Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2010, 154(4):345-354 | DOI: 10.5507/bp.2010.052

BIOMECHANICAL TESTING OF SPINAL SEGMENT FIXED BY THORACOLUMBAR SPINE LOCKING PLATE ON THE SWINE LUMBAR SPINE

Jan Kocis*a, Tomas Navratb, Zdenek Florianb, Peter Wendschea
a Department of Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University Brno, Czech Republic
b Institute of Solid Mechanics, Mechatronics and Biomechanics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Brno University of Technology

Background: The aim of the experiment was to compare the mechanical properties of intact spinal segment with impaired intervertebral disc and impaired intervertebral disc fixed by TSLP (Thoracolumbar Spine Locking Plate).

Methods and results: Spinal specimens were taken from domestic swine. A total of 8 test mechanical states (intact, impaired and fixed) were modeled and the mechanical properties, expressed by the value of moment of couple necessary to twist the specimen at tensile force F = 200 N and the value of moments necessary for extension straining, were determined. The study was based on in vitro biomechanical testing of the TSLP plate used to stabilize the front thoracolumbar column of spinal segments taken from a pig. The plate was used for monosegmental fixation. The disc was cut by scalpel to simulate the Type A injury to front spinal column. In each state (intact, impaired or fixed), specimens were subjected to a tension load of prescribed force and, then, twisted by a given angle. Subsequently, extension load of intact, impaired and impaired & fixed segment was measured. Statistical evaluation verified the hypothesis of the different behavior of intact, impaired and fixed specimens - both for tension & torsion load and extension load. The analyses did not indicate different mechanical behavior of intact and fixed specimens. In other words, monosegmental fixation of both impaired and intact specimens by TSLP Synthes implant will lead to similar mechanical behavior of these specimens. Further, we found that intact and fixed specimens show non-symmetric behavior at positive and negative twisting angles. This was not observed for impaired specimens.

Conclusion: Several stabilization systems were developed to stabilize the front thoracolumbar spinal column. Surgery of the anterior column of injured spine should restore the correct position of the spine, ensure decompression of vertebral canal when neural structures are compressed, and stabilize the spine to allow immediate loading and mobilization of the patient. The aim of this study was to compare mechanical properties of intact spinal segment, impaired spinal segment and impaired spinal segment stabilized by TSLP Synthes implant. The problems were solved by experimental modeling using a testing machine that simulated loads for several mechanical states of the spinal segment. Favorable mechanical properties of TSLP Synthes fixator were demonstrated. The experimental results will be used for subsequent computational modeling of the spinal segment in all experimentally solved states.

Keywords: Biomechanics, Thoracolumbar fracture, Spine stabilization, Anterior stabilization

Received: September 22, 2010; Accepted: November 16, 2010; Published: December 1, 2010  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kocis, J., Navrat, T., Florian, Z., & Wendsche, P. (2010). BIOMECHANICAL TESTING OF SPINAL SEGMENT FIXED BY THORACOLUMBAR SPINE LOCKING PLATE ON THE SWINE LUMBAR SPINE. Biomedical papers154(4), 345-354. doi: 10.5507/bp.2010.052
Download citation

References

  1. Knop C, Blauth M, Bastian L, Lange U, Kesting J, Tscherne H. Fractures of the thoracolumbar spine. Late results of dorsal instrumentation and its consequences. Unfallchirurg 1997;100:6309. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Abumi K, Panjabi MM, Duranceau J. Biomechanical evaluation of spinal fixation devices. Part III. Stability provided by six spinal fixation devices and interbody bone graft. Spine 1989;14:124955. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Dick JC, Brodke DS, Zdeblick TA, Bartel BD, Kunz DN, Rapoff AJ.Anterior instrumentation of the thoracolumbar spine. A biomechanical comparison. Spine 1997;22:74450. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Flamme CH, Hurschler C, Heyman C, Von Der Heide N. Biomechanical testing of different ventral fixation devices on the bovine lumbar spine. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2004;142:8896. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Vesely R, Florian Z, Wendsche P, Tosovsky J. Biomechanical evaluation of the modular anterior construct system (MACSTM) internal fixator for thoracic spinal stabilization. Acta Vet. Brno 2008;77:97102. Go to original source...
  6. Wenger DR, Carollo JJ, Wilkerson JA, Wauters K, Herring JA. Laboratory testing of segmental spinal instrumentation versus traditional Harrington instrumentation for scoliosis treatment. Spine 1982;7:265269. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Wilke HJ, Krischek S, Claes L. Biomechanical comparison of calf and human spines. J Orthop Res 1996;14:500503. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Fricka KB, Mahar AT, Newton PO. Biomechanical analysis of anterior scoliosis instrumentation: differences between single and dual rod systems with and without interbody structural support. Spine 2002;27:7026. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Cotteril PC, Kostuik JP, DAngelo G, Fernie GR, Maki BE. An anatomical comparison of the human and bovine thoracolumbar spine. J Orthop Res 1986;4:298303. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Gurr KM, McAfee PC, Shih CM. Biomechanical analysis of anterior and posteriori instrumentation system after corpectomy. A calf-spine model. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988;70:11821191. Go to original source...
  11. Kotani Y, Cunningham BW, Parker L, Kanayama M, McAfee P. Static and fatique biomechanical properties of anterior thoracolumbar instumentation systems using a synthetic model. Spine 1999;14:14061413. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Zdeblick TA, Warden KE, Zou D, McAfee PC, Abitbol JJ. Anterior spinal fixators. A biomechanical in vitro study. Spine 1993;18:513 517. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Buhren V, Beisse R, Potulski M. Minimally invasive ventral spondylodesis in injuries to the thoracic and lumbar spine. Chirurg 1997;68:10761084. Go to original source...