Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Digital Imaging 2/2013

01.04.2013

Mammographic Image Denoising and Enhancement Using the Anscombe Transformation, Adaptive Wiener Filtering, and the Modulation Transfer Function

verfasst von: Larissa C. S. Romualdo, Marcelo A. C. Vieira, Homero Schiabel, Nelson D. A. Mascarenhas, Lucas R. Borges

Erschienen in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Ausgabe 2/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

A new restoration methodology is proposed to enhance mammographic images through the improvement of contrast features and the simultaneous suppression of noise. Denoising is performed in the first step using the Anscombe transformation to convert the signal-dependent quantum noise into an approximately signal-independent Gaussian additive noise. In the Anscombe domain, noise is filtered through an adaptive Wiener filter, whose parameters are obtained by considering local image statistics. In the second step, a filter based on the modulation transfer function of the imaging system in the whole radiation field is applied for image enhancement. This methodology can be used as a preprocessing module for computer-aided detection (CAD) systems to improve the performance of breast cancer screening. A preliminary assessment of the restoration algorithm was performed using synthetic images with different levels of quantum noise. Afterward, we evaluated the effect of the preprocessing on the performance of a previously developed CAD system for clustered microcalcification detection in mammographic images. The results from the synthetic images showed an increase of up to 11.5 dB (p = 0.002) in the peak signal-to-noise ratio. Moreover, the mean structural similarity index increased up to 8.3 % (p < 0.001). Regarding CAD performance, the results suggested that the preprocessing increased the detectability of microcalcifications in mammographic images without increasing the false-positive rates. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed an average increase of 14.1 % (p = 0.01) in overall CAD performance when restored image sets were used.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat IARC. World cancer report: International agency for research on cancer. Lyon, 2008 IARC. World cancer report: International agency for research on cancer. Lyon, 2008
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Elmore JG, Nakano CY, Koepsell TD, Desnick LM, D’Orsi CJ, Ransohoff DF: International variation in screening mammography interpretations in community-based programs. J Natl Cancer Inst 95(18):1384–1393, 2003CrossRefPubMed Elmore JG, Nakano CY, Koepsell TD, Desnick LM, D’Orsi CJ, Ransohoff DF: International variation in screening mammography interpretations in community-based programs. J Natl Cancer Inst 95(18):1384–1393, 2003CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Veronesi U, Boyle P, Goldhirsch A, Orecchia R, Viale G: Breast cancer. Lancet 365:1727–1741, 2005CrossRefPubMed Veronesi U, Boyle P, Goldhirsch A, Orecchia R, Viale G: Breast cancer. Lancet 365:1727–1741, 2005CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Chlebowski RT: Breast cancer risk reduction: strategies for women at increased risk. Annu Rev Med 53:519–540, 2002CrossRefPubMed Chlebowski RT: Breast cancer risk reduction: strategies for women at increased risk. Annu Rev Med 53:519–540, 2002CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Giger ML, Chan H-P, Boone J: Anniversary paper: history and status of CAD and quantitative image analysis: the role of Medical Physics and AAPM. Med Phys 35(12):5799–5820, 2008CrossRefPubMed Giger ML, Chan H-P, Boone J: Anniversary paper: history and status of CAD and quantitative image analysis: the role of Medical Physics and AAPM. Med Phys 35(12):5799–5820, 2008CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Boyer B, Balleyguier C, Granat O, Pharaboz C: CAD in questions/answers review of the literature. Eur J Radiol 69(1):24–33, 2009CrossRefPubMed Boyer B, Balleyguier C, Granat O, Pharaboz C: CAD in questions/answers review of the literature. Eur J Radiol 69(1):24–33, 2009CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Freer TW, Ulissey MJ: Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology 220(3):781–786, 2001CrossRefPubMed Freer TW, Ulissey MJ: Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology 220(3):781–786, 2001CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Dean JC, Ilvento CC: Improved cancer detection using computer-aided detection with diagnostic and screening mammography: prospective study of 104 cancers. Am J Roentgenol 187(1):20–28, 2006CrossRef Dean JC, Ilvento CC: Improved cancer detection using computer-aided detection with diagnostic and screening mammography: prospective study of 104 cancers. Am J Roentgenol 187(1):20–28, 2006CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Mahoney MC, Meganathan K: False positive marks on unsuspicious screening mammography with computer-aided detection. J Digit Imaging 24(5):772–777, 2011CrossRefPubMed Mahoney MC, Meganathan K: False positive marks on unsuspicious screening mammography with computer-aided detection. J Digit Imaging 24(5):772–777, 2011CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kopans DB: Breast imaging, 3rd edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2006 Kopans DB: Breast imaging, 3rd edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2006
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoon HJ, Zheng B, Sahiner B, Chakraborty DP: Evaluating computer-aided detection algorithms. Med Phys 34(6):2024–2038, 2007CrossRefPubMed Yoon HJ, Zheng B, Sahiner B, Chakraborty DP: Evaluating computer-aided detection algorithms. Med Phys 34(6):2024–2038, 2007CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Acha B, Serrano C, Rangayyan RM, Leo Desautels JE: Detection of microcalcifications in mammograms using error of prediction and statistical measures. J Electronic Imaging 18(1):013011, 2009CrossRef Acha B, Serrano C, Rangayyan RM, Leo Desautels JE: Detection of microcalcifications in mammograms using error of prediction and statistical measures. J Electronic Imaging 18(1):013011, 2009CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Cole EB, Pisano ED, Kistner EO, Muller KE, Brown ME, Feig SA, Jong RA, Maidment ADA, Staiger MJ, Kuzmiak CM, Freimanis RI, Lesko N, Rosen EL, Walsh R, Williford M, Braeuning MP: Diagnostic accuracy of digital mammography in patients with dense breasts who underwent problem-solving mammography: effects of image processing and lesion type. Radiology 226(1):153–160, 2003CrossRefPubMed Cole EB, Pisano ED, Kistner EO, Muller KE, Brown ME, Feig SA, Jong RA, Maidment ADA, Staiger MJ, Kuzmiak CM, Freimanis RI, Lesko N, Rosen EL, Walsh R, Williford M, Braeuning MP: Diagnostic accuracy of digital mammography in patients with dense breasts who underwent problem-solving mammography: effects of image processing and lesion type. Radiology 226(1):153–160, 2003CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM, O'Shaughnessy KF, Sickles EA: Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection. Radiology 219(1):192–202, 2001PubMed Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM, O'Shaughnessy KF, Sickles EA: Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection. Radiology 219(1):192–202, 2001PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Ho WT, Lam PWT: Clinical performance of computer-assisted detection (CAD) system in detecting carcinoma in breasts of different densities. Clin Radiol 58(2):133–136, 2003CrossRefPubMed Ho WT, Lam PWT: Clinical performance of computer-assisted detection (CAD) system in detecting carcinoma in breasts of different densities. Clin Radiol 58(2):133–136, 2003CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Chan HP, Niklason LT, Ikeda DM, Lam KL, Adler DD: Digitization requirements in mammography: effects on computer-aided detection of microcalcifications. Med Phys 21(7):1203–1211, 1994CrossRefPubMed Chan HP, Niklason LT, Ikeda DM, Lam KL, Adler DD: Digitization requirements in mammography: effects on computer-aided detection of microcalcifications. Med Phys 21(7):1203–1211, 1994CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Nishikawa RM, Giger ML, Doi K, Metz CE, Yin FF, Vyborny CJ, Schmidt RA: Effect of case selection on the performance of computer-aided detection schemes. Med Phys 21(2):265–269, 1994CrossRefPubMed Nishikawa RM, Giger ML, Doi K, Metz CE, Yin FF, Vyborny CJ, Schmidt RA: Effect of case selection on the performance of computer-aided detection schemes. Med Phys 21(2):265–269, 1994CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Schiabel H, Nunes FL, Escarpinati MC, Benatti RH: Investigations on the effect of different characteristics of images sets on the performance of a processing scheme for microcalcifications detection in digital mammograms. J Digit Imaging 14(Suppl 1):224–225, 2001CrossRefPubMed Schiabel H, Nunes FL, Escarpinati MC, Benatti RH: Investigations on the effect of different characteristics of images sets on the performance of a processing scheme for microcalcifications detection in digital mammograms. J Digit Imaging 14(Suppl 1):224–225, 2001CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Garcia-Orellana CJ, Gallardo-Caballero R, Gonzalez-Velasco HM, Garcia-Manso A, Macias-Macias M: Study of a mammographic CAD performance dependence on the considered mammogram set. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2008:4776–4779, 2008PubMed Garcia-Orellana CJ, Gallardo-Caballero R, Gonzalez-Velasco HM, Garcia-Manso A, Macias-Macias M: Study of a mammographic CAD performance dependence on the considered mammogram set. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2008:4776–4779, 2008PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Tourassi GD, Ike R, Singh S, Harrawood B: Evaluating the effect of image preprocessing on an information-theoretic CAD system in mammography. Acad Radiol 15(5):626–634, 2008CrossRefPubMed Tourassi GD, Ike R, Singh S, Harrawood B: Evaluating the effect of image preprocessing on an information-theoretic CAD system in mammography. Acad Radiol 15(5):626–634, 2008CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Nunes FLS, Schiabel H, Benatti RH: Contrast enhancement in dense breast images using the modulation transfer function. Med Phys 29(12):2925–2936, 2002CrossRefPubMed Nunes FLS, Schiabel H, Benatti RH: Contrast enhancement in dense breast images using the modulation transfer function. Med Phys 29(12):2925–2936, 2002CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Mencattini A, Salmeri M, Lojacono R, Frigerio M, Caselli F: Mammographic images enhancement and denoising for breast cancer detection using dyadic wavelet processing. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 57(7):1422–1430, 2008CrossRef Mencattini A, Salmeri M, Lojacono R, Frigerio M, Caselli F: Mammographic images enhancement and denoising for breast cancer detection using dyadic wavelet processing. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 57(7):1422–1430, 2008CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Papadopoulos A, Fotiadis DI, Costaridou L: Improvement of microcalcification cluster detection in mammography utilizing image enhancement techniques. Comput Biol Med 38(10):1045–1055, 2008CrossRefPubMed Papadopoulos A, Fotiadis DI, Costaridou L: Improvement of microcalcification cluster detection in mammography utilizing image enhancement techniques. Comput Biol Med 38(10):1045–1055, 2008CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Gonzalez RC, Woods RE: Digital image processing, 3rd edition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 2008 Gonzalez RC, Woods RE: Digital image processing, 3rd edition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 2008
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Yaffe MJ: Digital mammography. In: Beutel J, Kundel HL, Van Metter RL Eds. Handbook of medical imaging. Vol 1. Physics and psychophysics. SPIE Press, Bellingham, 2000, pp 329–372CrossRef Yaffe MJ: Digital mammography. In: Beutel J, Kundel HL, Van Metter RL Eds. Handbook of medical imaging. Vol 1. Physics and psychophysics. SPIE Press, Bellingham, 2000, pp 329–372CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Saunders RS, Baker JA, Delong DM, Johnson JP, Samei E: Does image quality matter? Impact of resolution and noise on mammographic task performance. Med Phys 34(10):3971–3981, 2007CrossRefPubMed Saunders RS, Baker JA, Delong DM, Johnson JP, Samei E: Does image quality matter? Impact of resolution and noise on mammographic task performance. Med Phys 34(10):3971–3981, 2007CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Anscombe FJ: The transformation of Poisson, binomial and negative-binomial data. Biometrika 35:246–254, 1948 Anscombe FJ: The transformation of Poisson, binomial and negative-binomial data. Biometrika 35:246–254, 1948
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Mascarenhas NDA, Santos CAN, Cruvinel PE: Transmission tomography under poisson noise using the anscombe transformation and wiener filtering of the projections. Nucl Instrum Meth A 423:265–271, 1999CrossRef Mascarenhas NDA, Santos CAN, Cruvinel PE: Transmission tomography under poisson noise using the anscombe transformation and wiener filtering of the projections. Nucl Instrum Meth A 423:265–271, 1999CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Jin F, Fieguth P, Winger L, Jernigan E: Adaptive Wiener filtering of noisy images and image sequences. In: 2003 International Conference on Image Processing, Proceedings of IEEE Vol 3, New York (USA), 2003, pp 349-352 Jin F, Fieguth P, Winger L, Jernigan E: Adaptive Wiener filtering of noisy images and image sequences. In: 2003 International Conference on Image Processing, Proceedings of IEEE Vol 3, New York (USA), 2003, pp 349-352
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Metz CE, Doi K: Transfer function analysis of radiographic imaging systems. Phys Med Biol 24(6):1079–1106, 1979CrossRefPubMed Metz CE, Doi K: Transfer function analysis of radiographic imaging systems. Phys Med Biol 24(6):1079–1106, 1979CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Rabbani M: Bayesian filtering of poisson noise using local statistics. IEEE T Acoust Speech 36(6):933–937, 1998CrossRef Rabbani M: Bayesian filtering of poisson noise using local statistics. IEEE T Acoust Speech 36(6):933–937, 1998CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Doi K: Field characteristics of geometric unsharpness due to the X-ray tube focal spot. Med Phys 4(1):15–20, 1977CrossRefPubMed Doi K: Field characteristics of geometric unsharpness due to the X-ray tube focal spot. Med Phys 4(1):15–20, 1977CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Rossmann K: Point spread-function, line spread-function, and modulation transfer function. Radiology 93(2):257–272, 1969PubMed Rossmann K: Point spread-function, line spread-function, and modulation transfer function. Radiology 93(2):257–272, 1969PubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat NEMA: Measurement of dimensions and properties of focal spots of diagnostic X-ray tubes, NEMA Standards XR 5, 1992 NEMA: Measurement of dimensions and properties of focal spots of diagnostic X-ray tubes, NEMA Standards XR 5, 1992
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Nickoloff EL, Donnelly E, Eve L, Atherton JV, Asch T: Mammographic resolution: influence of focal spot intensity distribution and geometry. Med Phys 17(3):436–447, 1990CrossRefPubMed Nickoloff EL, Donnelly E, Eve L, Atherton JV, Asch T: Mammographic resolution: influence of focal spot intensity distribution and geometry. Med Phys 17(3):436–447, 1990CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Hendee WR, Ritenour ER: Medical imaging physics, 4th edition. Wiley-Liss, New York, 2002CrossRef Hendee WR, Ritenour ER: Medical imaging physics, 4th edition. Wiley-Liss, New York, 2002CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Rong XJ, Krugh KT, Shepard SJ, Geiser WR: Measurement of focal spot size with slit camera using computed radiography and flat-panel based digital detectors. Med Phys 30(7):1768–1775, 2003CrossRefPubMed Rong XJ, Krugh KT, Shepard SJ, Geiser WR: Measurement of focal spot size with slit camera using computed radiography and flat-panel based digital detectors. Med Phys 30(7):1768–1775, 2003CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Tang S, Barnes GT, Tanner RL: Slit camera focal spot measurement errors in mammography. Med Phys 22(11):1803–1814, 1995CrossRefPubMed Tang S, Barnes GT, Tanner RL: Slit camera focal spot measurement errors in mammography. Med Phys 22(11):1803–1814, 1995CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Goes CE, Schiabel H, Nunes FLS: Evaluation of microcalcifications segmentation techniques for dense breast digitized images. J Digit Imaging 15(Suppl 1):231–233, 2002CrossRefPubMed Goes CE, Schiabel H, Nunes FLS: Evaluation of microcalcifications segmentation techniques for dense breast digitized images. J Digit Imaging 15(Suppl 1):231–233, 2002CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Nunes FLS, Schiabel H, Goes CE: Contrast enhancement in dense breast images to aid clustered microcalcifications detection. J Digit Imaging 20(1):53–66, 2007CrossRefPubMed Nunes FLS, Schiabel H, Goes CE: Contrast enhancement in dense breast images to aid clustered microcalcifications detection. J Digit Imaging 20(1):53–66, 2007CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang Z, Bovik AC: Mean squared error: love it or leave it? A new look at signal fidelity measures. IEEE Signal Proc Mag 26(1):98–117, 2009CrossRef Wang Z, Bovik AC: Mean squared error: love it or leave it? A new look at signal fidelity measures. IEEE Signal Proc Mag 26(1):98–117, 2009CrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang Z, Bovik AC, Sheikh HR, Simoncelli EP: Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE T Image Process 13(4):600–612, 2004CrossRef Wang Z, Bovik AC, Sheikh HR, Simoncelli EP: Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE T Image Process 13(4):600–612, 2004CrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Schiabel H, Vieira MAC, Ventura L: Preprocessing for improving CAD scheme performance for microcalcification detection based on mammography imaging quality parameters. In: Medical Imaging 2009: Computer-Aided Diagnosis, Proceedings of SPIE Vol 7260, Orlando (USA), pp 72602G1-G12, 2009 Schiabel H, Vieira MAC, Ventura L: Preprocessing for improving CAD scheme performance for microcalcification detection based on mammography imaging quality parameters. In: Medical Imaging 2009: Computer-Aided Diagnosis, Proceedings of SPIE Vol 7260, Orlando (USA), pp 72602G1-G12, 2009
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Matheus BR, Schiabel H: Online mammographic images database for development and comparison of CAD schemes. J Digit Imaging 24(3):500–506, 2011CrossRefPubMed Matheus BR, Schiabel H: Online mammographic images database for development and comparison of CAD schemes. J Digit Imaging 24(3):500–506, 2011CrossRefPubMed
45.
Zurück zum Zitat CIRS - Computerized imaging reference systems, Inc. Model 011A manual. Norfolk, VA CIRS - Computerized imaging reference systems, Inc. Model 011A manual. Norfolk, VA
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Oliveira Jr PD, Vieira MAC, Schiabel H: Determination of focal spot size and the modulation transfer function of mammographic equipment without previous alignment. In: World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Munich (Germany), pp 1186-1189, 2009 Oliveira Jr PD, Vieira MAC, Schiabel H: Determination of focal spot size and the modulation transfer function of mammographic equipment without previous alignment. In: World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Munich (Germany), pp 1186-1189, 2009
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Vieira MAC, Oliveira Jr PD, Schiabel H: Computational method for automatic determination of radiographic equipment anode angle. In: Medical Imaging 2008: Physics of Medical Imaging, Proceedings of SPIE Vol 6913, San Diego (USA), pp 69133 M1-M8, 2008 Vieira MAC, Oliveira Jr PD, Schiabel H: Computational method for automatic determination of radiographic equipment anode angle. In: Medical Imaging 2008: Physics of Medical Imaging, Proceedings of SPIE Vol 6913, San Diego (USA), pp 69133 M1-M8, 2008
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Metz C: ROC analysis in medical imaging: a tutorial review of the literature. Radiol Phys Technol 1:2–12, 2008CrossRefPubMed Metz C: ROC analysis in medical imaging: a tutorial review of the literature. Radiol Phys Technol 1:2–12, 2008CrossRefPubMed
49.
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Glynn CG, Farria DM, Monsees BS, Salcman JT, Wiele KN, Hildebolt CF: Effect of transition to digital mammography on clinical outcomes. Radiology 260(3):664–670, 2011CrossRefPubMed Glynn CG, Farria DM, Monsees BS, Salcman JT, Wiele KN, Hildebolt CF: Effect of transition to digital mammography on clinical outcomes. Radiology 260(3):664–670, 2011CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Mammographic Image Denoising and Enhancement Using the Anscombe Transformation, Adaptive Wiener Filtering, and the Modulation Transfer Function
verfasst von
Larissa C. S. Romualdo
Marcelo A. C. Vieira
Homero Schiabel
Nelson D. A. Mascarenhas
Lucas R. Borges
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2013
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Ausgabe 2/2013
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Elektronische ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-012-9507-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2013

Journal of Digital Imaging 2/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

07.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Extreme Arbeitsverdichtung und kaum Supervision: Dr. Andrea Martini, Sprecherin des Bündnisses Junge Ärztinnen und Ärzte (BJÄ) über den Frust des ärztlichen Nachwuchses und die Vorteile des Rucksack-Modells.

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

IT für Ärzte Nachrichten

Darauf haben viele Praxen gewartet: Das Zi hat eine Liste von Praxisverwaltungssystemen veröffentlicht, die von Nutzern positiv bewertet werden. Eine gute Grundlage für wechselwillige Ärztinnen und Psychotherapeuten.

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.