Next Article in Journal
Impact of Repeated Acute Exposures to Low and Moderate Exercise-Induced Hypohydration on Physiological and Subjective Responses and Endurance Performance
Previous Article in Journal
Behavioral and Metabolic Effects of a Calorie-Restricted Cafeteria Diet and Oleuropein Supplementation in Obese Male Rats
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Prevalence and Influencing Factors of Metabolic Syndrome among Adults in China from 2015 to 2017

1
Key Laboratory of Trace Element Nutrition of National Health Commission, National Institute for Nutrition and Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100050, China
2
Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China
3
Beijing Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100050, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2021, 13(12), 4475; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13124475
Submission received: 25 October 2021 / Revised: 6 December 2021 / Accepted: 10 December 2021 / Published: 15 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Nutrition Methodology & Assessment)

Abstract

:
The prevalence and influencing factors of metabolic syndrome (MetS) in Chinese residents aged 20 or older were investigated. The data were collected from China Nutrition and Health Surveillance (2015–2017), which used a stratified, multistage, random sampling method. A total of 130,018 residents aged 20 years or older from 31 provinces were included in this study. The National Cholesterol Education Programme Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III) criteria were used to define MetS. The standardised prevalence of high waist circumference, high blood pressure and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol were 40.8%, 49.4% and 41.1%, respectively. The following factors were associated with a higher prevalence of MetS: female [odds ratio (OR) = 1.773, 95% CI = 1.709–1.840]; older age (OR = 1.037, 95% CI = 1.036–1.039); living in north China (OR = 1.087, 95% CI = 1.058–1.117); high body mass index (OR = 1.402, 95% CI = 1.395–1.408); higher income [OR (95% CI): 1.044 (1.007–1.083), 1.083 (1.044–1.124) and 1.123 (1.078–1.170) for moderate, high, and very high income, respectively]; family history of hypertension (OR = 1.237, 95% CI = 1.203–1.273); family history of diabetes (OR = 1.491, 95% CI = 1.426–1.558) and current smoking status (OR = 1.143, 95% CI = 1.098–1.191). Living in the countryside (OR = 0.960, 95% CI = 0.932–0.988), moderate alcohol consumption (OR = 0.917, 95% CI = 0.889–0.946) and being physically active (OR = 0.887, 95% CI = 0.862–0.913) were associated with a lower prevalence of MetS. The prevalence of MetS among residents aged 20 years or older in China is increasing, especially among women, people aged 45 years or older and urban residents. Preventive efforts, such as quitting smoking and engaging in physical activity, are recommended to reduce the risk of MetS.

1. Introduction

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) refers to a set of combined cardiovascular risk factors that, together, constitute cardiovascular risk beyond the sum of the individual components. The main components of MetS are abdominal obesity, insulin resistance, increased blood pressure and dyslipidaemia [1]. With economic development and changes in lifestyle, the prevalence of MetS is increasing worldwide [2,3] and has become a public health issue owing to its serious effect on human health. In 2001, a nationally representative sample survey conducted in 31 provinces and cities in China found that the standardised prevalence of MetS was 13.7% (men 9.8%, women 17.8%) [4]. In 2010–2012, the standardised prevalence of MetS was found to have increased to 24.2% (men 24.6%, women 23.8%) [5]. These data indicate the urgent need for the prevention and control of MetS. Based on data from China Nutrition and Health Surveillance (2015–2017), this study evaluated the prevalence and influencing factors of MetS among Chinese residents aged 20 years or older.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Source

The data were derived from China Nutrition and Health Surveillance (2015–2017), which adopted a stratified, multistage, random sampling method to recruit representative participants from 31 provinces/municipalities/autonomous regions of China. Detailed information about this survey is given in our previous report [6]. The protocol for the current study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the National Institute for Nutrition and Health, and the Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (approval numbers: 201519-A and 201614), and all of the participants signed an informed consent form prior to joining the study. A total of 130,018 participants aged 20 years or older were included in the analysis.

2.2. Data Collection

China Nutrition and Health Surveillance (2015–2017) collected information using the four following parts: a questionnaire survey, a physical examination, a dietary evaluation and a laboratory test.

2.2.1. Questionnaire Survey

A face-to-face questionnaire was used to collected family and personal information, including information on lifestyle factors, health status and physical activity.

2.2.2. Physical Examination

Height, weight, waist circumference and blood pressure were measured by trained investigators based on standard methods using a TZG height and sitting height meter, a TANITA HD-390 electronic weighing scale, a waist circumference ruler and an Omron HBP1300 electronic sphygmomanometer. These measurements were accurate to 0.1 cm, 0.1 kg, 0.1 cm and 1 mmHg, respectively.

2.2.3. Dietary Evaluation

The food frequency questionnaire was used to capture and evaluate the dietary structure and dietary habits of participants over the past year. Specifically, information was collected regarding the consumption of vegetables, fruits and red meat items.

2.2.4. Laboratory Tests

An overnight fasting blood sample was collected from each participant to measure blood biochemical indexes and nutritional status parameters.

2.3. Quality Control

To ensure quality, the National Project Working Group devised a quality control plan and supervised its implementation. This ensured that there were unified programmes, manuals and questionnaires; unified training and assessment; unified equipment and reagents; and unified data entry and data cleaning across the study sites.

2.4. Definition of MetS

MetS was defined according to the National Cholesterol Education Programme-Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP-ATP III) [7] as having three or more of the following factors: (1) a waist circumference of ≥90 cm for men and ≥80 cm for women; (2) a systolic blood pressure of ≥130 mmHg or a diastolic blood pressure of ≥85 mmHg or receiving anti-hypertension treatment; (3) a fasting triglyceride level of ≥1.7 mmol/L or receiving corresponding treatment; (4) a high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) level of <1.03 mmol/L for men and <1.30 mmol/L for women or receiving corresponding treatment; (5) a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) level of ≥5.6 mmol/L or receiving anti-diabetes treatment or reporting previously physician-diagnosed diabetes.

2.5. Covariates

A wide range of potential confounders were accounted for: (1) body mass index (BMI) was categorised as normal (18.5 ≤ to < 24 kg/m2), overweight (24 ≤ to < 28 kg/m2) or obese (≥28 kg/m2); (2) education level was categorised as low (primary school or below), moderate (junior school) or high (high school or above); (3) according to the income quartile, income was categorised as low, moderate, high or very high; (4) family history of hypertension (or diabetes) was defined as one or more of a grandfather, grandmother, father, mother or brother/sister suffering from hypertension (or diabetes); (5) smoking was categorised as never smoked, formerly smoked or currently smoke; (6) alcohol consumption was categorised as never consumed, moderately consume (men consume less than 25 g of alcohol and women less than 15 g of alcohol per day) or excessively consume (men consume more than 25 g and women more than 15 g per day); (7) physical activity was defined as inactive if, within one week, the total time of moderate-intensity activity was less than 150 min, or high-intensity activity was less than 75 min, or the cumulative amount of moderate- and high-intensity activity was less than 150 min [8]; (8) fruit and vegetable intake was defined as insufficient if the daily average intake was <400 g [9]; (9) red meat intake was categorised as insufficient (daily average red meat intake <18 g), moderate (18 g ≤ to < 27 g) or excessive (≥27 g) [10].

2.6. Statistical Analysis

SAS 9.4 software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was used to analyse the data. Continuous variables with normal distributions are presented as x ¯ ± s, and comparisons between groups were made using the t-test. Variables with skewed distributions are presented as the median with the 25th and 75th quantiles [M (P25, P75)], and comparisons between groups were made using the non-parametric statistical hypothesis test. Categorical variables are expressed as N (%) and were compared by the chi-square test. The PROC SURVEYFREQ was used to calculate the standardised prevalence and 95% CI of MetS and its components using the weight derived from the data published by the China National Bureau of Statistics in 2010. The influencing factors were analysed using a logistic regression model. A two-sided p value < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

3. Results

3.1. General Characteristics of the Participants

A total of 130,018 participants were included—61,775 men (47.5%) and 68,243 women (52.5%). The average age of the men in the study was higher than that of the women. There were significant differences in MetS prevalence by sex, age, urban vs. rural residence, area of the country, education level, income, family history of hypertension, family history of diabetes, smoking status, alcohol consumption, physical activity, fruit and vegetable intake and red meat intake. Waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, triglycerides and FPG were significantly higher in men than in women, while BMI and high-density lipoprotein were significantly lower in men than in women (p < 0.05, Table 1).

3.2. Standardised Prevalence of MetS and Its Components

The standardised prevalence of MetS among Chinese residents aged 20 years or older was 31.1%, with a significantly higher prevalence in women than in men (32.3% vs. 30.0%). The highest prevalence was found in participants aged ≥ 75 years (44.2%), and the lowest prevalence was found in participants aged 20–44 years (23.3%). The prevalence in the north (35.9%) was higher than that in the south (27.4%). There were significant differences in the prevalence of MetS among the groups of BMI, education level, family history of hypertension, family history of diabetes, physical activity, smoking, alcohol consumption and red meat intake (p < 0.05, Table 2).
The standardised prevalences of high WC, high BP, elevated TG, low HDL-C and elevated FPG were 40.8%, 49.4%, 29.3%, 41.1% and 24.6%, respectively. Among them, the standardised prevalences of high WC, high BP and low HDL-C were the highest (Figure 1). Among the 130,018 participants, 18,183 (14.0%) had no abnormal components; 32,821 (25.2%) had one abnormal component; 32,136 (24.7%) had two abnormal components; 24,656 (19.0%) had three abnormal components; 15,856 (12.2%) had four abnormal components; and 6366 (4.9%) had five abnormal components (Figure 2).

3.3. Multivariate Logistic Regression

Variables with statistical significance in the univariate analysis and those that were not significant but are closely related to MetS according to medical theory were included in the multivariate logistic regression. A stepwise regression method was adopted, and the variables that were finally included in the model were sex, age, location of residence, area of the country, BMI, education level, income, family history of hypertension, family history of diabetes, physical activity, smoking status, alcohol consumption, fruit and vegetable intake, and red meat intake.
The prevalence of MetS was higher in women than in men (OR = 1.773, 95% CI = 1.709–1.840). Every 1 year increase in age was associated with a 3.7% (95% CI = 3.6%–3.9%) increase in the prevalence of MetS. The following factors were associated with a higher prevalence of MetS: living in northern China (OR = 1.087, 95% CI = 1.058–1.117), high BMI (OR = 1.402, 95% CI = 1.395–1.408), higher income [OR (95% CI): 1.044 (1.007–1.083), 1.083 (1.044–1.124), and 1.123 (1.078–1.170) for moderate, high, and very high income, respectively], family history of hypertension (OR = 1.237, 95% CI = 1.203–1.273), family history of diabetes (OR = 1.491, 95% CI = 1.426–1.558) and current smoking (OR = 1.143, 95% CI = 1.098–1.191). Living in the countryside (OR = 0.960, 95% CI = 0.932–0.988), moderate alcohol consumption (OR = 0.917, 95% CI = 0.889–0.946) and being physically active (OR = 0.887, 95% CI = 0.862–0.913) were associated with a lower prevalence of MetS (Table 3).

4. Discussion

Based on data from China Nutrition and Health Surveillance (2015–2017), this analysis provides up-to-date information on the prevalence of and risk factors for MetS in Chinese adults. We found that the standardised prevalence of MetS was 31.1%. There was a significantly higher prevalence in women than in men (32.3% vs. 30.0%, p < 0.001) and in those living in northern China vs. southern China (35.9% vs. 27.4%, p < 0.001). The standardised prevalences of high WC, high BP and low HDL-C were 40.8%, 49.4% and 41.1%, respectively. These three variables are important components of MetS and should be addressed as key factors for MetS prevention and treatment. Only 14.0% of adults had no abnormal MetS components; thus, greater than 4/5 of adults had at least one abnormal MetS component.
Understanding which factors are associated with a high MetS rate would help to identify individuals who are at a greater risk of MetS. Consistent with previous studies, we found that the prevalence of MetS among Chinese adults was related to one’s socioeconomic status and lifestyle factors. Sex, age, location of residence (city or countryside), area of the country (north or south), BMI, income, family history of hypertension, family history of diabetes, smoking status, alcohol consumption and physical activity were related to MetS prevalence. There was a higher prevalence of MetS in women than in men; this trend has also been observed in Porto (24.9% vs. 17.4%) [11], Iran (47.1% vs. 36.5%) [12] and China (15.57% vs. 12.31%) [13]. Postmenopausal status is associated with an increased risk of central obesity and insulin resistance [14], which may be the cause of the sex differences seen in MetS prevalence; however, further research is required to verify this. The MetS prevalence tended to increase with increasing age, which was similar to the findings of Wang et al. [15]. Living in the countryside was associated with a lower prevalence of MetS than living in a city, which was similar to the findings of Xi et al. [16], while living in northern China was associated with a higher prevalence of MetS than living in southern China, which was also observed by Gu et al. [4]. The BMI is an important measure of obesity and overall health and is closely related to MetS [17,18]. This study found that every 1 unit increase in BMI was associated with a 40.2% increase in the prevalence of MetS. No association was found between education level and MetS prevalence, which was consistent with the findings of Park et al. [19]. Participants with higher incomes were more likely to have MetS than those with a low income, which may be related to the influence of economic development on diet structure and health awareness. Prasad et al. found that a middle-to-high socioeconomic status significantly contributed to an increased risk of MetS [20]. A family history of diabetes or hypertension was also significantly related to the prevalence of MetS. Carmelli et al. found that the consistency rates of diabetes, hypertension and obesity in identical twins were significantly higher than those in fraternal twins, indicating that genetic factors have an important relationship with the occurrence of MetS [21]. Current smoking status was a risk factor for MetS, which was consistent with previous studies [22,23]. Compared with never consumed alcohol, moderate alcohol consumption led to a lower risk of developing MetS, and this was consistent with the findings of Tresserra-Rimbau [24]. Being physically active was associated with a lower prevalence of MetS, which was also consistent with recent research showing that exercise can reduce the incidence of MetS [25,26]. Studies have confirmed that red meat intake is positively correlated with MetS occurrence [27,28], while eating more fruits and vegetables is protective against MetS [29,30]. This study did not identify any correlations between diet and the risk of MetS. This lack of correlation may have been related to bias. Furthermore, individuals who had previously developed MetS or a component of MetS may have changed their diet.
The survey data are representative of the whole country. After weighted adjustment, this study well reflects the epidemic characteristics of MetS among residents aged 20 years and older in China. However, this study also has some limitations. First, this was a cross-sectional study; thus, causal relationships could not be determined. Second, the investigation of alcohol consumption was limited to individuals’ consumption patterns within the previous 12 months; therefore, alcohol consumption may have been underestimated.

5. Conclusions

We found that the prevalence of MetS among residents aged 20 years or older in China is increasing, especially among women, those aged 45 years or older and urban residents. Preventive efforts, such as quitting smoking and engaging in physical activity, are recommended to reduce the risk of MetS.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.Y. and X.L.; methodology, F.Y., Y.B., D.Y. and X.L.; formal analysis, F.Y. and D.Y.; investigation, L.Z.; resources, L.Z.; data curation, Y.L., L.J., H.F. and W.P.; writing—original draft preparation, F.Y., Y.B. and D.Y.; writing—review and editing, Y.B., H.F., W.P., D.Y. and X.L.; project administration, L.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Project (Number: 2018YFC1603103); National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China Medical Reform Major Program: China National Chronic Diseases and Nutrition Surveillance of Adults (2015–2017).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the National Institute for Nutrition and Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Approval number: 201519-A and 201614).

Informed Consent Statement

Any Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data is not allowed to be disclosed according to the National Institute for Nutrition and Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention.

Acknowledgments

We thank all the participants who took part in the China Nutrition and Health Surveillance (2015–2017) and the staff who conducted this study.

Conflicts of Interest

No conflict of interest were declared.

References

  1. Ozmen, M.; Yersal, O.; Ozturk, S.; Solmaz, D.; Koseeoglu, M.H. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in rheumatoid arthritis. Eur. J. Rheumatol. 2014, 1, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lim, S.; Shin, H.; Song, J.H.; Kwak, S.H.; Kang, S.M.; Won, Y.J.; Choi, S.H.; Cho, S.I.; Park, K.S.; Lee, H.K.; et al. Increasing prevalence of metabolic syndrome in Korea: The Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey for 1998–2007. Diabetes Care 2011, 34, 1323–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Aguilar, M.; Bhuket, T.; Torres, S.; Liu, B.; Wong, R.J. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in the United States, 2003–2012. JAMA 2015, 313, 1973–1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gu, D.; Reynolds, K.; Wu, X.; Chen, J.; Duan, X.; Reynolds, R.F.; Whelton, P.K.; He, J.; For, T.I.C.G.; InterASIA, C.G. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome and overweight among adults in China. Lancet 2005, 365, 1398–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, Y.; Zhao, L.; Yu, D.; Wang, Z.; Ding, G. Metabolic syndrome prevalence and its risk factors among adults in China: A nationally representative cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e199293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yu, D.; Zhao, L.; Zhang, J.; Yang, Z.; Ding, G. China Nutrition and Health Surveys (19822017). China CDC Wkly. 2021, 3, 193–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Grundy, S.M.; Cleeman, J.I.; Daniels, S.R.; Donato, K.A.; Eckel, R.H.; Franklin, B.A.; Gordon, D.J.; Krauss, R.M.; Savage, P.J.; Smith, S.C.; et al. Diagnosis and Management of the Metabolic Syndrome. Circulation 2005, 112, 2735–2752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. World Health Organization. WHO Guidelines on Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  9. World Health Organization. Draft Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases 2013–2020; IChemE: Rugby, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  10. Afshin, A.; Sur, P.J.; Fay, K.A.; Cornaby, L.; Ferrara, G.; Salama, J.S.; Mullany, E.C.; Abate, K.H.; Abbafati, C.; Abebe, Z.; et al. Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 2019, 393, 1958–1972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Santos, A.C.; Ebrahim, S.; Barros, H. Gender, socio-economic status and metabolic syndrome in middle-aged and old adults. BMC Public Health 2008, 8, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Hajian-Tilaki, K.; Heidari, B.; Firouzjahi, A.; Bagherzadeh, M.; Hajian-Tilaki, A.; Halalkhor, S. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome and the association with socio-demographic characteristics and physical activity in urban population of Iranian adults: A population-based study. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Clin. Res. Rev. 2014, 8, 170–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xu, T.; Zhu, G.; Han, S. Prevalence of and lifestyle factors associated with metabolic syndrome determined using multi-level models in Chinese adults from a cross-sectional survey. Medicine 2020, 99, e22883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fujimoto, W.Y.; Bergstrom, R.W.; Boyko, E.J.; Chen, K.; Kahn, S.E.; Leonetti, D.L.; McNeely, M.J.; Newell, L.L.; Shofer, J.B.; Wahl, P.W. Type 2 diabetes and the metabolic syndrome in Japanese Americans. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2000, 50, S73–S76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, G.; Li, L.; Pan, Y.; Tian, G.; Lin, W.; Li, Z.; Chen, Z.; Gong, Y.; Kikano, G.E.; Stange, K.C.; et al. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome among urban community residents in China. BMC Public Health 2013, 13, 599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Xi, B.; He, D.; Hu, Y.; Zhou, D. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome and its influencing factors among the Chinese adults: The China Health and Nutrition Survey in 2009. Prev. Med. 2013, 57, 867–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Zhou, W.; Li, C.L.; Cao, J.; Feng, J. Metabolic syndrome prevalence in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Relationship with systemic inflammation. Clin. Respir. J. 2020, 14, 1159–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hannoun, Z.; Harraqui, K.; Ben, A.R.; Tahiri, K.; Smail, O.B.; Samara, I.; Arabi, F.E.; Bour, A. Epidemiological profile and clinical characteristics of metabolic syndrome in Marrakesh, Morocco. Pan Afr. Med. J. 2020, 36, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Park, H.S. The metabolic syndrome and associated lifestyle factors among South Korean adults. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2004, 33, 328–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Prasad, D.S.; Kabir, Z.; Dash, A.K.; Das, B.C. Prevalence and risk factors for metabolic syndrome in Asian Indians: A community study from urban Eastern India. J. Cardiovasc. Dis. Res. 2012, 3, 204–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Carmelli, D.; Cardon, L.R.; Fabsitz, R. Clustering of hypertension, diabetes, and obesity in adult male twins: Same genes or same environments? Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1994, 55, 566–573. [Google Scholar]
  22. Yu, M.; Xu, C.; Zhu, H.; Hu, R.; Zhang, J.; Wang, H.; He, Q.; Su, D.; Zhao, M.; Wang, L.; et al. Associations of Cigarette Smoking and Alcohol Consumption with Metabolic Syndrome in a Male Chinese Population: A Cross-Sectional Study. J. Epidemiol. 2014, 24, 361–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Jeong, J.; Yu, J. Prevalence and Influencing Factors of Metabolic Syndrome among Persons with Physical Disabilities. Asian Nurs. Res. 2018, 12, 50–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Tresserra-Rimbau, A.; Medina-Remón, A.; Lamuela-Raventós, R.M.; Bulló, M.; Salas-Salvadó, J.; Corella, D.; Fitó, M.; Gea, A.; Gómez-Gracia, E.; Lapetra, J. Moderate red wine consumption is associated with a lower prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in the PREDIMED population. Br. J. Nutr. 2015, 113, S121–S130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Lee, J.; Kim, Y.; Jeon, J.Y. Association between physical activity and the prevalence of metabolic syndrome: From the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999–2012. SpringerPlus 2016, 5, 1870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Houti, L.; Hamani-Medjaoui, I.; Lardjam-Hetraf, S.A.; Ouhaibi-Djellouli, H.; Chougrani, S.; Goumidi, L.; Mediene-Benchekor, S. Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome and its Related Risk Factors in the City of Oran, Algeria: The ISOR Study. Ethn. Dis. 2016, 26, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Huang, L.N.; Wang, H.J.; Wang, Z.H.; Zhang, J.G.; Jia, X.F.; Zhang, B.; Ding, G.Q. Association of Red Meat Usual Intake with Serum Ferritin and the Risk of Metabolic Syndrome in Chinese Adults: A Longitudinal Study from the China Health and Nutrition Survey. Biomed. Environ. Sci. 2020, 33, 19–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Shang, X.; Scott, D.; Hodge, A.; English, D.R.; Giles, G.G.; Ebeling, P.R.; Sanders, K.M. Dietary protein from different food sources, incident metabolic syndrome and changes in its components: An 11-year longitudinal study in healthy community-dwelling adults. Clin. Nutr. 2017, 36, 1540–1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Esmaillzadeh, A.; Kimiagar, M.; Mehrabi, Y.; Azadbakht, L.; Hu, F.B.; Willett, W.C. Fruit and vegetable intakes, C-reactive protein, and the metabolic syndrome. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2006, 84, 1489–1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tian, Y.; Su, L.; Wang, J.; Duan, X.; Jiang, X. Fruit and vegetable consumption and risk of the metabolic syndrome: A meta-analysis. Public Health Nutr. 2018, 21, 756–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Standardised prevalence of metabolic components among adults in China. WC, waist circumference; BP, blood pressure; TG, triglycerides; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; FPG, fasting plasma glucose.
Figure 1. Standardised prevalence of metabolic components among adults in China. WC, waist circumference; BP, blood pressure; TG, triglycerides; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; FPG, fasting plasma glucose.
Nutrients 13 04475 g001
Figure 2. Metabolic components among adults in China.
Figure 2. Metabolic components among adults in China.
Nutrients 13 04475 g002
Table 1. Participant characteristics according to sex.
Table 1. Participant characteristics according to sex.
MenWomenTotal
N61,77568,243130,018
Age, years *53.0 (43.4,63.2)51.8 (42.4,61.7)52.3 (42.9,62.4)
Residence location, N (%) *
City25,371 (41.1)29,878 (43.8)55,249 (42.5)
Countryside36,404 (58.9)38,365 (56.2)74,769 (57.5)
Area of the country, N (%) *
South31,232 (50.6)35,253 (51.7)66,485 (51.1)
North30,543 (49.4)32,990 (48.3)63,533 (48.9)
Education level, N (%) *
Low24,315 (39.4)36,645 (53.7)60,960 (46.9)
Moderate22,516 (36.5)18,608 (27.3)41,124 (31.6)
High14,944 (24.2)12,990 (19.0)27,934 (21.5)
Income, N (%) *
Low17,612 (28.5)18,535 (27.2)36,147 (27.8)
Moderate15,524 (25.1)17,265 (25.3)32,789 (25.2)
High15,715 (25.4)17,995 (26.4)33,710 (25.9)
Very high12,924 (20.9)14,448 (21.2)27,372 (21.1)
Family history of hypertension, N (%) *20,313 (32.9)23,619 (34.6)43,932 (33.8)
Family history of diabetes, N (%) *5609 (9.1)7149 (10.5)12,758 (9.8)
Smoking, N (%) *
Never20,433 (33.1)65,732 (96.3)86,165 (66.3)
Former8673 (14.0)569 (0.8)9242 (7.1)
Current32,669 (52.9)1942 (2.9)34,611 (26.6)
Alcohol consumption, N (%) *
Never21,429 (34.7)51,799 (75.9)73,228 (56.3)
Moderate28,415 (46.0)15,377 (22.5)43,792 (33.7)
Excessive11,931 (19.3)1067 (1.6)12,998 (10.0)
Physically active, N (%) *41,112 (66.6)50,741 (74.4)91,853 (70.7)
Insufficient fruit and vegetable intake, N (%) *32,012 (51.8)34,970 (51.2)66,982 (51.5)
Red meat intake, N (%) *
Moderate4606 (7.5)5714 (8.4)10,320 (7.9)
Insufficient24,442 (39.6)31,533 (46.2)55,975 (43.1)
Excessive32,727 (53.0)30,996 (45.4)63,723 (49.0)
BMI (kg/m²) *24.2 (22.0,26.6)24.2 (22.0,26.7)24.2 (22.0,26.6)
WC (cm) *85.3 ± 10.081.9 ± 9.783.5 ± 10.0
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) *136.6 ± 19.7134.4 ± 22.2135.4 ± 21.0
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) *81.7 ± 11.477.7 ± 11.479.6 ± 11.5
TG (mmol/L) *1.3 (0.9,2.0)1.2 (0.8,1.8)1.2 (0.8,1.9)
HDL-C (mmol/L) *1.2 ± 0.41.3 ± 0.31.3 ± 0.3
Fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) *5.2 (4.8,5.7)5.2 (4.8,5.6)5.2 (4.8,5.7)
Data are presented as x ¯ ± s for normal distributions, or as M (P25, P75) for skewed distributions, or N (%). * p < 0.05 compared with men. Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference; TG, triglycerides; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
Table 2. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in adults according to participant characteristics.
Table 2. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in adults according to participant characteristics.
Prevalence95% CIRao-Scott X2p-Value
Total 31.130.0–32.2
Sex 10.97070.0009
Men30.028.8–31.3
Women32.330.9–33.6
Age, years 1420.8214<0.0001
20–4423.322.1–24.5
45–5939.037.9–40.1
60–7443.942.4–45.5
≥7544.241.3–47.2
Residence location 2.85930.0908
City32.030.2–33.8
Countryside30.128.8–31.4
Area of the country 232.4353<0.0001
South27.426.2–28.6
North35.934.7–37.2
BMI 54,564.5498<0.0001
Normal11.811.1–12.6
Overweight41.039.9–42.0
Obese70.569.0–72.0
Education level 59.5475<0.0001
Low35.834.4–37.2
Moderate30.329.0–31.6
High27.124.9–29.3
Income 1.51580.6786
Low30.929.5–32.4
Moderate30.429.2–31.6
High31.730.4–33.1
Very high31.428.7–34.1
Family history of hypertension 87.8033<0.0001
No29.028.0–30.0
Yes34.833.1–36.4
Family history of diabetes 107.2048<0.0001
No30.028.9–31.0
Yes39.937.5–42.3
Physical activity 6.71190.0096
Not active32.130.7–33.5
Active30.629.5–31.8
Smoking status 34.7917<0.0001
Never31.230.0–32.5
Former37.735.4–40.0
Current29.628.1–31.0
Alcohol consumption 40.8781<0.0001
Never32.631.6–33.7
Moderate28.727.2–30.2
Excessive33.230.9–35.5
Fruit and vegetable intake 2.38820.1223
Sufficient31.630.5–32.7
Insufficient30.629.2–32.0
Red meat intake 36.6381<0.0001
Moderate30.829.0–32.5
Insufficient32.831.5–34.1
Excessive29.828.6–31.0
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index.
Table 3. Logistic regression analysis results of influencing factors.
Table 3. Logistic regression analysis results of influencing factors.
Influencing Factor βSEWald X2pOR95% CI
Intercept −12.45530.096116,784.5555<0.0001
SexWomen vs. Men0.57270.0189918.6448<0.00011.7731.709–1.840
Age 0.03680.00054751.4066<0.00011.0371.036–1.039
Residence locationCountryside vs. City−0.04110.01487.72420.00540.9600.932–0.988
Area of the countryNorth vs. South0.08350.013637.4822<0.00011.0871.058–1.117
BMI 0.33770.002419,715.8134<0.00011.4021.395–1.408
IncomeModerate vs. Low0.04330.01885.31700.02111.0441.007–1.083
High vs. Low0.08000.019017.6248<0.00011.0831.044–1.124
Very high vs. Low0.11600.020830.9902<0.00011.1231.078–1.170
Family history of hypertensionYes vs. No0.21300.0146212.8383<0.00011.2371.203–1.273
Family history of diabetesYes vs. No0.39920.0225315.9245<0.00011.4911.426–1.558
Smoking statusFormer vs. Never0.02890.02920.98080.32201.0290.972–1.090
Current vs. Never0.13390.020741.6962<0.00011.1431.098–1.191
Alcohol consumptionModerate vs. Never−0.08680.016029.6303<0.00010.9170.889–0.946
Excessive vs. Never0.00010.02540.00000.99571.0000.952–1.051
Physical activityActive vs. Not active−0.11970.014964.7071<0.00010.8870.862–0.913
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; SE, standard error.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yao, F.; Bo, Y.; Zhao, L.; Li, Y.; Ju, L.; Fang, H.; Piao, W.; Yu, D.; Lao, X. Prevalence and Influencing Factors of Metabolic Syndrome among Adults in China from 2015 to 2017. Nutrients 2021, 13, 4475. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13124475

AMA Style

Yao F, Bo Y, Zhao L, Li Y, Ju L, Fang H, Piao W, Yu D, Lao X. Prevalence and Influencing Factors of Metabolic Syndrome among Adults in China from 2015 to 2017. Nutrients. 2021; 13(12):4475. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13124475

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yao, Fan, Yacong Bo, Liyun Zhao, Yaru Li, Lahong Ju, Hongyun Fang, Wei Piao, Dongmei Yu, and Xiangqian Lao. 2021. "Prevalence and Influencing Factors of Metabolic Syndrome among Adults in China from 2015 to 2017" Nutrients 13, no. 12: 4475. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13124475

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop