Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 7/2012

01.07.2012 | Rhinology

Nasal septal packing: which one?

verfasst von: Engin Acıoğlu, Deniz Tuna Edizer, Özgür Yiğit, Fırat Onur, Zeynep Alkan

Erschienen in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Ausgabe 7/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of four different types of nasal packs on pain, nasal fullness and postoperative bleeding following septoplasty. Prospective randomised double blind study was conducted. The study group included 119 patients who underwent endonasal septoplasty under general anaesthesia. Four types of nasal packing materials were utilized: (1) Merocel standard 8-cm nasal dressing without airway, (2) Doyle Combo splint (DCS), (3) Merocel in a glove finger and (4) Vaseline gauze. All packs were removed at the 48th hour (±3 h) after the surgery. Three different variables were investigated following the surgical procedure: (1) pain, (2) nasal fullness and (3) bleeding after removal of the nasal packing material. DCS produced the greatest pain at the first and sixth postoperative hours. At the first postoperative day, the greatest pain score was reported for Merocel in the glove finger and the least for Merocel. The pain scores during the removal of the nasal packings were highest for Merocel and lowest for Merocel in the glove finger. DCS had the lowest nasal fullness score. Bleeding ratio was highest for Merocel, followed by Vaseline gauze, DCS and Merocel in the glove finger. Many different commercially available packing materials are presently used, each with inherent advantages and disadvantages. We evaluated the pain, nasal fullness and bleeding potential of four nasal packing materials and determined that Merocel had the highest pain potential during removal and the highest rate of bleeding following removal.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Ardehali MM, Bastaninejad S (2009) Use of nasal packs and intranasal septal splints following septoplasty. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 38:1022–1024PubMedCrossRef Ardehali MM, Bastaninejad S (2009) Use of nasal packs and intranasal septal splints following septoplasty. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 38:1022–1024PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ozcan C, Vayisoglu Y, Kiliç S et al (2008) Comparison of rapid rhino and Merocel nasal packs in endonasal septal surgery. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 37:826–831PubMed Ozcan C, Vayisoglu Y, Kiliç S et al (2008) Comparison of rapid rhino and Merocel nasal packs in endonasal septal surgery. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 37:826–831PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Bresnihan M, Mehigan B, Curran A (2007) An evaluation of Merocel and Series 5000 nasal packs in patients following nasal surgery: a prospective randomised trial. Clin Otolaryngol 32:352–355PubMedCrossRef Bresnihan M, Mehigan B, Curran A (2007) An evaluation of Merocel and Series 5000 nasal packs in patients following nasal surgery: a prospective randomised trial. Clin Otolaryngol 32:352–355PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Orlandi RR, Lanza DC (2004) Is nasal packing necessary following endoscopic sinus surgery? Laryngoscope 114:1541–1544PubMedCrossRef Orlandi RR, Lanza DC (2004) Is nasal packing necessary following endoscopic sinus surgery? Laryngoscope 114:1541–1544PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Kula M, Yuce I, Unlu Y et al (2010) Effect of nasal packing and haemostatic septal suture on mucociliary activity after septoplasty: an assessment by rhinoscintigraphy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 267:541–546PubMedCrossRef Kula M, Yuce I, Unlu Y et al (2010) Effect of nasal packing and haemostatic septal suture on mucociliary activity after septoplasty: an assessment by rhinoscintigraphy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 267:541–546PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Shaw CL, Dymock RB, Cowin A et al (2000) Effect of packing on nasal mucosa of sheep. J Laryngol Otol 114:506–509PubMed Shaw CL, Dymock RB, Cowin A et al (2000) Effect of packing on nasal mucosa of sheep. J Laryngol Otol 114:506–509PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Yilmazer C, Sener M, Yilmaz I et al (2007) Pre-emptive analgesia for removal of nasal packing: a double-blind placebo controlled study. Auris Nasus Larynx 34:471–475PubMedCrossRef Yilmazer C, Sener M, Yilmaz I et al (2007) Pre-emptive analgesia for removal of nasal packing: a double-blind placebo controlled study. Auris Nasus Larynx 34:471–475PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Cruise AS, Amonoo-Kuofi K, Srouji I et al (2006) A randomized trial of Rapid Rhino Riemann and Telfa nasal packs following endoscopic sinus surgery. Clin Otolaryngol 31:25–32PubMedCrossRef Cruise AS, Amonoo-Kuofi K, Srouji I et al (2006) A randomized trial of Rapid Rhino Riemann and Telfa nasal packs following endoscopic sinus surgery. Clin Otolaryngol 31:25–32PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Nunez DA, Martin FW (1991) An evaluation of post-operative packing in nasal septal surgery. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 16:549–550PubMedCrossRef Nunez DA, Martin FW (1991) An evaluation of post-operative packing in nasal septal surgery. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 16:549–550PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Weber R, Keerl R, Hochapfel F et al (2001) Packing in endonasal surgery. Am J Otolaryngol 22:306–320PubMedCrossRef Weber R, Keerl R, Hochapfel F et al (2001) Packing in endonasal surgery. Am J Otolaryngol 22:306–320PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Moumoulidis I, Draper MR, Patel H et al (2006) A prospective randomised controlled trial comparing Merocel and Rapid Rhino nasal tampons in the treatment of epistaxis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 263:719–722PubMedCrossRef Moumoulidis I, Draper MR, Patel H et al (2006) A prospective randomised controlled trial comparing Merocel and Rapid Rhino nasal tampons in the treatment of epistaxis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 263:719–722PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Arya AK, Butt O, Nigam A (2003) Double-blind randomised controlled trial comparing Merocel with Rapid Rhino nasal packs after routine nasal surgery. Rhinology 41:241–243PubMed Arya AK, Butt O, Nigam A (2003) Double-blind randomised controlled trial comparing Merocel with Rapid Rhino nasal packs after routine nasal surgery. Rhinology 41:241–243PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Dubin MR, Pletcher SD (2009) Postoperative packing after septoplasty: is it necessary? Otolaryngol Clin North Am 42:279–285PubMedCrossRef Dubin MR, Pletcher SD (2009) Postoperative packing after septoplasty: is it necessary? Otolaryngol Clin North Am 42:279–285PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Hajiioannou JK, Bizaki A, Fragiadakis G et al (2007) Optimal time for nasal packing removal after septoplasty. A comparative study. Rhinology 45:68–71PubMed Hajiioannou JK, Bizaki A, Fragiadakis G et al (2007) Optimal time for nasal packing removal after septoplasty. A comparative study. Rhinology 45:68–71PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Nasal septal packing: which one?
verfasst von
Engin Acıoğlu
Deniz Tuna Edizer
Özgür Yiğit
Fırat Onur
Zeynep Alkan
Publikationsdatum
01.07.2012
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Ausgabe 7/2012
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Elektronische ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-011-1842-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2012

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 7/2012 Zur Ausgabe

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

17.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Sie sei „ethisch geboten“, meint Gesundheitsminister Karl Lauterbach: mehr Transparenz über die Qualität von Klinikbehandlungen. Um sie abzubilden, lässt er gegen den Widerstand vieler Länder einen virtuellen Klinik-Atlas freischalten.

Betalaktam-Allergie: praxisnahes Vorgehen beim Delabeling

16.05.2024 Pädiatrische Allergologie Nachrichten

Die große Mehrheit der vermeintlichen Penicillinallergien sind keine. Da das „Etikett“ Betalaktam-Allergie oft schon in der Kindheit erworben wird, kann ein frühzeitiges Delabeling lebenslange Vorteile bringen. Ein Team von Pädiaterinnen und Pädiatern aus Kanada stellt vor, wie sie dabei vorgehen.

Klinikreform soll zehntausende Menschenleben retten

15.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Gesundheitsminister Lauterbach hat die vom Bundeskabinett beschlossene Klinikreform verteidigt. Kritik an den Plänen kommt vom Marburger Bund. Und in den Ländern wird über den Gang zum Vermittlungsausschuss spekuliert.

Eingreifen von Umstehenden rettet vor Erstickungstod

15.05.2024 Fremdkörperaspiration Nachrichten

Wer sich an einem Essensrest verschluckt und um Luft ringt, benötigt vor allem rasche Hilfe. Dass Umstehende nur in jedem zweiten Erstickungsnotfall bereit waren, diese zu leisten, ist das ernüchternde Ergebnis einer Beobachtungsstudie aus Japan. Doch es gibt auch eine gute Nachricht.

Update HNO

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.