Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Targeted Oncology 2/2009

01.06.2009 | Review

Maximum tolerated dose: clinical endpoint for a bygone era?

verfasst von: Chris H. Takimoto

Erschienen in: Targeted Oncology | Ausgabe 2/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) has been the classically recommended phase II dose for cytotoxic chemotherapy anticancer agents. However, the development of molecular targeted therapies with highly specific mechanisms of action has raised questions about the paradigm of dosing at the MTD. Inhibition of the molecular target may occur at dose levels substantially below those producing dose limiting toxicities. The impact of targeted therapies on our dose selection strategies has been immense; however, defining the MTD in phase I oncology trials still provides valuable information for future drug development. But, the MTD should not be selected blindly as the recommended phase II dose for efficacy testing. Optimal dose selection for targeted cancer agents needs to be evaluated using all available information collected during the early stages of drug development. Definition of the optimal dose may need to be deferred until randomized phase II trials can be conducted. Future clinical trail designs in oncology drug development need to reflect this paradigm shift.
Literatur
1.
2.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Takimoto CH, Rowinsky EK (2003) Dose-intense paclitaxel: deja vu all over again? J Clin Oncol 21:2810–2814CrossRefPubMed Takimoto CH, Rowinsky EK (2003) Dose-intense paclitaxel: deja vu all over again? J Clin Oncol 21:2810–2814CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Lippman ME (2000) High-dose chemotherapy plus autologous bone marrow transplantation for metastatic breast cancer. N Eng J Med 342:1119–1120CrossRef Lippman ME (2000) High-dose chemotherapy plus autologous bone marrow transplantation for metastatic breast cancer. N Eng J Med 342:1119–1120CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Haines IE (2008) Dose selection in phase I studies: why we should always go for the most effective. J Clin Oncol 26:3650–3652 author reply 2–3CrossRefPubMed Haines IE (2008) Dose selection in phase I studies: why we should always go for the most effective. J Clin Oncol 26:3650–3652 author reply 2–3CrossRefPubMed
6.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Parulekar WR, Eisenhauer EA (2004) Phase I trial design for solid tumor studies of targeted, non-cytotoxic agents: theory and practice. J Nat Cancer Inst 96:990–997PubMedCrossRef Parulekar WR, Eisenhauer EA (2004) Phase I trial design for solid tumor studies of targeted, non-cytotoxic agents: theory and practice. J Nat Cancer Inst 96:990–997PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat El-Maraghi RH, Eisenhauer EA (2008) Review of phase II trial designs used in studies of molecular targeted agents: outcomes and predictors of success in phase III. J Clin Oncol 26:1346–1354CrossRefPubMed El-Maraghi RH, Eisenhauer EA (2008) Review of phase II trial designs used in studies of molecular targeted agents: outcomes and predictors of success in phase III. J Clin Oncol 26:1346–1354CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Dowlati A, Robertson K, Radivoyevitch T et al (2005) Novel phase I dose de-escalation design trial to determine the biological modulatory dose of the antiangiogenic agent SU5416. Clin Cancer Res 11:7938–7944CrossRefPubMed Dowlati A, Robertson K, Radivoyevitch T et al (2005) Novel phase I dose de-escalation design trial to determine the biological modulatory dose of the antiangiogenic agent SU5416. Clin Cancer Res 11:7938–7944CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kummar S, Gutierrez M, Doroshow JH, Murgo AJ (2006) Drug development in oncology: classical cytotoxics and molecularly targeted agents. Br J Clin Pharm 62:15–26CrossRef Kummar S, Gutierrez M, Doroshow JH, Murgo AJ (2006) Drug development in oncology: classical cytotoxics and molecularly targeted agents. Br J Clin Pharm 62:15–26CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Goulart BH, Clark JW, Pien HH, Roberts TG, Finkelstein SN, Chabner BA (2007) Trends in the use and role of biomarkers in phase I oncology trials. Clin Cancer Res 13:6719–6726CrossRefPubMed Goulart BH, Clark JW, Pien HH, Roberts TG, Finkelstein SN, Chabner BA (2007) Trends in the use and role of biomarkers in phase I oncology trials. Clin Cancer Res 13:6719–6726CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Sleijfer S, Wiemer E (2008) Dose selection in phase I studies: why we should always go for the top. J Clin Oncol 26:1576–1578CrossRefPubMed Sleijfer S, Wiemer E (2008) Dose selection in phase I studies: why we should always go for the top. J Clin Oncol 26:1576–1578CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Emmenegger U, Kerbel RS (2005) A dynamic de-escalating dosing strategy to determine the optimal biological dose for antiangiogenic drugs. Clin Cancer Res 11:7589–7592CrossRefPubMed Emmenegger U, Kerbel RS (2005) A dynamic de-escalating dosing strategy to determine the optimal biological dose for antiangiogenic drugs. Clin Cancer Res 11:7589–7592CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kummar S, Kinders R, Rubinstein L et al (2007) Compressing drug development timelines in oncology using phase '0' trials. Nature reviews 7:131–139CrossRefPubMed Kummar S, Kinders R, Rubinstein L et al (2007) Compressing drug development timelines in oncology using phase '0' trials. Nature reviews 7:131–139CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Ratain MJ, Glassman RH (2007) Biomarkers in phase I oncology trials: signal, noise, or expensive distraction? Clin Cancer Res 13:6545–6548CrossRefPubMed Ratain MJ, Glassman RH (2007) Biomarkers in phase I oncology trials: signal, noise, or expensive distraction? Clin Cancer Res 13:6545–6548CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Workman P (2003) How much gets there and what does it do?: The need for better pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic endpoints in contemporary drug discovery and development. Current Pharm Design 9:891–902CrossRef Workman P (2003) How much gets there and what does it do?: The need for better pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic endpoints in contemporary drug discovery and development. Current Pharm Design 9:891–902CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Sarker D, Workman P (2007) Pharmacodynamic biomarkers for molecular cancer therapeutics. Adv Cancer Res 96:213–268CrossRefPubMed Sarker D, Workman P (2007) Pharmacodynamic biomarkers for molecular cancer therapeutics. Adv Cancer Res 96:213–268CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamazaki S, Skaptason J, Romero D et al (2008) Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of biomarker response and tumor growth inhibition to an orally available cMet kinase inhibitor in human tumor xenograft mouse models. Drug Metab Dispos 36:1267–1274CrossRefPubMed Yamazaki S, Skaptason J, Romero D et al (2008) Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of biomarker response and tumor growth inhibition to an orally available cMet kinase inhibitor in human tumor xenograft mouse models. Drug Metab Dispos 36:1267–1274CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Ratain MJ, Sargent DJ (2008) Optimising the design of phase II oncology trials: The importance of randomisation. Eur J Cancer 45(2):275–280CrossRefPubMed Ratain MJ, Sargent DJ (2008) Optimising the design of phase II oncology trials: The importance of randomisation. Eur J Cancer 45(2):275–280CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Fukuoka M, Yano S, Giaccone G et al (2003) Multi-institutional randomized phase II trial of gefitinib for previously treated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (The IDEAL 1 Trial) [corrected]. J Clin Oncol 21:2237–2246CrossRefPubMed Fukuoka M, Yano S, Giaccone G et al (2003) Multi-institutional randomized phase II trial of gefitinib for previously treated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (The IDEAL 1 Trial) [corrected]. J Clin Oncol 21:2237–2246CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Atkins MB, Hidalgo M, Stadler WM et al (2004) Randomized phase II study of multiple dose levels of CCI-779, a novel mammalian target of rapamycin kinase inhibitor, in patients with advanced refractory renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 22:909–918CrossRefPubMed Atkins MB, Hidalgo M, Stadler WM et al (2004) Randomized phase II study of multiple dose levels of CCI-779, a novel mammalian target of rapamycin kinase inhibitor, in patients with advanced refractory renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 22:909–918CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Workman P (2003) Auditing the pharmacological accounts for Hsp90 molecular chaperone inhibitors: unfolding the relationship between pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 2:131–138PubMed Workman P (2003) Auditing the pharmacological accounts for Hsp90 molecular chaperone inhibitors: unfolding the relationship between pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 2:131–138PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Maximum tolerated dose: clinical endpoint for a bygone era?
verfasst von
Chris H. Takimoto
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2009
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Targeted Oncology / Ausgabe 2/2009
Print ISSN: 1776-2596
Elektronische ISSN: 1776-260X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-009-0108-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2009

Targeted Oncology 2/2009 Zur Ausgabe

Mehr Lebenszeit mit Abemaciclib bei fortgeschrittenem Brustkrebs?

24.05.2024 Mammakarzinom Nachrichten

In der MONARCHE-3-Studie lebten Frauen mit fortgeschrittenem Hormonrezeptor-positivem, HER2-negativem Brustkrebs länger, wenn sie zusätzlich zu einem nicht steroidalen Aromatasehemmer mit Abemaciclib behandelt wurden; allerdings verfehlte der numerische Zugewinn die statistische Signifikanz.

ADT zur Radiatio nach Prostatektomie: Wenn, dann wohl länger

24.05.2024 Prostatakarzinom Nachrichten

Welchen Nutzen es trägt, wenn die Strahlentherapie nach radikaler Prostatektomie um eine Androgendeprivation ergänzt wird, hat die RADICALS-HD-Studie untersucht. Nun liegen die Ergebnisse vor. Sie sprechen für länger dauernden Hormonentzug.

Das sind die führenden Symptome junger Darmkrebspatienten

Darmkrebserkrankungen in jüngeren Jahren sind ein zunehmendes Problem, das häufig längere Zeit übersehen wird, gerade weil die Patienten noch nicht alt sind. Welche Anzeichen Ärzte stutzig machen sollten, hat eine Metaanalyse herausgearbeitet.

„Überwältigende“ Evidenz für Tripeltherapie beim metastasierten Prostata-Ca.

22.05.2024 Prostatakarzinom Nachrichten

Patienten mit metastasiertem hormonsensitivem Prostatakarzinom sollten nicht mehr mit einer alleinigen Androgendeprivationstherapie (ADT) behandelt werden, mahnt ein US-Team nach Sichtung der aktuellen Datenlage. Mit einer Tripeltherapie haben die Betroffenen offenbar die besten Überlebenschancen.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.