer, anti-SAE; a case of cervical cancer, anti-p155/140). Among 10 anti-p155/140 positive DM patients, only one had a malignancy (cervical cancer), likely related to the generally young age of the cohort, due to genetic and environmental factors or other reasons.

The prevalence of interstitial lung disease (ILD) was low compared with other studies, likely due to the very low prevalence of anti-ARS antibodies that are frequently associated with ILD (2). CPK at the initial visit was significantly higher in anti-Mi-2 (+) versus (-) DM patients (mean 5,369 versus 2,860 IU/L, P < 0.0005) (Table 3 and Figure 1B) and this trend was the same when Mexico City DM patients were separately analyzed (4,800 versus 3,502 IU/L, P < 0.01). Starting lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were also higher in the anti-Mi-2 (+) (mean ± SD, 1,517.17 ± 805.02) than in the anti-Mi-2 negative group (841.41 ± 605.86) (P < 0.005 by Mann-Whitney). None of the patients with anti-Mi-2 (+) had normal (< 200) CPK at the initial visit whereas 34% of the anti-Mi-2 (-) patients (P < 0.005) had normal levels, which was also consistent in Mexico City patients (P < 0.05). All 30 anti-Mi-2 (+) patients had CPK > 1,000 IU/L at the initial visit compared with only 52% in anti-Mi-2 (-) patients (P < 0.0001). CPK > 5,000 IU/L was more common in anti-Mi-2 (+) versus anti-Mi-2 (-) patients (54% versus 14%, P < 0.005). Although CPK levels in anti-Mi-2 (+) patients were very high, they responded well to steroid therapy and CPK levels dropped dramatically in most patients (P < 0.0001) (Figure 1C), similar to the anti-Mi-2 (-) group. At the last visit, the percentage of patients who had CPK > 500 IU/L was 37% in the anti-Mi-2 (+) versus 7% in the anti-Mi-2 (-) group (P = 0.095); however, 45% of the former group had normal or near normal CPK levels of < 200 IU/L.

Autoantibodies to Mi-2 were originally defined by double immunodiffusion using calf thymus extract as the antigen and reported as the first specific serologic marker of DM [22]. IP was applied and a target antigen complex was characterized [16], which was later identified as nucleosome remodeling deacetylase complex (NuRD) [23]. Clinically, most of the anti-Mi-2 positive patients are DM [22, 24‐26]; however, clinical characteristics associated with anti-Mi-2 have not been studied extensively due to limited availability of the immunoassays and relatively low prevalence in PM/DM. The present study, with a total of 33 anti-Mi-2 positive patients confirmed by IP, is the largest cohort in the literature with a detailed clinical analysis of anti-Mi-2 positive patients. Clinical features of anti-Mi-2 positive patients in this study were consistent with previous literature; they were mostly DM with typical skin manifestations, and low prevalence of ILD and malignancy [24]. Initial CPK levels were higher in the anti-Mi-2 positive DM group compared with the negative group (Table 3, Figure 1B). However, they responded well to steroid treatment in general; CPK levels were reduced dramatically and normalized in many cases (Table 3, Figure 1C), consistent with the good prognosis reported in the literature [24]. The high prevalence of anti-Mi-2 (35%) and the low prevalence of anti-synthetase antibodies (4%) in Mexican PM/DM cases was the most striking finding in the present study (Table 1) compared with MSAs in other ethnicities. Anti-Jo-1 which is the most common MSA in the majority of studies [4, 19] was found only in 4% of the PM/DM patients (7% in the PM and 3% in the DM). The prevalence of anti-Mi-2 was 35% in PM/DM and was increased to 45% in DM patients (Table 1). Data on the prevalence of MSAs in Mexicans are limited to basically one cohort in Mesoamerican Mestizo from Mexico City and Guadalajara [5, 6]. Our data are consistent with the study that reported a high prevalence of anti-Mi-2 and a low prevalence of anti-synthetase antibodies, in Mexican PM/DM [6] (Table 4). A correlation of UV radiation with the development of DM and production of anti-Mi-2 antibodies has been reported [6, 27]. The role of sunlight in anti-Mi-2 production through alterations in the expression, subcellular distribution, and/or metabolism of components of the Mi-2 antigens, has been suggested [6]. Supporting this hypothesis, regulation of Mi-2 expression by UV through protein translation and stability has been shown [28]. Although the high prevalence of anti-Mi-2 in Mexican PM/DM was interpreted in association with high UV radiation in the area [6], the roles of genetic versus environmental factors responsible for the production of anti-Mi-2 are not fully understood. Data on MSAs in the Mexican population living in the US to compare with these data are very limited. One study reported 8% prevalence of anti-Mi-2 in Mexican American PM/DM cases in Texas [4], which is not higher than other ethnicities and is lower than that of Mestizo living in Mexico [6]. This may seem to be consistent with the role of environmental factors, in particular UV radiation in anti-Mi-2 antibody production. However, a significant difference in the prevalence of anti-Mi-2 in Mexico City versus Guadalajara, which have comparable UV radiation levels, was observed in two independent studies by Okada et al. [6] and in the present study (Table 4). A significant difference in the prevalence of anti-Mi-2 in PM/DM patients in Mexico City versus those in Guadalajara (43% versus 14%, P = 0.0088, Table 4) was found in our study. Interestingly, a similar pattern of prevalence of anti-Mi-2 in Mexico City versus Guadalajara PM/DM cases (36% versus 13%, P = 0.03 by Fisher's exact test based on our calculation, not shown or discussed in the original study [6]) was also reported in a previous independent study [6]. When data from the two studies were combined (see Table 4, row 'anti-Mi-2 in PM/DM, combined'), the prevalence of anti-Mi-2 in Mexico City versus Guadalajara patients was 41% versus 14% (P < 0.0001) with no overlap in 95% CI. Despite relatively small numbers of DM in the present study, no overlap in 95% CI was seen in the prevalence of anti-Mi-2 in Mexico City versus Guadalajara patients (59% versus 15%, P = 0.001) (Table 4, row anti-Mi-2 in DM). Very similar data from two independent studies and statistical difference with no overlap of 95% CI support the interpretation that the difference between the two cities/cohorts is real. Interestingly, the percentage of DM in PM/DM in the two locations is similar, approximately 79% in the previous study [6] and 69% to 71% in the present study, indicating that the different prevalence of anti-Mi-2 is not a reflection of a difference in PM:DM ratios. These data suggest that anti-Mi-2 production is affected by undetermined differences in the two Mexico locations of genetic and/or environmental factors other than UV radiation alone. While environmental factors are poorly characterized, significant differences in genetic background of Mexican-Mestizo in the two locations have been reported [29]. Y-chromosome short-tandem repeats-based admixture estimates of African: European: Amerindian in the Mexican-Mestizo population in Mexico City is 4%:46%:50% whereas that in Jalisco County (where Guadalajara is located), is 5%:67%:28%, indicating a higher percentage of Amerindian derived genes in Mexico City and European derived gene dominance in Jalisco County [29]. This heterogeneous genetic background among Mexicans could also be an important issue when interpreting the reported low prevalence of anti-Mi-2 in Mexican-Americans [4] as the admixture of Mexican Americans in Texas [30] appears to be very similar to that of Jalisco County (Guadalajara) [29] that also has a low prevalence of anti-Mi-2 (Table 4). Other environmental factors not characterized in the previous studies may also be important in an unexplained accumulation of patients with a specific MSA to a certain year or geographical location, which does not appear to be due to genetic heterogeneity [10, 11].

Both genetic and environmental factors affect the phenotypes of autoimmune diseases; however, there are still unidentified or poorly characterized factors present and sometimes their contribution may not be apparent. The present study emphasizes the importance of careful analysis, considering the heterogeneity of the population that may also be related to genetic and/or environmental factors to understand better the mechanisms of MSA production [31].